I am curious, too, how this is addressed in 1.10. (We're not there yet).
Here is what I learned *why* this behaviour exists (narrowly looking at only
tcbs):
When the dispatcher dispatches any tcb, all it does for the system trace entry
is take the WLIC's last two byte (from the RB pointed to
You're just saying that because the beach has no sand in Vermont :)
A big thanks to all contributors to Hercules,,,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net wrote:
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
I've decided I'll drop off the list in a week or 2 rather than hear more
On 9/21/2009 at 12:52 AM, John Argall jarg...@csc.com wrote:
Hi,
We are in the process of standing up a z/VM running Linux on z. (on a z/9).
IBM have suggested a ratio of central/extended storage of 3 to 1 in the
VM image profile. I was curious to see what other folks have done and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg
At 07:56 -0600 on 09/15/2009, Roach, Dennis (N-GHG) wrote about Re:
file integrity verified - do I care?:
That depends on how important data integrity is to you.
97 indicates that the last
Do you have any idea of the time it takes to clear a mod-9, for instance? The
thing about DRCLEAR is it cleared 121 mod 3's, 121 mod 9's and 126 mod-L's in 1
hour!
Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV 25305
(304)558-5914
Pat,
Get Hercules and play at home. :-)
Congrats on a great career! Your presence will be missed here!!!
Bob
-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Patrick O'Keefe
Doc,
Actually, I dont' think this is accurate. From past audits, the PCI standard
is
very clear that the card #, stored at rest (either on disk, or tape), cannot
be stored in the clear at all. If at least one person, or userid, can access
this
dataset, the card # MUST be encrypted. If
Lizette,
If the CC # is encrypted, then the PCI standard is met, and yes it would be
much more difficult to identify. Validation that a string of numbers is a CC #
can be done by running a specific function against the 16 digits (I can't
recall
right now what it's called). If there are
You remembered the instruction wrong. 0A0D is the SVC for ABEND, not EXIT,
which is 0A03. ABEND would be the only way to end a task normally in the
Hosed System Architecture which I discussed at SHARE and CMG sessions in the
early 1990s. :-)
Bill Fairchild
Software Developer
Rocket
On 20 Sep 2009 07:24:11 -0700, jcew...@acm.org (Joel C. Ewing) wrote:
I can conceive of a case where you might want to distinguish between
97 and 00, but don't know of any programs in our shop doing that.
It might make sense if the failure was because of a known ABEND of a
re-runnable batch
On 20 Sep 2009 13:00:33 -0700, patrick.oke...@wamu.net (Patrick
O'Keefe) wrote:
I've decided I'll drop off the list in a week or 2 rather than hear more
about all the neat new features of software and hardware that I will
never see.
Of course, in many shops, one could be at the start of one's
Cobe,
Your upload/download process should work OK as far as I know. The FTP is just a
transport mechanism in this case. To assist in defining the Overview Control
Statements, look at the HELP tab in the Workload Overview Report spreadsheet.
There is a button that opens the Create Overview
Pat,
I have enjoyed your posts over the years and am sorry to see you go. Good luck!
Clifford McNeill
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:58:17 -0500
From: patrick.oke...@wamu.net
Subject: OT - End of a personal era
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
On Sept 25 my current employment ends, and since
Andy Robertson wrote on 09/20/2009 05:05:39 AM:
Thanks, Frank, Martin; the problem was my cut-and-pasting from PDF. In
fact the standard version of COBDFSYM works well with 410. Apologies for
timewasting.
Good to hear. Thanks for letting us know.
Frank Yaeger - DFSORT Development Team
I use to know the difference between the two HSM names in the FSR record
but those cells (and a lot of their neighbors) have gone to the bit
bucket. HSM uses two IDs with FSR records. They are '**HSM***' and '
*H*S*M*'. Does anyone remember what's the difference?
TIA
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390
I WILL JOIN YOU NEXT SEPTEMBER, ENJOY
-- Original message from Clifford McNeill sy...@hotmail.com:
--
Pat,
I have enjoyed your posts over the years and am sorry to see you go. Good
luck!
Clifford McNeill
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:58:17 -0500
From:
Gilbert,
My suggestion for having JCL/SET variables in a ASASYMBM user table has to
do with what a program would see when it runs in the initiator. Of course,
each step would see different variables/values.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 2:06 AM,
In a message dated 9/21/2009 9:08:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
sch...@shands.ufl.edu writes:
From the Help for RMF Spreadsheet Reporter:
Collect:When you create remote Report Listings or Overview Records, a
Postprocessor job is generated and submitted on the host system.
Download:When
I'm sorry - I didn't read Gilbert's example closely enough.
One possibility would be to have the program see the last valuable of a
given variable before the step was executed, sinces it is uncommon to set a
variable more than once in the scope of a given step.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:31 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
My suggestion for having JCL/SET variables in a ASASYMBM user table has to
do with what a program would see when it runs in the initiator. Of course,
each step would see different variables/values.
Gilbert has concocted a more bizarre
Gil,
I agree 100%, but I'll add that *both* would be valuable (100 parm, and
JCL/SET variables visible).
