[hugin-ptx] Building hugin etc. on Windows in MSYS2 mingw64

2022-03-05 Thread johnfi...@gmail.com
I just finished building a fork of hugin and a fork of libpano13 and unmodified enblend on Windows using MSYS2 / mingw64 I tested barely more than opening an existing project, so there is a good chance some operations won't work because of errors I made in building. I ran into a massive string

Re: [hugin-ptx] building hugin on fedora

2022-01-27 Thread johnfi...@gmail.com
Since I mentioned my problems with trying to start debugging a debug build of hugin, I'll describe the partial answer I've found so far. Maybe anyone else who would try to debug hugin would already know this stuff. But in case that is not true: I think CodeBlocks was failing because the under

Re: [hugin-ptx] building hugin on fedora

2022-01-26 Thread Terry Duell
On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 14:09 -0800, johnfi...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 10:39:36 AM UTC-5 johnfi...@gmail.com wrote: > > I ran make -j16 > Meanwhile I ran system monitor to see that about half my cpu capacity was in > use > > Then my system crashed.  Seemed to be a displ

Re: [hugin-ptx] building hugin on fedora

2022-01-26 Thread johnfi...@gmail.com
On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 10:39:36 AM UTC-5 johnfi...@gmail.com wrote: I ran make -j16 Meanwhile I ran system monitor to see that about half my cpu capacity was in use Then my system crashed. Seemed to be a display driver crash. Maybe there is some problem in building hugin with j16,

Re: [hugin-ptx] building hugin on fedora

2022-01-22 Thread johnfi...@gmail.com
On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 1:27:25 PM UTC-5 bruno...@gmail.com wrote: > The > standard nouveau driver might not have all the top features, but in my > experience it is very stable. > My experience has been very different. Years ago at work, I was using several Centos systems with va

Re: [hugin-ptx] building hugin on fedora

2022-01-22 Thread Bruno Postle
On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 15:39, johnfine2017 wrote: > I got build instructions both from > https://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Compiling_Fedora > and from a recent post by Bruno suggesting > The list of things to install is very different between those two sources. > Is that first one obsolete? The

[hugin-ptx] building hugin on fedora

2022-01-22 Thread johnfi...@gmail.com
I wanted to start this thread, even though I don't have a lot to ask/report yet, because I'll otherwise forget things, and because someone might have some useful feedback on what I have so far. uname -a reports Linux linux 5.15.15-200.fc35.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jan 16 17:37:06 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_6

Re: [hugin-ptx] Building Hugin on OSX 10.9 Mavericks (doesn't work)

2014-06-29 Thread David Haberthür
Ciao Gilbert On 30 Jun 2014, at 07:53, B1tstreamAlpha wrote: > Has anyone else here attempted to build Hugin natively on OSX 10.9 Mavericks? I’ve not *built* hugin on Mavericks, but I’m using Matthieus build of RC4 on it with virtually no problems. You can grab it here: http://sourceforge.net

[hugin-ptx] Building Hugin on OSX 10.9 Mavericks (doesn't work)

2014-06-29 Thread B1tstreamAlpha
Has anyone else here attempted to build Hugin natively on OSX 10.9 Mavericks? I am having a terrible time of it and before I start spewing compiler outputs, I thought I'd ask if anyone else has already made a successful build. Ok technically I've gotten it to *build* after much pain and few hac

Re: [hugin-ptx] Building Hugin with debugging symbols

2012-07-09 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
On 10 July 2012 08:27, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 at 7:53:26 +0200, Luk?? Jirkovsk wrote: >> On 10 July 2012 02:18, Terry Duell wrote: >>> >>> Whoops...that's not right. If building in the topmost dir of a hugin >>> repository, and running cmake at that level; >>> >>>

Re: [hugin-ptx] Building Hugin with debugging symbols

2012-07-09 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 at 7:53:26 +0200, Luk?? Jirkovsk wrote: > On 10 July 2012 02:18, Terry Duell wrote: >> >> Whoops...that's not right. If building in the topmost dir of a hugin >> repository, and running cmake at that level; >> >> " cmake . -DDebug=1" > > It should be "cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_

