:-)
Tony Wood
On 25/04/13 10:00, Chris Dennis wrote:
On 24/04/13 22:40, Lisi wrote:
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 19:22:00 Chris Dennis wrote:
Done!
User name: deleted
Password: deleted
Did you really mean to publicise those, Chris?
Lisi
Yes, it's called 'reverse
On 09/11/12 18:39, Chris Dennis wrote:
On 09/11/12 18:23, Tim Brocklehurst wrote:
On 05/11/12 15:46, Chris Dennis wrote:
So, this is the plan. I've re-enabled new accounts, which means that
anyone can create an account. BUT, only users who are members of the
'editors' group can change
Resurrecting a 5 month old thread..
I'd still like to edit a page on the wiki. Alternatively I'll move the
content somewhere else where I can edit it, which makes me sad. What's
the solution to this?
Alan,
Either register from the main page (http://www.hants.lug.org.uk/), or
contact Chris
On 24/04/13 12:59, Tim Brocklehurst wrote:
Resurrecting a 5 month old thread..
I'd still like to edit a page on the wiki. Alternatively I'll move the
content somewhere else where I can edit it, which makes me sad. What's
the solution to this?
Alan,
Either register from the main page
On 24/04/13 15:12, Chris Dennis wrote:
Yes, the old wiki still requires manual intervention (by me) to create
accounts for editing pages. I'm more than happy to do that for people
who ask.
Consider yourself asked.
If anyone can tell me how to improve that situation, I'd love to hear
from
On 24/04/13 17:02, Alan Pope wrote:
On 24/04/13 15:12, Chris Dennis wrote:
Yes, the old wiki still requires manual intervention (by me) to create
accounts for editing pages. I'm more than happy to do that for people
who ask.
Consider yourself asked.
I'll send you the details as soon as I
On 24/04/13 17:02, Alan Pope wrote:
On 24/04/13 15:12, Chris Dennis wrote:
Yes, the old wiki still requires manual intervention (by me) to create
accounts for editing pages. I'm more than happy to do that for people
who ask.
Consider yourself asked.
Done!
User name: AlanPope
Password:
** Chris Dennis cgden...@btinternet.com [2013-04-24 19:23]:
On 24/04/13 17:02, Alan Pope wrote:
On 24/04/13 15:12, Chris Dennis wrote:
Yes, the old wiki still requires manual intervention (by me) to create
accounts for editing pages. I'm more than happy to do that for people
who ask.
lol
On 24 April 2013 19:31, Paul Tansom p...@aptanet.com wrote:
** Chris Dennis cgden...@btinternet.com [2013-04-24 19:23]:
On 24/04/13 17:02, Alan Pope wrote:
On 24/04/13 15:12, Chris Dennis wrote:
Yes, the old wiki still requires manual intervention (by me) to create
accounts for editing
On 24/04/13 19:38, Chris Dennis wrote:
How embarrassing! I was sure I'd sent that just to Alan. I've changed
the password, and I'll try to tell Alan the new one a bit more quietly.
Thanks for pointing that out, Paul.
That made my evening :)
--
Alan Pope
Engineering Manager
Canonical -
Sounds like someone is knocking on your walls trying to find a weak spot. I
suggest going thru your logs and trying to see if they have been careless
enough not to hide their ips.
Also check logs for malformed data being their at you and patch any you find.
:-)
I am pretty sure you have
On 08/11/12 18:31, Chris Dennis wrote:
On 05/11/12 21:31, Alan Bell wrote:
On 05/11/12 15:46, Chris Dennis wrote:
Yes. Adam had to shut down most access to the wiki because of all the
spam. And my very brief reading of the MoinMoin documentation
suggests that the system wasn't designed to
Be wary about this, it is common for crackers to break into a site and
leave backdoors on the site to be sold/exploited later.
This could be an indication of that.
