Shmuel Metz writes:
>Sometimes you are on your own even when you pay for
>software, and sometimes there are support resources
>for free software. A big price tag doesn't guaranty
>anything except a big price tag.
True, but assuming we're actually talking about a properly measured and
allocated sup
R.S. asks:
>.Gentlemen,
>I'm getting lost.
>What does it mean "front end switch"?
The common vernacular in this particular field is to describe that
front-end system as an "ATM switch" (for example). "Switch" should not be
taken *too* literally, though.
But "transaction processing" is a bit too s
At 18:23 -0400 on 06/25/2008, Neil Duffee wrote about z/OS v1.7 JES2:
StcInRdr vs. IntRdr:
So, the question is, presuming it's already working on INTRDR, how does
JES2 contend with this load? Are all the jobs in INTRDR converted then
JES2 switches to STCINRDR? Does STCINRDR have precedence fo
John,
I was at 5/3 in Cincinnati. I am now working for Sirius Computer
Solutions.
I have written some statements of work for crypto-related items... and
would be happy to perform any type of work/advice you need.
Of course I like responding on IBM-Main too.
I will agree with Hal and give the
IEBCOPY does not delete members, it replaces, or adds new. Over time, modules
some become stranded as load module names change. Since we have a bunch of
product load modules in a common library, with IEHPROGM we can be sure we get
all of the old modules out and that none of the new modules na
Not that I like the idea of whacking on a live system, by IEBCOPY
works fine with DISP=SHR :)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Linda Mooney
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Non-SMS G
I use it fairly often to delete load modules from a common library in the link
list. Works great, very easy to do, runs in batch, provides an audit trail,
and saves me a bunch of time. Then I IEBCOPY in the new modules (for a product
update) without the replace option for the IEBCOPY. We have
You are correct. I had forgotten about MVS/SE.
John P. Baker
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 6:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Op codes removed from z/10
In <
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/20/2008
at 04:05 AM, Jan MOEYERSONS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Sorry, no, you will not. Because you will have to do it all yourself and
>on your own.
Sometimes you are on your own even when you pay for software, and
sometimes there are support resources for free
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/25/2008
at 10:05 AM, "John P. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>These instructions comprised a part of the MVS Extended Facility, which
>provided performance improvements back in the days of MVS/XA and MVS/SP.
As I recall, even MVS/SE had support for some of them.
> it's available in Format1 DSCB.
>
> TMDS1FLAG1,DS1COMPR
> JORETBUFNO
Greg Price wrote:
| Ripper. You know, I looked there but obviously missed it.
| I guess it's OBTAIN time.
Not necessary. You can examine the DSCB in the DCB exit, which
has the additional advantage that you can exa
Quoting "Gibney, Dave":
> I haven't had a good, or any reason to use IEHPRROGM for almost two
> decades.
Probably a good thing too ... :0)
I would suspect I have made use of BYPASSNQ *much* more recently than that.
Shane ...
-
With the help of IBM I figured out what the problem was. The company sent
me their signed cert. All I needed to do was use the versign class3 cert
in RACF. I created another keyring connected it to the cert and it worked.
That was way to easy in the end.
Michael Saraco
Systems Consultant
Baer C
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:04:07 -0700, Gibney, Dave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I'm already TLS from my workstation to the original logon of
>TSO, and then I at least am so far always using the Hipersocket
>connection, so I see no security lapse. I don't have any good reason
to
>check it ou
I haven't had a good, or any reason to use IEHPRROGM for almost two
decades.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel McLaughlin
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Non-SMS GDG Issue
Contro
We had a batch job which uses CA-FileSave to journal changes to VSAM
records. It abended with a:
IEC036I
002-0C,IGC0005E,MMSI099D,PS140,FSJRNL,2740,MN0030,MSHMN.NASE.JOURNAL.BAT
CH.CICSPIF
This is a BSAM write which tried to write a block which was greater than
the track size. So far, so good. Bu
No, for non-CMS guests such as z/OS, z/VSE, TPF and Linux, their tape I/O is
via the SSCH instruction. That can ONLY be intercepted by the z/VM Control
Program (CP). That would require a heavy modification to the operating
system and since IBM already has a hardware solution to virtual tape
require
Yes, running in Key 8, it could be possible to allocate [E]CSA storage,
however, you still need to be either running under an APF authorized job
step task or running in supervisor state, which is not common when C/C++
applications are running. Also, there is no option to tell C/C++ to use a
specif
I wonder if the issue is that you don't have a complete CA chain that
matches the other company. That is, if cert a is used to sign cert b
which is used to sign cert c, then you have to have all three on the
same keyring with cert a as trusted.
