Yes, I found the short reference to it in the IP Configuration Guide but I'm
not
sure as to exactly what needs to be changed and where and what the
consequences are in contrast to our current use of the default USSTAB.
Helping this knucklehead out appreciated at all times.
We've also contacted
Hi Jerry,
"Did you check out the Telnet Solicitor."
If this is the Telnet Solicitor which sits in front of z/OS and which is
arrived at via the standard Port 23 I would not advocate using it unless
there was a restricted concurrent user population, or it had been improved
since my first ADCD at
Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD. wrote:
Yes, I found the short reference to it in the IP Configuration Guide but I'm not
sure as to exactly what needs to be changed and where and what the
consequences are in contrast to our current use of the default USSTAB.
Helping this knucklehead out appreciated
Jim,
Thanks.
Elpida Tzortzatos
Storage Management Design (ASM, RSM, VSM)
z/OS Core Technical Design Team
(845)-435-3125, t/l: 295-3125, FAX: (845)-435-6248
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim Mulder/Poughkeepsie/IBM
12/08/2007 01:46 PM
To
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
cc
Subject
Re: Common Da
Here's the stuff that was broken by the new maintenance release (if any of
us had been responsible for an application with as many problems as IBMLink,
we would have long since been looking for another job):
The following SRD links under the "Order z/OS" function have been failing.
Here are wo
Kenneth,
VSM will not allocate "normal" storage from LSQA. REGION=0M sets the
highest useable User Region address to the 2GB boundary (see the LDA), but
when the User Region top actually hits the bottom of the LSQA storage, you
stand to get an 878-10 type abend. I have seen it happen in many JV
>Is it true that if more storage is needed up to the region cap, VSM will
>allocate from LSQA?
To answer directly, "no". The system will always allocate storage of the
type requested from the area used for that type. But of course there is no
such thing as "from LSQA". LSQA is just a group of subp
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
12/04/2007
at 12:27 PM, "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Actually, installing software on a computer is copying. Rarely is
>software run from the installation medium. And, there is a verbatim copy
>of the software, at least temporarily, in the RAM even in tha
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 12/04/2007
at 06:15 PM, "Van Dalsen, Herbie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Surely the copy of windows that you are running is fully licensed?
If it exists.
>Why expect IBM to give it away for free.
Have you stopped beating your wife? Why should he defend a claim that
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
12/05/2007
at 10:20 AM, Ian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>What do you think of the idea to make it a signature driven petition
>rather than a letter from a single person?
IMHO it's a good idea if you're talking about real signatures on real
paper, but avoid anything th
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/05/2007
at 03:59 PM, Mark Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>The only operating systems that are legal to run on Hercules are Linux,
>and MVS 3.8 (I think).
Shirley all of these are legal:
BOS/360
BPS/360
CALL/360
CP/67
DOS/VSE
DOS/360
MTS
O
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/05/2007
at 07:33 AM, Doc Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>One question - how many 80 column cards would equal one 305 RAMAC?
Well, the disk drive on the 650 derived from the RAMAC and could hold the
equivalent of 75000 cards.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/05/2007
at 08:34 AM, Rick Fochtman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Looks a little like the old 2302 fixed disk drive.
Superficially, but if you look closely you'll see that while the 2302 has
the comb of R/W arms that you're used to, the RAMAC had an arm that moved
bot
Peter Relson wrote:
> While REGION=0M, in the absence of other things, does indicate not to
> reserve any particular amount for system subpools, many customers use
their
> IEFUSI exit to provide a limit to what REGION=0M can provide.
While I've not written a IEFUSI exit in MANY years (and even t
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/07/2007
at 11:07 AM, Patrick Lyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Esmie - First there are not aliases in a user catalog.
Of course there are, and the whole SSA mechanism depends on them.
>They are in the Master catalog. They are associated to user
>catalogs.
The
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/05/2007
at 09:01 AM, "R.S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>BTW2: A lot of people, including IBMers run Hercules with z/OS.
>Illegally. We can doubt it, criticize it, but this is fact.
Your belief in the claim does not constitute evidence and does not make it
a fact.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/03/2007
at 04:04 PM, Dave Kopischke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>With all due respect, I don't believe IBM has an obligation to you or any
>of us to act responsibly nor fairly in this matter.
That's true to the extent that IBM obeys its contracts and the law, but
On Dec 9, 2007, at 9:54 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/05/2007
at 03:59 PM, Mark Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
The only operating systems that are legal to run on Hercules are
Linux,
and MVS 3.8 (I think).
Shirley all of these are legal:
BOS/360
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
>>The only operating systems that are legal to run on Hercules are Linux,
>>and MVS 3.8 (I think).
>
> Shirle
I think you have the open source security risks backwards, Herbie.
One of the features of open source is that the source code is public.
This means that ANYONE can read it, study it, find bugs in it, AND
find trap doors in it! And "anyone" means anyone in the whole world!
Thus, the risk of ma
Alternatively:
"You know you're becoming a policeman when people start to look older than you"
(source forgotten)
Roger Bowler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit
Edward Jaffe wrote:
> I found a box with several round tapes that must be converted
> to CART (or better yet AWSTAPE format) but no longer have
> access to hardware that can read them.
People in the Hercules group can do it. If there is data
(programs) of historical interest that could be rele
Hi,
We are looking at tightening control over MVS command authorization. We
are a JES3 shop running Flasher, Omegamon, Solve etc. with ACF2. Of
course we have batch production jobs streams, operators, MVS sysprogs
all issuing MVS commands at different times and in different situations.
Our manag
I'm a little surprised at tone of the few responses here. So I'll just
reply to the original question.
1. Obviously this proposal is an attempt to solve a real customer problem.
At least one. Fix teams do not lounge in windowless rooms imagining
hypothetical problems that might be solved by dubiou
Phillips, Peter wrote:
We are looking at tightening control over MVS command authorization. We
are a JES3 shop running Flasher, Omegamon, Solve etc. with ACF2. Of
course we have batch production jobs streams, operators, MVS sysprogs
all issuing MVS commands at different times and in different sit
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 12:17:39 -0600, Joel C. Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I also have been unable so far to find any on-line reference that
>actually gives examples or names of established "standard" graphic
>representations for the various codepoints in the EBCDIC codesets.
You can find the m
>About 10 years ago I have up on using Logical Not in favor of != or <>.
>Not only do those characters work in any code page, they always survive
>EBCDIC-ASCII translation (e.g. with FTP), and cut-n-paste always gives
>the correct result.
Nope! The exclamation point is at different code points
There is one at the IBM museum in Sindelfingen/Germany (near Boeblingen),
and as far as I remember, it has only one arm.
Kind regards
Bernd
Am Sonntag, 9. Dezember 2007 18:14 schrieben Sie:
>
> Superficially, but if you look closely you'll see that while the 2302 has
> the comb of R/W arms t
28 matches
Mail list logo
