In a message dated 10/19/2007 3:28:05 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All in all, I would not hold up the TCP/IP reimplementation as a model
of a successful replacement of a poorly ported product. It took a
number releases before I would call it successful.
>>
It
In a message dated 10/19/2007 9:46:49 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
software, i.e. is it zIIP eligible work. Anyway zIIPs can drop software
cost but would not make the system run faster, would they?
>>
Depends on how much it offloads? Sort of like the supermarket
Miklos,
The DDR utility has been used by the various levels of the VM ( VM/370,
VM/SP, VM/XA, VM/ESA, z/VM ) operating system. DDR only "understands"
tapes created by itself ( DDR, either the stand-alone version or the VM/CMS
online version ). If you are a licensed user of the VM operating sy
On Oct 19, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Field, Alan C. wrote:
Yesterday someone issued an RO *ALL,V 708-7014,OFFLINE which led to a
number of unplanned IPLs.
Now mgmt wants to implement a fingerchecker.
I searched CBT for a command exit that might ask something like "you
really want to vary 26,000 d
On Oct 19, 2007, at 7:14 AM, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Hi
I'm searching to get a standalone dump/restore program (DDR ? )
Is that for DFDSS or FDR or ?
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
s
Does anyone know of a utility that I can run to determine what percentage of
a stack volume is used? 3592 / JA
That would display;
Volume # Dataset Name: # of logical volumesPercentage
used:
Maybe I am asking too much. But I figure that it’s worth a try.
--
Skip
Sorry for being dense, but since we now have virtual dasd (RAID) and we now
have ICF, has anyone done any current research to see if a re-evaluation of
this process needs to be done?
I am just thinking that with the current dasd types, it maybe that things
have changed a bit.
We currently h
In that same time frame (mid 90s), our primary CFRM was so busy that we
could not XRC mirror it. That's no longer true. But yes, three volumes are
the minimum IBM recommendation. Other that keeping the three named
primaries on separate volumes, all other couple data sets can apparently be
placed an
>IXCH0243I For each couple dataset type the primary and alternate reside on
>different volumes this is consistent with the IBM recommendation.
It used to be recommended that certain primary and alternates be flip-flopped
over two volumes.
I have always believed they should be spread over more th
The most current recommendation I've seen comes from Health Checker. At
z/OS 1.9, an 'OK' result gives the message below. I would not venture to
guess whether fast DASD and channels would allow you stray from the blessed
path.
IXCH0243I For each couple dataset type the primary and alternate reside
The last manual I read on this was from 1999
Parallel Sysplex Performance Healthcheck
Case Study: DMdata/Danske Data
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg245373.pdf
I was wondering if this case study was still valid or if with the faster
CPUs and ICF and DASD whether or not I ne
>All work that can be dispatched on a zIIP will run at "full speed"
>regardless of the speed of the general CPs. So, yes, a zIIP can
>actually make work run faster.
My fault. I just didn't think of throttled engines.
--
Peter Hunkeler
Credit Suisse
---
Sorry but why did you post this at IBM-Main also.
Look at the replies at CICS-L and follow up.
Roland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-
One of my colleague informed me whenever apps team request to add the
Program and Transaction definitions they should also inform the DFHCOMMAREA
details to system support so that system personal can ensure that is defined
in the system. It was bouncer for me .Does this make any sense to any of
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacky Bright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 4:12 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: CICS DFHCOMMAREA changes
>
> nope the value for progs are less than 31000. How can I do that ?
>
> > You'd probably be better off asking t
>The really big roll-out was at 2.5, and it, too, was a big porting effort
>because a number of the redesigned "OS/390" processes were Unix processes
>ported to Unix System services.
I remember now (surprise!).
We did not move STK's VTS to TCP/IP from coax until 2.7, even though there was
a lot
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:38:02 +, Ted MacNEIL
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>When porting big applications or servers to z/OS UNIX the ...
>It's not just z/OS UNIX.
>The first implementation of TCP/IP on OS/390 was a port from VM.
