thanx for your help,
but i have exam in our companyitself
if u have sample quetions of TechChek for COBOL DB2 plz...provide me..
On 12/4/05, Kenny Fogarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll sit the test for you if you like?
On 03/12/05, Mahaboob Basha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i am taking COBOL DB2 from TechChek
JCL from Brainbench...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Resent: The enclosed message, sent to the IBM-MAIN discussion list, has
been
rejected because it contains an excessive amount of quoted material from
previous posts.
Below are the error messages I got each time I swapped the tape to a different
9840C drive.
I finally gave up. I am
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the update and something more to look at
.
Hmmm, we have an IOE (I/O Error) and Read Error Detected which I suppose
is not that surprising and the possible scenarios would seem to be listed
here:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-
bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2M960/SPTM012917
Hi folks
Which is the 'best' JES2 command to purge spool output?
I seem to have
£P JOBQ,Q=x,DAYSn
or
£O JQ,Q=x,DAn,CAN
Just wondering which is the better method way, if there are any subtle
differences, etc etc?
Thanks
Brian
-
This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended
$p will purge the output. $o will release output.
Perryman, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks
Which is the 'best' JES2 command to purge spool output?
I seem to have
£P JOBQ,Q=x,DAYSn
or
£O JQ,Q=x,DAn,CAN
Just wondering which is the better method way, if there are any
$p will purge the output. $o will release output.
Perryman, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks
Which is the 'best' JES2 command to purge spool output?
I seem to have
£P JOBQ,Q=x,DAYSn
or
£O JQ,Q=x,DAn,CAN
Just wondering which is the better method way, if there are any
I don't think it was here mentioned here (could be wrong), but I have a
vague memory of somebody telling me that there is a possibility of an
outage if a hardware ACTIVATE is done on a z890. Something about a bug
in a specific LIC level? Does anybody else remember such a thing?
--
John McKown
I think this is the first publicly announced System z9 total go-live shop.
(Anybody else want to make an announcement? :-)) Congratulations to
Hannaford Brothers. Details in this IBM press release:
http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/051205/0103015.html?printer=1
Sorry, don't have an ibm.com
Hello:
I clone a VSAM ESDS defined with REUSE using the ALLOCATE command with
the LIKE attribute. ALLOC DS(ESDS1B) LIKE(ESDS1) NEW CATALOG
On my z/OS 1.5 system, both the original and the new data sets have the
REUSE attribute. On one of my customer's z/OS 1.6 system, the model
also has
Dear all,
I am converting a rexx program to cobol and having this problem .
The data is , for example x'0123' and after conversion , it must have the
value 123 (decimal)
In rexx , the statement is : decvalue = x2d(c2x(value))
I don't know how to achieve it in Cobol.
CAn you please help ?
I usually do something like this:
$OJOBQ,Q=X,CANCEL,A5
$OJOBQ,ALL,CANCEL,A15
$POJOBQ,ALL,A15,PROTECTED
Note the use of PROTECTED in the $POJOBQ command.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America and Farmers Insurance Group
mailto: [EMAIL
Yikes! Now I'm REALLY confused..
My head hurts..!
Brian
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: 05 December 2005 14:40
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Purging spool output
I usually do something like this:
In a message dated 12/5/2005 9:12:28 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yikes! Now I'm REALLY confused..
$O Q,ALL,A=7,CANCEL,PROTECTED
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
05 in-put pic xx value x'0123'.
05 x-o pic s9(5) comp-3 value zero.
10 x-i pic xx.
10 pic x.
.
.
.
move in-put to x-i
move x-o to wherever
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 12/05/2005
09:49:10 AM:
Dear all,
I am converting a rexx program to cobol and having this
John,
See Hiper Fixes document 081904/111204A on the IBM Service Link website.
There are specific conditions when the error may occur that are described in
these two documents.
Regards,
Steve
Service Link website:
I would put a X'0c' behind the data, and then access the whole thing
as a decimal packed value with one digit after the decimal point (the zero).
I didn't work with COBOL for 10 years or so, but I guess, the
definitions will be something like
01 decval pic 'v9' usage comp-3.
01 charval
Let me extend my answer.
Under normal DB2 operations, the DB2 tabelspace and indexspace datasets open
and close as activity against those datasets comes and goes. Normal numbers
would be 10's to 100's datasets open and close per hour. Any catalog setting
can handle that level of activity. DB2
We run Oracle on z/OS here but i haven't come across a VSAM Transparency
option. i had a quick look in Oracle Metalink and someone had asked a
similar question and the answer was
Oracle's SQL*Loader will load MVS VSAM data directly into Oracle tables.
