John Kington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rgys.com...
I have an (awfully) basic question about ISMF: when defining SMS
constructs (e.g. mgntclas) I can enter numbers of a blank. I
cannot
find anywhere what the meaning of the blank value is.
Hi all,
Is there any way to enlarge the JES2 checkpoint dataset without cold
start???
any comment will be appreciated.
thanks
tommy
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
Did you allready look at the checkpoint reconfiguration dialog
documentattion?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tommy Tsui
Sent: dinsdag 27 november 2007 10:48
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: is there any way to enlarge the
Jim, now I'm confused. What are the acceptable methods of obtaining
storage while legally disabled?
The acceptable method to get legally disabled is to obtain the CPU lock.
The acceptable methods to obtain storage while legally disabled are
GETMAIN with BRANCH=(YES,GLOBAL) and STORAGE OBTAIN.
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:16:56 -0600, John C. Wolf wrote:
Ok how do you get IPCS to display the BEAR?
Look in RTM2WA. It is only available on a z9.
You said all your registers except for 13 are zero, with the high order bit of
R15 on. I wonder if you had a save area overlaid, loading zero
Our installation is a really high transaction environment and LLA/VLF don't
cover our performance requirements. We have the need to use a more
efficient prefetch management.
Nowadays, we can't replace QFetch for LLA/VLF but we would like to know
some other alternatives in the market
Thank you.
Our installation is a really high transaction environment and LLA/VLF don't
cover our performance requirements. We have the need to use a more efficient
prefetch management.
Nowadays, we can't replace QFetch for LLA/VLF but we would like to know some
other alternatives in the market
I'm
Yolanda Vivar wrote:
Our installation is a really high transaction environment and LLA/VLF don't
cover our performance requirements. We have the need to use a more
efficient prefetch management.
Nowadays, we can't replace QFetch for LLA/VLF but we would like to know
some other alternatives in
Good morning all.
I have four volumes that are 100% full and have no free DSCB's. I
usually run an extend vtoc command via ICKDSF.
Command follows:
REFORMAT DDNAME(VOLDD) VERIFY(STG003) EXTVTOC(29)
But since it is not mounted PRIVATE, it gives me a return code of 12.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Vary if offline to any other systems, then mount it private on the
system you plan to run the job, run the job, then re-mount it and vary
it online to make it available. The system puts these requirements in
to protect the integrity of your data.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
I always check ALL the requisite PTFs when I order PTFs electronically
via IBMLINK...and I NEVER get them.
Does anyone know the secret
Use ShopzSeries or SMP/E Internet Service Retrieval instead. Both of
these methods use an inventory file (aka bitmap) that identifies your
current PTF
Yolanda Vivar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It has been measured. We stopped Qfetch for one hour in one of our
production systems in order to evaluate the impact.
Regards,
Yolanda Vivar.
Yes, but you should configure LLA/VLA to deliver the desired
The time of last LLA refresh is not kept anywhere by the system.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
This is described in the JES2 Init Tuning Guide ... remember to update
your JES2 parameters to reflect the new checkpoint dataset information.
Bill
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:55:13 +0100, van Arnhem, Gerrit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you allready look at the checkpoint reconfiguration dialog
It has been measured. We stopped Qfetch for one hour in one of our
production systems in order to evaluate the impact.
Regards,
Yolanda Vivar.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Good Morning everyone, in July of this year, I asked a question swapping out
our 7060 H75 process and getting a new Z systems processor. Some one at that
time gave me a name of the company that they deal with where you can purchase
the processor from them plus they will do the upgrade of the
It has been measured. We stopped Qfetch for one hour in one of our production
systems in order to evaluate the impact.
But, did you evaluate VLF/LLA in the same manner?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sujay
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2007 1:01 pm
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RE: SYNCSORT : Merge multiple files Options
I have the following scenario. Assume that
I would suggest - if you haven't already done it - increasing the COFVLFxx
MAXVIRT from (the default) 4096 (16MB) to 32768 (128MB) assuming memory
allows you to. And then perhaps to try 64MB or 256MB. I'd also have a
little think about which load libraries to use it with. (You've probably
done
I wasn't the one who replied to your post back in July, and I don't know
what the reply was. However, Sirius Computer Solutions
(www.siriuscom.com) is one such company. We deal with them. They are
an IBM third party reseller.
Tom Kelman
Commerce Bank of Kansas City
(816) 760-7632
Frank wrote:
Good Morning everyone, in July of this year, I asked a question
swapping
out our 7060 H75 process and getting a new Z systems processor. Some
one
at that time gave me a name of the company that they deal with where
you
can purchase the processor from them plus they will do the
I have a subtask A that's getting XM posted by an ss-PC routine.
