Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] No, but I guess I inferred it from your demeanor. :D --Ozz -- Original message -- > On 10/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Sorry sv_maxunlag 0.150 > > > > I was tired > > np. :) > > > But I haven't seen anyth

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

On 10/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry sv_maxunlag 0.150 > > I was tired np. :) > But I haven't seen anything that states it must be an even integer James... ? Did I suggest such? ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list p

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Sorry sv_maxunlag 0.150 I was tired But I haven't seen anything that states it must be an even integer James... --Ozz -- Original message -- > On 10/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > -- > > [ Picked text/plai

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

ult > > > is like forcing everyone to cl_updaterate 20; cl_cmdrate 30 to combat rate > > > exploitation. It's screwing over the people who do use the best setting, > > > 1/.01, or in the case of rates, high rates such as 101/100. > > > > > > >

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

On 10/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > sv_maxunlag 150 should help those effects. I have yet to experience a bad > game on a server where I ping over 100 (i usually ping 110-120 to these > distant servers) like CoJ and

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

screwing over the people who do use the best setting, > > 1/.01, or in the case of rates, high rates such as 101/100. > > > > > > -Grant. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Whisper > > Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 10:18 PM > > S

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] sv_maxunlag 150 should help those effects. I have yet to experience a bad game on a server where I ping over 100 (i usually ping 110-120 to these distant servers) like CoJ and ESD (in germany). I am in Delaware -East Coast USA- and as far as

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Does anyone remember the wwcl config check/lock And if so, does anyone here know of a way to implement this into a Source mod?? i.e. Day of Defeat (to be specific ;) ). This is your answer to the cl_interpolate, cl_interp and cl_predict exp

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

gt; 1/.01, or in the case of rates, high rates such as 101/100. > > > > > > -Grant. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Whisper > > Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 10:18 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds] cs:s is full

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

the case of rates, high rates such as 101/100. > > > -Grant. > > > > -Original Message----- > From: Whisper > Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 10:18 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters > > BTW, if it was up to me, I'd force cl_interpolate 1 & c

RE: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

riginal Message- From: Whisper Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 10:18 PM Subject: Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters BTW, if it was up to me, I'd force cl_interpolate 1 & cl_interp 0.1 on Source for ALL players, I play with those settings and I get plenty

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Yes I have those binds Funnily with high rates, I rarely seem to get kills on people who have disappeared off my screen. When I say rare, I mean, I have to wrack my brain to come up with an example, but it would be disingenous of me to say it nev

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

On 10/13/05, Whisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > There appears to be a bug/exploit at the moment that allows people to set > their cl_interpolate to 0 but then set their cl_interp higher and the server > still counts the cl_interp value. I k

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] There appears to be a bug/exploit at the moment that allows people to set their cl_interpolate to 0 but then set their cl_interp higher and the server still counts the cl_interp value. Those are the guys who keep shooting you after you have run a

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

On 10/13/05, Whisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > Well my point was, there are some what are in retrospect quite easy to > detect/block cheats out there. No, it looks easy, thats my point :) You are looking at it from a purely geometic point

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Well my point was, there are some what are in retrospect quite easy to detect/block cheats out there. If a cheat has to normalise itself to the level where it plays as well as a normal human, well it almost defeats the purpose of using cheats in

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

even if you did try to track that, anyone with a knowledge of animation can extract one of the many "naturalising" algorithms to get smooth and "human-esque" movement, at least in terms of bell-curve distributions (the fundamental being, how random is a human? ;-). this will increase processing a b

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

gt; the CAL League Admins. > Most cheat authors are in the top ranks of CAL in case that gives you a > clue. > > cheat talk is useless. > Playing in league matches is also useless. > > Play for fun, not for glory. Better that way. > > > Original Message --

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I think a major problem is, there are no clear cut examples of what cheats look like in first person when viewing and demoing them eg. This is the XQZ Aimbot This is HLH No Recoil This is a good example of a wallhack etc etc We have seen a no

RE: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

The vast majority of our bans result from TKers or racists. -Original Message- From: Brian M Frain (eternal) Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 12:52 PM Subject: Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters There are a myriad of responses we could throw at you 2: is it possible there are not

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

D]> To: Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 1:36 AM Subject: Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] One of the biggest problems I ran into as a lead admin for a gaming company was the admins themselves. Any time a player came in showing any amoun

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] One of the biggest problems I ran into as a lead admin for a gaming company was the admins themselves. Any time a player came in showing any amount of exceptional skill it was decided he must be cheating. This was despite having multiple anti chea

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I've being playing CS:S pretty much since it was released, and I've rarely ever seen cheats. Perhaps I never notice them or may as an admin they're easier to spot (I'm only a player). -- ___ To unsubscr

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

er > way to leave your mark in the annuls of Half-Life history. :D > > Ray S. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zachary Doherty > Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 10:15 PM >

RE: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

oherty Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 10:15 PM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] It's time for someone to start another CS(or CSS) league. I think we, most of us being admins, should be leadin

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] It's time for someone to start another CS(or CSS) league. I think we, most of us being admins, should be leading the charge( I would be happy to donate my server to this cause); CAL is turning corrupt, therefore, something new is needed. Perhaps t

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] very ture -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

RE: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

ague matches is also useless. Play for fun, not for glory. Better that way. > Original Message ---- > Subject: Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, September 28, 2005 1:34 pm > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com > > -- > [

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Whatever , cs is done , finito -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

It's all about the admins, and clearly you had poor ones. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

RE: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

Its called delayed banning. -- John -- Original Message Follows From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:29:53 EDT -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] There are a myriad of responses we could throw at you 1: this isn't the place for info that has nothing to do with anything. 2: is it possible there are not as many cheaters as you think? 3: Sorry bout your troubles but there are other means of p

Re: [hlds] cs:s is full of cheaters

Congratulations on realising something everyone else did about CS1.3 Really, cheaters are always one step ahead, they'll never be beaten, you just need good admins and to know what to look for. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I have had cs servers