Shane writes:
>...Should have been zLinux from the start.
I completely disagree. z/OS UNIX System Services and Linux on System z are
very different, and both are extremely useful. It would be pretty much
impossible to have Java for z/OS, for example, without z/OS UNIX System
Services. (That's a hu
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 16:26 +0900, Timothy Sipples wrote:
> Most people don't "use" z/OS USS. That's not the right question. They use
> the many things that use z/OS USS.
And when customers ask:
"If z/OS USS is a strategic direction why are vendors like
(*especially*) Tivoli with TSM server aband
John, The link you need is this one:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/dgt2c871/16.6?
SHELF=EZ2ZBK0G.bks&DT=20081217173205
CATSYNCH will ensure rmm CDS data set information is correct regarding
catalog status. rmm should already know the catalog status because it tracks
Lizette,
A belated Thank You is in order for suggesting TMSAUDIT and then gently
reminding me when I didn't run it when you first suggested.
The volume which was scratched had Expdt=LDATE/005 from 2008/323 until
2009/144. On 2009/149 it was picked up by TMSCLEAN and scratched.
File now i
You are welcome.
Sometimes we forget the simplest things and that is what we are here for.
To help us remember the stuff we forget. :-D
Lizette
Lizette,
A belated Thank You is in order for suggesting TMSAUDIT and then gently
reminding me when I didn't run it when you first suggested.
Th
Saddest news I read all day, another mainframe bites the dust. While googling
MVS I found this Powerpoint:
www.its.niu.edu/its/letstalk/MVS%20Decommission%20Plan_0109.pptx
HTML version:
http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:Bq4l8mWgkqMJ:www.its.niu.edu/its/letstalk/MVS%2520Decommission%2520Pl
>>read-only data tables.
>
>Maybe so From the z/OS 1.11 preview:
>
That's at:
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=ca&infotype=an&appname=iSource&supplier=897&letternum=ENUS209-029
>"In z/OS V1.11, support is added for data tables contained in load modules
>and prog
Walt Farrell pisze:
[...]
I agree with the others that you really need to explore what your auditors
are intending to accomplish, and provide some education to them.
(This is semi off-topic, since it is - let's say - political issue.)
The question is why should I educate auditors?
Why should th
hi all
I got the following message on last lpar
IOS500I ACTIVATE RESULTS 394
ACTIVATE FAILED - ERROR MESSAGE(S) ISSUED
DEVICE IS NOT DEFINED AS DYNAMIC
how can I activiate the last one LPAR with activiate = IODFXX ?
many thanks
---
even activiate=IODFXX,FORCE issued, activiate still failure
REASON=0161,CAN NOT DELETE DEVICE 05CF
DESCTEXT=DEVICE IS NOT DEFINED AS DYNAMIC
COMPID=SC1C3
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Tommy Tsui wrote:
> hi all
> I got the following message on last lpar
> IOS500I ACTIVATE RESULTS 394
> ACTIVA
Is it possible to use RECOVER with TARGET option?
to activate the IODF even "dynamic =NO" is given on HSA
4.9.2.2 Continuing LPAR mode I/O configuration changes without system
reset
If your processor was running in LPAR mode, the failure does not
require a
system reset, and you want to co
Look at HMC Customize/Delete Profile.
2009/6/6 Tommy Tsui
> hi all
> I got the following message on last lpar
> IOS500I ACTIVATE RESULTS 394
> ACTIVATE FAILED - ERROR MESSAGE(S) ISSUED
> DEVICE IS NOT DEFINED AS DYNAMIC
>
>
> how can I activiate the last one LPAR with activiate = IODFXX ?
>
>
any book recommend PR/SM?
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:13 AM, carlos roberto
visconde wrote:
> Look at HMC Customize/Delete Profile.
>
>
>
> 2009/6/6 Tommy Tsui
>
>> hi all
>> I got the following message on last lpar
>> IOS500I ACTIVATE RESULTS 394
>> ACTIVATE FAILED - ERROR MESSAGE(S) ISSUED
>> DEVI
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
By experiment, I discover that HLASM won't let me create a CSECT
16MiB. It won't let me create a program with multiple CSECTs
totalling >16 MiB(?!) Sigh.
Are you using GOFF?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
L
refer to support element guide, I need to create a new reset profile
and point to a new IOCDS, deactivate and activate it again
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Tommy Tsui wrote:
> any book recommend PR/SM?
>
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:13 AM, carlos roberto
> visconde wrote:
>> Look at HMC Customi
At 11:13 -0500 on 06/06/2009, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: EXEC
Above the Bar (Was Large Page Support):
Nearby in the same document:
... when IEFBR14 is used to delete a data set ...
Haven't we agreed here that IEFBR14 doesn't delete data sets? Hasn't
IBM learned this yet?
I think th
In article you wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:18:07 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote:
> >
> >"In z/OS V1.11, support is added for data tables contained in load
> >modules and program objects to be placed above 2 GB. A new ADDR64
> >
For my 2 cents worth, I totally agree with Barbara. We don't have any
use for Unix at our installation. The only real reason we have to keep
up with and maintain UNIX is for TCP/IP. We don't have any substantial
use for UNIX. Okay, ServerPac, but, I could just as easily use the
tapes.
By cho
18 matches
Mail list logo
