On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:42, cri wrote:
> I've implemented a webpage that retrieve a random photo from flickr
> with tags "hugin" and "360x180" using the phpflickr class [1]. As you
> cans see in the preview [2], it is intended to substitute the current
> header in the Hugin's website.
>
You n
See here:
http://www.panoguide.com/forums/tipsntricks/4554/
and here
http://www.nodalninja.com/forum/showthread.php?4114-Revised-version-of-the-tutorial-quot-How-to-make-a-spherical-3D-panorama-with-a-single-camera-and-a-fisheye-lens-quot
A Google search on 360 stereo panoramas will also help you
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 14:06, Gerald wrote:
> enblend: warning: failed to detect any seam
> enblend: mask is entirely black, but white image was not identified as
> redundant
>
See http://hugin.sourceforge.net/docs/manual/Hugin_FAQ.html
Use --finemask
Cheers,
Seb
--
You received this messa
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 21:54, Seb Perez-D wrote:
> I've noticed a recent change in the behaviour of the fast preview.
>
> When toggling an image on or off in the fast preview, it used to just
> make the image appear. Now the image is highlighted in red until the
> mouse lea
I've noticed a recent change in the behaviour of the fast preview.
When toggling an image on or off in the fast preview, it used to just
make the image appear. Now the image is highlighted in red until the
mouse leaves the image button. This makes comparing the panorama with
or without an image mu
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:41, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 8. März 2011 schrieb Jeffrey Martin:
>> I got this while stitching:
>>
>> enblend: unknown option "-U"
>>
>> strange, I don't have any -U specified for enblend in my prefs.
>
> Of course you have. See " -Users-jeff-Desktop-t-nex..."
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:30, Jeffrey Martin <360cit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At any rate, can I file this as a bug?
If you provide a reproducible testcase and the expected behaviour, then yes!
Cheers,
Seb
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and o
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 18:34, harry van der Wolf wrote:
> So please let us know if you are against dedication in hugin or in
> favor. And if you are in favor of it please mention your person/
> subject/topic for dedication.
I vote against having a recurrent dedication in Hugin.
Cheers,
Seb
--
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 14:29, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Using the combination of
>> make package && sudo dpkg -i
>> is barely better than using
>> make && sudo make install
>
> Naturally I don't follow you here. Installing through package makes it easy
> to deinstall also.
> Ok, maybe it's valid for
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 15:48, Ger wrote:
> Juist built both the latest libpano and hugin from source, still the same
> result.
>
> Running in gdb and hitting ^C yields a stack trace of an amazing 190
> levels deep, but always with the top frame:
>
>> 0xb6e7a92c in wxImage::ShrinkBy(int, int) cons
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:39, Ger wrote:
>
> * On Mon Feb 07 11:16:33 +0100 2011, Seb Perez-D wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:16, Ger wrote:
>> > * On Sun Feb 06 19:05:35 +0100 2011, Ger wrote:
>> >
>> >> It seems that I am doing something w
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:16, Ger wrote:
> * On Sun Feb 06 19:05:35 +0100 2011, Ger wrote:
>
>> It seems that I am doing something wrong using Hugin, but the
>> 'optimize now' button never seems to work for me. The popup appears
>> saying 'optimizing variables', but it never finishes. The Elapsed
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 05:54, Sigma Relief wrote:
> Just a minor request for the GUI on the fast preview feature in
> windows; make the numbered tabs closer together when there are more
> images. [...] Wrapping to a 2nd or 3rd line
> would make identifying images easier as it eliminates having t
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 15:48, Sebastien Perez-Duarte
wrote:
> A much better projection is the Peirce Quincuncial. It is also square,
> but is almost everywhere conformal.
Sorry, I forgot the Wikipedia link!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peirce_quincuncial_projection
--
You received this messag
It apparently is a modified Levenberg Marquardt, using two strategies.
The function is RunLMOptimizer, but it is in libpano, not in Hugin:
http://panotools.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/panotools/trunk/libpano/optimize.c?revision=1297&view=markup
The L-M algorithm is here:
http://panotools.svn.sour
Have you tried optimizing on the field of view of the lens? 360°
should be enough for everyone...
Well, here is a counterexample: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sbprzd/346457104/
Cheers,
Seb
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 13:25, filip wrote:
> Ok I must admit. This is probably a stupid question. Howeve
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 15:06, thePanz wrote:
> I'm stitching 60 images for a stereographic projection. I'm using
> "hugin.win32.5161" from lemur.dreamhosters.com windows build.
