2015-02-25 9:43 GMT+01:00 David Coppa :
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin
> wrote:
>
>> Works great on FreeBSD thanks !
>
> And on OpenBSD too.
>
> There's a new dependency on libxkbcommon, is it right?
>
Yup
Bapt
Yes, we already spoke about it in this thread.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:43 AM, David Coppa wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin
> wrote:
>
>> Works great on FreeBSD thanks !
>
> And on OpenBSD too.
>
> There's a new dependency on libxkbcommon, is it right?
>
> Cheers!
>
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin
wrote:
> Works great on FreeBSD thanks !
And on OpenBSD too.
There's a new dependency on libxkbcommon, is it right?
Cheers!
David
--
"If you try a few times and give up, you'll never get there. But if
you keep at it... There's a lot of probl
Thanks a lot, Michael. That was it.
On 24/02/15 20:54, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
See https://github.com/i3/i3/blob/next/DEPENDS — I think your version
of libxkbcommon is too old.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Marcin Herda wrote:
Hi Michael and all,
I have just tried to test i3-next on my
See https://github.com/i3/i3/blob/next/DEPENDS — I think your version
of libxkbcommon is too old.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Marcin Herda wrote:
> Hi Michael and all,
>
> I have just tried to test i3-next on my Slackware system. The error I get
> is:
>
> cc -DI3_VERSION=\"'4.8-168-gd5ec59e
Hi Michael and all,
I have just tried to test i3-next on my Slackware system. The error I
get is:
cc -DI3_VERSION=\"'4.8-168-gd5ec59e (2015-02-22, branch \"next\")'\"
-DMAJOR_VERSION=4 -DMINOR_VERSION=8 -DPATCH_VERSION=0
-DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\" -DI3__FILE__=__FILE__ -DPCRE_HAS_UCP=1
-DPANGO_S
No particular functionality, and thanks for the report.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Chris Atkinson wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Builds and runs in Arch 64 current to commit d5ec59e ("Merge pull
> request #1486 from acrisci/feature/docs-xvfb-tests") using the
> stock i3-git PKGBUILD from the AUR.
Hi Michael,
Builds and runs in Arch 64 current to commit d5ec59e ("Merge pull
request #1486 from acrisci/feature/docs-xvfb-tests") using the
stock i3-git PKGBUILD from the AUR.[1]
Is there any particular functionality you would like tested or
additional information regarding my setup you would fi
Michael Stapelberg writes:
> Not that I know of. I might create a backport once 4.9 is actually
> released.
Ah ok. Thanks.
Frank
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Frank Haun wrote:
>> Michael Stapelberg writes:
>>
>>> If you are not running a version of i3 built from the “next” branch,
>>>
Not that I know of. I might create a backport once 4.9 is actually released.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Frank Haun wrote:
> Michael Stapelberg writes:
>
>> If you are not running a version of i3 built from the “next” branch,
>> please upgrade and help us test :).
>
> Is there a quick solu
Michael Stapelberg writes:
> If you are not running a version of i3 built from the “next” branch,
> please upgrade and help us test :).
Is there a quick solution to compile the latest i3 on debian/wheezy?
| ../i3/src/bindings.c:11:33: fatal error: xkbcommon/xkbcommon.h: Datei
| oder Verzeichnis
2015-02-21 22:29 GMT+01:00 Michael Stapelberg :
> Hey,
>
> it’s been quite a while since the i3 4.8 release, so it’s time to do
> another release soon :).
>
> If you are not running a version of i3 built from the “next” branch,
> please upgrade and help us test :). You can check which version you
>
Hey,
it’s been quite a while since the i3 4.8 release, so it’s time to do
another release soon :).
If you are not running a version of i3 built from the “next” branch,
please upgrade and help us test :). You can check which version you
are running by using i3 --moreversion. See also
http://i3wm.o
Build and run seems ok so far on FreeBSD
2014-06-13 23:21 GMT+02:00 Serge van Ginderachter :
>
> On 13 June 2014 22:52, Serge van Ginderachter
> wrote:
>>
>> Should we use the raring repo for Ubuntu 14.04 aka. trusty, or is there no
>> option here?
>>
>> (http://build.i3wm.org/ubuntu/ doesn't hav
On 13 June 2014 22:52, Serge van Ginderachter
wrote:
> Should we use the raring repo for Ubuntu 14.04 aka. trusty, or is there
> no option here?
>
> (http://build.i3wm.org/ubuntu/ doesn't have trusty mentioned)
>
I got a 'yes' on that on irc. Thanks.
On 13 June 2014 22:40, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> For Debian and Ubuntu, we have http://i3wm.org/docs/repositories.html
>
Should we use the raring repo for Ubuntu 14.04 aka. trusty, or is there no
option here?
(http://build.i3wm.org/ubuntu/ doesn't have trusty mentioned)
Hi everyone,
the old thread got pretty messy, so I’m starting a new one to make sure
I reach everyone.