Re: [hugin-ptx] Building Hugin with debugging symbols

2012-07-09 Thread Terry Duell
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:53:26 +1000, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: It should be "cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug" Yes, you are right. Sorry, I should have checked the CMakeLists.txt for the specific definition and not assumed it would be as per the one example in my rpmbuild spec file. Cheers

Re: [hugin-ptx] Building Hugin with debugging symbols

2012-07-09 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
On 10 July 2012 02:18, Terry Duell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:29:23 +1000, Terry Duell wrote: > > [snip] > > >> " cmake -DDebug=1" >> >> without the "" of course and prepending with ./ if necessary. > > > Whoops...that's not right. If building in the topmost dir of a hugin > repository, and

Re: [hugin-ptx] Building Hugin with debugging symbols

2012-07-09 Thread Terry Duell
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:29:23 +1000, Terry Duell wrote: [snip] " cmake -DDebug=1" without the "" of course and prepending with ./ if necessary. Whoops...that's not right. If building in the topmost dir of a hugin repository, and running cmake at that level; " cmake . -DDebug=1" Cheers

Re: [hugin-ptx] Building Hugin with debugging symbols

2012-07-09 Thread Terry Duell
Hullo Greg, On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:00:30 +1000, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: As you may have noticed, I'm currently having difficulty with the 64 bit version of Hugin under FreeBSD. I'd like to look around inside with gdb, but I don't do cmake, and I can't work out how to compile with debugg

[hugin-ptx] Building Hugin with debugging symbols

2012-07-09 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
As you may have noticed, I'm currently having difficulty with the 64 bit version of Hugin under FreeBSD. I'd like to look around inside with gdb, but I don't do cmake, and I can't work out how to compile with debugging symbols. Can anybody help? It would also be interesting to be able to specify

Re: [hugin-ptx] Building Hugin for Windows with Lensfunc

2012-05-20 Thread brian_ims
Steve, I did it earlier using MSVC 2008. iI don't have details with me at the moment but I think that I built the files as static Brian -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Building-Hugin-for-Windows-with-Lensfunc-tp33877469p33877682.html Sent from the hugin ptx mailing list

[hugin-ptx] Building Hugin for Windows with Lensfunc

2012-05-20 Thread Steeve
All I'm trying to build the gui_overhaul branch on Windows.. My current problem is that this also includes lensfun. From searching I can find some comments which suggest it can be compiled under Windows, and others which suggest not. Before I try has anybody already done this? Regards Steve --

Re: [hugin-ptx] building hugin 2010.2.0 with minGW

2010-09-23 Thread Yuval Levy
On September 23, 2010 10:03:32 am kfj wrote: > Having finally managed to build libpano and collateral software using > minGW and msys, I am now considering an attempt to build the latest > hugin version in the same environment. But I feel I should rather ask > before I start if anyone has any helpf

Re: [hugin-ptx] building hugin 2010.2.0 with minGW

2010-09-23 Thread Dale Beams
what is collateral? On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 07:03 -0700, kfj wrote: > collateral -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ

[hugin-ptx] building hugin 2010.2.0 with minGW

2010-09-23 Thread kfj
Hi all! Having finally managed to build libpano and collateral software using minGW and msys, I am now considering an attempt to build the latest hugin version in the same environment. But I feel I should rather ask before I start if anyone has any helpful hints concerning this, or has already don

[hugin-ptx] Building Hugin on windows?

2010-01-24 Thread Zoran Zorkic
Hi! I tried building Hugin following the http://wiki.panotools.org/Build_Hugin_for_Windows_with_SDK but failed as the SDK on the wiki has outdated Panotools, so I tried and failed to compile them. What I did was checked out the SVN 1242 and tried got different shades of missing files, most were f

[hugin-ptx] Building Hugin

2009-09-19 Thread anbue
High all, I´m new to this group and sort of dummy in softwaredevelopment. Nevertheless I tried to start building hugin on windows using the sdk. It seems to me that enblend has moved to http://enblend.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/enblend Using this adress cloning worked as described in the panotool