Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your answer, please see my comments inside.
On 5/22/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Mikhail and Vladimir,
I'd rather consider it as compatibility bug and close it as wontfix.
Yes, we can close the issue as wontfix with compatibility comments,
but I think
May be this is synthetic field (inner-parent reference)?
Check java asm for this test:
public class Test {
Object field;
public class Inner {
Inner() {
field = null;
}
}
}
public class Test$Inner extends java.lang.Object{
Test$Inner(Test);
Code:
0:
Weldon,
I confused this$ and class$ fields in your example.
Here is another example where class$ method is generated and used:
public class Test2 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Class cls = Test2.class;
}
}
and javap output is:
public class Test2 extends
Method class$ is synthetic and is produced by the Java compiler for some
class which references some class by the construct some class name.class
in its method' code.
For example, the code
---
Class c1 = Object.class;
---
will produce the following Java
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Hi George,
On 5/19/06, George Harley wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
[SNIP]
Hi Stepan,
Is your preference to separate out all remote server dependent tests
(that could be made work with a locally installed server) from the
normal test flow ?
Yes.
For instance, have
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 5/19/06, Tim Ellison wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
snip
I'm OK only if we separate tests with Jetty from common test suite run.
Why?
Because each external dependency complicates 'normal' test suite run ( I
don't want to face with situation when to run Harmony
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 5/19/06, Tim Ellison wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
snip
I'm OK only if we separate tests with Jetty from common test suite
run.
Why?
Because each external dependency complicates 'normal' test suite run ( I
don't want to face with situation when to run Harmony
Hi Miguel,
A list of files that you think can be removed would be ideal. Maybe add
it as a comment to the JIRA ?
Thank you,
George
Miguel Montes wrote:
George:
Ok. Would you like me to send a pruned version, or a list of files to be
removed?
Miguel
On 5/18/06, George Harley [EMAIL
Hi all,
I have opened HARMONY-485, which proposes an additional
doc for the website describing the HDK and its contents.
The layout of the HDK described in the doc matches that
produced by the build script alterations raised in
HARMONY-469.
I hope that eventually (once the natives are
Hi all,
There is now a repackaged version of the IBM VME available at:
https://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/iwm/web/preLogin.do?lang=en_USsource=ahdk
The new VME archives are called Harmony-vme-win.IA32-v3.zip for Windows
and Harmony-vme-linux.IA32-v3.tar.gz for Linux.
Following discussion
Daniel,
Sure, I use Sun's J2SE 5.0.
Here's how I run the tests:
c:\jdk1.5.0_05\bin\java -cp junit.jar;test.jar;stubs_dir
-Djava.security.policy=all.policy test_suite
Are there some additional configurations I should provide?
Below is the list of tests that fail, with the respective stack
By the way, if rmi2 module is ITC donation and rmi3 module is Intel
donation, then what is the contents of rmi module?
And how the process of getting the actual RMI implementation for Harmony
is going to go?
Vasily Zakharov
Intel Middleware Products Division
-Original Message-
From:
On 22 May 2006 at 21:20, Zakharov, Vasily M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, if rmi2 module is ITC donation and rmi3 module is Intel
donation, then what is the contents of rmi module?
See HARMONY-471. This JIRA was the first part of my trying to replace
the rmi stubs with the contents
Mark,
Well, I see your point. This strategy sounds reasonable, thank you very
much for your efforts on integration.
Confusion is really not a problem, as it's the easiest problem to
resolve. :)
Vasily
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hindess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May
Weldon Washburn wrote:
I just now looked at 483. Good work. I'd like to check-in these mods
into svn but don't have check-in permission.
I can check them in, but I think Ivan's code needs official blessing first.
-Archie
2006/5/22, Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Weldon Washburn wrote:
I just now looked at 483. Good work. I'd like to check-in these mods
into svn but don't have check-in permission.
I can check them in, but I think Ivan's code needs official blessing first.
What kind of official blessing?
Ok. I will add a coment to JIRA
Miguel
On 5/22/06, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Miguel,
A list of files that you think can be removed would be ideal. Maybe add
it as a comment to the JIRA ?
Thank you,
George
Miguel Montes wrote:
George:
Ok. Would you like me to send a pruned
On 22 May 2006 at 23:05, Ivan Volosyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/5/22, Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Weldon Washburn wrote:
I just now looked at 483. Good work. I'd like to check-in these
mods into svn but don't have check-in permission.
I can check them in, but I think
Archie,
Please hold off the check-in for a few days. I would like to try
Ivan's mods on my machine to make certain they are complete. The
intention is to reduce the chance of secondary patch-up check-ins and
the related blizzard of emails.
Thanks
Weldon
On 5/22/06, Archie Cobbs [EMAIL
Weldon Washburn wrote:
Please hold off the check-in for a few days. I would like to try
Ivan's mods on my machine to make certain they are complete. The
intention is to reduce the chance of secondary patch-up check-ins and
the related blizzard of emails.
No problem.. I'll wait for both (a)
Currently Mikhail marked this issue as won't fix with comments of
non-bug difference from RI. I remember there is a similar category in
JIRA(I just cannot recall the exact name, but it should be obvious), is
there any chance in JIRA system to change this issue's category to that
one? I think
Gregory,
Sorry I response so late. I just back from a long vacation and it took
me longer time than I expected to catch up the mailing list (after all,
it's very active!). Please see my comments below.
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Hello Paulex
I have a question about this problem. Do you know
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Hi all,
There is now a repackaged version of the IBM VME available at:
https://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/iwm/web/preLogin.do?lang=en_USsource=ahdk
The new VME archives are called Harmony-vme-win.IA32-v3.zip for Windows
and Harmony-vme-linux.IA32-v3.tar.gz for
Hello, all ,
I perfer to embed jetty in our test code to avoid external server in some
test cases.
I'm not against 'jetty based tests' but I'd prefer to separate such tests.
Stepan, If jetty is embedded in our test case code, I think it's unnecessary
still to seperate such tests, since
Hi Paulex
I've changed JIRA category to non-bug differences from RI just before
I closed the bug
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/23, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Currently Mikhail marked this issue as won't fix with comments of
non-bug difference from RI. I remember there is a similar category in
Ah, I only checked the bug type just now, I just noticed that the
non-bug differences from RI is not type but component. Sorry and thanks:).
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi Paulex
I've changed JIRA category to non-bug differences from RI just before
I closed the bug
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/23,
26 matches
Mail list logo
