You are right.
I'm using this construct in several REXX procedures and it works fine.
Volkmar
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List im Auftrag von Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)
Gesendet: Do 21.12.2006 16:35
An: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Betreff: Re: REXX Question - Variable Con
We are attempting to switch from 3590J(MEDIA3) to 3590K(media4) tapes but
HSM is issuing the messages below. We have ejected all the J media
scratches and inserted enough of the K media to at least get through
tonight. But it's critical that we figure this out before this weekend.
CBR4195I LAC
At 21:13 +0100 on 12/21/2006, Lindy Mayfield wrote about Question
about SVC 109:
Can someone please tell me if I have gotten this right? (:
SVC's are numbered from 0 to 255.
From 0 to 199 are reserved for IBM use.
SVC 109 is basically an SVC that can call an SVC from 0 to 255, and
again IBM
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 15:07 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
> This happened to us and we had to wait over half an hour for a
> full-volume dump (occurring on another system) of a 60K cylinder DASD to
> finish before SMF would initialize and the IPL could continue.
ADRUENQ maybe ???
Depends on other e
You make the presumption (sorry) that this doctrine applies to all court
cases. It only constitutionally applies to criminal courts. In civil
court, the burden of proof is on the defendant - always has been, even
in English common law. That's why
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 9:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX Question - Variable Control & Passing (IPCS/ISPF)
Assuming you want to stick to REXX an
What Len said is correct. I have taken his example and added some comments
so you can see what each control statement does. Please feel free to open a
support-issue and ask questions. That is what support is here for.
Russell Witt
CA-Dynam/TLMS Level-2 Support Manager
..
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=C
Assuming you want to stick to REXX and the variables are in
a separate member, something like this should work:
/*REXX*/
...
"ALLOC F(COPYBOOK) DS('datastname(member)') SHR"
"EXECIO * DISKR COPYBOOK (STEM cb_vars. FINIS"
"FREE F(COPYBOOK)"
do i = 1 to cb_vars.0
interpret cb_vars.i
end
Pete
In a message dated 12/21/2006 5:53:07 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could someone provide the name of the legal listserv. Since all the
lawyer wannabes are over here, maybe some sysadmin wannabes are over
there talking about the mainframe.
>>
Yeah, guess Darren
Could someone provide the name of the legal listserv. Since all the
lawyer wannabes are over here, maybe some sysadmin wannabes are over
there talking about the mainframe.
You make the presumption (sorry) that this doctrine applies to all court
cases. It only constitutionally applies to crim
Tom Marchant wrote:
I wonder what happens if your SMFPRMxx used at IPL time excludes
type 19 records, then after everything is up you issue SETSMF
(or SET SMF) to include type 19 records.
Yeah, I know, it's kind of a kluge, but I wonder how the system
behaves.
The tricky part is you can't i
>I don't think so, for address linkmvs. You have to
You're right. This only works for 1 parameter as if from a JCL PARM.
Rexx extends this and c doesn't handle multiple "PARMS".
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive ac
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:07:21 -0800, Edward Jaffe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If you collect SMF Type 19 records, beware that an
>SMF-initialization-time LSPACE request is issued for every volume
>connected to the system. If SYSVTOC.volid is held by another system for
>any significant period of ti
[re-sent with the correct Reply-to; sorry]
Phil Sidler wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:42:22 -0700, Steve Comstock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Indeed, I tried what you suggested and got a S0C4
(of course, I could have made some kind of an
error in copying or compiling, etc., but I think
I'm clos
Phil Sidler wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:42:22 -0700, Steve Comstock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Indeed, I tried what you suggested and got a S0C4
(of course, I could have made some kind of an
error in copying or compiling, etc., but I think
I'm closer to right on this one).
Well, I was a b
If you collect SMF Type 19 records, beware that an
SMF-initialization-time LSPACE request is issued for every volume
connected to the system. If SYSVTOC.volid is held by another system for
any significant period of time, an IPLing system will appear to be
"stuck". This happened to us and we had
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:42:22 -0700, Steve Comstock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Indeed, I tried what you suggested and got a S0C4
>(of course, I could have made some kind of an
>error in copying or compiling, etc., but I think
>I'm closer to right on this one).
