A list of tests for exclude is OK, or a patch to the old patch :)
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/6, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> Seems like a new patch is a better way.
>
> If apply it as is then some tests fail some hang up...
What would the new patch be? :)
If
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Seems like a new patch is a better way.
If apply it as is then some tests fail some hang up...
What would the new patch be? :)
If new code to replace the code we just voted on, then we have a problem.
If it's simply a set of tests to exclude, cool...
geir
Thanks,
Seems like a new patch is a better way.
If apply it as is then some tests fail some hang up...
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/8/31, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Well, that's 3 days :)
+1 from geir, alexey, vladimir, Ilya, the other alexey, sergey, mark,
oleg, paulex, mikhail, kenny,
no oth
Well, that's 3 days :)
+1 from geir, alexey, vladimir, Ilya, the other alexey, sergey, mark,
oleg, paulex, mikhail, kenny,
no other votes (other than interest in getting the dependency thing
fixed once and for all, and some chat about patching the patch)
so this passes.
Once we finish argu
armony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] HARMONY-1225 : Assorted fixes and enhancements for
AWT
and Swing
Please don't waste the time because I am not comfortable voting on
one code contribution, and committing something else.
If you just give me a list of all chunks that I can ignore, I&
Message-
>From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 2:45 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [vote] HARMONY-1225 : Assorted fixes and enhancements for
AWT
>and Swing
>
>Please don't waste the time because I
--Original Message-
From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 7:04 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vote] HARMONY-1225 : Assorted fixes and enhancements
for
AWT
and Swing
Most (probably all) of the failures ar
+1
On 8/31/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
2006/8/28, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1225 wrt BCC and ACQ.
>
> Please vote to accept or reject this set of patches and fixes into the
> Apache Harmony class library :
>
> [ ] + 1 A
+1
2006/8/28, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1225 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this set of patches and fixes into the
Apache Harmony class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a mini
>-Original Message-
>From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 7:04 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [vote] HARMONY-1225 : Assorted fixes and enhancements for
AWT
>and Swing
>
>Mos
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1225 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this set of patches and fixes into the
Apache Harmony class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) s
; Alexey A. Ivanov
> Intel Middleware Product Division
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Hindess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 4:17 PM
>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [vote] HARMONY-1
Original Message-
From: Mark Hindess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 4:17 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] HARMONY-1225 : Assorted fixes and enhancements for
AWT
and Swing
On 30 August 2006 at 14:02, "Sergey Soldatov"
<[EM
fixes have been
> > applied already.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alexey.
> >
> > --
> > Alexey A. Ivanov
> > Intel Middleware Product Division
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-----
> >> From: Mark Hindess [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
, August 30, 2006 4:17 PM
>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [vote] HARMONY-1225 : Assorted fixes and enhancements for
> AWT
>> and Swing
>>
>>
>> On 30 August 2006 at 14:02, "Sergey Soldatov"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
e.org
Subject: Re: [vote] HARMONY-1225 : Assorted fixes and enhancements for
AWT
and Swing
On 30 August 2006 at 14:02, "Sergey Soldatov"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually all these rejects were integrated during Swing text
integration and they doesn't matter.
Ok,
Mark Hindess wrote:
+1
However, I'd also like to hear the end of the dependency saga.
Which has nothing to do with this vote
It would also be useful (when the vote is complete) to have an up to
date patch. The current patch has lots of rejects due to "previously
applied" hunks, etc.
30, 2006 4:17 PM
> >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: [vote] HARMONY-1225 : Assorted fixes and enhancements for
> AWT
> >and Swing
> >
> >
> >On 30 August 2006 at 14:02, "Sergey Soldatov"
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
Original Message-
>From: Mark Hindess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 4:17 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [vote] HARMONY-1225 : Assorted fixes and enhancements for
AWT
>and Swing
>
>
>On 30 August 2006 at 14:02, &quo
On 30 August 2006 at 14:02, "Sergey Soldatov"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually all these rejects were integrated during Swing text
> integration and they doesn't matter.
Ok, but it would still be more reassuring to have a clean patch.
Currently, the only way I'd be confident that the patc
Actually all these rejects were integrated during Swing text integration and
they doesn't matter.
On 8/30/06, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
However, I'd also like to hear the end of the dependency saga.
It would also be useful (when the vote is complete) to have an up to
date pat
+1
On 8/30/06, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
However, I'd also like to hear the end of the dependency saga.
It would also be useful (when the vote is complete) to have an up to
date patch. The current patch has lots of rejects due to "previously
applied" hunks, etc. It will be q
+1
However, I'd also like to hear the end of the dependency saga.
It would also be useful (when the vote is complete) to have an up to
date patch. The current patch has lots of rejects due to "previously
applied" hunks, etc. It will be quite difficult to integrate in its
current state.
Regards
gt;Subject: Re: [vote] HARMONY-1225 : Assorted fixes and enhancements for
AWT
>and Swing
>
>+1
>
>On 8/28/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 2006/8/28, Vladimir Gorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > I see these improvements don't contain ve
+1
--
Alexey A. Ivanov
Intel Middleware Product Division
>-Original Message-
>From: Ilya Okomin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 12:10 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [vote] HARMONY-1225 : Assorted fixes and enhancements for
+1
On 8/28/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/8/28, Vladimir Gorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I see these improvements don't contain very important thing allowing us
> to automatically build (or get) the gl library. Or is this another
story?
This is another story.
> Otherwise only
2006/8/28, Vladimir Gorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I see these improvements don't contain very important thing allowing us
to automatically build (or get) the gl library. Or is this another story?
This is another story.
Otherwise only the advanced people can look at these enhancements :-).
Neverth
I see these improvements don't contain very important thing allowing us
to automatically build (or get) the gl library. Or is this another story?
Otherwise only the advanced people can look at these enhancements :-).
Nevertheless +1 for me.
Thanks,
Vladimir.
On 8/28/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL
+1
2006/8/28, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1225 wrt BCC and ACQ.
>
> Please vote to accept or reject this set of patches and fixes into the
> Apache Harmony class library :
>
> [ ] + 1 Accept
> [ ] -1 Reject (provid
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1225 wrt BCC and ACQ.
>
> Please vote to accept or reject this set of patches and fixes into the
> Apache Harmony class library :
>
> [ ] + 1 Accept
> [ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
>
> Lets let this run a minimum of 3
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1225 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this set of patches and fixes into the
Apache Harmony class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone states they need
more ti
31 matches
Mail list logo