As announced, I want to release i3 v4.8 soon. The current plan is to
release what we have in the “next” git branch right now in two days,
i.e. on Sunday, 2014-06-15. I’ve just committed a bunch
>"MS" == Michael Stapelberg writes:
MS> Thanks. Next time, can you submit it to http://cr.i3wm.org/ directly
MS> please?
Sure, sorry for the inconvenience.
--
Marcus
Hi Marcus,
Marcus Crestani writes:
> I've attached a patch that moves the __APPLE__ specific include of
> sysctl.h below the include of i3.h. This way, the compiler considers
> the redefinitions to come from a system header and does not show the
> warnings. Also, types.h is no longer needed on
>"MS" == Michael Stapelberg writes:
MS> I want to release i3 v4.8 soon, so here is a call for testing.
On OS X, I see a ton of "macro redefined" warnings when compiling
src/log.c. The redefinitions are caused by include/queue.h that exists
as a system header /usr/include/sys/queue.h on OS X.
Guess it isn't a regression then. A bit surprising for me, I've been
using i3 for ages and I've never seen the issue before. Now it's
popped up more than once in the last few days.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Lewis Gunsch wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:30 AM, wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 11.06
Can anyone tell me how to repeat this, I usually have windows popping in
and out every now and then, and use IntelliJ idea for development work. So
I'd like to look into this too.
On Jun 11, 2014 8:31 PM, "Lewis Gunsch" wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:30 AM, wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Le 11.06.2014 09
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:30 AM, wrote:
>
>
> Le 11.06.2014 09:29, Anders Aagaard a écrit :
>
> Java focus issues isn't what I originally reported though. Me typing
>> stuff and it ending up in a different (non Java) window is definitely
>> a regression.
>>
>
> I agree that this is not a Java pr
Le 11.06.2014 09:29, Anders Aagaard a écrit :
Java focus issues isn't what I originally reported though. Me typing
stuff and it ending up in a different (non Java) window is definitely
a regression.
I agree that this is not a Java problem, but I do not agree that it is
a regression. I had th
Hi Anders,
Anders Aagaard writes:
> Java focus issues isn't what I originally reported though. Me typing stuff
> and it ending up in a different (non Java) window is definitely a
> regression.
You were mentioning IntelliJ as one of the windows, and IntelliJ is
written in Java. Not sure how this i
Java focus issues isn't what I originally reported though. Me typing stuff
and it ending up in a different (non Java) window is definitely a
regression.
On Jun 11, 2014 9:22 AM, "Michael Stapelberg" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Marius Muja writes:
> > I can confirm a focusing issue with intellij. I can repr
Hi,
Marius Muja writes:
> I can confirm a focusing issue with intellij. I can reproduce it by doing
> Navigate -> Line and when the editor jumps to some line I cannot type in
> although the window has focus. If I move the focus out and back in the
> cursor appears and I can type.
We’ve been havin
I can reproduce this easily with `focus_follows_mouse` when switching focus
with pointer enter, but not at all with keyboard focus.
There is a similar issue on the stable branch, except that focus does not
change at all on pointer enter, so i3 remains in sync. This suggests the
underlying cause i
I can confirm a focusing issue with intellij. I can reproduce it by doing
Navigate -> Line and when the editor jumps to some line I cannot type in
although the window has focus. If I move the focus out and back in the
cursor appears and I can type.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Anders Aagaard
I just noticed one issue now, this is from 7482a0f which I've been
using for about a week. I had focus in one window (and the window is
active), however when I type it ends up in another window.
Unfortunately I jumped in and out of windows trying to figure out what
was going on. The problem I saw
Hi,
I have been using it for the last month or so without any problems
(including saving and restoring layouts http://www.slackword.net/?p=733)
Thank you.
regards
Marcin
Hi,
I want to release i3 v4.8 soon, so here is a call for testing. If you
haven’t, please use an i3 build from the “next
I have been using it since last week, no problems so far..
Thanks,
Wael
Michael Stapelberg writes:
> Hi,
>
> I want to release i3 v4.8 soon, so here is a call for testing. If you
> haven’t, please use an i3 build from the “next” git branch. For Debian
> and Ubuntu, we have http://i3wm.org/doc
Hi berenger,
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org writes:
> Just to be sure, is the version 4.7.3-1+g4.7.2-189-g6fe44d81 the
> version you speak about? Just wanted to be sure, since unlike for Ubuntu
> there is only one repo.
That’s exactly the one, yeah.
--
Best regards,
Michael
Le 09.06.2014 12:14, Michael Stapelberg a écrit :
Hi,
I want to release i3 v4.8 soon, so here is a call for testing. If you
haven’t, please use an i3 build from the “next” git branch. For
Debian
and Ubuntu, we have http://i3wm.org/docs/repositories.html with that
version so that you don’t ne
Hi,
I want to release i3 v4.8 soon, so here is a call for testing. If you
haven’t, please use an i3 build from the “next” git branch. For Debian
and Ubuntu, we have http://i3wm.org/docs/repositories.html with that
version so that you don’t need to compile it yourself.
