On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 13:27 -0600, Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
> ... basically found that (all things otherwise being equal),
> for a given amount of aggregate electronic memory, a global,
> non-partitioned cache was more effective than any partitioning the
> same amount of electronic memory.
Ever
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WE have an IP configuration using an OSAE 10/100 base with the
following definitions
DEVICE OSA1 LCS 0C40
LINK OSALNK0X ETHERNET 0 OSA1
;
;
;
; HOME internet (IP) addresses
;
; NOTE:
;
;The IP addresses for the
;the LINK s
In a message dated 8/24/2006 2:06:03 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFAIK he is also subscribed here.
>>
But doesn't post very regularly(anymore).
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive acces
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006o.html#68 DASD Response Time (on antique
3390?)
part of this is global cache/lru vis-a-vis local cache/lru. i had been
doing global cache management nearly 40 years ago in cp67 ... at the
time when at least some of the academic literature was focused on
local
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/24/2006
at 02:51 PM, john gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>o the fact that John Ehrman, who owns the HLASM, and his (remote
>Australian) development team are active participants.
AFAIK he is also subscribed here.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 08/24/2006
at 09:52 AM, "Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I am afraid that the problem is what I suspected, and what another
>poster suggested, that this (&COND) is handed to the IF macro as a
>string and not a "parse-able" line of text
HLA parses
Phil Payne wrote:
Anyone remember SQUISH from the GUIDE Goodie tape? An SIO appendage to set the
#1 DEB extent
to the physical volume?
No, but I got a copy from SHARE, and have some major modifications (may
call IEBCOPY to compress while copying; use up to eight input volumes;
etc.). Still
Casey,
My shop runs CA7 extensively, and we encountered an issue simlar to yours.
However, it was not related to the migration z/OS v1.7. We discovered this
in the later part of 2005, prior to my migration to v1.7. My Performance
Team recommends you look at your Dormancy and Hold values for y
FYI,
ISPF and Rexx requirements have been posted for discussion on the SHARE
requirements site. Please let your voice be heard.
If you did not receive the Email announcing the posting or do not know how
to access the SHARE requirements site, send me an Email and I will tighten
you up.
Reg
On 8/24/2006 11:17 AM, Terry Sambrooks wrote:
I had thought I had tried the SETR RACLIST(UNIXPRIV) REFRESH earlier only to
receive an indication that it has no effect. The display of active classes had
UNIXPRIV on the list.
This time I issued consecutive SETR RACLIST(UNIXPRIV) followed by SET
Shmuel,
I had a good laugh over your answer below. What good does it do the poster
to know that it is in your bookcase? Although he does know it exists!
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee Wisconsin
414-475-7434
- Original Message -
From: "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)"
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ray Mullins
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 10:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HLASM macro call question
MNOTE 'Send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
MNOTE 'SUBSCRIBE ASSEM
> But the real question is: what are you serializing? Can you use ENQ? can
> you use PLO? Inappropriate use of the CMS lock can adversely affect the
> running of the system.
Peter, first let me thank you for the education I couldn't get from the book.
Again, I'm in the research phase and decided
MNOTE 'Send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
MNOTE 'SUBSCRIBE ASSEMBLER-LIST your name'
&knowledge setb 1
(Steve, did you know that you don't need the return code parameter in
MNOTE?)
Later,
Ray
--
M. Ray Mullins
Roseville, CA, USA
http://www.catherdersoftware.com/
http://www.mrmu
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Terry Sambrooks
>
> [ snip ]
> I had thought I had tried the SETR RACLIST(UNIXPRIV) REFRESH
> earlier only to receive an indication that it has no effect.
> The display of active classes had UNIXPRIV on the list.
>
Hi Walt,
In respect of the earlier post on:
What actually occurs is a security violation on class FSOBJ.
ICH408I USER(UNXSTU1 ) GROUP(UNIXGRP ) NAME(UNXSTU1 ID ) 978
CL(FSOBJ )
INSUFFICIENT AUTHORITY TO MOUNTSETUID
Obscurity:
Every now and then someone gets named as a "master criminal". That, of course,
is the one
thing they're not - because they got caught. Real master criminals don't get
caught.
Security by obscurity meets offences by obscurity.
z/OS security is an embodiment of the expression: "You
Yes,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Two of its chief merits are
o the quality of its contributors, although there is significant overlap
with IBM_MAIN, and
o the fact that John Ehrman, who owns the HLASM, and his (remote Australian)
development
team are active participants.