On Nov 9, 2012 4:13 PM, Chris Dennis cgden...@btinternet.com wrote:
On 08/11/12 18:31, Chris Dennis wrote:
On 05/11/12 21:31,
On 05/11/12 15:46, Chris Dennis wrote:
So, this is the plan. I've re-enabled new accounts, which means that
anyone can create an account. BUT, only users who are members of the
'editors' group can change things. If you want to be an editor, create
an account, and let me know your user
On 09/11/12 18:23, Tim Brocklehurst wrote:
On 05/11/12 15:46, Chris Dennis wrote:
So, this is the plan. I've re-enabled new accounts, which means that
anyone can create an account. BUT, only users who are members of the
'editors' group can change things. If you want to be an editor, create
On 05/11/12 15:46, Chris Dennis wrote:
Yes. Adam had to shut down most access to the wiki because of all the
spam. And my very brief reading of the MoinMoin documentation
suggests that the system wasn't designed to be secure: it's open to
either everyone or no-one (except for
On 05/11/12 21:31, Alan Bell wrote:
On 05/11/12 15:46, Chris Dennis wrote:
Yes. Adam had to shut down most access to the wiki because of all the
spam. And my very brief reading of the MoinMoin documentation
suggests that the system wasn't designed to be secure: it's open to
either everyone
Hello all,
I'm trying to print a badge for meet today but it seems that the php
script handler is not configured correctly on the wiki.
My browser tries to download the script rather than open it. I've tried
with Firefox and Konqueror.
Cheers,
Steven
--
Please post to:
On 12/04/10 23:20, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
This removes the most non-standard thing we run for a far nice wiki.
I know that the horrible HTML code generated by abusemod wiki (which
we used to use) annoyed a few people too.
MoinMoin isn't great internally, actually. Externally it's clean, smart
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 21:03:22 +0100 (+0100), Daniel Pope wrote:
Hi all,
Since the meagre feedback that there was to the wiki migration was universally
positive, I have pushed ahead and switched the site to MoinMoin.
Cool, many many thanks for this. A small step for Dan, a giant leap
for
On 11 April 2010 21:03, Daniel Pope ma...@mauveweb.co.uk wrote:
Hi all,
Since the meagre feedback that there was to the wiki migration was universally
positive, I have pushed ahead and switched the site to MoinMoin.
As another change, I have added redirects so that all of the LUG's domains
On 11 April 2010 21:47, Philip Stubbs phi...@stuphi.co.uk wrote:
You are not allowed to view this page. - Not very good. It should
not require login to read the site.
Sorry, that was a bit terse. Good effort on the update. Well done. I
was trying to help with ironing out a fairly major wrinkle.
On 11/04/10 21:47, Philip Stubbs wrote:
You are not allowed to view this page. - Not very good. It should
not require login to read the site.
Messed up the ACL on the homepage - copypasted it without thinking it through.
Fixed?
Dan
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web
On 11 April 2010 21:57, Daniel Pope ma...@mauveweb.co.uk wrote:
On 11/04/10 21:47, Philip Stubbs wrote:
You are not allowed to view this page. - Not very good. It should
not require login to read the site.
Messed up the ACL on the homepage - copypasted it without thinking it through.
Fixed?
Sorted - it was matching a blacklisted word (dating FWIW).
Adrian
--
bitcube.co.uk - Expert Linux infrastructure consultancy
Puppet, Debian, Red Hat, Ubuntu, CentOS
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL:
2010/1/6 Adrian Bridgett adr...@smop.co.uk:
Sorted - it was matching a blacklisted word (dating FWIW).
.. that would be as in Chapter 3: Monitoring and Updating...!
Oh my.
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 09:37:29 + (+), Victor Churchill wrote:
2010/1/6 Adrian Bridgett adr...@smop.co.uk:
Sorted - it was matching a blacklisted word (dating FWIW).
.. that would be as in Chapter 3: Monitoring and Updating...!
Oh my.
Not terribly impressive is it!
Adrian
--
If you could tell use the time/date (and preferably IP) that you are
trying from then we can probably have a look in the logs. I suspect
you maybe accidentally hitting a blacklisted word.
Adrian
--
bitcube.co.uk - Expert Linux infrastructure consultancy
Puppet, Debian, Red Hat, Ubuntu, CentOS
2010/1/5 Adrian Bridgett adr...@smop.co.uk:
If you could tell use the time/date (and preferably IP) that you are
trying from then we can probably have a look in the logs. I suspect
you maybe accidentally hitting a blacklisted word.
