Perhaps he means clone the object to a WeakReference then null the original
object ?
That way the only existing copy of that object will be a WeakReference
with my limited
understanding of GC concepts would that no be benificial ?
Regards,
- Vikram Mohan
On 9/19/06, Ivan Volosyuk [EMAIL
Pretty much thanks.
Though I think I am unsure as to what you mean by IRs sorry.
On 19 Sep 2006 10:59:49 +0700, Egor Pasko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the 0x1E9 day of Apache Harmony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone clarify what Jetrnio.JET is please ?
DRLVM has two JIT compilers:
*
Can someone clarify what Jetrnio.JET is please ?
On 9/8/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/8/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Weldon,
I added 'alloc' support to JIRA 816 (magic2.zip file)
Now it supports objects allocation only, not arrays. MMTk allocation
works
the packages inside the JDK and giving me wierd
method not found errors. The package under consideration is the
sun.rmi.transport.* package.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
- FaeLLe
--
www.FaeLLe.com
www.VikramMohan.com
Problem solved thanks to the nice developers at IBM.
Solution is,
File, Settings, Modules, Order/Export Tab, Select Module Sources and click
Move Up and click Ok.
Now it reads the sun.rmi.transport.* package from my sources rather than the
JDK.
On 9/13/06, FaeLLe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hello Ivan,
What would be the criteria for freeing up the garbage collected objects in
new area ?
Wont if lead to performance issues with duplication of memory ?
Just wondering,
- Vikram Mohan
On 8/29/06, Ivan Volosyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Weldon,
I think there are two different
Hello Mikhail,
Thanks for the reply !
However your email only contained the attachement of the output do not see
the modified sources. If you could reply with them it would be nice.
Thanks,
- Vikram Mohan
On 8/23/06, Mikhail Markov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vikram,
First of all, what
interesting what you
are discovering in distributed GC. Do you plan to do an Apache open
source version of the correct algorithm? :)
On 8/23/06, FaeLLe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Weldon,
I am currently working on the DGC interface on a Java level so that it
can
work on top of the JVM. My
Forwarding message to Harmony list as it was rejected previously as spam probably due to ZIP attachement and links in body.Removing zip attachement and links.-- Forwarded message --
From: FaeLLe [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Aug 23, 2006 2:34 AMSubject: Java Distributed Garbage Collection
Hello,
I have pulled the java.rmi.* contribution code from the Harmony SVN and was
examining the test cases for the RMI DGC.Have a few questions about how the
test is performed if anyone can clarify them for me.
As far as I have understood the following is how the operation is,
-
I have examined the ITC rmi suite contribution and I think they should work
with the Intel contribution to integrate the best of two.
On 8/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've had multiple RMI modules hanging around for a while due to our
fortune of multiple submissions.
+1
Regards,
- Vikram Mohan
On 5/9/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-211 in paper form and
have reviewed them, so I can assert that the critical provenance
paperwork is in order. It is not in SVN yet, but I wanted to get this
vote
Hello Daniel,
Can you please tell us which algorithm you made use of for the Distributed
Garbage Collector ?
I am currently researching in this field and details would benifit me.
Regards,
- Vikram
On 3/22/06, Daniel Gandara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We are thinking in making a release
a comprehensive GC bibliography database here
http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/rej/gcbib/gcbib.html
Regards,
Tim
FaeLLe wrote:
Hello,
This is a slightly off topic post but I was wondering if anyone could
point
me in the right direction to obtaining research papers on Distributed
Hello,
This is a slightly off topic post but I was wondering if anyone could point
me in the right direction to obtaining research papers on Distributed
Reference Counting and Garbage Collection either both of them or just
Garbage Collection in Java.
If anyone has any out of print or rare papers
So have to agree with Mark...
Making a JVM in a .NET language this deserves a . LOL
Sorry if i sound out of order had to do it :s
On 5/19/05, Mark Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we are going to entertain writing most of the JVM in a type-safe
language, we should also
On 5/16/05, Simon Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, im a fairly new programmer (computer science student at Cambridge UK)
and am looking to get started on oss/java project and thought this would be
a nice place to start. I'll be mainly hanging around in the background,
maybe doing a few
On 5/15/05, Mark Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be clear, so as no-one feels they've been misled in the future, this
is
not what we'd like in the best of all possible worlds. In that world,
classpath would be relicensed under the AL, or a compatible licence.
What's listed above is a
Yes native .EXE should be a MUST :D
On 5/13/05, Mohammed Al-Qaimari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This project should provide a tool that generates a native executable
program that just starts a new VM and provides all arguments and classespath
etc... without suffering with batch and shell
I thought we are not going to have a IRC channel for discussions as no
archive is maintained of it
On 5/13/05, Dalibor Topic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mohammed Nour wrote:
I need to know which IRC channel I shold look into ?
Hi Mohammed,
try the #harmony channel on
Hahahahahaha you da man
On 5/13/05, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kev Jackson wrote:
Why do we need an open source Java?
Let's analyze it on the other way: why not?
1) because it's already there. [Ask Ben how much he loves java on FreeBSD]
2) because it's hard. [Ask
Everytime i read posts from you lot at Apache i feel more conviced this
thing is going to be one huge success.
I cant imagine how convincing your salesmen must be !! (If you indeed did
have salesment to market).
On 5/13/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't cc Gerry - I
Can somebody comment on this guys claims,
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/20050507#death_to_apache
Ps. warning: lot of flaming of our idealogies take place there but i would
still like to see him shut up.
--
www.FaeLLe.com http://www.FaeLLe.com
On 5/13/05, Kev Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So speak up project lead(s). We are here. We are talking a lot, but
not much is happening. Order us about. Assign work. Let's get our
hands dirty. The likelihood is that there will be changes along the
way anyhow. There almost always
@incubator.apache.org
-- Forwarded message --
From: FaeLLe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 13, 2005 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java)
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
On 5/13/05, Kev Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So speak up project lead
On 5/13/05, Kev Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How are you wasting replying to emails and undertaking a discussion.
Undertaking discussion isn't bad by itself. But discussing things and
producing nothing is. From these discussions that have already occured,
I would have liked to
This project does really sound intresting cannot wait for the project to be
initiated and start accepting individual contributors.
Good work Apache, Again !!
Regards,
- Vikram
--
www.FaeLLe.com http://www.FaeLLe.com
that test. Or as a worst case scenario verify compatiblity by
examining TCK source :/
On 5/11/05, Ian Darwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 05:47:35PM +0100, FaeLLe wrote:
But im still curious do you think TCK checks if Harmony would have
implementations of the deprecated
Very intresting and well noted writeup sir an insight from a Sun employee is
always a bonus.
I will for sure followup comments on this article and see what the community
has to say on this post.
On 5/11/05, Gerry Steele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a big fan of the Apache foundation but
Sorry but you miss two major points. (Please do correct me this is my
understanding by observing content on Harmony)
* The complete agreement and compatiblity of the rules set down by TCK was
one of the major factors that ensured that we would be 100% Java as it is by
Sun
* As a very learned
You just convinced me to try out JRockIt !!
On 5/12/05, Bob Griswold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a JRE to be usable for a real-life enterprise customer, it has to be a
hell of a lot more functional and stable than just passing the JCK. That
was
the absolute lowest bar of any test we used
31 matches
Mail list logo
