Folks,
Has anyone seen the following problem in the whole test run? I cannot
reproduce the problem for standalone test. (SuSE 9)
java.io.IOException
at java.io.IOException.(IOException.java:35)
at
org.apache.harmony.luni.platform.OSFileSystem.close(OSFileSystem.java:2
s,
Pavel
On 11/16/06, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Pavel, All,
>
> Let me add one "pro" for the second approach: it works already.
> Vladimir's scripts daily upload test results to http://harmonytest.org.
>
> With best regards,
> Alex
e, contains the following one:
>> >
>> >
>drlvm/trunk/vm/MMTk/ext/vm/HarmonyDRLVM/org/apache/HarmonyDRLVM/mm/mmtk
/
>> > Scanning.java:47: Warning: The following parameters of
>> >
>org::apache::HarmonyDRLVM::mm::mmtk::Scanning::precopyChildren(TraceLoc
Oops, I've missed:
* Andrew Zhang for reviewing class library patches and helpful discussions
On 11/16/06, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit tests
pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days fo
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit tests
pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great team we
are. Thanks for your thoughtful, diligent work and deep inspiration. Kudos
to you for the following (and not limited to this):
* Alexey Varlamov
Guys,
This is a good discussion, and let me praise Alexey for the wonderful fix.
I'm a bit concerned about our accepptance checks. How this could be
that regression was missed by a committer and an engineer durring
acceptance test runs?
Bug comments showed that Gregory ran the tests before a co
All,
I wonder if we should apply "zero regression" policy to this change.
Speaking simply, should this patch be reverted and kept for additional
investigation?
On 11/15/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The guilty change is the following, which effectively turns on
VM_LAZY_EXCEPTIO
Pavel, you are correct. Rana, sorry for confusion. Both issues block
passing class library unit tests.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2070 [drlvm][thread]
Unhandled exception in java.exe while java.util.jar module tests
execution
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2073 [d
Mikhail,
Sorry, I'm a bit slow. From my perspective making a documentation
bundle from inter-component interfaces is an excellent idea! I started
collecting interfaces from vm/include directory.
Are there any other bundles a community is interested in? Being closer
to the point, let me ask if yo
+1
On 11/15/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apparently this is a long awaited working (at least for drlvm
testing), I'll be utterly surprised if somebody objects. Thank you!
Here is My Big +1 :)
15.11.06, Vladimir Ivanov<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> написал(а):
> Hello everyone,
> I starte
Guys,
I was trying to compare public announcements of new patches with
private ones. The point of announcing new patches on harmony-dev@ is
the following: anyone is welcome to verify a new patch.
If no volunteers are willing to do so, then a committer or a bug
submitter will do the job.
Thanks,
Sian,
This is a good catch. I have the following justification for 3. I
think it is better process when a bug submitter validates a patch
*before* commit to ensure that it is good. Also it validates the patch
*after*. This worth to be requested via public alias.
Why a bug submitter should do a pr
Hello, Vladimir,
I have checked JIRA and http://harmonytest.org. This looks like a new
issue. I wonder if it could be a result of some recent fix?
With best regards, Alexei
On 11/13/06, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everyone,
today my cruise control failed on the linux SUSE b
Evgueni,
That was great.
Artem,
It's nice to see you online. Could you please check the last comments
to http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1904 and decide what
should we do about this issue?
+1 to use a uniform property for all modules
On 11/13/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've run swing and awt tests with fork mode "once" a dozen times
on Windows and Linux. All tests passed.
So to speed up precommit testing I'd like to change fork mode in
swign and awt to ${hy.tes
Andrey, Angela,
If I understood a problem correctly Alexey asked to make a developer's
life easier. It looks like now a developer should rebuild class
library, then to rebuild DRLVM each time he wants to check his class
library changes with DRLVM.
Can we simplify the procedure? For example, if I
Let me point out the second section of Egor's manual - LD_LIBRARY_PATH
is the only thing which should be additionally configured.
