Hy I tried it on Fedora 64Bit too now, but got the same results.Start is at
230Mb and it's climbig up. Cheers! Szoke
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/
We have the same issue but its only one of our servers that its causing lag.
The servers that is running Fedora as OS is running fine without lag and
as we have munin installed on all boxes we can se that the memory is
freed before it hits the "roof".
On Debian this dont work and when the memo
Sorry my last reply was malformed so i rewrote it send it again. So basically,
it's good that Valve tries to decrease the CPU load but this is just one
side if we are talking about server performance. The other big issue is the
huge memory leak, which is caused by the Source TV, and it can also
2007 23:50
Til: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Emne: Re: [hlds_linux] memory leak in srcds
Are you running any addons? That's a cause of accelerating ram usage.
if this is a linux box..you don't have to reboot the whole box...just
restart srcds.
Dennis Overskov wrote:
> This is
Are you running any addons? That's a cause of accelerating ram usage.
if this is a linux box..you don't have to reboot the whole box...just
restart srcds.
Dennis Overskov wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Do anybody know how
At 05:35 PM 2/8/2007, Dennis Overskov wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Do anybody know how to fix that problem?
When I do a top on my server, and can see the memory decrease very slowly.
So after a reboot, there is 1.2 GB
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Do anybody know how to fix that problem?
When I do a top on my server, and can see the memory decrease very slowly.
So after a reboot, there is 1.2 GB ram free, after 12-16 hours it is down to
0.6 G
Has there been a fix for memory leak problem in source, or is it a fake
problem , I looked at all posts I could find with no conclusive results.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valves
On Monday 28 February 2005 12:47, Patrick Landolt wrote:
> quit
> File /home/srcds/hl2/navplace.db was never closed
> File /home/srcds/hl2/navplace.db was never closed
> Memory leak: mempool blocks left in memory: 48
> Memory leak: mempool blocks left in memory: 540
> Mon Feb 28 10:46:28 CET 2005:
PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 28.
Februar 2005
12:34
An: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Betreff: Re:
[hlds_linux] Memory
leak
Patrick Landolt schrieb:
With
the newest version i
get a Memory Leak whil quiting the server with "quit".
Output:
status
hostname:
Title: Memory leak
So starting the server
not as root it will work?
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. Februar 2005
12:34
An: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Betreff: Re: [hlds_linux] Memory
leak
Title: Memory leak
Patrick Landolt schrieb:
With
the newest version i get a Memory Leak whil quiting the server with
"quit".
Output:
status
hostname:
Bullshitter
build
: 2301
udp/ip
: 127.0.0.1:27035
map
: de_dust2 at: 0 x, 0 y, 0 z
players
: 0 (12 m
Title: Memory leak
With the newest version i get a Memory Leak whil quiting the server with "quit".
Output:
status
hostname: Bullshitter
build : 2301
udp/ip : 127.0.0.1:27035
map : de_dust2 at: 0 x, 0 y, 0 z
players : 0 (12 max)
# userid name uniqueid connected ping loss
e /if it is.../ ;)
You can ignore it.
- Alfred
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
InspectorGifts Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 11:05 PM To:
hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: [hlds_linux] Memory leak
This is a multi-part message in
ECTED] On Behalf Of
InspectorGifts Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 11:05 PM To:
hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: [hlds_linux] Memory leak
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
L 02/08/2005 - 23:01:40: server_message: "restart&q
ry 08, 2005 11:05 PM To:
hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: [hlds_linux] Memory leak
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
L 02/08/2005 - 23:01:40: server_message: "restart"
File /home/---/hlds_source/hl2/NavPlace.db was ne
You can ignore it.
- Alfred
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
InspectorGifts Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 11:05 PM To:
hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: [hlds_linux] Memory leak
> This is a multi-part message in MIME for
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
L 02/08/2005 - 23:01:40: server_message: "restart"
File /home/---/hlds_source/hl2/NavPlace.db was never closed
File /home/---/hlds_source/hl2/NavPlace.db was never closed
Memory leak: mempool b
Yeah, setting the heapsize to 512megs might have had something to do with
the high memory usage :)
I wouldn't worry about the memory leak warnings, everyone gets them to my
knowledge. They seem to just me some minor small leak though, nothing that
grows really large. I've never seen my srcds serve
I was able to get rid of the memory leak by removing the startup switch
-heapsize 512000. Server up for 24 hours now and still only at 170MB ram.
But i still get the memory leak error after i quit the server
Memory leak: mempool blocks left in memory: 13
Memory leak: mempool blocks left in memor
Jeremy Brooking wrote:
CS1.6 _NO_ metamod, nothing other than a standard install, 1 32player
server, 1gig of ram, and within 3 days HLDS gets to the point it crashes
due to being out of memory.