Have you tried stitching first to an equirectangular image, then using
this equirectangular to generate the stereograph
Check the following URL:
http://groups.google.com/groups/bounced
Maybe your email address is bouncing, and you have to request that
they try again.
I have the same thing with a Gmail address.
Cheers,
Seb
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 13:39, my_daily_...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
> It is strange, but I do
I would assume that you have the latest version of libpano13, but if
you haven't, my first guess would be this one (I compiled trunk 5071
yesterday in Ubuntu 9.04 without problems).
Cheers,
Seb
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:51, prokoudine
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build rev5071 on Ubuntu 9.10
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 15:14, Rogier Wolff
wrote:
>
> Daisy, the patent free feature detector.
>
We might want to find something a little less common. Although these
softwares are not doing the same thing, it might be better to have
something more unique:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daisy_%28so
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 09:48, thibault.lemaitre
wrote:
> Then, I encounter a problem of extraction with the 7zip version. I'm
> on Ubuntu 9.04 using File Roller to manage my archives. I habitually
> don't encounter problems with the 7zip file format. Am I alone?
Why do you want a Windows build if
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 04:19, Zoran Zorkic wrote:
> Got enblend to stitch a pano 3.6gb big. Yay.
> Can't view it with anything. Nay. :(
> Lost hours, my google-fu has failed me.
>
> Managed to convert it to a PNG but nothing wants to touch it.
>
I have managed to edit this kind of panorama in Li
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:34, T. Modes wrote:
> I implemented a masking tool inside hugin. It's now in the trunk.
This is a great feature. Many many thanks.
One issue I found: if I include two times the same image, there is one
single mask for these two images.
Why would one want to do that? f
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 17:17, Jan Martin wrote:
> No, I didn't try yet.
It's a great way to always have an up-to-date system.
> I am on Ubuntu 9.10
Then the instructions should be pretty straightforward:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Compiling_Ubuntu
Let us know how it goes.
S.
--
You r
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 17:03, Jan Martin wrote:
> While we are at it:
> Is there a Linux build newer than 2009.4?
1) Building in Linux is not very complicated - have you tried?
2) what flavour of Linux are you using?
Cheers,
Seb
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 16:27, Thomas wrote:
> [ ideas about the visualization of control points and distances ]
>
> Aha, I see either again I spoke spanish (optimistic) or you guys just
> didn't like this idea :(
I would be tempted to give the same reply as Lukas, with the current
Hugin trunk and
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 23:05, Joe Templeman wrote:
> I'm just wondering whether its possible to turn off all vignetting
> control since I think that's what's causing it.
On the Camera and Lens tab there is a Reset button. Select all the
images you want to reset first, and tick the Vignetting che
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 21:28, Erik Krause wrote:
> Am 18.01.2010 18:46, schrieb allard:
>
>> I can reproduce this error too. Probably it feeds firefox just the
>> path, without a file:// in front of it.
>
> I can't reproduce it. Could it be this is a setting in Firefox?
In Linux (Kubuntu 9.04),
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:18, allard wrote:
> Good idea. I would like drag and drop even better. Of course it is
> possible, let's see if there's somebody willing & able to put in the
> work..
I second the idea of drag and drop!
Cheers,
Seb
--
You received this message because you are subscri
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 16:10, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> Please never try to compile as root.
> Use e.g.
> make
> sudo make install
Sorry, that should have been clearer (and that is what I do).
Perhaps better, although I don't know if autopano-sift-c is setup in
this way, is
make
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 13:48, Doug wrote:
> I ran "cmake . -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local" in
> ~/downloads/autopano-sift-c-2.5.1/
> then "make"
> then as root "make clean all"
> which did install autopano-sift-c in
> ~/downloads/autopano-sift-c-2.5.1/APSCpp/, but *not* in /usr/local.
> Then I
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 14:32, Ron Decline wrote:
> Still, I suggest that Hugin put the % sign next to the input box, also a
> drop-down menu (from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) in increments of 10) would be
> nice
I think that the quality is not measured in %, it's just a unitless measure.
Cheers,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 18:28, wb wrote:
> Done: dumont.pto and (.mk). This is just after the "Load images..."
> step. If you mean after an additional optimization, I can add that.