However we do not offer a VSAM
Because I only have SFTP (via Ported Tools) on a test LPAR my users can't use
it.
I would like to be able to allow usesr on the Production LPAR to submit a job
containing SFTP commands and some how have it run on the Test LPAR and return
the results of the SFTP run (which ran on the Test
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Kick off a job on a different LPAR.
Because I only have SFTP (via Ported Tools) on a test LPAR
I have to change 1 system symbol for 1 sysres volume for 1 system in a 6
system sysplex. In my LOADXX member is it possible to override the IEASYM
specification with an override at the system specfice level.
Example:
IEASYM (00,Z0,L)
NUCLST Z0
PARMLIB SYS1.LPLEX.PARMLIB
PARMLIB
Nobody answered, so I did a test.
I tried to use by mistake RACF structure as NEWCKPT1.
Here are the results.
IXL013I IXLCONN REQUEST FOR STRUCTURE IRRXCF00_P001 FAILED.
JOBNAME: JES2 ASID: 0018 CONNECTOR NAME: JES2_BROT
IXLCONN RETURN CODE: 0008, REASON CODE: 02010820
0820 mean:
Hi,
Anyone using IBM 3590 Tape drives to backup files in OS/390 or z/OS and in
Windowns plataform to save open system files?
Carlos Alberto Bodra
Sao Paulo - SP - Brasil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Best I can guess is that the 9840C is not driving the required hardware
commands for processing this media, which from your commentary seems to
require 3590 emulation mode.
Do you have mixed use of native, 9840B, 3590 and 3490E for the 9840C and so
sometimes you swap to a compatible drive, but
In a message dated 12/5/2005 10:20:24 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone suggest how this can be done without have operation or user
intervention on the TEST LPAR?
If you have connectivity JECL can do this:
2.2.6 Execution at Remote Node (non-APPC)
In the IEASYM you could use
SYSDEF SYMDEF(LPARNUM='01')
SYMDEF(LPTYP='X')
SYSDEF SYSNAME(AL10)
SYMDEF(LPARNUM='03')
SYMDEF(LPTYP='P')
Only on SYSNAME(AL10) the LPARNUM will be '03' and LPTYP = 'P'
Roland
Dear all
How can we achive this in Cobol ?
I don't see any function which can do it
Thank you
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
Google says see
http://search390.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid10_gci757615,00.html
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Cremieux
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 11:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: HEX TO
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
I would like to be able to allow usesr on the Production LPAR to
submit a job containing SFTP commands and some how have it run on the
Test LPAR and return the
ibm-main [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Anyone got a link to a tool that'll delete a broken VVDS catalog entry
???.
We've had two (yep *2*) sysplex-wide outages to move the MCAT onto a
dedicated CSV. The REPRO fails due to shonky cat entries. My attempts to
get
There isn't a direct function but long string from couple of weeks ago about
going from character to hex will work with the logic reversed.
Unless you just want to convert half word or full word to Decimal in which
case
77 number-half pic s9(4) comp. -- this is cobol definition for asm of
DS
Folks,
I wrote a program to communicate between two LPARs using a CTC
connection. I was having a problem with occasional I/O errors. I
originally had the program on an SCTC connection and swicthed it over to
a BCTC connection. Since moving it, I have had no problems with the
program.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Daniel Cremieux
Dear all
How can we achive this in Cobol ?
I don't see any function which can do it
77 HEX-FIELD PIC S9(9) COMP.
77 DECIMAL-FIELD PIC S9(9) COMP-3.
...
MOVE HEX-FIELD TO DECIMAL-FIELD.
Add these to your JCL.
/*ROUTE XEQ testnode
/*ROUTE PRINT prodnode
Howard Rifkind
We do this sort of thing all the time, using XCOM, a CA product that does
FTP-like things. Here's the sequence of events:
1. JOB-A on LPAR-A runs and does:
a. iefbr14 to delete a dataset-a that will receive output from LPAR-B.
b. sends JOB-B to LPAR-B.
2. JOB-B runs on LPAR-B and does:
IMHO you should get rid of BCTC. It is obsolete.
As I read somewhere, BCTC was on S/360 machines, and SCTC requires S/370
mode.
