Przemek:
These modification and many others RDD related I made few years ago
when I was working on xHarbour CVS code and later they were ported
to Harbour without detail replication of all ChangeLog notes.
In this week I'll try to make some cleanups in existing locking
schemes and then I'll
Hi,
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
so all that needs
to be done is fall back to return failure where cairo functions
don't exist in the cairo version hbcairo is build against.
I found only 4 functions that needs to be fixed. See, pdf.c and png.c.
I still has a question that to do with this:
Hi,
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
so all that needs to be done is fall back to return failure where cairo
functions don't exist in the cairo version hbcairo is build against.
I found only 4 functions that needs to be fixed. See, pdf.c and png.c.
I still has a question that to do with this:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, David Arturo Macias Corona wrote:
Hi,
Surprisely, except for source code, there are not reference of
DB_DBFLOCK_VFP, locking scheme in doc files and even changelog
file
These modification and many others RDD related I made few years ago
when I was working on xHarbour CVS
Viktor:
Thanks for your interest
- or, perhaps hbcurl does not work in OpenWatcom
Easily possible. The errors you sent are
all reported in system headers and libcurl
headers. We can't fix those in Harbour.
So is not due to case/otherwise flow for compilers in Harbour
Ideally this problem
Easily possible. The errors you sent are
all reported in system headers and libcurl
headers. We can't fix those in Harbour.
So is not due to case/otherwise flow for compilers in Harbour
No, seemingly it's incompatibility between libcurl
headers and OS/2 ow headers.
Maybe there exist some
Hi,
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
It seems that OS/2 cairo version has no
'CAIRO_HAS_IMAGE_SURFACE' support, and this
makes test app break. The correct fix here is to
provide Harbour level function regardless of
cairo version, but return permanent error in
this case. This is the method used in all
Hi,
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
It seems that OS/2 cairo version has no 'CAIRO_HAS_IMAGE_SURFACE' support,
and this makes test app break. The correct fix here is to provide Harbour
level function regardless of cairo version, but return permanent error in
this case. This is the method used in
-project.org] On Behalf Of David Arturo
Macias Corona
Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 7:40 AM
To: harbour@harbour-project.org
Subject: [Harbour] Re: OT: file size
Przemek:
This is becoming more interesting :-)
First thanks for your help
In the past I was answering for such questions over 10 times
Hi,
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Current hbcairo code uses RTE _right on creation_, which is
IMO not ideal solution, as it's more difficult to handle it
on .prg level.
So as a general advice, IMO RTE should only be thrown if
wrong parameter was passed to a function, so code snippet
like this one
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Current hbcairo code uses RTE _right on creation_, which is IMO not ideal
solution, as it's more difficult to handle it on .prg level.
So as a general advice, IMO RTE should only be thrown if wrong parameter was
passed to a function, so code snippet like this one can
Viktor, thanks:
For example, nobody have response for my recent messages about
hbcurl, hbcairo, hbqt because are considered as irrelevant in this
moment
I did notice it and thanks for these tests, but I'd suggest
to patch (or send patches for) existing .hbc files, after you
tested them with
Hi David,
I did notice it and thanks for these tests, but I'd suggest
to patch (or send patches for) existing .hbc files, after you
tested them with hbmk2 successfully using OS/2 specific 3rd
party lib names. It's rather inefficient if I edit them without
testing and we iterate it endlessly.
Przemek:
This is becoming more interesting :-)
First thanks for your help
In the past I was answering for such questions over 10 times.
You may find these messages in the Harbour and xHarbour mailing
list archives. A short description I added also to tests/xhb-diff.txt
I read xhb-diff.txt
Hi David,
I read xhb-diff.txt and checked it
About over 10 times:
I have seen before your info about locking schemes and so on, but in that
cases was not relevant because does not exist a direct need and we usually do
not go deep in those messages if we are not involved
For example,
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, David Arturo Macias Corona wrote:
I have not found a clear answer
Everyone have his own impression :-)
What is file size limit in DBF format ?
and in DBF-(x)Harbour ?
and in DBF-ADS 6.2x ?
In the past I was answering for such questions over 10 times.
You may find these
16 matches
Mail list logo
