On Dec 12, 2016, at 4:56 PM, james woodyatt wrote:
> I would strongly prefer that we avoid the risks above by using a
> special-purpose subdomain of a gTLD owned by IETF. I don’t really care which
> gTLD we use, and if “arpa” is really the only reasonable choice, then so be
> it. However, I can
That is not an option for this working group. Whether or not it is a good
idea is another topic, but that option is definitely not an option for this
working group, because it is not in our charter. If some other working
group _had already gotten_ such a TLD, then we could talk about using it,
In message <585d7369-28a8-4b6d-be77-c94b42ca4...@google.com>, james woodyatt
writes:
>
> On Dec 12, 2016, at 07:46, Ted Lemon wrote:
> >
> > I'm not in love with this as an end solution, but it has the advantage
> > that the IAB controls .arpa, and so we can get an unsecure delegation
> > right
That is a separate discussion. We can't standardize on a process that
doesn't yet exist.
On Dec 12, 2016 1:59 PM, "james woodyatt" wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2016, at 07:46, Ted Lemon wrote:
>
>
> I'm not in love with this as an end solution, but it has the advantage
> that the IAB controls .arpa, and
On Dec 12, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Ralph Droms mailto:rdroms.i...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> There are two approaches we can take to this. One is to proceed--ask ICANN
>> to do the delegation and see what happens. The other is to take the more
>> expedient, less satisfying approach: use .home.arpa inst
Ted - thanks for posting a clear summary of the situation for WG discussion and
consensus. Two questions in line…
> On Dec 12, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>
> One thing that I think the working group should be aware of, although I don't
> know if this awareness will change anything, i
One thing that I think the working group should be aware of, although I
don't know if this awareness will change anything, is that the situation
with the .homenet allocation is less simple than we would prefer: it's not
really simply a matter of adding .homenet to the special use domain names
regis
