On 7/7/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Actually, let me flip this the other way...
What are the differences between the impl of the threading lib in DRLVM
vs that in classlib?
Yep, that is the right question. I don't know the answer, perhaps
whoever made
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
I'm not sure it is just a name clash problem - drlvm won't give the
hythread library if the class lib hadn't requested it.
The classlib builds it's own copy of the hythread library, so there is
no need for a compatible VM
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
I'm not sure it is just a name clash problem - drlvm won't give the
hythread library if the class lib hadn't requested it.
The classlib builds it's own copy of the hythread library, so there is
no need
Actually, let me flip this the other way...
What are the differences between the impl of the threading lib in DRLVM
vs that in classlib?
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
I'm not sure it is just a name clash
Tim Ellison wrote:
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
I'm not sure it is just a name clash problem - drlvm won't give the
hythread library if the class lib hadn't requested it.
The classlib builds it's own copy of the hythread library, so there is
no need for a compatible VM to rebuild it or
Hi Tim,
On 7/4/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
I'm not sure it is just a name clash problem - drlvm won't give the
hythread library if the class lib hadn't requested it.
The classlib builds it's own copy of the hythread library, so there is
no need for a
I didn't find the exact reason why this happens, looks like a drlvm ant
scripts work differently.
It could be a side effect of the recent adoption of DRLVM build for
classlib binaries. The trick is that drlvm should put it's own
hythread library into the deploy JRE.
Before that change drlvm
On 3 July 2006 at 15:14, Andrey Chernyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I didn't find the exact reason why this happens, looks like a drlvm
ant scripts work differently.
It could be a side effect of the recent adoption of DRLVM build
for classlib binaries. The trick is that drlvm should put
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
I didn't find the exact reason why this happens, looks like a drlvm ant
scripts work differently.
It could be a side effect of the recent adoption of DRLVM build for
classlib binaries.
Most likely. :)
The trick is that drlvm should put it's own
hythread
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 3 July 2006 at 15:14, Andrey Chernyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(a) Do a quick-fix in build.xml / deploy.copy_classlib target - add a
filter which will will exclude hythr from copying;
(b) More graceful fix - split the process.components target in
build.xml into
On 7/3/06, Mark Hindess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3 July 2006 at 15:14, Andrey Chernyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I didn't find the exact reason why this happens, looks like a drlvm
ant scripts work differently.
It could be a side effect of the recent adoption of DRLVM build
for
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
(a) Do a quick-fix in build.xml / deploy.copy_classlib target - add a
filter which will will exclude hythr from copying;
Verified.
The Andrey's suggestion worked out (patch below).
To make the smoke tests pass on Linux I had to further apply more patches:
* fix
On Monday 03 July 2006 22:12 Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
(a) Do a quick-fix in build.xml / deploy.copy_classlib target - add a
filter which will will exclude hythr from copying;
Verified.
The Andrey's suggestion worked out (patch below).
To make the smoke tests pass
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
I'm not sure it is just a name clash problem - drlvm won't give the
hythread library if the class lib hadn't requested it.
The classlib builds it's own copy of the hythread library, so there is
no need for a compatible VM to rebuild it or provide it.
VMs are free to
On Friday 30 June 2006 21:39 Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Zakirov, Salikh wrote:
By the way, there are some other issues with current state of DRLVM,
as the following smoke tests (run by 'build.sh test') fail on
Linux/ia32:
util.DoPrivileged
classloader.LogLoader
15 matches
Mail list logo