The ss-PC routine does some work and POST the subtask A (in another AS)
and then issue a SUSPEND waiting to be resumed by the subtask A.
The RESUME in subtask A runs with a zero RC, but the ss-PC routine is
still suspended???
I used GCC -S to compile a program and looked at the generated assembler. The
machine codes are the same, but the assembler instructions are quite
different.
Is there some kind of doc on the assembler?
--
Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software,
Eduardo, from the auth assembler reference.
35.1.2 Programming Requirements
The task to be resumed must be in the primary address space.
The caller must include the IHAPSA and CVT mapping macros.
From the description you have given, it sounds like pasn at time of call to
RESUME is not
Is anyone currently implementing a single signon solution to
authenticate userid/password on zOS using kdc and an AD on other
platform?
Thx.
---steveBui, 480-965-3070
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Documentation on the zLinux assembler language
I used GCC -S to compile a program and looked
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:37:25 -0600 eduardo ruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:I have a subtask A that's getting XM posted by an ss-PC routine.
:The ss-PC routine does some work and POST the subtask A (in another AS)
:and then issue a SUSPEND waiting to be resumed by the subtask A.
:The RESUME in
Quite useful. Thanks.
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:08:01 -0600 McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: -Original Message-
: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
: Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:53 AM
: To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
:
Does anyone have the email address for the Ask Sam Palmisano or IBM CEO
Sam Palmisano.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
It seems someone out there was watching the goings on about the thread I
started last week regarding the $20.00 per hour rate offered for a systems
programmer type.
Craddock, Chris wrote:
You may be violating non-xmemory assumptions in issuing RESUME. I would
strongly recommend changing your design to use PAUSE/RELEASE. All of the
gritty details are handled for you under the covers and the interfaces
are a whole lot more programmer friendly.
And,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 1:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SUSPEND/RESUME problem
Craddock, Chris wrote:
You may be violating non-xmemory assumptions
At long last, I found a job. I'll be working for an insurance company in
Des Moines, Iowa. Its a 6 month contract with a possibility of being
longer. I'll leave the company name out for now. After I start, I'll make
sure its ok to mention their name in my postings.
This whole process
McKown, John wrote:
Which is slower? I would assume that since it does more for you that
PAUSE/RELEASE is slower. But I am easily confused!
SUSPEND/RESUME is slower than WAIT/POST. PAUSE/RELEASE is slower than both.
I would not say that PAUSE/RELEASE does more for you. As a replacement
From: Eric Bielefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At long last, I found a job. I'll be working for an insurance company in
Des Moines, Iowa. Its a 6 month contract with a possibility of being
longer. I'll leave the company name out for now. After I start, I'll make
sure its ok to mention
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 1:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: I Got a Job
At long last, I found a job. I'll be working for an
insurance company in
Des
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
At long last, I found a job. I'll be working for an insurance company
in Des Moines, Iowa. Its a 6 month contract with a possibility of
being longer. I'll leave the company name out for now. After I start,
I'll make sure its ok to mention their name in my
Congrats Eric! Best of luck.
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
At long last, I found a job. I'll be working for an insurance company
in Des Moines, Iowa. Its a 6 month contract with a possibility of
being longer. I'll leave the company name out for now. After I start,
I'll make sure its ok to
Eric,
Congrats on the job! PM sent.
Dana
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Congrats Eric!
I had a contract in Des Moines a few years back. It's a nice town to be
in. Enjoy your Travel(er)s to Des Moines!!!
Thanks,
Jim Weidt
Senior Systems Engineer
Jostens Inc.
Office: 952-838-7555
Cell: 612-419-3738
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information
Congratulations and good luck, Eric - good news is always worth
sharing!!
John Hamman
Senior Systems Programmer
BlueCross BlueShield of Mississippi
601.664.4410
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/27/2007 1:52:28 PM
At long last, I found a job. I'll be working for an insurance company
in
Eric:
Congratulations and just in time for the Holidays!
Bill Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:52:28 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:
I Got a Job To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU At long last, I found a job. I'll be
working for an insurance company in Des Moines, Iowa. Its a 6 month contract
with
Congratulations and welcome to the neighborhood. Just up the road about
30 miles from Des Moines in Ames.
Brad Wissink
Information Technology Services
Iowa State University
515-294-3088
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eric
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:52:20 -0600, Ed Gould
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I concur with your opinion. HOWEVER since IBM (last time I tried)
does not make the requirements data base public ...
As far asI know, that is still true. I don't IBM's official stand on this,
but in the past SHARE's
Greetings,
We are getting ready for our semi-annual DR test this week-end.