In case you notice a grave p
Hi,
Ran Benita (CC'ed) has been working on libxkbcommon-x11, a library that
handles the last few bits of tedious details in getting input handling
right. In i3lock, we have been using a mixture of libX11’s XKB functions
and libxkbcommon until now, but with the most recent release, xcb has
xcb-xkb
Hey,
this has already been changed. Upgrade to the latest version.
--
Best regards,
Michael
Hi,
I would really appreciate this, the new nagbar behaviour is nagging me.
Am 11.09.2012 02:50, schrieb Michael Stapelberg:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> Pavel Löbl writes:
>> I've read the release notes. Basically i think it's a good idea to be
>> more responsive at runtime. But do we really want to be that
Hi Pavel,
Pavel Löbl writes:
> I've read the release notes. Basically i think it's a good idea to be
> more responsive at runtime. But do we really want to be that strict?
>
> I think it's annoying and the message shown in i3-nagbar is not much
> helpful anyway. Maybe we can just work this out la
Hi all,
testing next for a few days. I noticed that for instance trying to resize
a window which is alone on a workspace popups an error. Generally it
does any resizing in any invalid direction.
I've read the release notes. Basically i think it's a good idea to be
more responsive at runtime. But
On 7 September 2012 14:08, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On 7 September 2012 13:31, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to release i3 4.3 soon™. Therefore, it’d be very helpful,
>> if you all could upgrade to the latest git version of the "next" branch.
>
> Great. I'll give it a go afte
>"MS" == Michael Stapelberg writes:
MS> Thanks, I’ve changed it in the makefile. Your patch didn’t apply at all
MS> here, also I don’t even have the commit in the "From" line. Is your
MS> working copy really tracking upstream or did it diverge sometime and you
MS> merged it back together?
I m
Hi Marcus,
Marcus Crestani writes:
> I've attached one patch that works around "readlink -f" that does not
> exist on OS X. I think "pwd -P" does what we need, but I'm not
> completly sure about it. Comments welcome!
Thanks, I’ve changed it in the makefile. Your patch didn’t apply at all
here,
I upgraded to the next branch using the i3-git PKGBUILD in arch and it
seems to work.
[discord@icecream i3]$ i3 --version
i3 version 4.2-287-ga1823e5 (2012-09-06, branch "next") © 2009-2012
Michael Stapelberg and contributors
>"MS" == Michael Stapelberg writes:
MS> If you have any bugfix or ticket that you feel is important enough to be
MS> included in this release, please speak up now and make me aware of it.
I have not yet been able to build i3-4.3 on OS X 10.8 (Mountain Lion).
I've attached one patch that work
Hi James,
James Robertson writes:
> Will the patch for Ignoring size increment hints for tiling windows be
> included? I note this git version does not include it, but you had
> noted it as being part of the 4.3 release as per
> http://bugs.i3wm.org/query/ticket/540.
Doesn’t that question answer
Amazing!
Great work!
--
*Braga, Bruno*
www.brunobraga.net
bruno.br...@gmail.com
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> "BRAGA, Bruno" writes:
> > Is there a release notes for 4.3 version? That would help for testers to
> > funnel the focus on double-checkin
On 7 September 2012 22:31, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> If you have any bugfix or ticket that you feel is important enough to be
> included in this release, please speak up now and make me aware of it.
Will the patch for Ignoring size increment hints for tiling windows be
included? I note this gi
Hi Bruno,
"BRAGA, Bruno" writes:
> Is there a release notes for 4.3 version? That would help for testers to
> funnel the focus on double-checking for issues...
Yes, it’s called RELEASE-NOTES-4.3 in the git repository:
http://code.stapelberg.de/git/i3/tree/RELEASE-NOTES-4.3?h=next
--
Best regard
Michael,
Is there a release notes for 4.3 version? That would help for testers to
funnel the focus on double-checking for issues...
Cheers,
--
*Braga, Bruno*
www.brunobraga.net
bruno.br...@gmail.com
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:17 PM, JF Straeten wrote:
>
> Re,
>
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:08
Re,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:08:54PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On 7 September 2012 13:31, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to release i3 4.3 soon™. Therefore, it’d be very helpful,
> > if you all could upgrade to the latest git version of the "next" branch.
>
> Gre
On 7 September 2012 13:31, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to release i3 4.3 soon™. Therefore, it’d be very helpful,
> if you all could upgrade to the latest git version of the "next" branch.
Great. I'll give it a go after the weekend.
> PS: Debian and Ubuntu users can simply us
Hi,
I would like to release i3 4.3 soon™. Therefore, it’d be very helpful,
if you all could upgrade to the latest git version of the "next" branch.
The output of i3 --version should look like this if you did it right:
i3 version 4.2-287-ga1823e5 (2012-09-06, branch "next")
This version is st
53 matches
Mail list logo