>And, it was a pig until they decided to re-implement by starting
This is Harold,
Actually I did not write it, I just made a few corrections.
And I'm glad you took it and improved it even more.
I would suggest that you submit the update to www.cbttape.org so that others
could similarly benefit from your enhancements.
- Original Message -
From: "Ric
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jacky Bright
>
> Hi,
>
> How can I change the DFHCOMMAREA size in the CICS Regions ?
> Is it possible to define DFHCOMMAREA for diff. programs ?
> Developers are saying their fields outputs are truncating due
> to
They can use pointers.
Instead of passing data, they can allocate a big enough area and pass
its address using pointer-type value through DFHCOMMAREA.
Using this technique, they are not limited to 32K.
Ali
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
nope the value for progs are less than 31000. How can I do that ?
On 10/19/07, Farley, Peter x23353 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jacky Bright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 3:41 PM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > Subject: CICS
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacky Bright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 3:41 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: CICS DFHCOMMAREA changes
>
> Hi,
>
> How can I change the DFHCOMMAREA size in the CICS Regions ? Is it possible
> to define DFHCOMMAREA for di
Hi,
How can I change the DFHCOMMAREA size in the CICS Regions ? Is it possible
to define DFHCOMMAREA for diff. programs ? Developers are saying their
fields outputs are truncating due to that ..?
Does anyone has any idea about this ?
JAcky
--
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Pinion
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 2:13 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Lost my hard drive and my IBM links
>
>
> Did you initiate your disaster recovery plan?
Y
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Norgauer
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 2:06 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Lost my hard drive and my IBM links
>
>
> Help -
>
> I need the URL's for IBM service link(IB
Did you initiate your disaster recovery plan?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: John Norgauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Lost my hard drive and my IBM links
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:06:24 -0700
Help -
I need the URL's for IBM service link(IBMLINK) and also the IBM
p
"McKown, John" wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Harminc
> > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 12:00 PM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: Zapping HFS files
> >
> >
>
>
> I asked over on the Linu
https://www-304.ibm.com/jct03004c/ibmlink/link2/servicelink/servicelinkP
age.jsp?lc=en&cc=US ibmlink
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/ Pubs for
z/OS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Norgauer
Sent
Help -
I need the URL's for IBM service link(IBMLINK) and also the IBM
publication's link.
Thanks
John Norgauer
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacramento, Ca 95817
916-734-0536
SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING.. Guilty, until proven innocent !! "JN 20
TIMI is what you want.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AS/400
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology
The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to
comp.sys.ibm.sys3x.misc,alt.folklore.computers,bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> (For the AS/400 I never could figure the internal code architecture,
> IBM used something called "LIC" that was
> > I didn't mean to ask for the quantity but for how zIIPs can
> > help that software, i.e. is it zIIP eligible work. Anyway
> > zIIPs can drop software cost but would not make the system
> > run faster, would they?
>
> Possibly -- IIRC the "specialty" engines always run at full throttle,
> regar
Dr Goebel is the most fanatical anti-Flex-ES person within the whole of IBM.
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.co.uk
+44 7833 654 800
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [
I've done this buy using the 'OPTIONAL" phrase on the file select in
Cobol, and then using TSO Allocate and Free commands from inside the
program itself.
The Program needs to Allocate, then OPEN, Read or Write, then Close,
then Free the file. This can be repeated in a single run of the program
as
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hunkeler Peter (KIUK
3)
>
> [ snip ]
>
> I didn't mean to ask for the quantity but for how zIIPs can
> help that software, i.e. is it zIIP eligible work. Anyway
> zIIPs can drop software cost but would not make the
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Field, Alan C.
>
> Yesterday someone issued an RO *ALL,V 708-7014,OFFLINE which
> led to a number of unplanned IPLs.
>
> Now mgmt wants to implement a fingerchecker.
>
> I searched CBT for a command exit that mig
Peter Hunkeler said:
> You can switch interval recording on if you need even more of
> those virtual projectiles.
