On Sep 30, 2005, at 2:51 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
David Tanzer has offered his proof-of-concept component model to
the project. It can be found here :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5
[ ] +1 Accept the code into the project
[X] -1 Don't accept the cod
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
David Tanzer has offered his proof-of-concept component model to the
project. It can be found here :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5
[ ] +1 Accept the code into the project
[X] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason :
The code itself is posix only.
If we
+1 (non-binding)
Dan Lydick
> [Original Message]
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 9/28/05 11:49:17 PM
> Subject: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-5 : David Tanzer's
proof-of-concept component model
>
> David Tanzer has offered his proof-of-concept component
+1
On 9/28/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Tanzer has offered his proof-of-concept component model to the
> project. It can be found here :
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project
> [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Rea
This contribution was accepted by the Apache Harmony community with
sufficient binding votes from the PPMC (geir, dims, stefano), and all
documentation is complete. This contribution and it's contribution
information has been placed in the contrib archive (where it shall
remain untouched)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse my dumbness, I haven't done much substantial in C in awhile so
I'm rusty.
I'm goofing with this, I've downloaded various things. I realize it
won't immediately work on OS X/PPC but I figured it might be fun to goof
with adding some of that to it. After gettin
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doh! Apparently there is no port of glibc for OS X!
Can this be true?
fink?
Does not appear so. I dinked around and tried to see if its actually
that big of a deal to port gcc since there is a powerpc arch...but for
some reason it han
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doh! Apparently there is no port of glibc for OS X!
Can this be true?
fink?
--
Stefano.
Doh! Apparently there is no port of glibc for OS X!
Can this be true?
Andrew-Olivers-Computer:~/downloads/glibc/build acoliver$
../glibc-2.3.5/configure
checking build system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.2.0
checking host system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.2.0
*** The GNU C library is curr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 29, 2005, at 11:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse my dumbness, I haven't done much substantial in C in awhile
so I'm rusty.
I'm goofing with this, I've downloaded various things. I realize it
won't immediately work on OS X/
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 29, 2005, at 11:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse my dumbness, I haven't done much substantial in C in awhile so
I'm rusty.
I'm goofing with this, I've downloaded various things. I realize it
won't immediately work on OS X/PPC but I figured it might
El jue, 29-09-2005 a las 11:11 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
> Excuse my dumbness, I haven't done much substantial in C in awhile so
> I'm rusty.
>
> I'm goofing with this, I've downloaded various things. I realize it
> won't immediately work on OS X/PPC but I figured it might be fun to go
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 code is good.
+1 to accepting and +1 to aco's statement.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 29, 2005, at 10:24 AM, Peter Edworthy wrote:
0 - Not got time to check the code at the moment
2) I normally would put a 3 day review period, but this code is
small
an
+1 code is good.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 29, 2005, at 10:24 AM, Peter Edworthy wrote:
0 - Not got time to check the code at the moment
2) I normally would put a 3 day review period, but this code is small
and I want to use this to test the process
Can we go for an any objectio
On Sep 29, 2005, at 11:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse my dumbness, I haven't done much substantial in C in awhile
so I'm rusty.
I'm goofing with this, I've downloaded various things. I realize
it won't immediately work on OS X/PPC but I figured it might be fun
to goof with addin
Excuse my dumbness, I haven't done much substantial in C in awhile so
I'm rusty.
I'm goofing with this, I've downloaded various things. I realize it
won't immediately work on OS X/PPC but I figured it might be fun to goof
with adding some of that to it. After getting everything I needed to
On Sep 29, 2005, at 10:24 AM, Peter Edworthy wrote:
0 - Not got time to check the code at the moment
2) I normally would put a 3 day review period, but this code is
small
and I want to use this to test the process
Can we go for an any objections version then ?
I don't understand the q
On Sep 29, 2005, at 10:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Although, I'd dlopen with RTLD_LAZY
When it's in there, submit a patch :)
David Tanzer has offered his proof-of-concept component model to the
project. It can be found here :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5
[ ] +1
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> David Tanzer has offered his proof-of-concept component model to the
> project. It can be found here :
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project
> [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason :
>
+1 Accept the code into
0 - Not got time to check the code at the moment
>> > 2) I normally would put a 3 day review period, but this code is small
>> > and I want to use this to test the process
Can we go for an any objections version then ?
Or prohaps only email Geir?
Just seems like a lot of mail
Pete
+1
Although, I'd dlopen with RTLD_LAZY
> David Tanzer has offered his proof-of-concept component model to the
> project. It can be found here :
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project
> [ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason :
>
>
> --
>
>
+1
On 9/29/05, Enrico Migliore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> > David Tanzer has offered his proof-of-concept component model to the
> > project. It can be found here :
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project
> > [ ] -1 Don't acc
+1
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 10:17 +0200, Enrico Migliore wrote:
> +1
>
> > David Tanzer has offered his proof-of-concept component model to the
> > project. It can be found here :
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project
> > [ ] -1 Don
No worries!
We always want everyone to vote as the opinion of the whole community
is very important, but the binding votes are the PPMC while in
incubation, and the PMC when out of incubation.
geir
On Sep 29, 2005, at 4:25 AM, Anindo Ghosh wrote:
Hi,
Please forgive my ignorance but I wo
Anindo Ghosh wrote:
Hi,
Please forgive my ignorance but I would like to know who all are
eligible to vote ?
Formally, those who were signed up to the original Harmony proposal, and
anyone who has joined the provisional project management committee
(PPMC) since (which, IIUC is no-one yet).
Hi,
Please forgive my ignorance but I would like to know who all are
eligible to vote ?
Regards,
Anindo Ghosh
On 9/29/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Tanzer has offered his proof-of-concept component model to the
> project. It can be found here :
>
> http://issues.apa
+1
David Tanzer has offered his proof-of-concept component model to the
project. It can be found here :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5
[ ] +1 Accept the code into the project
[ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason :
--
Notes :
1) Yes, this is formal, but we want a cle
27 matches
Mail list logo