OK, the IP address was 82.10.120.134 , and a lot of the
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 21:11:13 + (+), Victor Churchill wrote:
[snip
Thanks, you don't _appear_ to be triggering anything that I can see so
I'm a bit confused. I've added a bit more debug to the wiki. If it
fails would you mind sending me the text you were trying to change it
to and
Is there some limit on how much you can put into a wiki page? (I
haven't come across one IME, but haven't used this particular wiki)
I ask because it seems I can do trivial edits to a page I create, and
'minor' (biggest had wc stats 51 397 2305) submissions, but my doc I
want to add is (247
Hants LUG Chairman wrote:
Hi,
I see that someone has had a go at making a revised front page for the wiki.
It's great to see someone having a go at adding content. Do you think it
would
help if I twisted Popeys arm and got him to repeat his wiki talk so that more
people would have the
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:42:20PM +0100, Adam Trickett wrote:
I see that someone has had a go at making a revised front page for
the wiki. It's great to see someone having a go at adding
content. Do you think it would help if I twisted Popeys arm and got
him to repeat his wiki talk so that
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 17:05:57 + (+), Adrian Bridgett wrote:
Well I think it's certainly helped quite a bit. Not perfect, but then
apart from me who is :-)
Bah! Spoke too soon, 11 pages spammed :( I've turned on another
anti-spam feature now. As usual, yell if you have problems.
Well I think it's certainly helped quite a bit. Not perfect, but then
apart from me who is :-)
2171 blocked, 87 allowed.
Due to the unique way in which the edits work, really there have only
been 9 page changes - 5 which were fine, four of which were not. So
overall, it's letting a few past,
Adrian Bridgett wrote:
Due do a recent spate of attacks on the wiki, we've made a few changes.
I did write a simple anti-spam thing (basically watching percentage of
links to text on a page), but that's currently in log only mode.
However I've just tied it into our very own Steve Kemps's
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:17:07 + (+), Simon Capstick wrote:
SPAM blocked for LinuxHints/XenOnEtch
My IP's static if that's any help to you.
Thanks - would you mind trying again?
Caught by Bayesian filter like Adam. I've turned that module off - yay
for ability to exclude plugins!
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 at 07:29:05PM +, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
However I've just tied it into our very own Steve Kemps's
blogspam.net service so we'll see how that goes.
Please shout if you have any problems - it will say SPAM blocked (we
don't want to tell spammers _why_ we block them but
On Mon Jan 26, 2009 at 10:37:25 +, Dr A. J. Trickett wrote:
I don't mind (I don't normally make changes from work) I'm just
curious how 204.193.45.69 tripped it, can you check the logs?
The IP wasn't the source, the content of your page tripped the
bayasian filter. I've seeded your
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:37:25 + (+), Dr A. J. Trickett wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 at 07:29:05PM +, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
However I've just tied it into our very own Steve Kemps's
blogspam.net service so we'll see how that goes.
Please shout if you have any problems - it
Due do a recent spate of attacks on the wiki, we've made a few changes.
I did write a simple anti-spam thing (basically watching percentage of
links to text on a page), but that's currently in log only mode.
However I've just tied it into our very own Steve Kemps's
blogspam.net service so we'll
On Sun Jan 25, 2009 at 19:29:05 +, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
However I've just tied it into our very own Steve Kemps's
blogspam.net service so we'll see how that goes.
It wasn't really setup with wikis in mind, but I'd be very
interested in hearing how it works out.
Mostly it will
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 19:48:03 + (+), Steve Kemp wrote:
On Sun Jan 25, 2009 at 19:29:05 +, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
However I've just tied it into our very own Steve Kemps's
blogspam.net service so we'll see how that goes.
It wasn't really setup with wikis in mind, but I'd
B STEVENS wrote:
this may be a naive question but why would anyone attack a linux user
group wiki? what form did these attacks take?
Wiki spam is pretty much the same as the regular sort - utterly tedious
and nothing personal as a rule.
Sean
--
The computer can't tell you the emotional
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 21:29:05 + (+), B STEVENS wrote:
this may be a naive question but why would anyone attack a linux
user group wiki? what form did these attacks take?
Probably random attacks.
Have a look at this:
On Sunday 25 Jan 2009, B STEVENS wrote:
this may be a naive question but why would anyone attack a linux user group
wiki? what form did these attacks take?
Several reasons:
1) It's an automated attack they don't know who they are attacking
2) It's easy to do, wiki's and blogs are designed to
46 matches
Mail list logo