Well, I was a bit cavalier in thinki
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ray Mullins
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 4:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones
You make the presumption (sorry) that this doctrine appli
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:02:19 -0600, Tom Moulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>One thing I keep thinking about through all of this ---
>
>What about the American tradition of presumption of innocence? Don't we
>pride ourselves as a country on presuming that a person is innocent until
>proven guilty
Phil Sidler wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:32:02 -0700, Steve Comstock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since the argument list for address linkmvs
is a list (array) of addresses pointing to
halfword prefix strings, I use:
#pragma environment(CLA2)
struct argtable_entry {
short argstring_
You make the presumption (sorry) that this doctrine applies to all court
cases. It only constitutionally applies to criminal courts. In civil
court, the burden of proof is on the defendant - always has been, even in
English common law. That's why OJ owes the Goldman family a bazillion
dollars or
Depends on what run-time is available. If LE (Language Environment) is
available at run-time (probably via the linklist - but possibly in a
steplib), then you can run either VS COBOL II or Enterprise COBOL compiled
programs.
If you only the VS COBOL II run-time available, then NO you cannot run
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:32:02 -0700, Steve Comstock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Since the argument list for address linkmvs
>is a list (array) of addresses pointing to
>halfword prefix strings, I use:
>
>#pragma environment(CLA2)
> struct argtable_entry {
>short argstring_len;
>ch
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:32:02 -0700, Steve Comstock wrote:
But once again, I'm running into troubles with C.
But it looks like argp[0]->argstring_len is
16448 (decimal; this is '4040' in hex, so it
looks like I'm getting spaces in what is
expected to be a length field).
A
John McKown wrote:
As far as I can see, in today's z/OS environment, everything could be
architected as
a type 1, 3, or 6 SVC with no real impact on functionality. If I'm
blowing smoke, please
educate me on the advantages of a type 2 (other than no paging, I guess)
or a type 4.
and it
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 3:07 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Question about SVC 109
>
>
> Lindy Mayfield wrote:
> > The doc above says specifically:
>
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:51:32 -0600, Patrick O'Keefe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:59:15 -0600, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>...
>>Why would you expect them to mention it or stop advertising? Has any
>>other company ever stopped advertising their product because
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 3:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question about SVC 109
So type-3 or type-4 is the same nowdays?
As I recall, TYPE 3 are single pag
So type-3 or type-4 is the same nowdays?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 11:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question about SVC 109
Lindy Mayfield wrote:
> The doc abov
Lindy Mayfield wrote:
The doc above says specifically:
ESR (type 4) SVC - is type 2
But I didn't quite understand that. Seems SVC 109 is a type-2 that only calls
type-4 SVC's, but that doesn't quit jive for me (yet). That was my question.
(-:
SVC 109 is a type-2 standard SVC routine tha
One thing I keep thinking about through all of this ---
What about the American tradition of presumption of innocence? Don't we
pride ourselves as a country on presuming that a person is innocent until
proven guilty? Has there been a trial of PSI or IBM's claims yet? Maybe in
Phil's mind, but n
Hello Rob,
I see what you are saying, but one thing that was a bit confusing (after some
research) was the doc here that says "ESR (type 4) SVC - is type-2".
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2V260/1.4.3.112?SHELF=IEA2BK61&DT=20050713173259
But, I also from that see t
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:32:02 -0700, Steve Comstock wrote:
>
> But once again, I'm running into troubles with C.
>
> But it looks like argp[0]->argstring_len is
> 16448 (decimal; this is '4040' in hex, so it
> looks like I'm getting spaces in what is
> expected to be a length field).
>
> Any sugg
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:59:15 -0600, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>...
>Why would you expect them to mention it or stop advertising? Has any
>other company ever stopped advertising their product because of
>impending litigation?
>...
I was questioning SHARE's apparent endorsement of th
Below is a part of one of the last ones I ran, but it's been awhile.
Note PARM='TEST', it is your friend, it will tell you what it will try
to do before updating anything.
If I remember correctly, this would copy all active files from the tape
volumes listed AND those on any other tapes in the v
>You can turn the positive values negative by multiplying them by -1
DOH!! Major Homer Simpson moment - with the hand print on the forehead to
prove it.
Jeffrey Deaver, Engineer
Systems Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
651-665-4231(v)
651-610-7670(p)
--
Some time ago I sent to IBM-Main list a question about migration of old
3480/90 physical cartridges to a VTS subsystem. Someone sends me an e-mail
telling about COPYCAT.
I, now got this product from CA-Brazil and installed it, but some technical
simple doubts arise, so I will need to study and tes
Lindy Mayfield wrote on 12/21/2006 15:13:04:
> Can someone please tell me if I have gotten this right? (:
>
> SVC's are numbered from 0 to 255.
