RE: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 02:57 PM 30/10/2007, Tim \The Beave\ Lider wrote: All these Caps being damaged messages reminds to let you guys know that you can drastically reduce the problem by actually buying high end Power Supplies. If you spent $50.00 or less on a power supply, well may I say you get what you paid

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread Anthony Q. Martin
Thane Sherrington wrote: At 02:57 PM 30/10/2007, Tim \The Beave\ Lider wrote: All these Caps being damaged messages reminds to let you guys know that you can drastically reduce the problem by actually buying high end Power Supplies. If you spent $50.00 or less on a power supply, well may I

Re: [H] wify printer ?

2007-10-31 Thread Tharin Olsen
resending this because it got bounced last night Ahaha.. ermm yes.. well, its not terribly difficult. Since I don't see a mention of a particular make and model of printer I'll just summarize how most network printers are configured and installed. Hopefully you are already using a

Re: [H] Private IP classes

2007-10-31 Thread Tharin Olsen
resending another email that bounced.. did hardwaregroup.com go down yesterday? I'm not certain because I've never tested it, but I think on the LAN side you must use a subnet that would be confined to a single Class C network when using a consumer router. Using 255.255.0.0 as a

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 11:09 AM 31/10/2007, Anthony Q. Martin wrote: How much time did this take you in total? It seem to me that the problem is cheap, cheap, cheap all the way around. I'd say a little under an hour and a half of labour. The whole thing cost the customer $93. I charge by the job, not by the

Re: [H] wify printer ?

2007-10-31 Thread FORC5
thanks, big help fp At 11:13 AM 10/31/2007, Tharin Olsen Poked the stick with: resending this because it got bounced last night Ahaha.. ermm yes.. well, its not terribly difficult. Since I don't see a mention of a particular make and model of printer I'll just summarize how most network

Re: [H] Private IP classes

2007-10-31 Thread DHSinclair
inline below. Great share btw.. I'll move ahead and address this share even though I have not readied my return query to the bottom half of your last share.. :) Apologies to the remaining List members if this discussion is causing problems At 11:29 10/31/2007 -0700, you

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread Rick Glazier
I am doing something similar with an old Soyo(/AMD/VIA) MB of my own... I managed to find a NEW exact rev. sealed board from a dealer... I think I'm good to go for another three years... And all for only $40(US)... grin Lots of RAM, and runs at 2.6G AMD... I'm beginning to think it was a bad

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 05:03 PM 31/10/2007, Rick Glazier wrote: I am doing something similar with an old Soyo(/AMD/VIA) MB of my own... I managed to find a NEW exact rev. sealed board from a dealer... I think I'm good to go for another three years... And all for only $40(US)... grin Lots of RAM, and runs at 2.6G

[H] Dynamic DHCP re the ISP

2007-10-31 Thread DHSinclair
All you folk that are blessed with static IP addys from you ISP need not respond. I already envy you. Here owning a static IP addy is $16/mo. I know there is no free lunch, but still. :) So, I use Dynamic DHCP with my ISP (BellSouth). It works, but from time to time they (BellSouth

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread Rick Glazier
Actually, the remark about AMD/VIA and Soyo stems from the fact they don't last over 3.75 years. You can squeeze them a little longer, but two of mine went pretty belly up, and my wifes was VERY sensitive to moderate heat this summer... The minute the temp dropped a couple degrees it worked

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread DHSinclair
Thanks, Thane. And why I passed on the whole P4 scene...back when?.. Best, Duncan At 16:34 10/31/2007 -0300, Thane wrote: snip Because of the puffed caps problem? Intel-based motherboard have had plenty of those. The P4 doubles as a cap-puffer due to the ridiculous power strain it puts on

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread Robert Martin Jr.
I've definitely had issues with a few VIA based mainboards, BUT I also have 3 epia mini-itx systems that have been rock solid running 24/7 for about 4 years. The mini-itx ones seem to be very stable when configured as these ones are. I used the same drive image for all of them, running win2k

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread FORC5
more VIA then AMD IMO I shy from VIA anymore. At 02:15 PM 10/31/2007, DHSinclair Poked the stick with: Rick, Agree totally even w/o any technical specifics. Every AMD/VIA m/b I have ever used has been a problem, or, suffered what I perceive to be an early RTF. Maybe, just my situation, but

Re: [H] Asus bad

2007-10-31 Thread DHSinclair
Good choice IMHO. To me, VIA means an experience. Best, Duncan At 16:28 10/31/2007 -0700, you wrote: more VIA then AMD IMO I shy from VIA anymore. At 02:15 PM 10/31/2007, DHSinclair Poked the stick with: Rick, Agree totally even w/o any technical specifics. Every AMD/VIA m/b I have ever used