An interesting conversation just popped up on the bf1942 linux server port
list, as Im sure some of you that Ive seen on it already know, but I thought
it would be relevant to hlds, and was curios whether this is implemented, or
has even been considered for the linux hlds server?
BTW, to make
Is it this much trouble with linux?
Gah, I just love FreeBSD then... rock solid...
/Bjorn
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Matthew Watson wrote:
haven't noticed much difference, but don't have many people playing at the
moment.
--On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 9:31 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell
[EMAIL
An interesting conversation just popped up on the bf1942 linux server port
list, as Im sure some of you that Ive seen on it already know, but I
thought
it would be relevant to hlds, and was curios whether this is implemented,
or
has even been considered for the linux hlds server?
[snipp]
Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
what do you guys think? anyone know if this is actually coded into the
linux server? would that be good? bad?
It most probably wouldn't be bad. The question is, would it be any
good. A few years a go most TCP/IP implementations ignored the TOS
field and the same was
When is that stupid CD-Key in use (when the CD-Key is definitely *not*
in use) error going to stop being a problem? It's gotten pretty old
after all these months :(
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or
hello
I have problem !
I cant run HLTV on linux !! , HLDS 3110 , CS 1.5 and addons !
Soft : Linux RedHat 7.3
who can help me
plzzz HELP
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
Man I love when people aren't specific...
What happens when you try?
-
Tyler [TASF]Overkill Schwend
Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors.
Waiting for our enemies to strike us first is as dangerous and
irresponsible as it is an act of ignorance.
Man I love when people aren't specific...
What happens when you try?
ehhh i cant RUN !!
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Man I love when people aren't specific...
What happens when you try?
ehhh i cant RUN !!
Try this command just before you try to run the HLTV again:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
PS. Some people are really weird ;)
--
Martel Valgoerad (a.k.a. Michal Minicki) | Lubie kobiety, bo
we use 8.0 on our dual xeon machine and experience similar problems. We're
looking at debian as the next alternative
- Original Message -
From: Haspers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:32 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Does everyone
the most uptodate version. But i have tried with all versions and Get this
problem with all
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
we use 8.0 on our dual xeon machine and
Yesterday I setup a new 7.3 box with the latest kernel. Same problem. I
reverted to my trusty 2.4.9-34 and things are great again. I know... broken
record, but it works for me (across several machines running P4's, a
celeron, an xp 2100 and a dual PIII). All react the same way. I just have
to
I have a RedHat 7.3 (2.4.18-24.7.x) box (P4 1.9, 512mb ram, SCSI disks)
that experiences WEIRD lag issues (lag spikes) with Day of Defeat 3.1
When I have 13 people in it, and up to 21 people, the spikes are
often and continuous. The processor on the box rarely hits more than
70%
even with 20
I have Intel Nic , redhat 7.2, kernel 2.4.19 and the same problems of perf :
lags and high cpu usage.
Timothy
- Original Message -
From: Rob Poe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:47 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
I have a RedHat 7.3
Does anyone know the proper way to make IPTables log all dropped
packets? I added a rule to LOG all TCP packets just to test out
the logging, and not only to the network and local access lock
up, but the console got flooded with what I assume should have
gone in the logs... IDeas?
-
Tyler
You have to launch klogd with option -c 1
Go in /etc/sysconfig/syslog to fix this and restart syslogd . Logs will stop
flooding your console.
- Original Message -
From: Tyler Overkill Schwend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 5:40 PM
Subject:
Create a new chain where you log before blocking packet.
And then change in your firewall config every rules to jump to this new
chain in place of Blocking...
Timothy
- Original Message -
From: Tyler Overkill Schwend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 20,
Hello Valve,
Would it be possible to add a few configuration options to VAC? As it is,
VAC gobbles an enormous amount of CPU power and makes it completely unusable
on some servers. But, I'd still like to use the global banlist and the
simple cheat detection. Would it be possible to add
Well ym dual AMD 1400+ does More Work than my Dual 2.4ghz Xeon machine with
my current red hat insatll, and it lags worse when it does, Because each of
the servers spike up to 70 % cpus usage randomly
I love AMD chips and will probably be buying ONly amd servers from now on
- Original
Hey, I remember when HL came out and a P3-500 was a 'dream server' for the
damn thing heh
*sigh* where are those 'good'ol' days?!?
~Poof
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 18:29
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
:-/. Guess I'll have to go ahead and try 2.4.19 and see if it makes a
difference.
Justin
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Justin Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
My celeron 400 used to be full 24/7 with 20 players... and everyone pinged
under 20. Now it'll barely handle 10
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Gerry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
Hey, I
So is Valve in league with Intel and AMD? or does counterstrike just do
alot more than it used to?
--On Thursday, 20 February 2003 9:59 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My celeron 400 used to be full 24/7 with 20 players... and everyone pinged
under 20. Now it'll barely handle
Yah, if i recall correctly 1.3 used gobs more cpu than previous versions. I
had to shut down my server b/c of it.
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
So is
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:11:40PM -0500, Justin Mitchell wrote:
Yah, if i recall correctly 1.3 used gobs more cpu than previous versions. I
had to shut down my server b/c of it.
- Multicast spectator added.
- Voice communication added. -- hate it (so much)
I'd say these did it. Not entirely
James Clark said:
- Voice communication added. -- hate it (so much)
I disabled v-comm - didn't seem to have any effect on CPU usage.
-Mad
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
--Original Message-
-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Clark
-Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:18 PM
-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf
-
-
-On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:11:40PM -0500, Justin Mitchell wrote:
- Yah, if i
I run a teamspeak server, which doesn't seem to use up much cpu, the server
shouldn't really have to do any processing on the voice so it shouldn't use
up much cpu I wouldn't imagine. (Bandwidth perhaps)
Matt.
--On Thursday, 20 February 2003 7:27 PM -0800 Mad Scientist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VAC has been the real killer, it drove CPU usage up around 10 - 15% atleast.
Voice comms are ok, But i still use team speak personally.
- Original Message -
From: James Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 3:17 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re:
There's a great little package I used before I learned all I ever wanted
to know about IPTables.
It's called NARC (Netfilter Automatic Rule Configurator).
It's easy to use, it has one main config file where you input all your
settings.
http://www.knowplace.org/netfilter/narc.html
Think of it as
30 matches
Mail list logo
