To the users:
Thanks for your replies. I also received feedback directly to my personal
mailbox.
- 3585 works on ppc tiger
- 3585 doesn't work on ppc leopard.
I will temporarily build a tiger Hugin and a Leopard Hugin. Probably tonight
I will make the Leopard Hugin (as the tiger hugin is the curren
Don Holeman wrote:
>
>>> Is there a way to adjust for parallax(?).
>
> An inexpensive alternative to a fancy pano head is the Panosaurus. I have
> one and it works amazingly well.
An inexpensive alternative to a Panosaurus is a
home made head:
http://www.panotools.org/mailarchive/msg/65392#ms
I recently played at getting VERY close shots with my Canon A630,
which will focus down to 1cm.
All (eventually... :-) went well, but the resulting
shot has savage barrel distortion:
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/bugbear33/photo_tech/rule_close.jpg
I normally correct my 35mm images wit
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 13:44, paul womack wrote:
> I recently played at getting VERY close shots with my Canon A630,
> which will focus down to 1cm.
Wouldn't a better subject give you more lines to play with in the
barrel distortion correction? you don't have a lot to base the
optimization on (
Seb Perez-D wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 13:44, paul womack wrote:
>> I recently played at getting VERY close shots with my Canon A630,
>> which will focus down to 1cm.
>
> Wouldn't a better subject give you more lines to play with in the
> barrel distortion correction? you don't have a lot
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 15:04, paul womack wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't a better subject give you more lines to play with in the
>> barrel distortion correction? you don't have a lot to base the
>> optimization on (in particular for large distances from the subject).
>
> You're confusing cause and effec
Nice work. I'll take two.
-Original Message-
From: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com [mailto:hugin-...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of paul womack
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 6:02 AM
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Parrallax (?)
Don Holeman wrote:
>
>>> Is there a w
paul womack wrote:
>
> An inexpensive alternative to a Panosaurus is a
> home made head:
There are a couple home made ones on
http://wiki.panotools.org/Heads#Self_made
if you know more please add...
--
Erik Krause
http://www.erik-krause.de
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~---
**Hi Mac users,
I renamed the "hugin0.8_svn3585_20090118" to
"hugin0.8_svn3585_20090118-tiger" and built a new
"hugin-0.8_svn3585_20090119-leopard".
- The difference between the Leopard version and the Tiger version is in
the autopano process closure. The Tiger version will end in error whe
Hi, the 'Equisolid' and 'Lambert equal area azimuthal' projections
seem to be identical - Is this intended?
--
Bruno
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
Bruno Postle twisted the bytes to say:
Bruno> Hi, the 'Equisolid' and 'Lambert equal area azimuthal' projections
Bruno> seem to be identical - Is this intended?
Hi bruno,
Jim added that projection recently in a rushed patch. I am not sure
the projection is or how it works. I think it was
On Mon 19-Jan-2009 at 17:42 -0500, Daniel M. German wrote:
>
>If equisolid means equal solid angle, then it is semantically
>equivalent to equal area in an azimuthal projection.
It seems that both names are in common use - An equisolid lens
produces equal area photographs, and a lambert equal ar
On Sun 11-Jan-2009 at 22:15 +0100, Benjamin Schnieders wrote:
>
>anyway, since there are so many projections now, maybe we should think
>about ordering them? something like "keeps straight lines", "keeps
>angles", "keeps areas equal" or "mixed", as the architectural
>projection. or are the proj
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:45:11PM +0100, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
> **Hi Mac users,
>
> I renamed the "hugin0.8_svn3585_20090118" to
> "hugin0.8_svn3585_20090118-tiger" and built a new
> "hugin-0.8_svn3585_20090119-leopard".
>
>- The difference between the Leopard version and the Tiger ver
14 matches
Mail list logo