On 13 Nov 2006 15:46:44 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the 0x220 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
> I have a dumb question - I was pl
All,
Evgueni's patch is a step in the right direction. Considering
pthread_mutex_init as a conventional example, monitor shouldn't be
locked at _init function. Test errors on Linux can just tell us that
there are more places that rely on the incorrect contract of the
function.
-- Alexei
On 11/1
Gregory,
I have checked the patch. I like it. Here are few notes.
* When I used ant there were no tag [1]. I used autogenerated
ant files to run something in a loop. Solution with takes less
place and is more readable.
* From my perspective 3 min timeout for a smoke test should be
decreased. I
To get rid of conflicts I think we should remove this file from revision
control.
+1
On 11/10/06, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 01:12 Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> > generate this file as part of the build process?
>
> +1 for
Anton,
I like your approach to result comparison. 10% can be default value
for some form field - anyone can change it if needed.
As for test execution time reported by JUnit, it is applicable for
stress tests as well if we gradually increase a load over time. Though
using ttime field for stress
generate this file as part of the build process?
+1 for autogeneration of version_svn_tag.h
On 11/10/06, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everyone,
When I do my morning SVN update of drlvm module I see the permanent conflict
on the version_svn_tag.h file because this file is u
DRLVM build always requires prebuilt classlib...
I believe ia32 classlib is ok until linking happens.
On 11/11/06, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Same for me. I saw this yesterday. It is because HARMONY-1558 has changed
Class interfaces but didn't change x86_64 specific files. Now
ed VIM using a tutorial. I don't need the
VIM tutorial any longer, but at the beginning it was useful.
+1 for maintain Getting Started as is with minor changes
Why Eclipse was chosen for the tutorial? Our goal was to use Harmony for
Harmony development. I liked that idea.
With best
too.
- the first page only includes 50 latest test runs, link to archive
search added (includes search by uploader's name - request by Tony Wu)
- filter diff results by test name (request by Alexei Fedotov)
- detection of crashes - sometimes when suite crashes, there is an
empty TEST-.xml
Nadya,
I have failed to find web pages copyrighted by IBM on Apache using
Google. Apache copyright usually contains no more than two lines. This
page has fourty lines of legal staff. Is it really needed?
Thanks!
On 11/8/06, Morozova, Nadezhda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
I'd like to share
Alexey wrote,
As far as I remember TCK does not check for signature compatibility.
http://jcp.org/en/resources/tdk reads:
Signature Test tool
The Signature Test tool verifies that a Java technology implementation
undergoing compatibility testing and its reference APIs are mutually
compatible
is the status of DRLVM smoke tests? As any tests written in java
they have a dependency from a class library. Do you think they should be
skipped while testing the patch?
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Java & XML Engineering
>-Original Message-
>From: Alexey Petrenko
Weldon,
I agree with you that it is nearly impossible to achieve stability for
a branch under active development.
From the other side, adding new features is fun, and also has a reason
behind it. If we strive for a complete implementation of J2SE, we
cannot avoid this type of activity.
So my
+1
for committing
A declaration VmThreadHandle h; is converts to (void*) h;
Intel compiler doesn't understand type names in brackets.
This is a fix for http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1897
icl build on Windows failed
Thanks, Salikh. A good catch!
On 11/3/06, Salikh Zakirov <[EMAIL
The first link at the page
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/index.html
to "Getting Started For Contributors" is now incorrect - it contains
http://incubator.apache.org/docs/quickhelp_contributors.html
instead of
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/quickhelp_contribut
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the 0x216 day of Apache Harmony Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> Egor,
>
> Thank you for your interest.
We definitely need to improve our documentation. Necessity is not a
real interest :)
> Here is an algorithm:
>
> 1. Create a list of words from HTML f
Egor,
Thank you for your interest. Here is an algorithm:
1. Create a list of words from HTML files.
2. Merge a dictionary of all words used in documentation.
3. Remove a half of the most frequently used words from the dictionary
- I believe they do not add much sense.
4. Remove misspelled words
ollowing Wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/DRLVM_Documentation_Quality
All are welcome to check masterpieces of our documentation. All
volunteers are welcome to improve page ranks by editing comments in
DRLVM sources.
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Java & XML Engineering
34 matches
Mail list logo
