less then 3.
fp
At 04:11 AM 10/5/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poked the stick with:
>- Original Message - From: "Thane Sherrington (S)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "The Hardware List"
>Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:25 PM
>Subject: RE: [H] AMD CP
- Original Message -
From: "Thane Sherrington (S)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Hardware List"
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:25 PM
Subject: RE: [H] AMD CPU question
I agree with Chris. When you decide to be a small computer place, you
take on
an example.. :)
*OK, shameless plug*
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of warpmedia
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 9:16 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] AMD CPU question
It's not a requirement, in fact all that's required to work
Sep 2005 15:49:56 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [H] AMD CPU question
> aren't most factory Dell's and HP's on board video ?
>
> it is a inexpensive way to go, MATX and good for 99% of the ppl.
>
> it's what I have seen anyway.
> fp
>
> At
aren't most factory Dell's and HP's on board video
?
it is a inexpensive way to go, MATX and good for 99% of the ppl.
it's what I have seen anyway.
fp
At 04:39 AM 9/30/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poked the stick
with:
Am I now facing the same
situation with video onboard? If 10% refuse to buy from me
At 08:39 AM 30/09/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Windows 98 and Me. I let myself be forced to audio onboard. Am I now
facing the same situation with video onboard? If 10% refuse to buy from me
because the video is onboard, but I double my sales by lowering the
overall price of the computer, I c
It's not a requirement, in fact all that's required to work for Dork
Squad is a HS diploma, maybe "some" experience doing PC work, and a
clean urine sample.
I know because I am unemployed and considering doing GS just so I can
pay rent while trying bring my education up enough to look for a re
wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Thane Sherrington (S)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Hardware List"
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:25 PM
Subject: RE: [H] AMD CPU question
I agree with Chris. When you decide to be a small computer place, you
take on t
Have you tried match.com? I hear the matching process is pretty thorough
and has good success. People talk for four hours on the phone and stuff.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am seeking one
technician who loves to brainstorm on the phone.
--
Cheers,
joeuser (still looking for the 'any' key)
- Original Message -
From: "Thane Sherrington (S)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Hardware List"
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:25 PM
Subject: RE: [H] AMD CPU question
I agree with Chris. When you decide to be a small computer place, you
take on
At 01:19 AM 30/09/2005, Chris Klein wrote:
and your image when you know that it's not your best work. I just don't get
it. I have pride. I want to learn, I want to be good at what I do. Hell
your customers might as well call the geek squad then...I think even those
guys have an A+ certtha
TECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne Johnson
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:03 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: RE: [H] AMD CPU question
At 12:25 PM 9/29/2005, Thane Sherrington (S) typed:
>When you decide to be a small computer place, you take on the challenge
>to be better than any of the big,
Hey lego my alter-Ego!
Wayne Johnson wrote:
FWIW that was my alter ego talking.
At 12:25 PM 9/29/2005, Thane Sherrington (S) typed:
When you decide to be a small computer place, you take on the
challenge to be better than any of the big, uncaring
stores. Getting the best product for your customers, even if it
means a lot of work for you is just part of the job.
Why when
At 12:45 PM 29/09/2005, Chris Klein wrote:
I've read a few of your other posts and they kind of scare me. As a fellow
computer guy, don't you like a challenge? Don't you want to try out new
hardware that you've never touched before? There was a point when I had no
experience with AMD's, but I
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 7:26 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] AMD CPU question
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Sevart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Hardware List"
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [H] AMD CPU question
At 10:51 AM 29/09/2005, joeuser wrote:
Don't bother Thane, he's a lost cause.
I know, but I'm a sucker for lost causes. :)
T
Don't bother Thane, he's a lost cause.
Thane Sherrington (S) wrote:
At 08:25 AM 29/09/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is another reason I build and sell computers with Intel CPU's.
Intel has never been as complicated as AMD to me. I have only a G.E.D.
and my A+. I would have to go to col
At 08:25 AM 29/09/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is another reason I build and sell computers with Intel CPU's. Intel
has never been as complicated as AMD to me. I have only a G.E.D. and my
A+. I would have to go to college to learn to build computers with AMD CPU's.
Well, you should lear
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Sevart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Hardware List"
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [H] AMD CPU question
Well, they couldn't clock as high, were finicky on memory, and many board
manufacturers
At 01:04 AM 29/09/2005, Greg Sevart wrote:
isn't. Sure, they ultimately don't care if an end user can only hit 2.3GHz
or 2.7GHz, but overclocking is a very valid metric of design/process headroom.
Besides, a chip can still suck if it sucks for end users (even if only a
segment of end users). :
*laugh* but complaints about overclocking are not a reasonable concern of
the chip manufacturer.
Well, yes and no. A chip manufacturer loves it when chips can clock high--it
means there is plenty of clock scalability at the current process and
tape-out design. Poor overclocking means...well, t
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Sevart
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:43 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] AMD CPU question
Well, they couldn't clock as high, were finicky on memory, and many board
manufacturers had to go through several BIOS revisions before
regarding Winchesters on the places
I frequent...
:)
Greg
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Reeves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'The Hardware List'"
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:06 PM
Subject: RE: [H] AMD CPU question
I think that's a bi
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 6:30 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] AMD CPU question
Venice, San Diego, Manchester (512KB dual core, 3800+, 4200+, 4600+), and
Toledo (1MB dual core, 4400+, 4800+...I have a Toledo) all share the same
memory controller, so yes.
Winchesters seem
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'The Hardware List'"
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 6:23 PM
Subject: RE: [H] AMD CPU question
No, my 3000 is a Winchester. I think that's the earlier one that had the
problems.
So if I go for a new dual core, or a venice I should be oka
er 28, 2005 6:53 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] AMD CPU question
Is your 3000+ a Venice?
The Venice/San-Diego is the first memory controller that can handle running
four sticks of memory at DDR400 speeds. Previous cores could only do DDR333
(or was it 2T?) reliably.
If it is a Venice
Is your 3000+ a Venice?
The Venice/San-Diego is the first memory controller that can handle running
four sticks of memory at DDR400 speeds. Previous cores could only do DDR333
(or was it 2T?) reliably.
If it is a Venice, you won't have any better luck with a Toledo or
Manchester dual core, a
28 matches
Mail list logo