Ahh yes...finally...someone who has completely used up memory. Knowing
this, the coders for hlds has a b
Here is a suggestion for you Jeremy Brooking:
read this - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/linuxkernel/
i have, it helps. and it might help you too.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valves
So tell me then, do you know for sure if it is an allocation problem or
is it definitely a memory leak? if so, wher e is the leak coming from?
how can you garnish all this from just seeing memory usage? do you know
a memory leak is ? do you know how linux allocates memory from the
kernel? what
kkith wrote:
m0gely wrote:
Read my posts again. I had a 1.5 server running this same map and it
did *not* happen. Hello? Also what the heck kind of services do you
run that operate by consuming all available memory on a box when they
shouldn't and thats considered "normal"?
BTW 93 hours (3 days)
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Memory Leak - Part III - *No Metamod*
Are you running metamod or anything else?
Glenn Shannon wrote:
I have a dod server.
Fedora Core 2 Linux,
After an uptime of 112 hours, mem
Alfred Reynolds wrote:
Try different GLIBC versions to see how that effects the speed of the
leak.
Unless someone would like to correct me (kama?) this isn't something
that can easily be done. The linux_base-8 is the only Linux compat that
comes with glibc 2.3 (mine is 2.3.2). The other linux bas
Try different GLIBC versions to see how that effects the speed of the
leak.
- Alfred
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of m0gely
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 5:19 PM To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Memory Leak
- Part III - *No
kama wrote:
m0gley, as you probably know I run all my servers on FreeBSD as you are...
When running a no metamod server I do not get any memory leak.
I run linux_base-8 on all servers... FreeBSD 4.X-STABLE... it can run for
month without it eating memory... it sits at aprox 80-90MB after aprox two
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, m0gely wrote:
> kkith wrote:
> > I would suggest, running hlds without metamod until you run out of main
> > memory and see what happens.
>
> What would be the purpose in this? It's eating memory it should not.
>
> > IF the case is that the allocated memory is being used for
Both CS 1.6 and CZ exhibit this behavior. I've seen a CZ server,
completely stock, use over 300megs in under 24 hours. It doesn't always
happen so quickly, but the more active a server is, the quicker it occurs.
It has nothing to do with how many maps in the cycle or even which maps,
it always occ
kkith wrote:
I would suggest, running hlds without metamod until you run out of main
memory and see what happens.
What would be the purpose in this? It's eating memory it should not.
IF the case is that the allocated memory is being used for caching
purposes (like map information)
First of all its
richy wrote:
Cron restart your server every morning.
Doesn't fix it but it is a fix for it. (If you get my meaning)
You think i don't do this now? C'mon think a little harder than this.
The purpose of this email is so I *don't* have to do this anymore.
--
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
Q2
I have the same problems with my 1.6 servers. However, I have not ran
the server without metamod.
Are we sure it is a memory leak? Is it possible that hlds does allocate
memory and uses it as some sort of cache?
I would suggest, running hlds without metamod until you run out of main
memory and se
Cron restart your server every morning.
Doesn't fix it but it is a fix for it. (If you get my meaning)
Regards
Richy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of m0gely
Sent: 26 August 2004 22:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] M
It's been a couple months since I last posted and now I have ran my
server without even Metamod. While the memory usage appears to be a
little better it's still not right. To recap:
CS 1.5 server Iceworld 24/7 - 12 player
Mods: MM 1.17, AMX 0.9.8a, WebMod .47, HLG 1.52
Mem usage: 310M after *90+ d
Ever since the patch last time it has caused all the servers that I am
hosting to drain memory very quickly. Once all memory is drained and
paging/swap files are huge in size the cpu usage goes up to like 95-100%
load ( probably trying to make up for the lack of memory ). Servers are
averaging 50-7
After the recent Steam updates I've seen a big increase in memory usage
and footprint is almost 3x the normal.
This server has been running for 24 hours with an average load of 11
players.
(snippet from top under FreeBSD)
203M 195M RUN519:49 37.01% 37.01% hlds_amd
The CPU usage is acceptable
Nothing wrong there 220Mb is quite normal not memory leak
to speak of.
Steve / K
"Brian A. Stumm" wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, m0gely wrote:
>
> > 1.6 'stats' after 18 hours
> > [MM1.17p6 and NSV1.21 only]:
> > ---
> > CPU InOut Uptim
--- MPCM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was trying to find working 32 player maps, do you have any or know
> a
> place where I could working maps? Some places claim to have them, but
> for 4 different assault maps all hit a 20 player limit on my 32
> player
> test box. Running tfc at the moment,
I was trying to find working 32 player maps, do you have any or know a
place where I could working maps? Some places claim to have them, but
for 4 different assault maps all hit a 20 player limit on my 32 player
test box. Running tfc at the moment, but cs was much more popular.
--
MPCM
Andrew A. C
My top "record" is 1.3 gigs used by one instance of hlds, it's obviously
related to the playercount, since empty servers never see much usage.
- Sindre
>= Original Message From "Andrew A. Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =
>Hello-
>Is there still a bad memory leak in the Linux HLDS server?
>
>xx
It will be all the plugins you are probably running.
I have not seen default servers use more than 100mb.
James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew A.