John Gilmore
Ashland, M
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of john gilmore
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HLASM macro call question
Seymour's contrary view noted, this thread nevertheless belongs on and
should
The ABCs of Systems Programming Volume 7 is now available:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/abstracts/SG246987.html?Open
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
In our environment Shark 800 w/ficon it's 2 ms or less into the hundreds
of mic's with cache hits in the 90 - 100% range. When we supported RVA
T82, w/escon w/3390 emulation I seem to remember 4 - 7 ms with same cache
hit ratio. I also found some old doc from out site that showed STK 8890
with
On 8/24/2006 9:24 AM, Terry Sambrooks wrote:
I have attempted to introduce SUPERUSER granularity by exploiting UNIXPRIV
within RACF. I have defined a number of resources including
SUPERUSER.FILESYS.MOUNT and given UNIXGRP (my chosen name) update access which
according to the z/OS 1.6 UNIX Syst
From the current (V1R5) HLASM Language Reference manual, SC26-4940-04:
COMPAT(NOSYSLIST), abbreviation CPAT(NOSYSL)
instructs the assembler not to treat sublists in SETC symbols as character
strings, when passed to a macro definition in an operand of a macro
instruction.
Seymour's contrary vi
I don't know what hardware you have available... If you have peer mode
capability you need to use ICP for the "channel path type" otherwise for
compatibility mode if I recall correctly you need to use ICR/ICS.
Unless you want to override the values the control unit and device
numbers are suggested
I don't need to keep the old z/OS 1.4 system so I think that it is
simplest/quickest to do the first IPL in production with the new z/OS 1.7
system with JES2 using the old z/OS 1.4 spool. No need to do the spool
offload/reload because I don't have to change the size of the spool.
Francois Pare
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 7:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HLASM Macro Call Question
You need to provide a bit more context. Please do a cut & paste fr
Paul, Suggest you take a look at the DALLIKE text unit which is documented
in the Authorized Assembler Programming Guide; it allows a model data set
to be specified on a new allocation.
Mike WoodRMM Development
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:28:52 -0500, Paul Schuster
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>T
Hi Sail,
What is the SRR? Is this a construct of yours (Vanguard) that you are
trying to serialize? If so an MVS LOCK is probably not the best choice.
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMA
Hi,
Yet another opportunity to demonstrate my ignorance has arisen.
I have attempted to introduce SUPERUSER granularity by exploiting UNIXPRIV
within RACF. I have defined a number of resources including
SUPERUSER.FILESYS.MOUNT and given UNIXGRP (my chosen name) update access which
according to
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 15:05 +0900, Timothy Sipples wrote:
> I have sympathy for AMD's position, but let's bear in mind they want to
> sell lots and lots of chips, and (to be totally cynical) virtualization is
> not in the interests of a chipmaker interested in high volumes.
Well no, they don't wan
In a message dated 8/24/2006 7:11:16 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>(*) I used to work with a guy who prided himself on
>being "clever" enough to program around any restrictions
>imposed by the OS that got in his way. Of course,
>this always involved APF, Key0, e
Steve Myers said:
utilities generally verify read access through SAF, and
do a data ENQ on the data set name, but they do not
actually process the data set through OPEN. While it is dangerous ...
Dangerous? (*) Sensitive to OS changes, maybe, but as long as
*all* the necessary precautions are
David Day:
Very interesting thread. Since I read IBM-MAIN in DIGEST mode, I missed it
yesterday during real-time.
I don't think I have ever heard of anyone considering slowing down response
time to make it as slow as a mainframe for benchmarking purposes. Neat
idea. I have only used it many times
>However, I don't want to obtain CMS lock while CMSSMF or CMSEQDQ is held
(ABEND073).
And how are "you" getting control? You should have understandings of your
caller's environments. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I cannot think of any place
in the system where non-system code would get called holding the
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 08/23/2006
at 07:03 PM, "Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I need a bit of IEBEYEBALL by some of you heavy weight MACRO writers.
You need to provide a bit more context. Please do a cut & paste from
the actual listing, showing where you set the LCLC
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/23/2006
at 05:08 PM, "Jeffrey D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Your question belongs in the ASSEMBLER list group.
This is a legitiamte list for the guestion, and it probably has more
eyeballs.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO posi
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 08/23/2006
at 04:43 PM, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>The 3278-1 had a primary screen size of 12x40 (480 bytes) and an
>alternate screen size of 12x80 (960 bytes).
That came later.
>I am shocked that no one bothered looking in their handy 3276
>Descriptio
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/23/2006
at 03:01 PM, "Patrick O'Keefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>That's what I thought, too, but Googling 3270 "Model 1" results in
>several hits showing 16x40.
The official IBM manuals trump google.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/23/2006
at 03:01 PM, "Patri
I have defined CFR(Dedicated) and CFS(Shared) channels for my Production CPC
and when I am connecting them, its failing with following HCD message:
Processor X cannot be connected via different control units to the
coupling facility - partition CF01 of processor X.
I am afraid I have/can not de
Steve,
Too late - check out IHAUDA in SYS1.MODGEN.
Cheers,
Greg
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http:/
40 matches
Mail list logo
