For the record, I only said it was deramati as a joke, not implying it is the
same rule
From: Heb-naco On
Behalf Of Shinohara, Jasmin via Heb-naco
Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 2:37 PM
To: Galron, Joseph ; Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] קלוקלים
External Email Warning
e category. Hence, ḳeloḳlim, not: ḳeloḳelim or
ḳloḳlim (from: ḳeloḳel).
Thanks, Jasmin
From: Heb-naco On
Behalf Of Galron, Joseph via Heb-naco
Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 1:41 PM
To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] קלוקלים
I agree with Barry – it should be Kel
Authority Funnel
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] קלוקלים
Hi, Jasmin,
The rule seems to be that if in the singular base word the letter in question
has a vowel underneath it, then, in the plural
the sheva is a sheva na. So, since the sing. is kelokel, with tsere under the
kof, then the plural should be
Name Authority Funnel
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] קלוקלים
Hi, Jasmin,
The rule seems to be that if in the singular base word the letter in question
has a vowel underneath it, then, in the plural
the sheva is a sheva na. So, since the sing. is kelokel, with tsere under the
kof, then the plural should
: [Heb-NACO] קלוקלים
Hi Jasmin,
In biblical Hebrew grammar, the sheva under the second kof would be a vocal
sheva. Because a vav holem is a long vowel, the syllable kof vav holem is an
open syllable so the second kof is the beginning of the next syllable and
therefore the sheva is a vocal
-naco
Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 6:01 PM
To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
Subject: [Heb-NACO] קלוקלים
External Email Warning: This email originated from outside the Broward County
email system. Do not reply, click links, or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender’s email address (not
Hi Jasmin,
In biblical Hebrew grammar, the sheva under the second kof would be a vocal
sheva. Because a vav holem is a long vowel, the syllable kof vav holem is an
open syllable so the second kof is the beginning of the next syllable and
therefore the sheva is a vocal sheva. I don’t know if t
המילה היא ריבוי של קְלוֹקֵל - קְלוֹקְלִים
כך אצל אבן שושן וברב מילים
מצורף צילום מאבן שושן
מאת: Heb-naco בשם Shinohara, Jasmin via
Heb-naco
נשלח: יום שלישי 08 פברואר 2022 01:00
אל: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
נושא: [Heb-NACO] קלוקלים
Hi, all
Hi, Jasmin,
The rule seems to be that if in the singular base word the letter in
question has a vowel underneath it, then, in the plural
the sheva is a sheva na. So, since the sing. is kelokel, with tsere under
the kof, then the plural should be kelokelim.
See:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://
Hi, all,
The above is found in a couple titles by Toviyah Rubner (and is cited from him
in the E.-Sh. entry for word). It has historically been romanized as
ḳeloḳelim. My question is, why is the sheva under the second kof romanized as
though it were a vocalized sheva? As a sheva merahef, woul
10 matches
Mail list logo