You have three wrong control points between images 0 and 3. They are
throwing everything off. Delete them and reop
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 17:46, Warren Block wrote:
> The control points appear to be fine. It's the position of the images
> that is completely wrong.
Thanks for the images!
It would help if you posted the pto file just after optimisation.
Best,
Seb
--
You received this message because you
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 20:49, wb wrote:
> autopano-sift and autopano-sift-C have problems with a panorama of six
> 4000x3000 images. Images end up upside down or twisted, and not
> related to each other at all. panomatic has no trouble with the same
> images.
Is the problem that you cannot fin
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 18:52, Timothee wrote:
>
> That being said, the gimp solution is not so nice for positive
> masking. Then again, neither is the inkscape approach. In both cases,
> we basically have to erase the desired area from all pano layers
> except the current one. That's a lot of bor
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:16, Timothee wrote:
> I'm trying to do a 360 pano with my kids for xmas and they just won't
> stay still, so I definitely will have to do some level of masking.
You can also edit the TIF images in Gimp (or Photoshop), erasing the
bits you don't want. A bit more cumberso
This is in the OpenGL preview, right?
I've seen it happen to me too - but I've never seen that the output
(through nona) is wrong.
Have you tried using the normal preview?
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 15:11, Jeffrey Martin <360cit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I gave Hugin 0.8 2 images - sigma 8mm
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 07:10, Yuv wrote:
>
> I had the same error and fixed it with a couple of new dependencies.
> check the list at
> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Compiling_Ubuntu#Building_Enblend
> if it does not work yet, start from scratch:
>
> cd enblend
> rm -fr *
> hg update --clean
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 06:30, Wirz wrote:
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/../src/enblend.cc', needed by
> `varsenblend.texi'. Stop.
For what is worth, I get the same error in Kubuntu 9.04.
By the way, when I do "hg update" I get a screen with three columns
showing three versions of th
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 06:46, Seb Perez-D wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 00:53, Bruno Postle wrote:
>>>
>>>Can anyone reproduce? (the steps to reproduce are in the bug report).
>>
>> I haven't tried to reproduce, but all this stuff has been heavily
>
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 18:43, Tom Sharpless wrote:
> I think "a new Hugin" should provide only two direct stitching
> targets: cube faces and equirectangular, and let you convert either of
> those to other projections later.
There is however one big usage of Hugin, to generate partial
panoramas
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 00:53, Bruno Postle wrote:
>>
>>Can anyone reproduce? (the steps to reproduce are in the bug report).
>
> I haven't tried to reproduce, but all this stuff has been heavily
> refactored in the layout branch, maybe it is already fixed there.
OK, checking out & compiling.
B
Hi all
I just got bitten by a strange bug, which I described here:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2877384&group_id=77506&atid=550441
Basically, with two lenses and different camera response models, the
output depends on which image is first, which was a surprise to me.
Can any
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 09:58, Bruno Postle wrote:
>
> Is this the case even with the 'Photometrics' button enabled in the
> Fast Preview?
I must say I hadn't noticed this button. Gosh, if a frequent user like
me misses this, I can only imagine how daunting Hugin can look like
for a newbie... ;-)
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 23:54, Bruno Postle wrote:
>
> On Thu 08-Oct-2009 at 17:46 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
>>
>>I recall there was some reason to keep the old preview next to the new
>>one. Is this still the case, or can we forego the old preview and work
>>with the new one only?
>
> The 'old' Pr
And http://www.you3dview.com/video/140/Tikal-Mexico is just the same
panorama as here:
http://mexpedition.blogspot.com/2009/04/tikal-spherical-panorama.html
Of course the quality of the initial image is much better.
I will stop now.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 08:48, Seb Perez-D wrote:
> Also,
itself.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 08:38, Seb Perez-D wrote:
> If you are trying to self-promote that website, at least be upfront about it.
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 08:22, Leo wrote:
>>
>> It said: Free Flash Panorama Hosting like YouTube, Sharing panorama at
>> You3
If you are trying to self-promote that website, at least be upfront about it.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 08:22, Leo wrote:
>
> It said: Free Flash Panorama Hosting like YouTube, Sharing panorama at
> You3DView is as easy as sharing video at YouTube.
>
> Any comments? Good or not?
--~--~-~-
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 03:42, Dale Beams wrote:
> On a side note, using "auto fine tune". Perhaps the problem is there.