>
> From 0 to 199 are reserved for IBM use.
>
> SVC 109 is basically an SVC that can call an SVC from 0 to 255, and
> again IBM has reserved 0 - 199 for t
OK, so I've got address link working for
programs written in Assembler, COBOL, PL/I,
and [thanks to Phil Sidler], C. They also
work for address attach, except for COBOL,
which is OK since the doc says that neither
address link nor address attach are supported
by COBL, so I guess I'm ahead of the g
Can someone please tell me if I have gotten this right? (:
SVC's are numbered from 0 to 255.
>From 0 to 199 are reserved for IBM use.
SVC 109 is basically an SVC that can call an SVC from 0 to 255, and again IBM
has reserved 0 - 199 for their own use. This in essence extends the range of
SVC'
The OP didn't say what OS version his LPAR was. The specification
for the broadcast data set in IKJTSOxx was new in z/OS 1.6. However,
it has been ignored / not needed in MSTJCLxx since z/OS 1.3 IIRC.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America /
Jeffrey Deaver wrote on 12/21/2006 08:16:15 AM:
> I have two files in the same format...
>
> ADC.DPGMDEV.TWORK.HDBSPB.IT010 2006-08-31...Â.
> CCC4CDCDCCE4EEDDD4CCCEDC4CEFFF446FF6FF00160
> 143B4774455B36692B842272B930100020060080310072C
>
> ... That's the te
Do all your numbers end in 0? there can also be 1C through 9C.
On 12/21/06, Jeffrey Deaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Crude, but I decided to simply edit my file2 and change x'0c' to x'0d' for
0-9 in the sign column.
--
Mike
-
>From Init & Tuning Reference:
The master scheduler JCL no longer has to point to the broadcast data
set. You now specify the broadcast data set in the IKJTSOxx member.
The master JCL will no longer allocate the broadcast data set. TSO/E
will use either the default (SYS1.BRODCAST) or the
In my test LPAR MSTRJCLxx, I have no dd for SYSLBC, yet when I do WHOHAS
command, I see that the MASTER ASID has an allocation to the BRODCAST
dsn.
How does master asid start-up do all the allocations for this dataset and
the other datasets which are not
specifically defined in my MSTRJCLXX?
Joh
Thanks every one.
Took previce advise and did exactly that.
--- Bruce Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to break out the 3390 generic into 2
> > groups; 3390-3 and 3390-9.
> Sorry, generics are based on the 4-byte device type
> in the UCB, and
> there is only a single device
I would like to break out the 3390 generic into 2
groups; 3390-3 and 3390-9.
Sorry, generics are based on the 4-byte device type in the UCB, and
there is only a single device type for all models of 3390. As others
suggested, esoterics are the way to go
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Devel
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Arthur T.
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 9:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX Question - Variable Control & Passing (IPCS/ISPF)
Create a single string with all of the assig
David, DELVOL is what I meant when I said I had deleted a number of primary
volumes. And, to my understanding, the "days" parameter for EXPIREBV says
to delete only stuff that is *older* than "days". The manual says "If the
age of such a backup version exceeds 'days', the EXPIREBV command dele
Have you tried VPUT / VGET to the PROFILE pool instead of the
application or shared pool? Just asking.
I wouldn't recommend it. Unlike the SHARED pool (which is dynamically
created and deleted during ISPF sessions), the PROFILE pool is kept
'forever'; i.e. it's saved on disk. And just like eve
There are lots of reasons primary space management is not finishing.
This may be one of them.
What version of DFSMShsm are you running?
How many tasks are you using the Primary Space Management?
Do most of your MGMTCLAS definitions specify to go to ML1 or directly to
ML2 or both?
What type of tap
Crude, but I decided to simply edit my file2 and change x'0c' to x'0d' for
0-9 in the sign column.
Jeffrey Deaver, Engineer
Systems Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
651-665-4231(v)
651-610-7670(p)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That reminds me. The first ATMs in Canada I saw at my bank were made by
IBM - and they used a formed-character printer to print the information
about the transaction on card stock media.
It was apparent to me that what they were using was exactly the right
size to be a 9
A small almost got-me... more than one representation for positive in that
last nibble... C, along with F, and I see from my lookup that it could
have also been A or E. Anyone know why there is a difference? I'm
switching them all to D for my subtraction.
Jeffrey Deaver, Engineer
Systems Engin
Help.
I have two files in the same format...
ADC.DPGMDEV.TWORK.HDBSPB.IT010 2006-08-31...Â.