Chen
Sent: 19 February 2004 01:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] memory
Yes :)
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew A. Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 6:08 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] memory leak
> Hello-
> Is there still a bad memory leak in the Linux HLDS server?
>
> xxx
Hello-
Is there still a bad memory leak in the Linux HLDS server?
xxx 11862 24.7 17.2 185096 178276 ? R08:27 113:51 ./hlds_amd
This is after 7.5 hours. It'll happily grow to 300MB+ if it continues
running. This is relatively busy 32 player server.
---
Andrew A. Chen
Divo Networks
swap
Valve i hope you look in to this asap.
Regards
Daniel aka Fall
Swedish Maffia Community
- Original Message -
From: "Sindre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:41 PM
Subject: [hlds_linu
copy/paste:
20491 sindre20 0 646M 515M 4712 R93.5 25.5 2237m hlds_amd
that's 646mb memory usage, up from 100-150, and while we're at it, 93.5%
cpu-use on an athlon MP2800+, which means unplayable server-fps.
could alfred (or anyone else from valve of course) just respond with a simpl
have 128 or 512 MB of RAM.
//Rentz
-Original Message-
From: m0gely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 2 december 2002 22:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] memory leak
Florian Zschocke wrote:
> Alfred wrote:
>
>>That 230mb is
>>probably from the VM s
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 14:39, SQLBoy wrote:
> I don't get that app. I mean, why would an admin put that up?
Why knows, perhaps to get a quick look at system status from a location
thats locked out of ssh? *shrug*
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list prefe
I don't get that app. I mean, why would an admin put that up?
On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 19:37, Mad Scientist wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 06:29:01PM +0100, Kelly Koomans wrote:
> >>> | Sys status: http://cs.o8s.net/system/?template=aq
>
> > On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 10:44, Børge Amundsen wrote:
>
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 13:37, Mad Scientist wrote:
>
> Step 1 in hacking: Reconnaissance. Look at all the great info given away on
> that page.
>
[root@tightass halflife]# ftp localhost
Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1).
220-=(<*>)=-.:. (( Welcome to PureFTPd 1.0.12 )) .:.-=(<*>)=-
[root@tight
since you
noticed this memory leak.
kev
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Capriotti
->Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:21 AM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] memory leak
->
->
->metamode
6 AM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject: [hlds_linux] memory leak
->
->
->Has anyone experienced memory leaks so far ?
->
->I explain: Yesterday I installed another 128 MB of ram on a server, sonce
->it was using off of the RAM I had.
->
->In the begining it ran fine with 120 M
nope. what addons do you have installed? build? linux emulation?
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Capriotti
->Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:26 AM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject: [hlds_linux] memory leak
Has anyone experienced memory leaks so far ?
I explain: Yesterday I installed another 128 MB of ram on a server, sonce
it was using off of the RAM I had.
In the begining it ran fine with 120 MB of free ram.
After 7 hours running HLSD all I had left was about 5 MB or so.
I restarted the server,
1 12:02 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Memory Leak?
YES! i use C and it segfault!!!
02/11/01 0:29:33, "[AF]|[ Vudumen ]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>I'm using 1.3b and I think I will not update to beta c. You told too much
>negative things about it. Now with 1.3b I d
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Bryan Socha wrote:
>
> welcome to hlds.. you'll also notice your pings going up to match the
> memory waste... I have a cerimonial reboot to help keep this in control
>
Ya know .. I _swear_ I thought that was the beta server. What happens
with me is as a match goes on (le
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:05 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Memory Leak?
> I've tried removing AdminMOD and it does not correct the problem. I
switched
> to beta c in an attempt to fix the problem, but to no avail. Now, I am
using
> top to determine my
ECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Memory Leak?
I'm using 1.3b and I think I will not update to beta c. You told too much
negative things about it. Now with 1.3b I don't have too much problems about
the memory. It stays about 75 MB everytime. (1.1 sometimes was 130 MB or
more).
An idea. Try re
linux
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:11 AM
>Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Memory Leak?
>
>
>> /me is just running a previous version of HLDS that doesn't have this
>> problem
>>
>> Bryan Socha wrote:
>>
>> >
hlds going all over the place again.. it
>> keeps it clean... I'm trying to just do a cerimonial killall time to time
>> now..
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 5:56 PM
ent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Memory Leak?
>
>
> I'm using 1.3b and I think I will not update to beta c. You told too much
> negative things about it. Now with 1.3b I don't have too much
> problems about
>
at causing the leak.
Voodooman
- Original Message -
From: "Sysop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mirror.valve.hlds_linux
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:11 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Memory Leak?
> /me is just running a previous ver
gt; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 5:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Memory Leak?
>
>
> ewww rebooting linux? I thought we only did that for hardware and kernel
>
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Memory Leak?
ewww rebooting linux? I thought we only did that for hardware and kernel
updates...
But anyways back to the matter at hand I havnt noticed much in the way of a
leak but i did notice a gain in usage off the bat but it holds steady.
- Original Me
64 matches
Mail list logo