I think. Certificate structures give me a headache ;
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:47:59 -0500, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, All,
>
>Just had a RECEIVE FROMNETWORK job crash SB37-04 on SYSUT4. The package
>being received is HJVA140 and current service. When I looked at the
>SYSUTn (n = [1 - 4]) DDDEFs for the z/OS 1.9 global zone, I saw th
Thank you, Tom. That is very informative.
Does this apply (somehow indirectly) to, for example, inside a z/OS guest which
attaches and accesses a tape drive?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas Kern
Sent: 26. kesäkuuta
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 3:25 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Op codes removed from z/10
>
> -
>
>
-
MVS use of the SVC assist was removed in MVS/ESA SP3.1.0
MVS use of the lock assists was removed in OS/390 2.10.
---
At the risk of a "Stupid Question", why ??
---
AFAIR LE use subpool 2 key 8. However it's possible to allocate CSA/ECSA
while running in key8. Since z/OS R8 or R9 you can deny such kind of
allocations. Before it was an undocumented option.
Roland
>I don't recall this ever happening. In order to allocate storage out of
>CSA/ECSA the progra
As I understand things:
>From the perspective of the router, it is receiving packets from all
over and sending them all over. It is reasonable to assume that data is
flowing over many ports concurrently. It is also expected to have
packets from diverse endpoints being interleaved over common paths
-
Just had a RECEIVE FROMNETWORK job crash SB37-04 on SYSUT4. The package
being received is HJVA140 and current service. When I looked at the
SYSUTn (n = [1 - 4]) DDDEFs for the z/OS 1.9 global zone, I saw they all
had UNIT=VIO and SPACE=(312
As usual, what is reasonable depends. We use SPACE=(CYL,(500,100)) for
SYSUTx, on disk not VIO. There does not appear to be any recommendation
in the SMP/E manuals.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sen
Hi, All,
Just had a RECEIVE FROMNETWORK job crash SB37-04 on SYSUT4. The package
being received is HJVA140 and current service. When I looked at the
SYSUTn (n = [1 - 4]) DDDEFs for the z/OS 1.9 global zone, I saw they all
had UNIT=VIO and SPACE=(3120,(760,760)), apparently "as delivered" with
th
Neil Duffee wrote:
...
This line of inquiry (among others) focuses on JES2's internal readers.
We suspect processes generating e-mail to students with a 1-1 ratio of
jobs to messages ie. 1 job=1 e-message, using SYSOUT=(*,INTRDR). (We're
also pursuing multi-step jobs since $HASP050: >90% JNUM ha
> I suspect that "switch only" is simply a way of depreciating the
> solution, because it's not mainframe.
Not at all. I hear the term "switch" used all day, every day
regardless of which platform it's on.
Some switches do nothing but switch transactions but most
seem to do a lot more.
J R wrote:
This is not unique to Tandem. It's a function of "front end switches".
[...]
Gentlemen,
I'm getting lost.
What does it mean "front end switch"?
IMHO "the switch" does AT LEAST the following:
- maintains all the communication to ATMs and POSes.
- checks the PIN and the quote
- maint
Chris Mason wrote:
The acid test is getting something like ISPF running having used the TSO
TELNET command. I'm afraid just seeing a USS message 10 isn't sufficient. It's
the TN3270 server which is responsible for presenting you with USS messages.
You need to get past this point in order to be
Well, I'm already TLS from my workstation to the original logon of
TSO, and then I at least am so far always using the Hipersocket
connection, so I see no security lapse. I don't have any good reason to
check it out using the path out of the CEC and back.
