Hi Geir,
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 10:30 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Over time we would like to have more compromises of course.
Just like we compromised with GNU Classpath and added an
exception statement to the GPLv2. If we could get something
similar for the ASL to make it compatible
Hi Geir,
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 06:44 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 7, 2005, at 5:40 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 08:44 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Lets not count our chickens here. The LGPL policy is still in the
works, and may not allow anything but
On Nov 9, 2005, at 5:59 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Geir,
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 06:44 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 7, 2005, at 5:40 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 08:44 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Lets not count our chickens here. The LGPL policy is still
-Original Message-
From: Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Nov 5, 2005 5:09 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: compiling bootJVM with MSVC
Hi Tim,
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 22:29 +, Tim Ellison wrote:
...snip...
Lets make Harmony into that collaborative
Sebastian Hartte wrote:
Enrico Migliore wrote:
Sebastian Hartte wrote:
Hi you two,
I tried a similar thing (using Visual Studio 2005 Professional). The
empty structs are still an error in that compiler version (What do you
need empyt structs for anyway? Allocation a zero byte memory region
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Nov 9, 2005 11:07 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: compiling bootJVM with MSVC
Sebastian Hartte wrote:
Enrico Migliore wrote:
Sebastian Hartte wrote:
...snip...
For a win32 pthread
On Nov 7, 2005, at 5:40 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Geir,
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 08:44 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Lets not count our chickens here. The LGPL policy is still in the
works, and may not allow anything but limited-time optional
dependencies, and no re-distrubution of
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Tim,
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 22:29 +, Tim Ellison wrote:
It is worth noting that many of us are here specifically due to the
terms of the ASL
When we started our harmony collaboration project half of the people
signing the announcement were from projects that
On Nov 5, 2005, at 5:40 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Matt,
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 06:57 -0800, Matt Benson wrote:
Shouldn't more care to be taken RE pointing people to
LGPL resources on this list as the compatibility
issues between the LGPL and Apache licenses are AFAIK
still unresolved?
Hi Matt,
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 06:57 -0800, Matt Benson wrote:
Shouldn't more care to be taken RE pointing people to
LGPL resources on this list as the compatibility
issues between the LGPL and Apache licenses are AFAIK
still unresolved?
There is no problem combining ASL and LGPL into a
Enrico,
Did Tim's comment help? Did this resolve it?
Have you had any other porting issues in either
compilation or configuration? I would like for us to
keep up with these sorts of issues because it would
be great if we could support MSVC as one of the
development _and_ target type
Hi you two,
I tried a similar thing (using Visual Studio 2005 Professional). The
empty structs are still an error in that compiler version (What do you
need empyt structs for anyway? Allocation a zero byte memory region
doesn't make much sense to me).
But i also run into problems with pthread.h
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: compiling bootJVM with MSVC
Hi you two,
I tried a similar thing (using Visual Studio 2005 Professional). The
empty structs are still an error in that compiler version (What do you
need empyt structs for anyway? Allocation a zero byte memory region
doesn't make much sense to me
Enrico Migliore wrote:
Enrico,
Did Tim's comment help? Did this resolve it?
Have you had any other porting issues in either
compilation or configuration? I would like for us to
keep up with these sorts of issues because it would
be great if we could support MSVC as one of the
That seems to be a reasonable explanation. And I don't see
any problem if it's changed to look more like C. ;-)
bye,
Sebastian
Mika Miettinen wrote:
Enrico Migliore wrote:
Right now I got some problems which I'm planning to solve during the
weekend,
here are two examples:
Enrico Migliore wrote:
Sebastian Hartte wrote:
Hi you two,
I tried a similar thing (using Visual Studio 2005 Professional). The
empty structs are still an error in that compiler version (What do you
need empyt structs for anyway? Allocation a zero byte memory region
doesn't make much
Sebastian Hartte wrote:
Hi you two,
I tried a similar thing (using Visual Studio 2005 Professional). The
empty structs are still an error in that compiler version (What do you
need empyt structs for anyway? Allocation a zero byte memory region
doesn't make much sense to me).
But i also run
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 4, 2005, at 5:07 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
Enrico Migliore wrote:
I'm not much familiar with InstallShield scripts and honestly I'd
prefer
to dedicate
my spare time to work on the source code side (C is my daily bread).
FWIW I spent literally a couple
--- Enrico Migliore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a win32 pthread implementation, try this:
http://sources.redhat.com/pthreads-win32/
There are two libraries I downloaded this one:
pthreadVC2.lib
Shouldn't more care to be taken RE pointing people to
LGPL resources on this list as the
--- Enrico Migliore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a win32 pthread implementation, try this:
http://sources.redhat.com/pthreads-win32/
There are two libraries I downloaded this one:
pthreadVC2.lib
Shouldn't more care to be taken RE pointing people to
LGPL resources on this list as
Thanks for pointing that out Matt. It is worth noting that many of us
are here specifically due to the terms of the ASL, and of course the
project could not exit the incubator with dependencies upon
ASL-incompatible code. [1]
Regards,
Tim
[1]
21 matches
Mail list logo
