Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

Hi Erik, Thank you for your email. There is nothing (IMO) else to say at this stage, lol :) I have already taken a few panoramas with locked AF and we will see the result soon. I took them whis weekend and if all is oK, it means it was a problem with AF. I will share results. Thank you all aga

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

On 07/16/2014 10:51 AM, Erik Krause wrote: Am 16.07.2014 22:00, schrieb David W. Jones: Hmm, I've never seen autofocus change magnification on my Minolta 7D. Magnification is a function of focal length; focus is not. ...and many modern lenses change focal length while focusing (rear or inner e

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

On Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:22:13 AM UTC+1, Pawel Rozenek wrote: > > > > So changing focus while shooting a panorama is not a good idea. > > I did not know about it :) > It is not actually wrong to change focus between shots. Sometimes it is necessary in order to get the nearest and farthest

RE: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

> So changing focus while shooting a panorama is not a good idea. I did not know about it :) However it means there was nothing wrong with my home made bracket on the ball head and also I was right saying it was something strange because the problem used to appear far away from the nodal point

RE: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

d W. Jones Sent: 16 July 2014 21:01 To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching? Hmm, I've never seen autofocus change magnification on my Minolta 7D. Magnification is a function of focal length; focus is not. But if you're using a la

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

Hmm, I've never seen autofocus change magnification on my Minolta 7D. Magnification is a function of focal length; focus is not. But if you're using a large opening and have little depth of field, autofocus can definitely mess up a panorama! On 07/12/2014 06:57 AM, Pawel Rozenek wrote: Hi Gu

RE: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

Hi Guys, I know what was wrong with my panorama!!! :) Autofocus caused the problem. When it slightly changes the distance, also it slightly changes the magnification :) From: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com [mailto:hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of panostar Sent: 15 June 2014

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 9:57:47 AM UTC+1, Bruno Postle wrote: > > I'm not sure why John couldn't post this, it hasn't been 'held' for > moderation by googlegroups. > I made two attempts to post a response but they didn't appear immediately in the web forum listing. I see they have now appeare

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

On Sun 15-Jun-2014 at 00:56 -0700, Pawel Rozenek wrote: I have just received an answer from John Houghton, for a strange reasons he couldn't post the message to this group. He prepared an animated gif here: http://ge.tt/1vEx1Wk1/v/0?c proofing the nodal point should have been improved. I'm no

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

Pawel Rozenek wrote: Thank you anyone who decided to say something in my post. The L bracket is made from 10 mm thic aluminium, plate plate is 4mm thick and please believe me that the maximum fluctuation is +/-2 2 mm so in MY opinion with 14mm focal length is nothing (am I wrong?) The head ba

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

Hi Carlos, It sounds too complicated like for me :) I am still thinking about changing options in Hugin's preferences tab, however I have no idea how to change it, this is a reason why I am looking for help here - maybe someone had the same problem :) On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 11:16:42 UTC,

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

Hi, I have posted recentlya try to automate panorama creation with scripts (I did it in unix shell script) and I tried to deal with this kind of problem. In my expe