Hi,
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:46:19PM +0300, Yossi Kreinin wrote:
This mail was sent via Mobileye Mail-SeCure system.
Fully on-topic :-)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering -
On Jun 25, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:46:19PM +0300, Yossi Kreinin wrote:
This mail was sent via Mobileye Mail-SeCure system.
Fully on-topic :-)
Why, is SeCure worse than SeDisease?
Josh
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:06:17AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
I don't know the actual Mobileye software, but the ubiquitous insertion
of this mail has been sent from my xxx-phone and such things is enough
reason for hate
When sent from a phone, I can understand it. Jesse Vincent's
On Jun 26, 2010, at 3:16 AM, Peter Corlett wrote:
On 26 Jun 2010, at 10:35, j...@jameslaver.com wrote:
I do hate blackberries though, especially when used in expensive
restaurants.
They're nice enough in tarts and other desserts. The device known
as a Blackberry should also be fed to the
On 2010-06-26, at 04:06, Gert Doering wrote:
I don't know the actual Mobileye software, but the ubiquitous insertion
of this mail has been sent from my xxx-phone and such things is enough
reason for hate
Yes yes yes yes yes!
On 2010-06-26, at 05:31, Joshua Juran wrote:
P.S. This message was sent while wearing a Microsoft Office:mac 2004 t-shirt.
This message was sent in my underpants.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/26/10 5:12 PM, Peter da Silva wrote:
This message was sent in my underpants.
Would that qualify as hunting and pecking?
- --
Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick a.k.a. Raccoon Fink
Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development
Blog:
Okay, you make a fair case for including a parenthetical (Sent from my phone
-- pardon my brevity) or such, specifically in those cases that call for it
-- if I take the time to tap out a full response, or my answer was short
anyway, then such a note is superfluous.
Plus, brevity is not a
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 04:12:07PM -0500, Peter da Silva wrote:
On 2010-06-26, at 05:31, Joshua Juran wrote:
P.S. This message was sent while wearing a Microsoft Office:mac 2004
t-shirt.
This message was sent in my underpants.
They seem to have come off en route.
--
Bruce
Bitterly it
Joshua Juran wrote:
On Jun 25, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:46:19PM +0300, Yossi Kreinin wrote:
This mail was sent via Mobileye Mail-SeCure system.
Fully on-topic :-)
Why, is SeCure worse than SeDisease?
Josh
This mail was received via Mobileye
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:03:56PM +1200, Mike Beattie wrote:
Which now confuses me. Have you all become complacent, or are is it
doctor's orders to stop being so miserable in order to try any get
rid of your stomach ulcers?
Too much time spent on hating software to write about it...
Mike Beattie wrote:
it did inform me that there had indeed been
no posts since April.
Which now confuses me. Have you all become complacent, or are is it
doctor's orders to stop being so miserable in order to try any get
rid of your stomach ulcers?
Incidentally, just yesterday I started to
Earle Martin hates-softw...@downlode.org writes:
When it becomes clear that the maintainers of a piece of software have given
up any plans to fix it after it has been broken for a long time, software
moves from hateful to not worth retaining any contact with. As is the case
with the hates
* Matthew King matthew.k...@monnsta.net [2009-06-28 08:05]:
You hate the website so you're unsubscribing from the mailing
list?
It's not a mailing list! It's NOT a mailing list! It's a... well
it looks like a mailing list, walks like a mailing list, smells
like a mailing list, it even
When it becomes clear that the maintainers of a piece of software have given
up any plans to fix it after it has been broken for a long time, software
moves from hateful to not worth retaining any contact with. As is the case
with the hates-software website. So I'm unsubbing. Ciao.
--
Earle
If you're going to accept mail for a list through several alias
posting addresses, you should bloody well filter the incoming
mail for duplicate message IDs. Sending out two copies of every
mail because someone in upthread somehow sent to one address and
also CCed the other is, at best, clumsy.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 01:58:57PM +0200, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
And if you can't do it right, make up your mind and don't accept
mail on two addresses.
The temptation is always strong to reduce it all the way to zero.
--
Richard Clamp richa...@unixbeard.net
* Jarkko Hietaniemi j...@iki.fi [2007-08-12 00:15]:
And to keep on the subject of hate:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack
Of course this isn't new, even though IDN exponentially expanded
the scope of the problem.