> Before it wasn't this slow even with all three options checked.
Adding a control point with auto fine tune takes a reasonable amount
of time on my computer. Linux Ubuntu 9.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 08:38, Carl von Einem wrote:
>
> Uncheck "auto fine tune". I don't
> understand why this option is set as a default. Or why hugin isn't able
> to remember that I normally don't want to use this option.
+1
This is the button I uncheck *every* time I start Hugin.
Cheers,
You remove the folder with the Hguin program? the only thing left is
the keys in the registry, but as a Windows user you might just want to
live with that... The Hugin installation is selfcontained.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 20:35, Mike wrote:
>
> Hi, how do I uninstall hugin, it doesn't show up i
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 15:45, Oskar Sander wrote:
> De-fisheye conversion of a single image should be possible to do using PT,
> right? If there is a writeup on this is somewhere and could I please ask
> for a pointer to it in that case?
Open Hugin, add a fish-eye image, assign the correct in
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 00:09, Bruno Postle wrote:
>
> On Tue 15-Sep-2009 at 06:20 -0700, rok senk wrote:
>>
>>Delete key worked before hugin 7.0 for me, but not since.
>
> Same here, the Delete key hasn't worked in the Control Points tab
> for a long time.
Same here - but it works in the contro
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 16:35, John Isner wrote:
> Here is my most successful result (the notes below the photo give some
> technical details about the setup).
>
> http://www.23hq.com/photogroup/meetthegimp/photo/4948800
>
> As you can see, there are halos on the tiles' top and right edges that
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 15:02, rok senk wrote:
> I compiled hugin recently on Arch linux. For me all shortcuts work,
> except for delete key. I use slovenian keyboard.
For the delete key to work, you have to have selected a control point
pair. I assume this is the case?
--~--~-~--~~
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:57, dex Otaku wrote:
> I haven't tried the linux 0.8.0 yet but last I tried using 0.7.0 there
> [about a month ago] it was the same as under OS/X. [...]
> Another thing I've noticed is the differences in behaviour in the
> control point editor between windows and linux
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 03:26, dex Otaku wrote:
> I noticed the lack of keyboard shortcuts that exist in the Windows
> version [all except the ones listed in the menus] some time ago with
> 0.7.0. Now I'm using 0.8.0 on the Mac at work and it still lacks the
> shortcuts.
Which shortcuts are you
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 17:46, Yuval Levy wrote:
>
> Bruno Postle wrote:
>> I 'think' this is caused by building on a system with the
>> proprietary nvidia driver, it would be useful to confirm this.
>
> I'll only have access to my (Ubuntu) workstation with proprietary nvidia
> drivers in one wee
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 17:47, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 5:02 PM, cspiel wrote:
>> Could give any revision after 33a5cee578f7 a spin? I have changed
>> the way distances are measured in the NFT, which makes the bug
>> go away at least in all of my tests.
>
> Just r
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:49, cspiel wrote:
> Please keep in mind that there is no such thing as an
> "Enblend version 4.0", yet. Currently, we are in a feature freeze
> for the _upcoming_ version 4.0. However, if you are adventurous,
> young, daring, and willing to experiment, keep on test
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 07:38, cspiel wrote:
>
> This is a known problem
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2855277&group_id=123407&atid=696409
Ah well, it sucks. :-( I would then need to figure a way to have both
4.0 and 3.2 installed at the same time.
I tried with --no-op
Hi all
I tried enblend 4 as described on the wiki, in Linux Ubuntu 9.04
x86_64. With a standard equirectangular panorama, I get the following
strange result:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3530/3907886322_4280aa77f6_b.jpg
This is a reduced version of the 1x5000 original.
When I create the im
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 23:03, D M German wrote:
> I have the inverse transformations done. they are described here:
>
> http://turingmachine.org/~dmg/temp/tiltEq.pdf
>
> I am struggling with the inverse ones. If anybody wants to help, I'll be
> grateful. This is the only roadblock to have an alph
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:45, Ad Huikeshoven wrote:
> Yuval asked me to build an installer based on 2009.2 branch in stead of
> trunk. This morning I succeeded in packaging something. It should be up at
> http://hugin.huikeshoven.org/ now.
