On 11/9/06, Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
>-Original Message-
>From: Nathan Beyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 5:49 AM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Japi diffs for harmony
>
>No problem on the name change, but d
Cool, just making sure. Excuse my obvious questions. :)
-Nathan
On 11/9/06, Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
> No problem on the name change, but doesn't what Stuart is talking
> about require that methods add this exception to the signature to
> actually show up in
Nathan Beyer wrote:
No problem on the name change, but doesn't what Stuart is talking
about require that methods add this exception to the signature to
actually show up in the reports?
That's correct. If it's a subclass of RuntimeException (which it ought
to be, otherwise it'd have to be in thr
Nathan Beyer wrote:
> No problem on the name change, but doesn't what Stuart is talking
> about require that methods add this exception to the signature to
> actually show up in the reports?
Yes, that is my understanding.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology cen
>-Original Message-
>From: Nathan Beyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 5:49 AM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Japi diffs for harmony
>
>No problem on the name change, but doesn't what Stuart is talking
>about
No problem on the name change, but doesn't what Stuart is talking
about require that methods add this exception to the signature to
actually show up in the reports?
On 11/8/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> I'm no fan of stubs for just such
Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> I'm no fan of stubs for just such reason. But for those dev's that are
>> following along, there is an
>> org.apache.harmony.luni.util.NotYetImplementedException that is defined
>> for just such purposes.
>
> Would you consider renaming this to NotImp
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm no fan of stubs for just such reason. But for those dev's that are
following along, there is an
org.apache.harmony.luni.util.NotYetImplementedException that is defined
for just such purposes.
Would you consider renaming this to NotImplementedException since Japi
recogniz
Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Wow, I'm impressed that harmony is 94.66 against 1.5. That's
> incredibly good progress - especially if all of that is actual
> functional implementations rather than stubbed out methods. (If you
> have stubbed out methods by the way, I suggest defining a
> RuntimeException
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Nov 3, 2006 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: Japi diffs for harmony
To: Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
(this will probably bounce from harmony-dev, I'm not subscribed; feel
free to forward it)
On 11/3/06, Stefano Mazzo
I wonder if you can do a neat dump of the harmony svn archive in a
"lump" for local processing. This is one interesting difference between
CVS and SVN - you can always take a copy of the CVS data just for the
files you care about. I don't know enough about SVN to know if you can
get the equiv
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>>> Ah, also, would it be possible to have a list of the percentage over
>>> time? It would be very interesting to plot the evolution of coverage
>>> over time.
>> Here's the basic data from the build we've been doing since J
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>> Ah, also, would it be possible to have a list of the percentage over
>> time? It would be very interesting to plot the evolution of coverage
>> over time.
>
> Here's the basic data from the build we've been doing since July.
> http://people.apac
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Ah, also, would it be possible to have a list of the percentage over
> time? It would be very interesting to plot the evolution of coverage
> over time.
Here's the basic data from the build we've been doing since July.
http://people.apache.org/~tellison/build.csv
If
Stuart,
I'm a *huge* fan of your Japi diffs (I admit that I have a sort of
obsessive compulsion about it, getting happy with every small percentage
increase and sad when it decreases).
That said, I have a few questions to ask, see below.
Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Japi diff jdk15 vs harmony:
> Full
org.omg packages looks much better after applying latest Yoko.
javax.rmi looks much better too! :)
http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk15-harmony.html
Thanks, Stuart, for these regular comparison updates!
SY, Alexey
2006/9/28, Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Japi diff jdk12 vs h
Stuart,
Any chance that we can get a link to Harmony results on the
http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/ page, to show people who come via
your tool?
Thanks!
Tim
Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Japi diff jdk11 vs harmony:
> Full results:
> http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk11-harmony.html
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
