Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> 2009/10/9 Bruno Postle :
>>
>> Currently Hugin doesn't need to worry about ordering of commands, it
>> just writes rules and then specifies the end target(s) it wants, you
>> will need to write a dependency solver.
>
> May be fun. I never did that :-D
if y
On 7 окт, 17:04, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> I can imagine using something different instead of makefile. My first
> thoughts were about using some dynamic language like python or perl
> but I rejected these thoughts immediately. They would brink need to
> distribute python/perl/whatever with hugin
Hi Bruno,
2009/10/9 Bruno Postle :
>
> On Thu 08-Oct-2009 at 10:04 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>>
>>> I know I'm not great at this stuff, but in the panostart tool there
>>> is a perl module that abstacts all the business of writing and
>>> escaping Makefile rules, i.e. you declare your intent
On Thu 08-Oct-2009 at 10:04 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>
>> I know I'm not great at this stuff, but in the panostart tool there
>> is a perl module that abstacts all the business of writing and
>> escaping Makefile rules, i.e. you declare your intent with a list of
>> input files, a list of out
Harry van der Wolf wrote:
> And for windows? Better or worse?
nightmare.
Yuv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is a
Hi Lukáš
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> I don't want to replace .pto files.
would you mind elaborating a little bit more about what exactly you want
to do? given the previous discussions on this list (that you could not
know about) I (and maybe some others too) have some preconceived notions
in the
2009/10/8 Lukáš Jirkovský
>
> >
> > I am a fan of python but it is probably overkill for the sequence of
> > commands that would need to be executed.
>
> I think so.
>
>
Please don't introduce an extra "external" dependency. Python works well on
Linux and fine on MacOSX as long as you don't starr
Hi Garry,
2009/10/8 Gerry Patterson :
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Bruno Postle wrote:
>>
>> On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
>> >Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>> >> What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
>> >
>> >this has been discussed befo
Hi Yuv,
2009/10/7 Yuval Levy :
>
> Hi Lukáš,
>
> Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>> What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
>
> this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor
> the Makefile, others would favor the XML (me included).
I didn't know that
Hi Bruno,
2009/10/7 Bruno Postle :
>
> On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 15:04 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>>
>>What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
>>Although I'm not a huge XML fan (in fact I think it's overused) it
>>could bring some improvements to the current workflow
Hi Gerry,
2009/10/7 Gerry Patterson :
>
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Lukáš Jirkovský
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>> I've got a quite sound idea. Just "to put a bug in your head" (czech
>> saying) – to make you think about it. There are numerous bug reports
>> which are caused by using some
Bruno Postle wrote:
> Isn't there enough stuff that really needs fixing in Hugin?
yes there is. but the topic seems to itch Lukáš. Other topics may not be
of interest to him.
> What can you do with XML that we can't already do with the current
> .pto format?
it's extensible without conflicts
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Bruno Postle wrote:
>
> On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> >Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> >> What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
> >
> >this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor
> >the Ma
On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
>Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>> What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
>
>this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor
>the Makefile, others would favor the XML (me included).
This all sounds
Hi Lukáš,
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor
the Makefile, others would favor the XML (me included).
The next logical step, rather than discussing this to death on
On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 15:04 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>
>What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
>Although I'm not a huge XML fan (in fact I think it's overused) it
>could bring some improvements to the current workflow. I've two ideas
>how it could help. First i
On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Lukáš Jirkovský
wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I've got a quite sound idea. Just "to put a bug in your head" (czech
> saying) – to make you think about it. There are numerous bug reports
> which are caused by using some "forbidden" characters inside makefile
> (and some st
17 matches
Mail list logo
