Anyone who wants set a mani webshortcut to this or rip the pictures is
more than welcome.
You'll probably want to jump straight to 2.html
www.unics.co.uk/help
www.unics.co.uk/help/2.html
Also, make it an advert so people that don't read the motd might read the
advert.
__
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
This is only for source.
Jani, I don't think that telling Valve that you're going to shut down your
servers is going to convince them to revert the changesplus 3/4 of
people will set the restrict value to 0 anyway, which would effectively
"fi
is this only for source? It doesn't affect 1.6?
Jani Tiira wrote:
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Since we aren't going to give up zBlock or CVAR-X our server have now been
empty two days. If this keeps up we'll close shop.
--
___
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Since we aren't going to give up zBlock or CVAR-X our server have now been
empty two days. If this keeps up we'll close shop.
--
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ghost
> Sent: 17 November 2006 23:12
> To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Counter-Strike: Source and Source Engine Update
> Released
>
> Valve - instead of ignoring us, can you give us some insight? Can you
Don't forget the 64 bit and dual core support!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ghost
Sent: 17 November 2006 23:12
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Counter-Strike: Source and Source Engine Update
Rel
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Well put. It sounds like we're in similar standing (re: connections, web
hits, etc.).
It must not be apparent to the development team that the CS:S community is
losing market share to WoW, BF2142, and other multiplayer online games.
VALVe, you've
Valve - instead of ignoring us, can you give us some insight? Can you
say something? Why are you always so silent?
Specifically, I would like to hear your thoughts on:
- Is this update _really_ worth breaking so many mods and server add-ons?
- Why is CS:S not considered good enough for the C
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I believe this was one of those community inspired updates. Like the one
that makes you see how flashed a player gets when you are spectating in
first person. Both updates came out recently after they were disscussed in
the forums. The idea is goo
I simply can not understand, why Valve let us suck EVERY TIME an update
is released?
What is this good for?
Mani is already working on a new admin plugin version, wich will simply
make this IDIOT command useless.
Why cant you guys at Valve just release SERIOUS updates? Do you have so
much tim
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
We have the kiddie admins to thank for this. I too have suffered from admins
who are childish enough to scramble my configs or change my name when they
get killed by me. That's just plain stupid. There should be a test before
you can become a serv
to execute stuff on the client.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Regime
> Sent: Saturday, 18 November 2006 12:52 a.m.
> To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Counter-Strike: Source
_Anything_ that tries to execute stuff on the client.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Regime
Sent: Saturday, 18 November 2006 12:52 a.m.
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Counter-Strike: Source and Source
Question about this update; Which server commands are exactly being
'prevented' by the cvar cl_restrict_server_commands? For instance, would
mani's ma_cexec be made non-functional by that?
Or is this only about things like sv_cheats?
Thanks,
---
Regime
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.livebythegun.com/
14 matches
Mail list logo