One of the things that came out of our last test was we found we
couldn't generate our usual utilization reports from the SMF data
that was returned.
I'm not the capacity planning person and I don't know much about
Hi, All,
We got the CPACF activated on our z9s this past weekend, and now I'm in
the midst of initializing ICSF. So far, I've completed all the steps
outlined in the ICSF Sysprog Guide and have the started task running.
SYSLOG messages are correct for first-time startup in our configuration
with
Ed,
On the face of it, that doesn't make sense to me. Why would pause/release
be slower than wait/post? Are you saying the code path length is longer? Is
there some built-in wait for something within pause/release that isn't there in
post/wait? Do you have some kind of measurement
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: ICSF First-time Startup
Hi, All,
We got the CPACF activated on our z9s this past weekend, and
John,
Based on the CSFM506I message, it looks like your LPAR does not have any crypto
hardware as part of its configuration or there is no domain assigned to your
LPAR for master key processing. Check the configuration of your LPAR from the
HMC/SE for your CEC and the activation profile for
https://www.ibm.com/cgi-bin/email-sjp.pl
Mark S. House
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RLDWIDE.COM
David Day wrote:
Ed,
On the face of it, that doesn't make sense to me. Why would pause/release
be slower than wait/post? Are you saying the code path length is longer? Is
there some built-in wait for something within pause/release that isn't there in
post/wait? Do you have some kind
From: Eric Bielefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At long last, I found a job. I'll be working for an insurance company in
Des Moines, Iowa. Its a 6 month contract with a possibility of being
longer. I'll leave the company name out for now. After I start, I'll make
sure its ok to mention
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:16:56 -0600, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: ICSF First-time Startup
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:16:56 -0600, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chase, John
[ snip ]
CSFM001I ICSF
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:52:28 -0600, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
At long last, I found a job. I'll be working for an insurance company in
Des Moines, Iowa. Its a 6 month contract with a possibility of being
longer. I'll leave the company name out for now. After I start, I'll make
sure its ok to
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kopischke, David G.) writes:
From what I understand, we just use canned processes to extract
SMF, load databases and create reports. But
Thanks to all who replied, both on and off list. Brad - your the 3rd person
from Iowa to respond - the others off list. I'll probably visit Ames a few
times, as my niece is going to Iowa State and graduates in May.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
414-475-7434
John,
Based on the CSFM506I message, it looks like your LPAR does not have any
crypto hardware as part of its configuration or there is no domain assigned to
your LPAR for master key processing. Check the configuration of your LPAR from
the HMC/SE for your CEC and the activation profile for
congratulations Eric.
that is good to hear
- Original Message -
From: Eric Bielefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:52 PM
Subject: I Got a Job
At long last, I found a job. I'll be working for an
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:45:27 -0600 David Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:I don't use SUSPEND/RESUME in my code, but I do use PAUSE/RELEASE. I
:intentionally coded PAUSE/RELEASE because I was under the impression it had
:a shorter path length and was more effecient than POST/WAIT. You say it was
David Day wrote:
I don't use SUSPEND/RESUME in my code, but I do use PAUSE/RELEASE. I
intentionally coded PAUSE/RELEASE because I was under the impression
it had a shorter path length and was more effecient than POST/WAIT.
You say it was no surprise to you that the opposite was true. When
I don't use SUSPEND/RESUME in my code, but I do use PAUSE/RELEASE. I
intentionally coded PAUSE/RELEASE because I was under the impression it had
a shorter path length and was more effecient than POST/WAIT. You say it was
no surprise to you that the opposite was true. When PAUSE/RELEASE was
What setup are you talking about? PAUSE/RELEASE are functions that are
called by branching to them. You don't go through any interrupt handler
code. The only setup I'm aware of to use these functions is in acquiring
the Pause Element itself, but once acquired, a token is used to reference.
I should have mentioned in my last post that you need to define the CRYPTO
environment for the LPAR in the HMC CRYPTO window to define the DOMAIN
value, cryptographic and security functions, etc.
If you wish, I can send you a session I did in 2002 at SHARE that shows you
all the steps necessary to
I will tell you this... There is something about Iowa and the way they grow
their women... ;)
To those I offended, please keep the hate-mail to minimum.
Thanks.
And congratulations. I know it was a longtime search.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
11/21/2007
at 11:22 AM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Shmuel tends to not explain his answers.
That depends on the question, and on the resources I have available at the
time. For a suggested code/design change, I do tend to give yes-or-no
answers, but for a
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/21/2007
at 10:43 AM, Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
IIRC, the various series were, in order, 360, 370, 303x, 43xx, 308x,
3090, 9672, z/900 z/800, z/990 z/890, z9
Correct, but incomplete. There were also, e.g., ES/9000, Multiprise.
