On 10/6/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - 'cc' - for cruise control script (and move current stuff to this dir);
>
> - 'coverage' - for coverage scripts (It will nice if somebody also
placed
> here data from issue 564);
>
> - 'japi' - for script to run 'japi'-tool.
Agreed
On 10/6/06, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Agreed on all three. Do we have a japi script?
I have one but it's a little specific to the wrapper we use for the
builds that report to the -commits list. But I can provide it if
it will help.
If this script requires some updates I a
Thanks - maybe someone can massage that to fit with what we're building...
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 6 October 2006 at 9:41, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
While nobody objects :) the right place for coverage scripts is 'buildtest'
module.
Seems, that thi
On 6 October 2006 at 9:41, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> > While nobody objects :) the right place for coverage scripts is 'buildtest'
> > module.
> >
> > Seems, that this module should be a little bit reorder: new top level
> > directories shoul
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
While nobody objects :) the right place for coverage scripts is 'buildtest'
module.
Seems, that this module should be a little bit reorder: new top level
directories should be created:
- 'cc' - for cruise control script (and move current stuff to this dir);
- 'coverage
While nobody objects :) the right place for coverage scripts is 'buildtest'
module.
Seems, that this module should be a little bit reorder: new top level
directories should be created:
- 'cc' - for cruise control script (and move current stuff to this dir);
- 'coverage' - for coverage scripts (
On 10/3/06, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Regarding the 'run japi' script what are you planning to do here? The
IBM Build/test builds also run japi (on linux only since we get enough
information using one platform and linux is easier). We might as well
share ant code.
Also note tha
On 3 October 2006 at 21:08, "Vladimir Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have one more question about coverage: should it be the part of the B&T
> infrastructure or integrated to the current classlib build system?
>
> From my point of view it should be a part of B&TI while it is rarely use
I have one more question about coverage: should it be the part of the B&T
infrastructure or integrated to the current classlib build system?
From my point of view it should be a part of B&TI while it is rarely used
functionality and no needs to waste regular build by this data (it does not
requ
The coverage information was updated on the wiki to current state (issue
564 also was updated):
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Coverage_information
thanks, Vladimir
The coverage information was updated on the wiki to current state.
thanks, Vladimir
>Subject: Re: [classlib] [testing] Coverage (was Re: 37% of total test
>execution time is spent in a single test)
>
>The coverage information was updated on the wiki. Also, coverage for
>accessibility, awt, instrument and sound modules was added. I have a
>problem
>to calculate co
Coverage for swing module was added.
thanks, Vladimir
On 8/18/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for updating the numbers Vladimir. Overall I think they look
quite respectable.
There are a few places where it looks like we could use more test
coverage. It's a great way to co
Thanks for updating the numbers Vladimir. Overall I think they look
quite respectable.
There are a few places where it looks like we could use more test
coverage. It's a great way to contribute to Harmony (he said, hinting
to the lurkers ). Pick a favourite package, kick the wheels of
Harmony u
The coverage information was updated on the wiki. Also, coverage for
accessibility, awt, instrument and sound modules was added. I have a problem
to calculate coverage for swing module (test run hang up) so issue 564 will
be updated later.
thanks, Vladimir
On 6/20/06, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTEC
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Classes from exclude list are now specified as green.
I've update wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Coverage_information)
and
coverage pages.
Great, thank you, Vladimir!
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 6/16/06, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vladimir
Vladimir Ivan
Classes from exclude list are now specified as green.
I've update wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Coverage_information) and
coverage pages.
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 6/16/06, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vladimir
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>>
>> The current reports don't provide code s
Vladimir
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
The current reports don't provide code source linking. Are you going to
add it?
There were no information for 'security' and 'auth' modules, but, I have
updated the pages and now there is source code linking for all modules.
One more issue to discuss: exclude
The current reports don't provide code source linking. Are you going to
add it?
There were no information for 'security' and 'auth' modules, but, I have
updated the pages and now there is source code linking for all modules.
One more issue to discuss: excluded classes present in the coverage
On 6/15/06, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
I've update web (viv.byethost15.com) - published fresh coverage
information.
No awt package in the beans coverage table anymore.
Also I've update the jira-564 by extended script (that include security,
auth, crypto, lang and rmi packages).
Hi Vladimir,
The
I've update web (viv.byethost15.com) - published fresh coverage information.
No awt package in the beans coverage table anymore.
Also I've update the jira-564 by extended script (that include security,
auth, crypto, lang and rmi packages).
Now I have 2 questions/ issues to discuss:
1) preferable
Mark Hindess wrote:
> On 14 June 2006 at 7:04, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> yes.
>>
>> And/or add it to the upcoming donation of the [testing] infrastructure
>> to make it part of the CI runs.
>
> Are you talking about me? It's just an ant file and a few script so I
> hope yo
On 14 June 2006 at 7:04, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yes.