It does seem strange though if TLS isn
I get full function ISPF or for that matter any other application I can
logon to in the target system. (which is all of them)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Mason
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA
By open, I was referring to the fact that not all z/OS Lpars are
running TCPIP (Those not may well be very few) and all should be
firewalled to some extent.
I have to admit I've never tried from a native 3270, but when logged
on to one Lpar's TSO/ISPF via my emulator(we currently use QWS fro
--
--
I don't see how leaving a bogus CDE in the system can
possibly help with
the task of fixing the problem that led to the S106 ABEND.
---
The example you give shows connectivity to CHPIDs 0B, 0D, and 30. I don't
see where the I/O will use either CHPID 4A or 96.
The I/O will go down whichever CHPID is deemed "not busy". In most cases,
the available CHPIDs will appear to be used equally.
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:15:27 -0500, Victor Z
If you believe that the slow down is in JES, have you researched the
output from JMonitor and/or the JDHistory, etc. These usually go a long
way in explaining what JES is doing and what's its problem?
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
-
Thanks. I'll put this in my notes.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:21:55 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote:
>--
>I don't see how leaving a bogus CDE in the system can possibly help with
>the task of fixing the problem that led to the S106 ABEND.
>--
2008/6/26 Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So, in order to answer the original question "So who is right? Can I open a TN
> session to a host in another domain???" restated accurately as "Can I create a
> TELNET connection using 3270 data stream from one Communications Server
> IP component - us
- Original Message -
From: "Peggy Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:20 PM
Subject: zFS Root catalog requirements
Hi -
Does the Root filesystem have to be cataloged in the Master catalog?
no it does not, at my last cou
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:22 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Strange Problem: System Code S106
>
> --
In a message dated 6/26/2008 12:14:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Personally, I'd also look at ways to avoid JNUM > 90% and to increase
the total number of jobs that can be in the system at any given time.
Can you tell us your settings that control JNUM?
Can you i
--
I don't see how leaving a bogus CDE in the system can possibly help with
the task of fixing the problem that led to the S106 ABEND.
-
If you fix the problem (S106 Abend) that led to the bog
In a message dated 6/26/2008 11:27:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Another workaround for us is: don't use the address in the CDE entry,
if it is zero or X'8000'.
I have seen another case of a control block's containing a full word of
X'8000' that was s
Neil,
you mentioned that you were getting $HASP050: >90% JNUM
messages during your problem time periods.
Others have suggested PCE settings and some other ways to increase
the number of internal readers, in order to increase throughput.
Personally, I'd also look at ways to avoid JNUM > 90% and to
In a message dated 6/26/2008 10:36:31 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>My first thought is that the invalid CDE should be removed by LOAD
processing if the LOAD fails. But there's also a good case for fixing
the problem that led to the S106 Abend as well.
I don't s
Correction: I think I got the name of the first example wrong. It might be
BLOCKTAP not BLOCKIO.
/Tom Kern
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:48:35 -0500, Thomas Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>For programs inside a virtual machine that use standard CMS TAPEIO macros
>for their I/O, you can create a nucle
On 26 Jun 2008 08:43:40 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richards,
Robert B.) wrote:
>Some banks were trying to change off of Tandem, but a major banking
>software vendor bought an "up and coming" Linux on System z solution and
>essentially killed it in favor of their own, dated technology.
I just want
For programs inside a virtual machine that use standard CMS TAPEIO macros
for their I/O, you can create a nucleus extension that intercepts the tape
I/O and transforms it in some way. Two examples are the BLOCKIO program that
was used by lots of installations to increase the real blocksize of data
TN3270 supports block mode from a TSO Client.
If you are connecting to a remote host (MVS TN3270) you will
successfully connect in transparent mode.
but if you invoke "TSO TELNET host-name (linemode" then your session
is connected in line mode and anything after that is also connected in
line
Peggy,
We do exactly what you want to do. We have a high level qualifier of
VSAM which is an alias to a user cat. All of our root directories (4
LPARs) begin with VSAM.ZFS.