CCC4CDCDCCE4EEDDD4CCCEDC4CEFFF446FF6FF00160
143B4774455B36692B842272B930100020060080310072C
... That's the text with the hex turned on below it.
Both files conta
---
Does anyone one know if it is possible to receive monthly PUT Tapes?
Who should I contact?
-
It's possible, but unless you intend to apply maintenance that often,
why bother?
IMHO, you're better off
On 21 Dec 2006 06:20:47 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thompson, Steve , SCI TW)
wrote:
I have a problem where I would like to pass some number of
variables
between different REXX sources (in this case >200).
I have placed the variables
Or if it's SAS, you could concatenate a SAS OPTION statement before the
SAS source.
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECT
I Think You Mean or I Thought You Meant.
Howard Rifkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
12/21/2006 10:27 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: HCD EDT Question
Tom, Thanks.
But what is ITYM ?
Tom, Thanks.
But what is ITYM ?
--- Tom Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:34:10 -0800, Howard Rifkind
> wrote:
>
> >Hello.
> >
> >I have just make a change to my EDT 00 to add Disk9
> >for 3390 mod 9's and Disk3 for 3390 mod 3's.
> >
> >Is this considered a software o
Sadly Ed - and despite IBM promoting such services - not yet available on a
worldwide basis.
James F. Smith
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: 21 December 2006 22:27
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
In a recent note, R.S. said:
> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:58:43 +0100
> >
> > I tried to understand both JCL Reference and UG (the latter not
> > even giving a single hit when doing a fuzzy search for 'symbol'
> > ...) but came up clueless.
>
In #<<< 5.4.2.1 "z/OS V1R7.0 MVS JCL Reference
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:43:32 +0200, גדי בן
אבי <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Could you provide an example of such a job?
>
SMP/E 3.4 Manuals:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/GIM2BK50
SHARE session 2851 from Seattle in March 2006
SMP/E Internet Service Retrie
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:11:57 -0600, Patrick O'Keefe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Interesting. SHARE is still sending out ads about PSI. They don't seem
>to mention a law suit:
>
Why would you expect them to mention it or stop advertising? Has any
other company ever stopped advertising their pro
Hi,
Could you provide an example of such a job?
Thanx
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 4:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Receiving Monthley PUT Tapes
bci ao `a
In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:
> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:36:40 -0500
>
> I've written programs where the lower bound was negative. Yes, the
> code was clearer that way than it would have otherwise been.
>
Heck, I've written programs in Rexx and awk (others might use
How about .
// SET QUOT =
// SET X = SUCCESS
// SET A=&X
// SET B="&A=&X"
//STEPA EXEC PGM=IEFBR14,PARM ="&A"
//STEPB EXEC PGM=IEFBR14,PARM ="&B"
Alan Brown
Princeton Softech
(609) 627-5598
Peter Hunkeler replied:
> Betreff: Re: Problem resolving JCL SET symbol
>
>
> > //SASPROC ENTRY=SASXAL0,
> > // OPTIONS=,
> > // SORT=4
> >
> //*
> > //SAS EXEC PGM=&ENTRY,PARM='SORT=&SORT &OPTIONS'
>
>
Steve,
I wrote a couple of fairly simple assembler REXX functions a few years
ago to pass stem variables between two separate REXX execs in the same
address space.
They are called STEMPUSH and STEMPULL and can be found in the downloads
section of www.mximvs.com
STEMPUSH puts the rexx variables
bci ao `ai wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone one know if it is possible to receive monthly PUT Tapes?
Who should I contact?
You can order such tapes through IBMLink (ServiceLink) and (I think)
ShopzSeries. But why? We run a RECEIVE ORDER job _every_ night:. That
provides us with have the most curre
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 8:19 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: REXX Question - Variable Control & Passing (IPCS/ISPF)
>
> My options at this po
I have a problem where I would like to pass some number of variables
between different REXX sources (in this case >200).
I have placed the variables into a single REXX source. And I know that
this can't be called and then have those variables available in the
calling REXX exec (if I can, that w
Hi,
Does anyone one know if it is possible to receive monthly PUT Tapes?
Who should I contact?
