> > ... I tried again, and it worked beautifully.
Yay! Thank you Carl and Calvin for confirming that this works ( saves
me testing it! ). IMHO the "zenith and nadir include masks" method
would be a useful addition to the Hugin documentation and/or Bruno's
tutorials for full-sphere panos.
> > ...
Masks are recognised by both Enblend and Enfuse, so if you don't apply
your mask to all layers in a stack Enfuse may well produce a set of
intermediate images which are difficult to Enblend (and vice versa).
Enfuse doesn't really recognise "the properly exposed" layer of a
stack the way you and I d
As of version 2011.4, on the Preview tab of the Fast Preview window,
there is a "Background" colour picker ( to the right of the "Gray
Picker"). By default this is black.
On Mar 21, 12:29 am, krome wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a 360 degree pano image width=2880 x height=709
>
> I need to convert it to a
Hi Rockman,
On Feb 4, 3:13 am, "rock...@circleoaks.com"
wrote:
> OK so yesterday i was making 3 panoramas and the first one went good
> the second on however kept crashing wile trying to align the photos.
> so I restarted my computer and tried again and it worked but them when
> i went on to make
Thank you Lukas,
> ... copying enblend and enfuse executable from the older
> build to your current installation should be enough.
Yes that seems to have done the trick; at least on my "awkward.pto" -
testing memory limits obviously requires big projects which takes a
long time ...
> IIRC the re
On Feb 25, 11:44 pm, Bruno Postle wrote:
>
> Another technique would be script creation of the template, e.g. if
> you have a complex layout, or shoot with a robotic head that has
> logging you can then control the whole process.
>
> To do this you need to add a New Control Point Detector in File
Hello all,
I'm having some problems with the Hugin 2011.4 Win32 executable from
the current (Mar 2012) sourceforge download.
I'm getting the "out of memory" process failure with projects which
should be no more demanding than those I had sailing through 2011.2
without problem. Sometimes it's Enfu
Wow ! These examples are amazing. I had no idea that deconvolution
could work so well !
Congratulations Terry - this is a significant achievement !
I can't wait to see what happens when this PSF deconvolution is
applied to the whole image.
If I understand correctly, the pixel-perfect alignment *
On Mar 21, 10:05 am, Peter Suetterlin
wrote:
> Partially, yes. Of course the deblurring would not be done in (rectilinear)
> image space, but even on the sphere the PSF is not constant over the FOV
> (imagine rotation around mage center - or am I overseeing something?). And
> what is with obje
May I suggest an experiment ?
1. Take a RAW file and convert it -- so that the whole DR is included
-- into a single TIF . ( In order to get the whole DR into the TIF,
you will have to flatten the global contrast. )
2. From this TIF, manually create a +2EV TIF and a -2EV TIF, so you
now have a se
Pit, are we talking about the lens distortion and rectilinear
projection peculiarities ? I was hoping that Hugin's ( Fulla & Nona )
lens modelling would be sufficient to 'remove' these obstacles prior
to / during deconvolution ?
:-J
On Mar 20, 4:24 pm, Pit Suetterlin wrote:
> Erik Krause wrote
Hi all.
I get really annoyed when my beautifully sharp panorama is sullied and
spoilt by a bit of camera-motion-blur in just one or two of the source
images
... :-(
My ( innumerate ) understanding is that motion blur can be corrected
by a) modelling the motion effect as a Point Spread Function [0
I agree : +1 revert to "old behaviour".
The "Identify" function does highlighting much better.
"Displayed images" button 'rollover to hide' is a convenient little
additional feature.
:-J
On Mar 11, 9:47 pm, Carl von Einem wrote:
> Reminds me ofhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/730834
>
> S
Bruno, with a heavy heart, I must disagree.
On Mar 10, 11:45 pm, Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Thu 10-Mar-2011 at 05:15 -0800, Jeffrey Martin wrote:
> ...
> As we say, it doesn't do photometric optimisation it just reads the
> EXIF EV values.
But it then interpolates "photometric values" by combini
Thank you, Thomas, for the pointers. So it's just a GUI problem, not a
bug.
The uncorrected preview requires explicitly setting EV=0 in two
places : first on the Cam/Lens tab ("reset" button) and on the Preview
tab ("mean exposure" button). Doing one without the other, or typing
"0" into the prev
Jeffrey, Bart and gurus,
I checked Jeffrey's dog-grave images' [www.vrlog.net/temp/dog-
grave-1row.zip] EXIF data in Lightroom3: they all appear to have valid
"Fnumber" and "ExposureTime" values and "ISOspeedRating" = 80. The
original input images are not overexposed. No obvious problems there.
Don't use the "Align" button on the "Assistant tab" ... ever! ;-)
When you want to calculate geometrical corrections use the "Optimise
Now!" button on the "Optimiser tab".
When you want to calculate exposure (photometric) corrections use the
"Optimise Now!" button on the "Exposure tab".
On "Cam/Le
On Mar 5, 11:40 pm, tcorbet wrote:
> John is very knowledgeable and he suggested yaw, pitch, and roll AND
> the tutorial says that we ought also be able to 'skin the cat' by
> letting the software optimize the r, v, d and e parameters. Is there
> a nice article, in lay terms with minimal jargon,
On Mar 5, 11:08 pm, Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Sat 05-Mar-2011 at 22:51 +, James Legg wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 13:55 -0800, JohnG wrote:
> >> Does Enblend use Control Points to help it place "Seams" ?
>
> >No.
>
> >Control points on
Hi all. I'm new here but I already like Hugin. I'm trying to get my
head around how it all fits together. I have just one simple tech
question ( for now ) :
Does Enblend use Control Points to help it place "Seams" ?
I read the Enblend manuals & articles ( http://enblend.sourceforge.net/
) which s
Fellow Alien, I am also quite new to planet Hugin and I completely
sympathise with your confusion.
The most important thing to do is Don't ever hit the Align button on
the Assistant Tab - EVER!
> In particular, while I thought I had it turned off, running another align/
> optimize cycle causes th
21 matches
Mail list logo