Gale McGrath
Senior System Support Analyst
Administrative Office of the Courts
Olympia, Wa. 98504-1170
(360) 705
Peggy Andrews wrote:
> Hi -
> Does the Root filesystem have to be cataloged in the Master catalog?
>
> Rather than use SYS1 HLQ for zFS (VSAM linear) and deal with recatalog to a
> new Master catalog, can I make my zFS OMVS files a SYS2 (user catalog) like
> such:
>
> SYS2.OMVS.ROOT
> SYS2.OMVS.E
Hi -
Does the Root filesystem have to be cataloged in the Master catalog?
Rather than use SYS1 HLQ for zFS (VSAM linear) and deal with recatalog to a
new Master catalog, can I make my zFS OMVS files a SYS2 (user catalog) like
such:
SYS2.OMVS.ROOT
SYS2.OMVS.ETC
SYS2.OMVS.VAR
Thanks!
Peggy
Thank you for your responses.
First, this is kind of "one in ten years" problem, because
there should never be an I/O error on the load library PDS.
The new module was copied to the production loadlib by means
of our regular CCM system; this seemed to work, but the module
was not usable (S106)
The Hercules and Flex emulators can also emulate tape drives using a
couple of different formats, AWS, etc.
How difficult would it be to do something similar on z/VM? And what
ways might someone go about it?
Lindy
--
For
I will be out of the office starting 27/06/2008 and will not return until
07/07/2008.
For AirNZ or TCL operational matters please contact Tony Brown on X5514.
For Westpac NZ operational matters please contact Dave Welch on x9789, for
NWM Software currency or operational matters contact Richard Cr
Many thanks John, works perfectly.
i
-- Original Message --
Received: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:38:07 PM BST
From: "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NFS mounts to linux for text and binary return same conversion
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IB
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:22:28 +0100, Ian S. Worthington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi.
>
>I'm trying to set up two nfs mounts for text and binary files from a linux
>system to z/os.
>
>I'm using the following but there's no difference between the files on the two
>paths.
>
>"mount filesystem(xsrc)
> Back in the OS390 2.10 days the malloc() command/function used to
allocate
> the storage requested in CSA/ECSA. Does anyone know if this is still
true
> under z/OS 1.7?
[] Eh? I don't believe that was ever true.
CC
--
For IBM
Rick Fochtman quoted
>
> we faced a strange problem with a system code S106, as response to a
> LOAD macro call.
>
> Although the LOAD was not successful (I/O error on the PDS), the LOAD
in
> error added an entry into the CDE with the requested
Some banks were trying to change off of Tandem, but a major banking
software vendor bought an "up and coming" Linux on System z solution and
essentially killed it in favor of their own, dated technology.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wouldn't use IEHPROGM for anything any more. IDCAMS is the way to go.
Also, for tapes, you really should be including the file-sequence number in the
catalog entry.
DEFINE NONVSAM(NAME(PSI.TRN.SI0095C.G2671V00) -
DEVICETYPES(3490) VOLUMES(183323) FSEQN(1))
Note: the FS
Chris Mason wrote:
Jim
See my response to George.
The point about your post was that you didn't go further than the USS
messages which means you didn't go far enough. George did - and it seems
you did before this post also.
I'm glad we're all on the same page now!
Chris Mason
Sorry if yo
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian S. Worthington
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:22 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: NFS mounts to linux for text and binary return same
> conversion
>
> Hi.
>
> I'm trying t
we faced a strange problem with a system code S106, as response to a
LOAD macro call.
Although the LOAD was not successful (I/O error on the PDS), the LOAD in
error added an entry into the CDE with the requested module's name, and
an entry
Hi.
I'm trying to set up two nfs mounts for text and binary files from a linux
system to z/os.
I'm using the following but there's no difference between the files on the two
paths.
"mount filesystem(xsrc) type(nfs) ",
" mountpoint('/xx/xsrc')",
" tag(text,819)",
"
When I imported the cert RACF would not let me assign CERTAUTH I had to
give it TRUST is this the problem. Does that mean that the company did not
send me a correct CERT.
