Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Thanks for that, I'll try that! On 11/8/20 7:55 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > On Sun, 2020-11-08 at 18:09 +0100, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: >> I was hoping for a solution, which could use Elisp in one part of the >> makefile and bash in another part of the makefile. > I apologize that I wasn't following t

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

On Sun, 2020-11-08 at 18:09 +0100, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > I was hoping for a solution, which could use Elisp in one part of the > makefile and bash in another part of the makefile. I apologize that I wasn't following the previous messages in this thread so I don't have the full context. Howev

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Hi Ricardo! Thanks for your reply. I've not gotten around to trying this yet. I was hoping for a solution, which could use Elisp in one part of the makefile and bash in another part of the makefile. I seem to remember a blog post somewhere, in which someone explained how to use various things as

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: >>> >>> $ make clean >>> /bin/rm --verbose *.html *.md *.texi || true; >>> Symbol’s value as variable is void: /bin/rm >>> make: *** [Makefile:19: clean] Error 255 >>> >> Well, isn’t that expected as you’re using Emacs as a shell? > > Yes : ) But that is the

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Hi Ricardo! On 10/11/20 9:51 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: > >> Hello Matt, >> >> On 10/10/20 3:14 PM, Matt Wette wrote: >>> >>> On 10/10/20 5:31 AM, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > #!/usr/bin/make -f > > SHELL := emacs > .SHELLFLAGS := --quick

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: > Hello Matt, > > On 10/10/20 3:14 PM, Matt Wette wrote: >> >> >> On 10/10/20 5:31 AM, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: >>> #!/usr/bin/make -f SHELL := emacs .SHELLFLAGS := --quick --batch --eval >> >> Maybe try this: >> >>

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Hello Matt, On 10/10/20 3:14 PM, Matt Wette wrote: > > > On 10/10/20 5:31 AM, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: >> >>> #!/usr/bin/make -f >>> >>> SHELL := emacs >>> .SHELLFLAGS := --quick --batch --eval >>> >>> > > Maybe try this: > >     #!/usr/bin/make -f - > > with the added dash.

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

On 10/10/20 5:31 AM, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: #!/usr/bin/make -f SHELL := emacs .SHELLFLAGS := --quick --batch --eval Maybe try this:     #!/usr/bin/make -f - with the added dash.

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Hello Dmitry! I know this is kind of a late reply. I hope you do not mind me unearthing this. : ) On 7/16/20 10:47 AM, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: > "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" wrote: In the case you will stick with Org, there at least should be a runnable build recipe (i. e. a Makefile)

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list (Zelphir Kaltstahl)

Hello Artyom! You are welcome and thank you for providing the links and information! guile-rpc and guile-udev have been added to the list. Best regards, Zelphir On 01.08.20 20:15, Artyom V. Poptsov wrote: > Hello Zelphir, > > First of all, thanks for maintaining the list, there are many cool Gu

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list (Zelphir Kaltstahl)

Hello Zelphir, First of all, thanks for maintaining the list, there are many cool Guile projects that I didn't know about until I read the list. :-) I see that there's no Guile-RPC in the RPC section of your list of Guile awesomeness: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile-rpc/ Also I'd like to s

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

John Cowan writes: > I don't see any. A list of links is unlikely to be included in the source > code of a software work. As soon as you put it into the help section of for example a Guile Studio, displayed with a help-command and referenced back to some degree (so that it's not just side-by-

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 4:47 PM Zelphir Kaltstahl < zelphirkaltst...@posteo.de> wrote: "We also recommend the GNU FDL for dictionaries, encyclopedias, and any > other works that provide information for practical use." > These are works with substantial original content, and the GFDL prevents peop

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 01:55:18AM +0300, Vladimir Zhbanov wrote: ... > I suspect it is all about including chunks of your GPL'd code as > examples into your other licenced docs. And vice versa, e.g. if I've meant *otherwise licenced*, sorry for mistake. -- Vladimir (λ)επτόν EDA — https://git

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:47:21PM +0200, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > Hi Dmitry! > > On 16.07.20 11:18, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: > > Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > >> On 15.07.20 08:36, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > >>> Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: > > First at foremost, the list _itself_ has t

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

Hi Dmitry! On 16.07.20 11:18, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: > Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: >> On 15.07.20 08:36, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >>> Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: > First at foremost, the list _itself_ has to be licensed as a free > documentation. FWIW, most of ‘awesome lists’ are

