[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1001) DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK

2010-11-19 Thread Eli Collins (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12933735#action_12933735 ] Eli Collins commented on HDFS-1001: --- Unit test results look the same as trunk before the

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1001) DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK

2010-05-10 Thread bc Wong (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12865828#action_12865828 ] bc Wong commented on HDFS-1001: --- Note that this change does not increase the client read

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1001) DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK

2010-05-10 Thread Eli Collins (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12865936#action_12865936 ] Eli Collins commented on HDFS-1001: --- bq. Another way to fix this bug is to make the client

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1001) DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK

2010-04-29 Thread Eli Collins (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12862370#action_12862370 ] Eli Collins commented on HDFS-1001: --- +1 Nice change. Nits: * in DataNode DataNode

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1001) DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK

2010-03-18 Thread Todd Lipcon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12847052#action_12847052 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1001: --- The body of patch looks good to me. But could we

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1001) DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK

2010-03-17 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846574#action_12846574 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1001: - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1001) DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK

2010-03-02 Thread bc Wong (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12840314#action_12840314 ] bc Wong commented on HDFS-1001: --- Can you verify that the test fails properly if the change to

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1001) DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK

2010-03-02 Thread Todd Lipcon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12840316#action_12840316 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1001: --- bq. The test fails if I verify the opposite. But

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1001) DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK

2010-03-02 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12840331#action_12840331 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1001: - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1001) DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK

2010-03-01 Thread bc Wong (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12840048#action_12840048 ] bc Wong commented on HDFS-1001: --- I have a patch. But I can't assign this issue to myself.

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1001) DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK

2010-03-01 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12840051#action_12840051 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1001: - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1001) DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK

2010-02-26 Thread Todd Lipcon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839021#action_12839021 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1001: --- Testing this is a bit difficult. I think the one

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1001) DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK

2010-02-25 Thread Todd Lipcon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838242#action_12838242 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1001: --- This is a bug on the datanode side, right? The tests