Sorry, I WAS referring to interval recording. I've a feeling Cees was
referring to the 30-4 and -5 subtypes.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
Performance Consultant
IBM United King
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 9:45 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Are there tasks that don't play by WLM's rules
>
>
> >>
> >Have to run the zIIPal
---
We've updated Harold's nice subroutine in order to be 31-bit compliant. I will
send you a copy if you like.
How about sending it to the CBT site and share with all comers?
>>
>Have to run the zIIPalyzer to make an educated guess. Maybe a little,
maybe
>enough to make it thru the humps. W/O measurement just idle
speculation.
I didn't mean to ask for the quantity but for how zIIPs can help that
software, i.e. is it zIIP eligible work. Anyway zIIPs can drop software
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I seem to remember this as TCP/IP version 3.2 with 3.3 having the fixes
> for optimization. Weren't there twin stacks being managed or s
If you have the CP's and the speed for short bursts maybe not an issue. If
you don't - well - I remember the recommendation by IBM to put our WAS
version 5 cell group in SYSSTC on a small 2 way G5 machine running 31 bit.
I remember the faces here when we started the cell group up, 7 address
spa
In a message dated 10/19/2007 1:31:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How would zIIPs help here?
>>
Have to run the zIIPalyzer to make an educated guess. Maybe a little, maybe
enough to make it thru the humps. W/O measurement just idle speculation.
Same for some o
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Field, Alan C.
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 9:14 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: VARY too many devices offline
>
> Yesterday someone issued an RO *ALL,V 708-7014,OFFLINE which
Yesterday someone issued an RO *ALL,V 708-7014,OFFLINE which led to a
number of unplanned IPLs.
Now mgmt wants to implement a fingerchecker.
I searched CBT for a command exit that might ask something like "you
really want to vary 26,000 devices offline?"
How do others shops handle t
For our doomsayer friend in Poland... do dead operating systems get
press releases?
http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/071019/0317343.html
Link courtesy of Jerry Johnston of IBM.
I must say it is pretty rare that IBM will publicly acknowledge VSE in
this manner, so any chance that we get to gloat about
>>
>>No. Not unless you have a VSTOR detail set up ahead of time or were
>>running RMF MON II in the background. See hlq.IBM.PARMLIB(ERBRMF03)
>>and the fine manuals for how to do that.
>>
>>Mark
>
>Clarification... since you mentioned AUX specifically in the last post:
>
>VSTOR won't show the AU
I seem to remember this as TCP/IP version 3.2 with 3.3 having the fixes
for optimization. Weren't there twin stacks being managed or some such
thing. I'm not too TCP/IP literate. We had this original version
implemented because I remember doing a pre/post resource impact analysis
finding additi
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL) writes:
> It's not just z/OS UNIX.
> The first implementation of TCP/IP on OS/390 was a port from VM.
> And, it was a pig until they
I also found this:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21215703
Are you running through the z/OS HTTP Server? If so, is the
communication between that and WAS using SSL (if you don't know,
then it probably is). That can be changed to HTTP if you want - save
you some cycles.
Do yo
It has come to our attention that the SHARE member directory is being
used by the employee of a SHARE member company to advertise a new
product. The SHARE member directory provides a facility for members to
contact one another directly. It does not reveal the email of the
recipient, but does reveal
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:09:53 -0500, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:15:54 -0500, Patrick Lyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>>
>>But back to my previous question, is there an RMF report that I can use via
>>batch to see history on how many AUX frames were allocated to
>> Type 30 any further than I can throw them. :-(
>
>That sounds like a more interesting competition that
>throwing cellphones.
...and supplies are kept coming for free. You can switch
interval recording on if you need even more of those
virtual projectiles...
--
Peter Hunkeler
Credit Suisse
At 10/16/2007 06:54 PM, Leonard D Woren wrote:
Does this mean that you use z/XDC to debug z/XDC? That must be fun.
Yes, of course I do. And yes, even after 29 years, it STILL is fun!
[:)]
Dave
Dave Cole REPLY TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cole Software WEB PAGE: http://www.co
Hi All,
We have posted our latest release (z1.9) of z/XDC. For more
information, see "www.colesoft.com/pr071015.shtml".