BTW: CTC can be on BusTag (both BCTC and SCTC), can be on ESCON.
It also can be on FICON, but only as FCTC, which is AFAIK almost the
same as SCTC (at least for VTAM
On Monday 05 December 2005 01:20 pm, R.S. wrote:
IMHO you should get rid of BCTC. It is obsolete.
As I read somewhere, BCTC was on S/360 machines, and SCTC requires S/370
mode.
BTW: CTC can be on BusTag (both BCTC and SCTC), can be on ESCON.
It also can be on FICON, but only as FCTC, which is
In a message dated 12/5/2005 11:23:08 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
to access regular 3490 tape or virtual 3490 tape we use the esoteric
UNIT=TAPEP and let SMS drive the allocation.
Real tape gen'ed as
UNIT TYPE STATUS
03A0 3490 O-NRD
Vitural tape
UNIT TYPE
Mark Jacobs wrote:
On Monday 05 December 2005 01:20 pm, R.S. wrote:
IMHO you should get rid of BCTC. It is obsolete.
As I read somewhere, BCTC was on S/360 machines, and SCTC requires S/370
mode.
BTW: CTC can be on BusTag (both BCTC and SCTC), can be on ESCON.
It also can be on FICON, but
I am getting a lot of responses stating that BCTC is required for GRS.
This, I know. I do appreciate the attempts to be helpful.
There are many refences on the board regarding the requirement for GRS
to use BCTC. I have GRS using BCTC and I am neither questioning its use
of BCTC or its
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 06:09:08 -0600, Big Iron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I didn't see this option listed in the User's Guide in the list of
columns for
the Output Descriptor panel. On some panels, entering a ? will show
different columns.
I didn't see the TRC option either. I can add the PAGEDEF
Just to clarify (and explain different answers already given),
to answer this question we need to know what you mean by HEX input and
DECIMAL output. If you want to convert binary stored data (often
displayed by its hex values) to packed-decimal output, then the approach
listed below is the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Arnett
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 12:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: BCTC vs SCTC
I am getting a lot of responses stating that BCTC is required
for GRS.
In a message dated 12/5/2005 1:09:38 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
to select the font defined in my PAGEDEF. It appears that the TRC option
can't be added to an output after it is generated.
What kind of printer? What MODE is it in?
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:54:18 -0700, Paul Gilmartin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
A suitably specialized FTP server would recognize the naming convention
violation and, rather than quietly failing, reject the transfer before
it really begins...
Is EMEA's server similarly smart, or does it leave it
Has anybody seen any updates to the 3/31/2007 date for End-of-Service on
z/OS 1.5? The IBM web site still has an * next to it indicating it has
not been officially announced yet.
Is there any offering available from IBM that will still get you z/OS
1.5 for those of us still stuck on G5 hardware?
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:52:34 -0600, Steve Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I am asking for is some help finding the differences between the
two. As a software developer how can I go to SCTC or even FCTC if I
cannot find documentation on either the protocaols in use or the
differences between
Hi,
as of today I just deliver SHOWzOS V7.12 to Sam Golob to make it available for
all via CBTTAPE (FILE#492).
I believe he need some times to make it available and provide the preloaded
version (FILE#614).
Version 7.12 contains the following changes
*$712
Thanks to everyone that responded.
Bruno Sugliani wrote:
have a look around page 3.3
could be helpfull
Watch the wrap
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg29fafd2510f68d17285256ced0051213eaid=1
Bruno
Bruno(dot)sugliani(at)groupemornay(dot)asso(dot)fr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:1133810346.149768.199330
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Greetings and happy holidays!
I copied a full volume to tape using ADRDSSU from SYSTEM-V and restored
to an empty volume on SYSTEM-C, again with ADRDSSU. The copy went
fine. I manually
Hi all,
I am having a problem in my IMS-DC code.
I want to know what's the difference between the below
two statements
CALL 'CBLTDLI' USING IMS-INSERT
IOPCB
MOD-AREA
MODNAME.
(MODNAME
Sudhanshu,
Is that a compilation error problem?
Look in 'CBLTDLI' source and it should either expect two or three
parameters. That's 'exclusive OR', one or the other but not both.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
The second ISRT call without the modname means that the modname IMS
will use may be the previously specified modname on the previous ISRT
call.
On 12/6/05, sudhanshu Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am having a problem in my IMS-DC code.
I want to know what's the difference between the
54 matches
Mail list logo
