Thanks, everyone, for the help and suggestions. I'm going to go
further with using the built-in mask facilities and see what I can
come up with.
Regards,
Daniel Reetz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A
On 11-02-13 09:21 AM, Yuval Levy wrote:
On February 12, 2011 10:38:15 pm Daniel Reetz wrote:
AFAIK, Hugin always searches the entire area of each image for control
points. I use Hugin for all kinds of image registration [1], and often
I would get much better results if I could specify a "region
On February 13, 2011 01:03:02 pm Carl von Einem wrote:
> Isn't this already achieved with "Remove control points in masks" from
> the 'Edit' menu?
Duh! Of course. Shows how much I have been using the masking function... not.
Thanks for completing the info.
Yuv
signature.asc
Description: This
Yuval Levy schrieb am 13.02.11 18:21:
On February 12, 2011 10:38:15 pm Daniel Reetz wrote:
AFAIK, Hugin always searches the entire area of each image for control
points. I use Hugin for all kinds of image registration [1], and often
I would get much better results if I could specify a "region of
OpenCV can do this...
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Yuval Levy wrote:
> On February 12, 2011 10:38:15 pm Daniel Reetz wrote:
> > AFAIK, Hugin always searches the entire area of each image for control
> > points. I use Hugin for all kinds of image registration [1], and often
> > I would get m
On February 12, 2011 10:38:15 pm Daniel Reetz wrote:
> AFAIK, Hugin always searches the entire area of each image for control
> points. I use Hugin for all kinds of image registration [1], and often
> I would get much better results if I could specify a "region of
> interest" where the CP generator
Hi All,
AFAIK, Hugin always searches the entire area of each image for control
points. I use Hugin for all kinds of image registration [1], and often
I would get much better results if I could specify a "region of
interest" where the CP generator could search.
Is this possible with the present ve