Oh it's much worse than that, at least nowadays, for some people. It's not
something that you can turn off, everything is going to be bad for a long
time and it will get worse before it gets better.
255:0:0 means the reddest red. But my wide gamut monitor's reds are like
50% redder than yours (an
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:03:26AM -0700, Joshua Rodman wrote:
> It seems hateful for yoru mail client to decide it needs to mail
> itself, and it would be hateful if it decided to arbitrarily remove
> your addresss as well.
I'd settle for a knob: "don't mail myself in group replies".
maybe a f
> I use mutt as well, and regardless of wether I hit 'r' (reply), or
> 'g' (group-reply), no mail is send to myself. The former composes
> a mail to Nicholas directly, the latter a mail to all the addresses
> listed in the 'Mail-Followup-To' header.
>
> Perhaps my mutt is old enough to not cause
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 05:57:04PM +0200, Abigail wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:52:10AM -0700, Joshua Rodman wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:43:03PM +0200, demerphq wrote:
> > > I have to admit that I haven't felt sufficiently hate-inclined to
> > > research whether the hate should be
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:52:10AM -0700, Joshua Rodman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:43:03PM +0200, demerphq wrote:
> > 2009/8/19 Yosef Kreinin :
> > > PS Sort of on topic, the brain-crippled bird of thunder omitted your
> > > address
> > > from the To: list when I hit its Reply button, and
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:43:03PM +0200, demerphq wrote:
> 2009/8/19 Yosef Kreinin :
> > PS Sort of on topic, the brain-crippled bird of thunder omitted your address
> > from the To: list when I hit its Reply button, and to compensate me for it,
> > it listed me instead. I've never seen this befor
2009/8/19 Yosef Kreinin :
> C++ FQA Lite barely scratches the surface. It's based on C++ FAQ Lite which
> for some reason or other contains almost no items on things like overload
> resolution which alone could easily quadruple its size.
I wonder whether this is fallout from the fact that the C+
On 08/19/2009 07:43 AM, Denny wrote:
> You have to name the image {foo}-trans.png, and it won't work on images
> that are being used as a repeated background, but it's a start.
>
> Of course, Javascript can be considered hateful also. And having to use
> it to make image transparency work correct
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 07:34 -0400, Numien wrote:
> You could, of course, leave the PNG background transparent and just have
> the text. That would solve the problem.
>
> Oh, but no! It wouldn't, because a certain major browser in an
> older-but-still-common version doesn't handle that properly.
>
2009/8/19 Yosef Kreinin :
> PS Sort of on topic, the brain-crippled bird of thunder omitted your address
> from the To: list when I hit its Reply button, and to compensate me for it,
> it listed me instead. I've never seen this before and it didn't reproduce
> with other messages I tried; perhaps i
On 08/19/2009 07:23 AM, Yosef Kreinin wrote:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:40:05AM +0300, Yossi Kreinin wrote:
>>
>> Aha. I thought I'd read about this, and it seems I remembered it
>> correctly
>>
>> PNG gamma correction. Top google link is
>> http://hsivonen.iki.fi/png-gam
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:40:05AM +0300, Yossi Kreinin wrote:
Aha. I thought I'd read about this, and it seems I remembered it correctly
PNG gamma correction. Top google link is http://hsivonen.iki.fi/png-gamma/
and explains it how I remembered it. There seem to be severa
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:40:05AM +0300, Yossi Kreinin wrote:
> Alan Amaya wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Yossi Kreinin
> >
> > The color issue is likely due to color correction / gamut mapping. Any
> > recent non-professional wide-gamut monitor will soon leave you wishing
> > it
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:40:05AM +0300, Yossi Kreinin wrote:
> Alan Amaya wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Yossi Kreinin
> >
> >The color issue is likely due to color correction / gamut mapping. Any
> >recent non-professional wide-gamut monitor will soon leave you wishing
> >it wasn
On 19/8/09 09:40, Yossi Kreinin wrote:
Alan Amaya wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Yossi Kreinin
The color issue is likely due to color correction / gamut mapping.
Any recent non-professional wide-gamut monitor will soon leave you
wishing it wasn't. What is #44ffaa after all, but some
Alan Amaya wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Yossi Kreinin
The color issue is likely due to color correction / gamut mapping. Any
recent non-professional wide-gamut monitor will soon leave you wishing
it wasn't. What is #44ffaa after all, but some hex digits which never
look the same.
16 matches
Mail list logo