For access to the download page, please contact Wendie Wyant at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Dave Cole REPLY TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cole Software WEB PAG
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:15:54 -0500, Patrick Lyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>But back to my previous question, is there an RMF report that I can use via
>batch to see history on how many AUX frames were allocated to what address
>space via the REPORTS or SYSREPORTS statement, or via some other r
Shmuel,
SLR was non-DB2 (even announced as such in V3 R3.1 - the last release I
think).
The product marketing by IBM that supported DB2 was:
SystemView Enterprise Performance Data Manager/MVS (EPDM, 5695-101)
that was renamed into IBM Performance Reporter again renamed into
the Tivoli Perform
Hello everybody,
After migration one of our application from WAS3.5 to WAS5.1 we encountered
following problem:
response time grows dramatically, and in time of peak, most of users cannot
simply logon (or work with) application.
In WAS log we can see a lot of messages like that:
Trace: 2007/10/
Thank you
Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) wrote:
I'm searching to get a standalone dump/restore program (DDR ? )
DFDSS has a stand alone restore program. Search the dss books for
"stand alone" or BUILDSA.
--
Miklos Szigetvari
Development Team
ISIS Information Systems Gmbh
tel: (+43) 2
>I'm searching to get a standalone dump/restore program (DDR ? )
DFDSS has a stand alone restore program. Search the dss books for
"stand alone" or BUILDSA.
--
Peter Hunkeler
Credit Suisse
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
Hi
I'm searching to get a standalone dump/restore program (DDR ? )
--
Miklos Szigetvari
Development Team
ISIS Information Systems Gmbh
tel: (+43) 2236 27551 570
Fax: (+43) 2236 21081
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hotline: +43-2236-27551-111
Visit our Website: http:/
We've updated Harold's nice subroutine in order to be 31-bit compliant. I will
send you a copy if you like.
Rich Szabo
State Auto Insurance
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EM
"Martin Packer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om>...
> Kees wrote:
>
> > Remember that the reported figures are highwater marks,
> > so they will only go up, never down, but it can provide
> > you a clue.
>
> I tend to characterise this as Allocated rather than Su
Kees wrote:
> Remember that the reported figures are highwater marks,
> so they will only go up, never down, but it can provide
> you a clue.
I tend to characterise this as Allocated rather than Suballocated / Used.
So in principle the numbers can go down - but that's not a frequent
occurrenc
Hi John,
My understanding is that the client and the server will use the first cipher
suite they agree on. You should arrange them in order of preference (strongest
to weakest) so the first cipher both sides agree on is the strongest. If you
are using BZ FTP, click on the lock icon on the sta
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 10/18/2007
at 10:58 AM, Martin Packer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>SLR is based on VSAM databases - which is why I stick with it for my mode
> of usage.
I vaguely recall that they added DB2 support to it, but I'm not sure
whether that was before the first (4 letter) na
>When porting big applications or servers to z/OS UNIX the developers must be
>willing to change the design here and there to cope with z/OS UNIX and MVS
>behaviour. This makes the difference between a
successful port and a not so successful one.
It's not just z/OS UNIX.
The first implementatio
"Ed Gould" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Oct 18, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Patrick Lyon wrote:
>
> > Thanks to all who have responded.
> >
> > We went through this all again today and DB2 crashed. After
> > restarting it, it
> > doesn't take up near the storage a
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:42:28 -0400 Gerhard Postpischil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:>Paul Gilmartin wrote:
:>>> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:27:02 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:>>> BPAM is not THAT unfriendly.
:>> If it truly were "not THAT unfriendly" you'd not have troubled
:>> to write a wrapper to
Hello,
nice thread - but the heading isn't quite right.
These processes play by WLM rules: pop up all by the same time,use little cpu
and go to sleep again. RMF will show bursts of activity and
"long" periods with low activity. I've seen this with batch jobs
having common i/o patterns and low cpu
70 matches
Mail list logo
