Re: [I18n]combining xkb 'layouts'

2002-02-22 Thread Ivan Pascal
Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > While on that: > > Currently symbols files also map some modifiers. e.g, from symbols/ru > > modifier_map Shift { Shift_L }; > modifier_map Lock { Caps_Lock, ISO_Lock }; > modifier_map Control{ Control_L }; > modifier_map Mod3 { Mode_switch }; > > Are

[I18n]So, will Bidi+Xterm happen ?

2002-02-22 Thread Nadim Shaikli
Having read this widely popular thread :-) I'm still fuzzy about what the consensus was (if any) and what is needed to make the inclusion of Bidi into xterm a reality. I would like to note that there have been a number of calls along the lines of "Bidi might/is difficult [in relation to terminal

Re: [I18n]The xkb with complex letter question again

2002-02-22 Thread Pablo Saratxaga
Kaixo! On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 04:16:25PM +0700, Ivan Pascal wrote: > > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/compose.dir > > > > I believe (but am not sure) that you should be able to add an entry > > like: > > > > : "[lam][alpha]" Indeed it works! Well, I didn't used as it doesn't exist yet, but: : "\3

Re: [I18n]combining xkb 'layouts'

2002-02-22 Thread Pablo Saratxaga
Kaixo! On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 04:38:27PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > While on that: > > Currently symbols files also map some modifiers. e.g, from symbols/ru > > modifier_map Shift { Shift_L }; > modifier_map Lock { Caps_Lock, ISO_Lock }; > modifier_map Control{ Control_L };

[I18n]So, will Bidi+Xterm happen ?

2002-02-22 Thread Nadim Shaikli
Having read this widely popular thread :-) I'm still fuzzy about what the consensus was (if any) and what is needed to make the inclusion of Bidi into xterm a reality. I would like to note that there have been a number of calls along the lines of "Bidi might/is difficult [in relation to terminal