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.comwrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:03:31 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
My suggestion for
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Peter Vander Woude
pwo...@harristeeter.com wrote:
If the CC # is encrypted, then the PCI standard is met, and yes it would be
much more difficult to identify. Validation that a string of numbers is a CC
#
can be done by running a specific function against
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
... More generally useful would be a relaxation of the 100-character
PARM limit and/or native support of symbol substitution in
SYSIN data sets by the reader/converter/interpreter. ...
Of course, like everybody, I would like both things to be implemented,
but because
On the issue of the parm length.. why not just create something new.
Sometimes retrofitting is just not practical. I vote
PARM='PARMX',PARMX='WAY LONGER THAN 100 CHARACTERS'. A bit goofy..
but probably a lot easier to implement. Of course I am probably
oversimplifying. Kind of like how
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 09/18/2009
04:41:28 AM:
Re: Curious about ATTACH and 'SVCR 0'
Steve Austin
This is occuring on z/OS 1.10. Is there specific maintenance required?
What type of entry will I see when the anomaly is addressed?
-Original
Dell is set to acquire Perot Systems to the tune of $3.9 billion. I
wonder how this will end up affecting out-sourcing and the use of the
mainframe.
http://banktech.com/architecture-infrastructure/showArticle.jhtml;jsessi
onid=BQQITPK0C3PSLQE1GHPCKHWATMY32JVN?articleID=220100298_requestid=290
On 9/21/2009 at 2:45 PM, Kelman, Tom thomas.kel...@commercebank.com
wrote:
Dell is set to acquire Perot Systems to the tune of $3.9 billion. I
wonder how this will end up affecting out-sourcing and the use of the
mainframe.
Probably in much the same way as HP's purchase of EDS. I.e, not
-snip---
On Sept 25 my current employment ends, and since I'm not planning to
look for another job, about 37 years of a system programming career
ends with it. Although the last 20 of those years have been more
support /
This paper commissioned by IBM might be the source as the figures are just
about as noted:
http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/cio/optimize/optit_wp_ibm_systemz.pdf
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:03:23 -0500, Eric Bielefeld eric-
ibmm...@wi.rr.com wrote:
Craig had a couple of other comments that I
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:37:52 -0400, Rob Schramm wrote:
On the issue of the parm length.. why not just create something new.
Sometimes retrofitting is just not practical. I vote
PARM='PARMX',PARMX='WAY LONGER THAN 100 CHARACTERS'. A bit goofy..
but probably a lot easier to implement. Of
Cross-posted to Linux-390, IBMVM, and IBM-MAIN
I've received six more Linux and z/VM presentations. I can't say I'm expecting
any more to come in. Thanks to all the speakers that have contributed.
Session Presenter Title
9102Bill Bitner Introduction to Virtualization:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:54:45 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
...
PARM='PARMX',PARMX='WAY LONGER THAN 100 CHARACTERS'.
...
I'd be quite satisfied with this _provided_ it was compatible
with the existing CALL, LINK, ATTACH, etc. argument lists.
...
(And that symbol
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:43:21 -0500, Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
...
PARM='PARMX',PARMX='WAY LONGER THAN 100 CHARACTERS'.
...
I'd be quite satisfied with this _provided_ it was compatible
with the existing CALL, LINK, ATTACH, etc. argument lists.
...
(And that symbol substitution would work within
Just a side note here in defense of Vermont's reputation.
There's a nice sandy beach. You just have to know where to find it.
--Roger
http://www.vtstateparks.com/htm/sandbar.cfm
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.comwrote:
You're just saying that because the
z/OS Related Workshops Coming up from ProTechTraining.com
The following training workshops are scheduled in our virtual classroom.
Please feel free to share with colleagues that might have an interest.
z/OS http://www.protechtraining.com/training/course/PT3996/*~*~*
Performance Tuning and
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:10:12 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
...
Awww, c'mon. That exposure has existed for classic PARM
since the Dawn of Time, and we aren't hearing complaints,
are we? Clarifying, by symbol, I meant JCL symbol, for
which substitution is supported. I wasn't
You remembered the instruction wrong. 0A0D is the SVC for ABEND, not
EXIT, which is 0A03. ABEND would be the only way to end a task normally
in the Hosed System Architecture which I discussed at SHARE and CMG
sessions in the early 1990s. :-)
Wow, someone's actually *reading* my ramblings! :-)
At 14:54 -0500 on 09/21/2009, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: Reading
DD card information:
I'd be quite satisfied with this _provided_ it was compatible
with the existing CALL, LINK, ATTACH, etc. argument lists.
I.e. on program entry R1 points to a fullword which points
to a halfword containing
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:58:13 -0400 Robert A. Rosenberg hal9...@panix.com
wrote:
:At 14:54 -0500 on 09/21/2009, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: Reading
:DD card information:
:I'd be quite satisfied with this _provided_ it was compatible
:with the existing CALL, LINK, ATTACH, etc. argument lists.
Miss you Pat !
Have a wonderful retired life.
Thanks Best Regards.
Umamaheshwar Iyer | Project Manager | Tech Mahindra
Hinjwadi, Pune - 411 004, INDIA
Ph. Office: +91 20 4225 0801 | Cell: +91 97666 44472
Email: ui0037...@techmahindra.com
www.techmahindra.com
-Original Message-
40 matches
Mail list logo
