I just finished building a fork of hugin and a fork of libpano13 and
unmodified enblend on Windows using MSYS2 / mingw64
I tested barely more than opening an existing project, so there is a good
chance some operations won't work because of errors I made in building.
I ran into a massive string
Since I mentioned my problems with trying to start debugging a debug build
of hugin, I'll describe the partial answer I've found so far. Maybe anyone
else who would try to debug hugin would already know this stuff. But in
case that is not true:
I think CodeBlocks was failing because the under
On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 14:09 -0800, johnfi...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 10:39:36 AM UTC-5 johnfi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I ran make -j16
> Meanwhile I ran system monitor to see that about half my cpu capacity was in
> use
>
> Then my system crashed. Seemed to be a displ
On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 10:39:36 AM UTC-5 johnfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
I ran make -j16
Meanwhile I ran system monitor to see that about half my cpu capacity was
in use
Then my system crashed. Seemed to be a display driver crash. Maybe there
is some problem in building hugin with j16,
On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 1:27:25 PM UTC-5 bruno...@gmail.com wrote:
> The
> standard nouveau driver might not have all the top features, but in my
> experience it is very stable.
>
My experience has been very different. Years ago at work, I was using
several Centos systems with va
On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 15:39, johnfine2017 wrote:
> I got build instructions both from
> https://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Compiling_Fedora
> and from a recent post by Bruno suggesting
> The list of things to install is very different between those two sources.
> Is that first one obsolete?
The
I wanted to start this thread, even though I don't have a lot to ask/report
yet, because I'll otherwise forget things, and because someone might have
some useful feedback on what I have so far.
uname -a reports
Linux linux 5.15.15-200.fc35.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jan 16 17:37:06 UTC 2022
x86_64 x86_6
Ciao Gilbert
On 30 Jun 2014, at 07:53, B1tstreamAlpha wrote:
> Has anyone else here attempted to build Hugin natively on OSX 10.9 Mavericks?
I’ve not *built* hugin on Mavericks, but I’m using Matthieus build of RC4 on it
with virtually no problems.
You can grab it here:
http://sourceforge.net
Has anyone else here attempted to build Hugin natively on OSX 10.9
Mavericks?
I am having a terrible time of it and before I start spewing compiler
outputs, I thought I'd ask if anyone else has already made a successful
build.
Ok technically I've gotten it to *build* after much pain and few hac
On 10 July 2012 08:27, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 at 7:53:26 +0200, Luk?? Jirkovsk wrote:
>> On 10 July 2012 02:18, Terry Duell wrote:
>>>
>>> Whoops...that's not right. If building in the topmost dir of a hugin
>>> repository, and running cmake at that level;
>>>
>>>
On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 at 7:53:26 +0200, Luk?? Jirkovsk wrote:
> On 10 July 2012 02:18, Terry Duell wrote:
>>
>> Whoops...that's not right. If building in the topmost dir of a hugin
>> repository, and running cmake at that level;
>>
>> " cmake . -DDebug=1"
>
> It should be "cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:53:26 +1000, Lukáš Jirkovský
wrote:
It should be "cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug"
Yes, you are right.
Sorry, I should have checked the CMakeLists.txt for the specific
definition and not assumed it would be as per the one example in my
rpmbuild spec file.
Cheers
On 10 July 2012 02:18, Terry Duell wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:29:23 +1000, Terry Duell wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
>> " cmake -DDebug=1"
>>
>> without the "" of course and prepending with ./ if necessary.
>
>
> Whoops...that's not right. If building in the topmost dir of a hugin
> repository, and
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:29:23 +1000, Terry Duell
wrote:
[snip]
" cmake -DDebug=1"
without the "" of course and prepending with ./ if necessary.
Whoops...that's not right. If building in the topmost dir of a hugin
repository, and running cmake at that level;
" cmake . -DDebug=1"
Cheers
Hullo Greg,
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:00:30 +1000, Greg 'groggy' Lehey
wrote:
As you may have noticed, I'm currently having difficulty with the 64
bit version of Hugin under FreeBSD. I'd like to look around inside
with gdb, but I don't do cmake, and I can't work out how to compile
with debugg
As you may have noticed, I'm currently having difficulty with the 64
bit version of Hugin under FreeBSD. I'd like to look around inside
with gdb, but I don't do cmake, and I can't work out how to compile
with debugging symbols. Can anybody help? It would also be
interesting to be able to specify
Steve,
I did it earlier using MSVC 2008. iI don't have details with me at the
moment but I think that I built the files as static
Brian
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Building-Hugin-for-Windows-with-Lensfunc-tp33877469p33877682.html
Sent from the hugin ptx mailing list
All
I'm trying to build the gui_overhaul branch on Windows.. My current
problem is that this also includes lensfun. From searching I can find
some comments which suggest it can be compiled under Windows, and
others which suggest not.
Before I try has anybody already done this?
Regards
Steve
--
On September 23, 2010 10:03:32 am kfj wrote:
> Having finally managed to build libpano and collateral software using
> minGW and msys, I am now considering an attempt to build the latest
> hugin version in the same environment. But I feel I should rather ask
> before I start if anyone has any helpf
what is collateral?
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 07:03 -0700, kfj wrote:
> collateral
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
Hi all!
Having finally managed to build libpano and collateral software using
minGW and msys, I am now considering an attempt to build the latest
hugin version in the same environment. But I feel I should rather ask
before I start if anyone has any helpful hints concerning this, or has
already don
Hi!
I tried building Hugin following the
http://wiki.panotools.org/Build_Hugin_for_Windows_with_SDK
but failed as the SDK on the wiki has outdated Panotools, so I tried
and failed to compile them.
What I did was checked out the SVN 1242 and tried got different shades
of missing files, most were f
High all,
I´m new to this group and sort of dummy in softwaredevelopment.
Nevertheless I tried to start building hugin on windows using the sdk.
It seems to me that enblend has moved to
http://enblend.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/enblend
Using this adress cloning worked as described in the panotool
23 matches
Mail list logo