--
Shmuel
David Day wrote:
What setup are you talking about? PAUSE/RELEASE are functions that
are called by branching to them. You don't go through any interrupt
handler code. The only setup I'm aware of to use these functions is
in acquiring the Pause Element itself, but once acquired, a token is
Why not just look for the message in SYSLOG?
Ken G.
Peter Relson wrote:
The time of last LLA refresh is not kept anywhere by the system.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
For IBM-MAIN
You need to add 9221, 9121, and 9021, Multiprise 2000, and Multiprise 3000.
The 43xx group consisted of 4331, 4341, and 4381 processors.
The 303x group consisted of 3031, 3032, and 3033 processors.
The 308x group consisted of 3081, 3083, and 3084 processors.
All of these groups, including the
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 11/27/2007
04:35:36 PM:
David Day wrote:
Ed,
On the face of it, that doesn't make sense to me. Why would
pause/release be slower than wait/post? Are you saying the code
path length is longer? Is there some built-in wait
On Nov 27, 2007, at 8:32 PM, John P. Baker wrote:
You need to add 9221, 9121, and 9021, Multiprise 2000, and
Multiprise 3000.
The 43xx group consisted of 4331, 4341, and 4381 processors.
The 303x group consisted of 3031, 3032, and 3033 processors
And 3033 MP and AP (IIRC) There may have
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 11/27/2007
05:45:27 PM:
I don't use SUSPEND/RESUME in my code, but I do use PAUSE/RELEASE. I
intentionally coded PAUSE/RELEASE because I was under the impression it
had
a shorter path length and was more effecient than POST/WAIT.
Jim Mulder wrote:
... There are no free
lunches in computer programming.
Except when /you/ come to the TDMs ... ;-)
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The 3033 was not the only machine to have AP/MP. The S/370 Model 168 did,
and a few others, unless I am mistaken.
John P Baker
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 9:57 PM
To:
Jim,
Sorry for my off-topic question.
What does it mean when we say 'interrupt handling completes'?
From what you said about SRB, I guess it means FLIH have done its work and
scheduled SLIH. And that's why normally SRB doesn't need a save area: FLIH
will directly give back control to SRB so
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 11/27/2007
11:07:20 PM:
Jim,
Sorry for my off-topic question.
What does it mean when we say 'interrupt handling completes'?
From what you said about SRB, I guess it means FLIH have done its work
and
scheduled SLIH. And
On Nov 27, 2007, at 3:47 AM, Tommy Tsui wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any way to enlarge the JES2 checkpoint dataset without cold
start???
any comment will be appreciated.
It is documented in the appropriate JES2 manual. I have done it
several times and it works. Go step by step and don't
Looks like everyone already answered everything for this question.
I have recently setup ICSF, CEX2C, CKDS, PKDS, TKE for 6 mainframes
across 3 sites with 15 LPARs, 33,000 symmetric keys and a handful of
asymmetric keys... max of 55 million cypto api's so far in a day with
response times about
On Nov 27, 2007, at 2:54 PM, Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
---
SNIP
... This would cut down on duplicates a
whole lot, IMO. It would (should) make IBM more responsive to
requirements.
...
Well, the coordinators are
Jim,
Thanks for the clarification. Does that mean SLIH is running disabled too?
If not, another interrupt between SLIH and FLIH will override the status
saved for the interrupted SRB if a SSRB is not used.
On Nov 28, 2007 12:20 PM, Jim Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IBM Mainframe Discussion
Johnny Luo wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. Does that mean SLIH is running disabled too?
If not, another interrupt between SLIH and FLIH will override the status
saved for the interrupted SRB if a SSRB is not used.
Interrupt handlers run disabled.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 11/28/2007
01:09:52 AM:
Jim,
Thanks for the clarification. Does that mean SLIH is running disabled
too?
If not, another interrupt between SLIH and FLIH will override the status
saved for the interrupted SRB if a SSRB is not used.
Ed Gould writes:
I have been out of the loop and I am not familiar with the term ELA.
But I guess from your entry it is a modifiable contract.
Enterprise License Agreement.
Let me back up two steps, though. Speaking for myself here, of course, as
always. Any company presumably tries to maximize
Would you expand on your question a bit, Steve. I assume you mean Kerberos
KDC. Does AD mean Active Directory (Microsoft) in the context of your
question? Basically, if you could draw a mental picture, that would be
helpful.
To take a guess at your question, I think there are a fair number of
85 matches
Mail list logo