What would be great is a version of the Installer that do
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 08:48, Elvis wrote:
> And I check my hugin SVN 3478, there is no antipano-sift-c excutable,
>
> but there is a antipano excutable,
>
> I thought builded hugin should call something which was created inside
> the project, but not a ready-made one,
>
> and I found there seems
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 13:15, Zoran Zorkic wrote:
> On Sep 7, 12:45 pm, Seb Perez-D wrote:
>
>> I've read (and I believe it is true) that a very very hard drive is
>> needed - some setups that have been mentioned in PanotoolsNG have
>> several fast drives actin
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:22, Oskar Sander wrote:
> How does an ideal Hugin system look like (for example Windows) going
> forward? I suppose huge amounts of memory is still good, but how does
> other factors rank (i.e. multiple cores, GPU etc)?
I've read (and I believe it is true) that a very
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 17:03, Dale Beams wrote:
> I'd be think it's more liable that Hugin or Image-Exif Tool is not properly
> interpreting the orientation. Something's wrong
This can happen if the EXIF is not recognized. In practice I think it
works. If Hugin complains that the images don't ha
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 15:06, Dale Beams wrote:
> While the issue is the control point error, the bigger issue is that Hugin
> or Hugin's assistant is failing to recognize a photo in the proper position
> and is flipping the photo. Remember I only used the assistant tab for
> loading the photos a
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 13:56, Oskar Sander wrote:
> Did these controll points stand out looking at the list of control points,
> or did you identify these in another way?
>
> I think control point quality the key to many experienced problems
> (including mine!) and ways to help the user quickly id
I have a similar but more automatic approach. I create the pto project
file for one exposure, and then use a custom script to generate the
panoramas for the different exposures. One feature of nona is very
useful: you can pass the names of the images on the command line and
it will use those image
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 11:21, Dale Beams wrote:
> Hugin is flipping photos. You can see that the points are correct, however
> it creates a awkward pano.
>
> http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/2173/screenshot12.png
> http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/3069/screenshot13p.png
Given the large errors, i
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:58, Elvis wrote:
> How to do the whole stitch frome command line ?
You might like to read the thread
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/95d6134fa8eb7b16
Bruno gives the name of the programs for each step. You might also
want to look at the Pa
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 20:35, Seb Perez-D wrote:
> I see the button, when I press it I see the blue lines, but I don't
> see the orange ones.
Oops, my mistake: it's because all my control points were very good.
Sorry about this, and thanks a lot for this feat
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 20:18, James Legg wrote:
> I have improved it and commited it to trunk. svn revision 4277 or later
> will have this feature.
>
> You can see the control points in the fast preview by pressing the 'Show
> Control Points' button.
> Lines appear over the preview with the end p
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 21:15, Stefan de Konink wrote:
>
> - Create control *lines* between two imagines, for example if a
> straight road is available but the photo's are non-overlapping or
> difficult to enter features on. Automatically find lines
> (Houghtransform) or manually enter lines (li
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 16:58, Thomas Steiner wrote:
> BTW: Probably this is true for every image size of any camera, but
> isn't a lossless jepg rotation only possible for images with sizes
> that can be writen as 2^n or multiples? (So a 2x3 pixel images cannot
> be rotated lossless.)
The blocks
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 04:05, Dale Beams wrote:
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.3/ext/hash_set:64,
> from /usr/include/boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp:22,
> from
> /home/user/hugin/src/hugin_base/algorithms/optimizer/ImageGraph.h:34,
>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 13:18, Bart van Andel wrote:
> I've always wondered why this is necessary. I would rather have Hugin
> treat them as the same lens (which it basically is), with the same
> parameters. Everything should be the same, except the image is rolled
> 90 degrees. Why isn't this imp
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 04:56, Nicolas
Pelletier wrote:
> Can I in the GUI know which image is which? so I can separate them back into
> 2 lenses?
Int the image tab you should be able to see the size of the images.
The horizontal and vertical images have the dimensions swapped. Then
it should be
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 03:10, Nicolas
Pelletier wrote:
> Just to confirm, you are running a 64 bit build of APSC. Correct?
> Do you know what was the memory level at which it peaked?
Yes, I build APSC myself in a 64 bit setup, so I imagine it must be a
64 bit build.
Memory consumption was rathe
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 14:35, Nicolas
Pelletier wrote:
> 36 * 15mpx images will blow up after 30-32 images, regardless of the value
> of maxdim. I've used the default of 1600, and tried many values, even down
> to 100. Still an out of memory.
