Hi
If someone can sujest a freeware ZIP/UNZIP program for z/OS ( compattible
with WINZIP )
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Skip Robinson wrote:
When I first saw this question, I resisted the urge to jump in until I had
a better notion of the issues. Here goes.
A while back I looked at a production control challenge here that seemed
to have one obvious solution: mount an AIX file on USS and edit it with
ISPF. I
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
If someone can sujest a freeware ZIP/UNZIP program for z/OS ( compattible
with WINZIP )
http://www.info-zip.org
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ginnie,
I do not know of a way to do this without doing what I would consider
abnormal things with the SMS ACDS configuration.
I still do not understand *WHY* you are trying to this by management
class. Are there specific datasets you are trying to handle
separately?
Maybe if you explained
On 18 Jun 2006 01:19:43 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miklos Szigetvari) wrote:
If someone can sujest a freeware ZIP/UNZIP program for
z/OS ( compattible
with WINZIP )
There is a commercial one from ASI. I haven't dealt
with them
Thanks for your reply at least that verifies my original thought that
47476 was the 'track capacity' as published by IBM and that my memory may be
still partially functioning
James F. Smith
\
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Also, while I haven't used the mainframe version, I
know there is an os/390 port of INFO-Zip. It's freeware, including free for
commercial applications.
It's also 'functionally stabilised'.
They haven't done any work on it since OS/390.
Nothing, with z/OS.
And, there's no support.
We looked
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Yes, IP drops packets. But also, yes, TCP keeps track of it all and requests retransmissions.
Not according to the traces.
If TCP/IP is so robust, why has it NEVER happened in 7 years under SNA (how
long we've had the TN3270 client we use), and it always happens under
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I obviously can't comment on traces I haven't seen. I can say that TCP
provides guaranteed delivery ... if you (and your software) are willing to cope
with some very ugly timings.
We have no guaranteed delivery! Period!
And, the only change was SNA to TCP/IP.
If
Crispin Hugo wrote:
Crispin Hugo
Hi Chaps,
I have a RACF profile defined for the master catalog CATALOG.Z17.MASTER
which has a UACC of READ with group TSG in the access list with ALTER. The
profile is owned by group TSG. The profile is defined as Generic although it
is the fully qualified
Arthur T. wrote:
On 18 Jun 2006 01:19:43 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miklos Szigetvari) wrote:
If someone can sujest a freeware ZIP/UNZIP program for z/OS ( compattible
with WINZIP )
There is a commercial one from ASI. I haven't
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
06/16/2006
at 10:31 AM, Klein, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm not sure where all the she stuff is coming from.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We don't care. We don't have to
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
06/16/2006
at 01:38 PM, Arthur T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And, this is just one of those random pieces of
knowledge picked up *between* sessions.
IMHO the information picked up between sessions is one of the major
reasons for going to SHARE. It's amazing what people
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/16/2006
at 03:10 PM, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Gee Wiz another chance to hear Cheryl talk about herself.. I will
pass thank you anyway.
Not that Cheryl isn't perfectly capable of defending herself, but that
was a low blow directed against someone who has
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
06/16/2006
at 10:31 AM, Klein, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm not sure where all the she stuff is coming from.
Youre message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] includes
the text The programmer says she can do this with Windows.
I'm a he(6foot1, bald, beard).
Irrelevant unless you
Assuming all your group SYS1 users don't also have the OPERATIONS
attribute, there is a separate profile (don't have my manuals handy)
which can be used to just to grant the authority to define aliases in
the master catalog. Perhaps they have access to that.
Crispin Hugo wrote:
I have a
Agreed wholeheartedly.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 4:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Justifying SHARE (was SHARE in Baltimore, August
13-18, 2006)
I'm sorry for the following vent of spleen, but I am sufficiently pissed
off to let go with both barrels here, having just spent an hour looking
for yet another IBM web page that has moved. With the old link no longer
valid and no redirection to the new address.
I was looking for the Catalog
Peter,
I accept the fact that VLF would not be involved. I'm primarily
interested in improving the performance of the directory of a large PDS.
I know that this library is only updated by one job each day and I'd put an
LLA REFRESH of that library as part of that job.
Is this a situation
19 matches
Mail list logo