>
> And/or add it to the upcoming donation of the [testing] infrastructure
> to make it part of the CI runs.
Are you talking about me? It's just an ant file and a few script so I
hope you aren't expecting too much.
yes.
And/or add it to the upcoming donation of the [testing] infrastructure
to make it part of the CI runs.
geir
Nathan Beyer wrote:
> Is there any possibility of adding this to an Ant script that can optionally
> be run with the build scripts? I'd like to make this easier for everyone to
> run
Is there any possibility of adding this to an Ant script that can optionally
be run with the build scripts? I'd like to make this easier for everyone to
run while developing.
Has anyone tried any other coverage tools? Like TPTP for Eclipse, Clover or
Corbetura (sp)?
-Nathan
> -Original Messa
On 13 June 2006 at 18:50, "Vladimir Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > P.S. I think java.awt does not currently belong to beans module,
> > > though who knows what the future may bring us :)
>
> In fact, coverage information is gathered for each jar, that, to
> some extend corresponds to
I've update the web site by information about auth, crypto and rmi modules.
The exclude list also was added.
I'm not sure that all tests were run correctly so I'm going to verify test
runs.
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 6/13/06, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more thing I've missed
One more thing I've missed: what is the exclude list you've finally ended
with?
I'm going to publish it ASAP.
> P.S. I think java.awt does not currently belong to beans module,
> though who knows what the future may bring us :)
In fact, coverage information is gathered for each jar, that, to
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Latest Harmony API source coverage by Harmony API unit tests results I
stored at wiki page
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Coverage_information
Cool! Thank you, Vladimir.
Would you please also add the excluded class list, so that we can
differentiate them from the classe
Cool! Sorry, I've missed it
One more thing I've missed: what is the exclude list you've finally ended with?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/6/13, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The detailed info available at http://viv.byethost15.com/ (this address
also pointed on wiki-page).
Do you need additiona
The detailed info available at http://viv.byethost15.com/ (this address
also pointed on wiki-page).
Do you need additional information ?
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 6/13/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Great!
Is it possible to see uncovered classes/methods/lines?
Thanks,
Mikhail
P.
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> Great!
Yep, that's great.
> Is it possible to see uncovered classes/methods/lines?
There is a link at the top of the wiki page to show details.
> Thanks,
> Mikhail
>
> P.S. I think java.awt does not currently belong to beans module,
> though who knows what the future ma
Great!
Is it possible to see uncovered classes/methods/lines?
Thanks,
Mikhail
P.S. I think java.awt does not currently belong to beans module,
though who knows what the future may bring us :)
2006/6/13, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Latest Harmony API source coverage by Harmony API uni
Latest Harmony API source coverage by Harmony API unit tests results I
stored at wiki page
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Coverage_information
I'm going to refresh it bi-weekly (seems, it is enough for coverage).
I think we have got a agreement on the test naming convention[1], but
for sur
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/6/8, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Vladimir,
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> Thanks Paulex!
>
> I did the same, but could not send results due to spam filter J
> Observations:
>
> 1. Coverage results look pretty much similar.
> 2. Exclude list looks pretty much simila
2006/6/8, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Vladimir,
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> Thanks Paulex!
>
> I did the same, but could not send results due to spam filter J
> Observations:
>
> 1. Coverage results look pretty much similar.
> 2. Exclude list looks pretty much similar too, but, looks like
Vladimir,
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Thanks Paulex!
I did the same, but could not send results due to spam filter J
Observations:
1. Coverage results look pretty much similar.
2. Exclude list looks pretty much similar too, but, looks like it
depends on the way of data collection (I didn't ru
Thanks Paulex!
I did the same, but could not send results due to spam filter J
Observations:
1. Coverage results look pretty much similar.
2. Exclude list looks pretty much similar too, but, looks like it
depends on the way of data collection (I didn't run ant task and the list is
a litt
I've attach the scripts and excluded class lists to JIRA, please refer
to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-564. Enjoy it:).
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 2 June 2006 at 10:37, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark,
I'm glad that there is someone else has interest on emma, I'v
Paulex,
And I have got some ant script and more excluded list for emma, if
anyone has interests, I can upload it to JIRA.
Yes please, upload the list into JIRA. I'm going to experiment with the list
and source coverage of HY API too.
When I tried to experiment with HY API by unit tests co
On 2 June 2006 at 10:37, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> I'm glad that there is someone else has interest on emma, I've tried it
> before. AFAIK, emma works by instrumentation, but sometimes for classes
> in bootclasspath, the instrumentation cannot work, there are two case
Mark,
I'm glad that there is someone else has interest on emma, I've tried it
before. AFAIK, emma works by instrumentation, but sometimes for classes
in bootclasspath, the instrumentation cannot work, there are two cases:
1. Some instrumented classes cannot be loaded by VM.
2. Some classes can
42 matches
Mail list logo