Michael Saraco
Systems Consultant
Baer Consulting, Inc.
Work - 507-526-2566
Cell- 507-525-0530
From:
"Chase, John" <[E
This is not unique to Tandem. It's a function of "front end switches".
It's just that Tandem is the traditional platform of choice for this
function. It's hard to convince banks to change from a long standing
solution. However, new installations are adopting other alternatives.
As I said
Hi all,
If VTS have more than one channels connected with CPUs, and if a backup job
is initiated, will next IO still tries to connect the initiating channel or
will it use any available channel coded in hcd or iocds?
CHPID PATH=(4A,96),TYPE=CNC,SHARED
CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=F100,PATH=(0B,0D,30),
Hi all,
I heard that in newer version of hsm, it will not allocate temporary dataset
name(SYS9) to open a datasets,I want to know from what version of HSM
the change happened?
Regards
Victor
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signof
Hi
Never seen in CSA or ECSA currently in subpool 2 key 8 .
Betsy Jeffery wrote:
Back in the OS390 2.10 days the malloc() command/function used to allocate
the storage requested in CSA/ECSA. Does anyone know if this is still true
under z/OS 1.7?
TIA
---
>What's this "over 3270"? Where did that idea come from?
I just coined this term trying to describe that logging into a UNIX
server
from TSO telnet does bring you into line mode in UNIX. Probably a
misnomer.
I suggest we just forget about it ;-)
>And what's "raw mode"?
When logging into a serve
FTP to the MF is completely different than FTP from the mainframe. Two
different ID's, keyrings*, parms, etc.
He who speaks first is the client. He who listens then obeys is the
server.
*Key rings can be shared, so that may not be completely true in every
situation. No idea of the risk/benefit
I don't recall this ever happening. In order to allocate storage out of
CSA/ECSA the program has to be running authorized. Malloc() gets storage
from private area subpools, in the key of the TCB that created the memory
pool (usually key 8).
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
NOTE: All opinions ar
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Michael Saraco
>
> I am trying to do a SSL FTP from the mainframe to another
> server out side of our network. I can do a FTP SSL to the
> mainframe from outside of the network. I imported the CERT
> from the client
> I have no idea what's going on in the banking industry in general,;
> maybe reliance on Tandem is decreasing. But I see no move at this
> bank to move away from them. Our move towards higher availability
> has next to nothing to do with ATM support (Tandem's forte); it is
> driven by online ban
Back in the OS390 2.10 days the malloc() command/function used to allocate
the storage requested in CSA/ECSA. Does anyone know if this is still true
under z/OS 1.7?
TIA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access inst
ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO wrote:
> I Don't know if you can get this information from DCBE, but it's
> available in
> Format1 DSCB.
>
> TMDS1FLAG1,DS1COMPR
> JORETBUFNO
Ripper. You know, I looked there but obviously missed it.
I guess it's OBTAIN time.
Thanks,
Greg
I would expect message IXC457I to be issued when the new structure instance
is successfully allocated in a new CF. What does that message say when the
structure in question is rebuilt into the CF that causes the health check to
complain.
A structure with zero lists is bizarre. Perhaps there was
Jim
See my response to George.
The point about your post was that you didn't go further than the USS
messages which means you didn't go far enough. George did - and it seems
you did before this post also.
I'm glad we're all on the same page now!
Chris Mason
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:45:50 +0100
I Don't know if you can get this information from DCBE, but it's
available in
Format1 DSCB.
TMDS1FLAG1,DS1COMPR
JORETBUFNO
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
Banco Bradesco S/A
4254 - DPCD Engenharia de Software
Sistemas Operacionais Mainframes
George
Thanks for putting the doubters right. The key is "transparent"
and "transparent mode".
It is documented. Under the description, ironically enough, of the "linemode"
parameter we find the following "small print":
Linemode
Uses the line mode and prevents operation in the transparent m
>This is what Transparent Mode does.
That seems to be the point, or function, I was missing.
