On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 12:08:57AM +0100, Vic wrote:
>
> >I think we're talking at cross purposes, then. I've just tried
> > Google's server, and it definitely needs two CR/LFs at the end of the
> > process: one to terminate the final header line, and another to
> > terminate the header block.
>I think we're talking at cross purposes, then. I've just tried
> Google's server, and it definitely needs two CR/LFs at the end of the
> process: one to terminate the final header line, and another to
> terminate the header block.
Here's my transcript :-
[...@bombardier ~]$ telnet google.co
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 11:41:51PM +0100, Vic wrote:
>
> >> My Apache servers do not behave in that way...
> >
> >I bet they do.
>
> I bet they don't. None of my servers require the second CRLF. Nor does
> Google's. Nor does lug.org.uk's. Try a few...
I think we're talking at cross purpos
>> My Apache servers do not behave in that way...
>
>I bet they do.
I bet they don't. None of my servers require the second CRLF. Nor does
Google's. Nor does lug.org.uk's. Try a few...
>> Either something very odd is going on with this hardware, or $ISP is
>> lying
>> to me about which subsc
Hello Vic and Hugo,
On 05/07/10 23:20, Hugo Mills wrote:
> Either one of those is plausible, although the latter is more
> likely, IMO
I agree with this as the more plausible one of the two. If you have
somebody on-site that can connect through the router you have in mind,
please ask them t
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 10:48:37PM +0100, Vic wrote:
>
> >> Yes - and trying "GET /" or similar gets a 404 response (although I
> >> always
> >> have to hit return twice).
> >
> >Yup, that's part of the HTTP protocol. The empty line indicates the
> > end of the headers.
>
> My Apache servers
>> Yes - and trying "GET /" or similar gets a 404 response (although I
>> always
>> have to hit return twice).
>
>Yup, that's part of the HTTP protocol. The empty line indicates the
> end of the headers.
My Apache servers do not behave in that way...
>> But it's a web-ish server running on p
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 10:22:38PM +0100, Vic wrote:
>
> > The reply from the line starting 501 looks like the reply one would
> > expect from a web server when throwing something un-http at it.
>
> Yes - and trying "GET /" or similar gets a 404 response (although I always
> have to hit return tw
> It's not difficult to configure apache or for that matter most other web
> servers to run on any non-used port.
Yes I know - but I administer the server there, and it isn't running FC6,
and it isn't running apache on .
Hence the appeal as to whether or not anyone knows what is going on...
It's not difficult to configure apache or for that matter most other web
servers to run on any non-used port. The default for httpd is to run on
port 80, or 443 for shttp requests. "non-standard" ports use to be
quite common in the early days of the web.
It would require some manual configur
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 10:09:38PM +0100, Vic wrote:
>
> Hi All.
>
> This might be OT for the list, but I know there are some decent network
> admins reading it...
>
> A customer of mine has a static IP address with a server on the back of
> it, running a few odds and ends. Nothing special - mai
> The reply from the line starting 501 looks like the reply one would
> expect from a web server when throwing something un-http at it.
Yes - and trying "GET /" or similar gets a 404 response (although I always
have to hit return twice).
But it's a web-ish server running on port , and claimi
The reply from the line starting 501 looks like the reply one would
expect from a web server when throwing something un-http at it.
Vic wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> This might be OT for the list, but I know there are some decent network
> admins reading it...
>
> A customer of mine has a static IP addr
Hi All.
This might be OT for the list, but I know there are some decent network
admins reading it...
A customer of mine has a static IP address with a server on the back of
it, running a few odds and ends. Nothing special - mail, web, news, ftp.
He can't currently talk to his server - and nor c
On 04/07/2010 10:16, pavithran wrote:
> I am looking for a light weight laptop which is powerfull and also is
> supported in GNU/linux ( hopes for all free drivers)
>
> It would be nice if the laptop could run compiz + openoffice+ firefox(
> 10 tabs +gmail) without any delays .
>
> Regards,
> Pavit
15 matches
Mail list logo