Gadi
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MA
> //SASPROC ENTRY=SASXAL0,
> // OPTIONS=,
> // SORT=4
> //*
> //SAS EXEC PGM=&ENTRY,PARM='SORT=&SORT &OPTIONS'
How about:
//STEP1 EXEC PROC=SAS,
// PARM.SAS='SORT=4 add whatever parms you need he
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:44:58 +0100, Robert Bardos wrote:
> How can I get &X resolved in STEPB in the following stripped down example:
> // SET X=SUCCESS
> // SET A=&X
> // SET B='A=&X'
> //STEPA EXEC PGM=IEFBR14,PARM='&A'
> //STEPB EXEC PGM=IEFBR14,PARM='&B'
Surprisingly, it
Thanks Terry,
I'll give it a try. Ultimately I want to pass a
SYSPARM='variable=value' string to SAS. This however is deeply
encapsulated. Somewhat similar to
// EXEC SAS,PARM= opt2 opt3>>
(I used <> instead of quotes to illustrate the nesting levels.
"value" in this sample being the element t
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:34:10 -0800, Howard Rifkind wrote:
>Hello.
>
>I have just make a change to my EDT 00 to add Disk9
>for 3390 mod 9's and Disk3 for 3390 mod 3's.
>
>Is this considered a software or hardware change to
>HCD.
It is a software change.
>
>Do I have to create a new IODF and activ
Carol, Yes both HOME and CURRENT are reserved location names, and as such
they have special meaning. They effectively translate to the value set in
the volume record; HOME to the home lcoation, CURRENT to the current
location. This means that for each volume they relate to volume
information an
Robert Bardos wrote:
Radoslaw Skorupka (hope I got the spelling right) wrote:
What's your problem ?
You don't have to investigate how would it work, you can TRY IT.
Radoslaw,
what in my original post made you think that I did not try
it?
Misunderstanding ;-)
I read it "at low brain
Hi
In respect of the SET symbol problem, the following may be acceptable.
// SET X=SUCCESS
// SET A=&X
// SET SIGN='='
// SET B=&A.&SIGN.&X
//STEPA EXEC PGM=IEFBR14,PARM='&A'
//STEPB EXEC PGM=IEFBR14,PARM='&B'
The problem
Hello.
I have just make a change to my EDT 00 to add Disk9
for 3390 mod 9's and Disk3 for 3390 mod 3's.
Is this considered a software or hardware change to
HCD.
Do I have to create a new IODF and activate it in a
new slot (A0,A1..etc)?
Thanks
__
David Crayford wrote:
Steve Comstock wrote:
DLLs are overrated by people who are not aware of
how normal dynamic linkages work in z/OS. But one
must deal with them, since they are becoming more
and more common.
That depends on what language you code in. For C/C++ DLLs are a godsend.
Why d
Radoslaw Skorupka (hope I got the spelling right) wrote:
> What's your problem ?
> You don't have to investigate how would it work, you can TRY IT.
Radoslaw,
what in my original post made you think that I did not try
it?
Robert
--
Robert Bardos wrote:
Folks,
once again I'm drawing blanks. How can I get &X resolved in STEPB
in the following stripped down example:
// SET X=SUCCESS
// SET A=&X
// SET B='A=&X'
//STEPA EXEC PGM=IEFBR14,PARM='&A'
//STEPB EXEC PGM=IEFBR14,PARM='&B'
I tried to unders
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/20/2006
at 08:33 AM, "Jeffrey D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Having worked for several years on instruction emulation,
IBM draws a clear distinction between architecture and implementation.
The issue here is one of architecture, and for that PoOps is what is
Folks,
once again I'm drawing blanks. How can I get &X resolved in STEPB
in the following stripped down example:
// SET X=SUCCESS
// SET A=&X
// SET B='A=&X'
//STEPA EXEC PGM=IEFBR14,PARM='&A'
//STEPB EXEC PGM=IEFBR14,PARM='&B'
I tried to understand both JCL Reference
Larry,
Won't Expirebv execute nonsmsversions(uncatalogedata(5000)) do the same
thing for you without the programming effort?
You might want to Delvol the obsolete volumes.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Burch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:31 PM
To: IB
Steve Comstock wrote:
DLLs are overrated by people who are not aware of
how normal dynamic linkages work in z/OS. But one
must deal with them, since they are becoming more
and more common.
That depends on what language you code in. For C/C++ DLLs are a godsend.
Pat,
My wife did warn me that there would not be hordes of young girls
wanting to sleep with me because of my assembler coding skills.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi_g2
-Original Message---
>Whenever an address space is dispatched, its local SRBs,
>if any exist at that moment, are dispatched before any TCBs are.
Except for preemtable SRBs (client and enclave SRBs), which compete
with the TCBs for CPU access, IIRC.
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
---
90 matches
Mail list logo