Still learning something new every day (forgetting
something else to make room the new stuff :-)
--
Peter Hunkeler
Credit Suisse
--
F
How about:
1) Check all I/O statements for correct execution (COBOL FILE STATUS).
This includes OPEN and CLOSE. If the file is a VSAM file, then be sure
to put the VSAM FILE STATUS in any messages in addition to the normal
FILE STATUS. This can be a life saver. As an example, we had a normal
FILE
Chris -
I thought I understood the question - after your mail I may be confused!
What we did was:
Telnet (PCOMM) to z/os mainframe and get NVAS logon menu -> logon tso and
enter TSO TELNET and via TCP/IP
go through the TCP/IP stack in another z/OS mainframe and get the NVAS
logon screen on this s
I use Telnet quite regularly (from the TSO command line) to get from one z/OS
system to another.
It doesn't matter that the system you are going from is referred to by you as a
'host' - in this case, it's just another telnet client.
All colours, PFkeys, ISPF screen displays, scrolling etc all
On 6/26/08, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jim
>
> The acid test is getting something like ISPF running having used the TSO
> TELNET command. I'm afraid just seeing a USS message 10 isn't sufficient.
> It's
> the TN3270 server which is responsible for presenting you with USS
> messages.
Andrew McLaren of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
wrote on 06/26/2008 12:56:17 AM:
> Hi all,
>
> Kind of a weird question I know, but ... it has been a day full of weird
> questions.
>
> A customer would like to know if they can open a TN3270 session *from*
> one z/OS host, to another z/OS host
Jim
The acid test is getting something like ISPF running having used the TSO
TELNET command. I'm afraid just seeing a USS message 10 isn't sufficient. It's
the TN3270 server which is responsible for presenting you with USS messages.
You need to get past this point in order to be playing in the
Hi Walter
OK you're right now ity works. Thank you very much
Max Scarpa
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives a
>From 1 Tso to another tcpip stack, certainly full screen:
READY
telnet p3l1
MVS TCP/IP TELNET CS V1R7
Connecting to P3L1 198.176.137.228, port TELNET (23)
***
Using Transparent Mode...
Notes on using Telnet when in Transparent Mode:
- To enter Telnet Command, Hit PA1
*
Peter
The function postulated in this thread has certainly not been always
supported - always starting from the earliest flavour of TCP/IP for VM - or it
escaped my extensive testing of the function in the earliest TCP/IP for MVS
and the documentation. That such a handy function would escape
d
On 6/26/08, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Please explain how (you think) you are doing it.
If you issue "tso telnet zoshostname" from your tso/ispf session you will be
presented with a full screen logon in the same manner as if you used a
TN3270 client from a pc. If you then hit PA
Hello IBMMAIN List,
we faced a strange problem with a system code S106,
as response to a LOAD macro call.
Although the LOAD was not successful (I/O error on the PDS),
the LOAD in error added an entry into the CDE with the
requested module's name, and an entry point address X'8000'.
This
Tonni
Other than confusion over which TELNET client may be being used, it may be
that there is some confusion over what "*from* a z/OS host" means. Does
this imply using the TSO TELNET client as most responders have assumed or
does it mean a TN3270 connection to a TN3270 server in one system wh
I have the keyring connected to the userid submitting the job. I have a
seperate SYSFTPD member. I am doing the SSL on port 21 to the server.
Michael Saraco
From:
"Gibney, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Date:
06/26/2008 02:30 AM
Subject:
Re: FTP client ssl error
First
Greg
Are you sure you are not talking about the z/OS UNIX TELNET server? See my
response to Andrew McLaren.
I cannot find any support for your contention in the manual: z/OS
Communications Server IP User's Guide and Commands Version 1 Release 9
SC31-8780-07.
Please explain how (you think) you
Peter
Use of 3270 data stream is *not* required for CICS and IMS - and possibly
some of the applications you have in mind in your "etc. etc.". They at least
are happy to run with the 3767 emulator supported by the so-called TN3270
server when 3270 functions are *not* agreed during the TELNET co
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
