Re: This is why I gave up on Linux desktops

2010-12-26 Thread Peter da Silva
I am missing so many messages in this thread, that I don't know whether someone has already brought up this point. On the Mac, the menu bar does not follow *the mouse*, it follows *focus*. If you use any mechanism (clicking on the window, alt-tab, selecting an app from the dock or a document f

Re: This is why I gave up on Linux desktops

2010-12-26 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 09:46:34 +, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:41:47AM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > > > That seems like a solution at first thought, doesn't it? But the > > menu bar is at the top of the screen. The pointer is often far > > away. A straight line fro

Re: This is why I gave up on Linux desktops

2010-12-26 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:41:47AM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > That seems like a solution at first thought, doesn't it? But the > menu bar is at the top of the screen. The pointer is often far > away. A straight line from the pointer to the menu bar will cross > windows of other applicatio

Re: This is why I gave up on Linux desktops

2010-12-26 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* Nicholas Clark [2010-12-26 08:20]: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:15:03PM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > > The point is that it does not work in the *general case*, > > because a confluence of UI and API choices means that > > applications *may* crash under FFM, because of how the menu > > ba

Re: This is why I gave up on Linux desktops

2010-12-26 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:15:03PM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > The point is that it does not work in the *general case*, because > a confluence of UI and API choices means that applications *may* > crash under FFM, because of how the menu bar works. You can list > exceptions to the rule (i