See also http://rnicrosoft.com/
Regards,
--
Aristotle
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Jarkko Hietaniemi j...@iki.fi [2007-08-12 00:15]:
And to keep on the subject of hate:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack
Of course this isn't new, even though IDN exponentially expanded
the scope of the problem.
See also http://rnicrosoft.com/
* Jarkko Hietaniemi j...@iki.fi [2007-08-12 15:45]:
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Jarkko Hietaniemi j...@iki.fi [2007-08-12 00:15]:
And to keep on the subject of hate:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack
Of course this isn't new, even though IDN exponentially
expanded the
mircosoft
micnosoft
miorosoft
I knew a Michael Smith in high school. I guess he's fucked then.
He could change his name to something unique like Sting, Prince,
or Megabyte, while he's changing his name anyway.
* Peter da Silva pe...@taronga.com [2007-08-11 06:55]:
I knew a Michael Smith in high school. I guess he's fucked
then.
He could change his name to something unique like Sting,
Prince, or Megabyte, while he's changing his name anyway.
Or maybe Ingy döt Net. :-)
Regards,
--
Aristotle
Abigail wrote:
Just change your name to just 'Yossi'.
Great idea! I must do it fast though, before the other 3 people working with me
and having the same first name hear about it. Maybe I'll use a static IP address
instead, that should avoid these nasty collision problems... except it
On Aug 7, 2007, at 1:33, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Peter da Silva pe...@taronga.com [2007-08-07 03:30]:
smart-arse quotes
There is no such thing as a smart quote. There is only smart
quoting.
Smart-arse quoting deserves no defense. Smart-arse literalism is no
defense.
* Peter da Silva pe...@taronga.com [2007-08-07 12:50]:
Smart-arse literalism is no defense.
Congratulations for having read my mail!
(Specifically the part where I said I wasn't going to get
into that topic.)
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
Dots in email addresses are soo unusual! People who use
them deserve to have their threads inaccessible by anyone else!
And you know what? It’s not the one with a dot in his email
address who suffered the problem, it’s me who wanted to look up
one of his threads.
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:05:48PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis said:
Every single weblog where I've ever left a comment used internal
anchors to make comments linkable individually. That makes the
hates-software permalink pages *the worst* of any blog engine I
have ever seen.
If you send me a list
-register with the same address just
makes the server crap itself and return a blank page. Great, just
great.
So I idly clicked the siesta logotype, and discovered
that there is a SECOND archive:
http://siesta.unixbeard.net/siesta/archive/hates-software/
This one actually has one page per post -- wh
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
So, each poster's thread gets archived under a host named for
their email address. There is no way whatsoever to link to
individual posts on these pages; only entire threads get an
address. Just great!! Who needs links anyway -- this web
thingamajig is
* Ann Barcomb a...@domaintje.com [2007-08-06 18:55]:
Well, I'm still waiting for my new posts, which are under 'Ann'
to get moved under my nick of choice, 'Kudra' (which is how my
old posts are accessed), which is something I requested right
after we were informed that this information had
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Ann Barcomb a...@domaintje.com [2007-08-06 18:55]:
Well, I'm still waiting for my new posts, which are under 'Ann'
to get moved under my nick of choice, 'Kudra' (which is how my
old posts are accessed), which is something I requested right
after we
On Dec 31, 2006, at 5:23 AM, David Landgren wrote:
Tia Marie wrote:
Yes you. All of you; from A. Pagaltzis to Yoz Grahame it hates
you soo much it wants to keep me from seeing your spamful hatred.
bogofilter doesn't have the concept of whitelists?
Maintaining a whitelist is hateful.
Yes you. All of you; from A. Pagaltzis to Yoz Grahame it hates
you soo much it wants to keep me from seeing your spamful hatred.
bogofilter doesn't have the concept of whitelists?
Not by itself. Bogofilter looks at an email, and gives back a return
value. It's up to the calling program
Tia Marie wrote:
Yes you. All of you; from A. Pagaltzis to Yoz Grahame it hates you soo
much it wants to keep me from seeing your spamful hatred.
bogofilter doesn't have the concept of whitelists?
How hateful.
--
hope still, a little resistance always maybe stubborn tiny lights vs.
Yes you. All of you; from A. Pagaltzis to Yoz Grahame it hates you
soo much it wants to keep me from seeing your spamful hatred.
Or maybe Bogofilter thinks he is doing my mental health a favour by
keeping all of the hate from my innocent eyes (We shall forget the
fact that I have opted to
36 matches
Mail list logo