I've just tried with 64 jpeg images, each 10,000x5000
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 23:26, hein wrote:
> Unable to open file '_MG_0172.tif'.
You have of course checked that there is a file called _MG_0172.tif in
the folder where you are running fulla?
Cheers,
Seb
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because yo
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 20:13, Tom Sharpless wrote:
> In short, the reported failures remain undiagnosed. So I am appealing
> to all interested parties to try to create a repeatable case where
> APSCpp runs out of memory.
I ran APSCpp on a set of 104 images, each 3872x2592 (10 Mpix),
full-size w
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 19:47, Manolo wrote:
>
> Do you know if align_image_stack produce equally sized images?
Yes. If not, you can play with the pto file that align_image_stack can produce.
Cheers,
Seb
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because y
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 17:22, Manolo wrote:
>
> Hello,
Hi
> So my plan is to take many such photos, centered in the same star-
> spot, and average them in order to increase S/N ratio. But, because of
> earth rotation, the images will be slighted tilted from one to
> another.
Look at align_imag
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 13:46, Bruno Postle wrote:
>
> If I were stitching gigapixel panoramas (which I'm not), I'd want to
> script the control point generator to only compare pairs of images
> that I already know overlap. To do this I would run 'generatekeys'
> once for each input photo, then r
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 13:26, Tom Sharpless wrote:
> But if nobody uses these files, I don't see any point in ever writing
> them.
The files have proved useful to me in some cases, because you can
reuse the generated files when the matching phase fails (because of
memory issues, etc.).
Of cou
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 16:00, nick wrote:
> Error was "Out of memory".
There is currently an unsolved memory loss in autopano-sift-c.
Alternatives include match-n-shift or the old autopano-complete.sh
> I'll try smaller image, but would this impact the quality/precision of
> the control point g
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 14:37, nick wrote:
> I have a problem with autompano sift as it runs out of memory.
> Memory itself is not the problem as my box has over 8gig. I've also
> looked a consumption as it is processing and it never goes up. It
> seems more likely that the process tops the 2 gig
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 02:09, Benjamin
Schnieders wrote:
> ... i think everything will be fine if i can just reset all settings ;)
> but where can i find that file? (almost crawled through my whole home
> folder now...)
.hugin in your home folder (at least it is in my computer)
Cheers,
Seb
--~
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 14:20, wetinwales wrote:
> It appears that the final image (now very well stitched) is smaller
> pixel size that the original.
> How do I avoid reducing the pixel sizes (as I want to produce a 2-3GB
> file of textiles)
In the Stitcher tab, you will see a button "Calculate o
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:33, wetinwales wrote:
> here is the URL for an example of what is happening:-
>
> http://www.dotrussell.co.uk/nybfinal.jpg
>
You are trying to create a linear panorama. The usual workflow does
not work. Check the links:
http://www.dojoe.net/tutorials/linear-pano/
http://
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:54, wetinwales wrote:
> You must have autoconf installed to compile panoglview.
> Install the appropriate package for your distribution,
> or get the source tarball at http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/
You have to install autoconf:
sudo apt-get install autoconf
or somet
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 17:01, Daf Hobson wrote:
> After I posted it dawned on me to use Synaptic in Jaunty (although so
> often in 8.04Ubuntu, Synaptic came to greif)
> Hugin and it's associated crew installed and seems to be working -
> though the screensavers are very different.
> It looks compl
You seem to have forgotten the instruction to download enblend
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonym...@enblend.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/enblend
co -P enblend
Check that files are created in the enblend folder. You have to cd
enblend after you run the checkout in cvs.
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Co
There is this documentation:
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/docs/html/
You can find a PDF version (May 2009) here:
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/web/hugin-api_2009-04-15.pdf
Good luck !
Seb
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 13:47, Dex wrote:
>
> does it have some documents to help me learning th
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 03:00, James Legg wrote:
> I think the problem has already been diagnosed by Seb as "Hugin
> requiring GLX and VNC not providing it."
But I have seen a screenshot from the original poster showing Hugin
working under what I assumed to be a VNC. I would be interested in
know
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:43, Andrii wrote:
>
> According the making of panorama from 81 photos I see such error
> http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/web/err.GIF
>
> What is mean?
The issue has been diagnosed as a too large output size (75000x75000).
Cheers,
Seb
--~--~-~--~~
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