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Dmitry Alexandrov writes: > "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" wrote: In the case you will stick with Org, there at least should be a runnable build recipe (i. e. a Makefile). >> >> I’d like to cut this discussion short: >> >> https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/awesome-guile/pulls/1/files

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > Dmitry Alexandrov writes: > >> Quoth (emphasis mine): >> | A work released under CC0 is dedicated to the public domain to the fullest >> extent permitted by law. If that is not possible for any reason, CC0

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

Dmitry Alexandrov writes: > Quoth (emphasis mine): > | A work released under CC0 is dedicated to the public domain to the fullest > extent permitted by law. If that is not possible for any reason, CC0 also > provides a *lax, permissive* lice

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > On 15.07.20 08:36, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: First at foremost, the list _itself_ has to be licensed as a free documentation. FWIW, most of ‘awesome lists’ are under CC0. >>> While the list is not CC0, I meant to put it un

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" wrote: >>> In the case you will stick with Org, there at least should be a runnable >>> build recipe (i. e. a Makefile). > > I’d like to cut this discussion short: > > https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/awesome-guile/pulls/1/files > all: readme.md readme.texi

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Hi Zelphir, Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: > I just read multiple articles about GFDL and CC0 and still don't know > what the better choice is for the list. > > In particular I do not find information about whether CC0 is copyleft or > not (1), which perhaps means, that it is not and I do not understa

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Hi Zelphir, Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: > On 14.07.20 16:14, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: >>> https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/awesome-guile >>> >>> If you know more things, which should be added to the list, please tell >>> me or create a PR or open an issue

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Hi Arne! On 14.07.20 16:14, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: > >> https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/awesome-guile >> >> If you know more things, which should be added to the list, please tell >> me or create a PR or open an issue or … you get it. > Would enter-three

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Hi Arne, On 15.07.20 08:36, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: > >> One can write whole scientific books in org-mode > Or roleplaying books, which actually have higher requirements :-) > (I did both) > * Do you think license information should be written next to eac

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: > One can write whole scientific books in org-mode Or roleplaying books, which actually have higher requirements :-) (I did both) >>> * Do you think license information should be written next to each item in >>> the list? >> First at foremost, the list _itself_ has t

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: >>> (Perhaps I should not ask this question … the amount of markdown typing … >>> my fingers hurt.) >> ??? The only thing where org-mode saves typing over markdown-mode is ToC >> generation. But there are lots ToC helpers for Markdown! (describe-package >> 'markd

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Hi Aleix! On 14.07.20 00:56, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 2:20 PM Zelphir Kaltstahl > mailto:zelphirkaltst...@posteo.de>> wrote: > > Hello Guile Users, > > I followed up on that idea I mentioned recently on the mailing > list and > started creating an

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Hi Dmitry! On 7/14/20 11:00 AM, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: > Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: >> I ‹…› started creating an awesome list >> https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/awesome-guile > +1! > > However, even if you are not going to apply for inclusion¹ in meta-list > and theref

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

On 13.07.2020 23:19, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > Hello Guile Users, > > I followed up on that idea I mentioned recently on the mailing list and > started creating an awesome list: > > https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/awesome-guile Cool! Let me mention my following projects. They're in main

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: > https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/awesome-guile > > If you know more things, which should be added to the list, please tell > me or create a PR or open an issue or … you get it. Would enter-three-witches apply? Write executable game-stories like theater plays, as

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > I ‹…› started creating an awesome list > https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/awesome-guile +1! However, even if you are not going to apply for inclusion¹ in meta-list and therefore are free from complying with all rules that might come to the mi

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 2:20 PM Zelphir Kaltstahl < zelphirkaltst...@posteo.de> wrote: > Hello Guile Users, > > I followed up on that idea I mentioned recently on the mailing list and > started creating an awesome list: > > https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/awesome-guile > > I'd prefer to rende

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: Hello Guile Users, I followed up on that idea I mentioned recently on the mailing list and started creating an awesome list: https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/awesome-guile I'd prefer to render only the org-mode file, as that is what I write an

Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Hello Guile Users, I followed up on that idea I mentioned recently on the mailing list and started creating an awesome list: https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/awesome-guile I'd prefer to render only the org-mode file, as that is what I write and feel most comfortable in, but I decided that th