Mark Zelden pisze:
[...]
I don't have a stake either way, but if I were rooting for Neon and they
won this battle, IBM would still be free to change the licensing rules or
not charge less for special engines, or they could just change the code
and break zPrime for Neon. So the only benefit
Steve Comstock pisze:
For years now I've configured my mail client to not
accept HTML emails. The common wisdom, as I percieved
it anyway, has been that HTML emails and various
kinds of attachements (esp. Word documents) were prime
paths for viruses to attack your system.
I seem to be getting a
I am out of the office until 02/05/2010.
Note: This is an automated response to your message ?Re: OT (?): Are
HTML emails unsafe sent on 2/3/10 1:05:14.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
I agree with pretty much everything Phil said--except I don't use
Outlook. I'm still using Pegasus at home.
It's not that HTML email is inherently evil, it's just that you have to be
as careful as you would surfing the web. And few people would
suggest you should completely stop using the
Curious if anyone can shed light on the subject matter. We're taking the
default of 4 mb and want to increase to around 100 mb for the RID pool. It
appears in V7 the RID is allocated below the bar, in V8 it looks like the lists
part of the RID get moved above the bar.
Do we need to be
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 2:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBM countersues Neon over zPrime accelerator
Mark Zelden pisze:
[...]
I don't have a stake
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:19 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
wrote:
More likely effect: IBM discontinues the speciality engines entirely. And OEM
vendors start basing their software prices on both CP and speciality engines
in the box instead of just on the CPs. IMO, the entire
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:03:33 +0100, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
Mark Zelden pisze:
[...]
I don't have a stake either way, but if I were rooting for Neon and they
won this battle, IBM would still be free to change the licensing rules or
not charge less for special engines, or they
Everyone keeps talking about the impact on the IBM software bill.
I would be very worried about the impact of my non-IBM software bill. Even if
IBM allowed the use of speciality engines (which I would not expect them to
do), other software suppliers may not.
I think the zPrime product could
I saw a roadshow this past summer and immediately came away with the
implications to licensing. A small group of us also talked about what you do
below, IBM changing the licensing or breaking the software.
To me anyway, it's a crafty/risky move and left me feeling, no disrespect to
Neon
While I agree with what you are saying and being a very early WAS customer
there were also sometimes severe implications to performance *trying* to get
WAS to play nice with the traditional workloads. Something had to be done to
allow the 2, trad. workloads WebFear, to cohabitate...
--- On
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:04:43 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:03:33 +0100, R.S. wrote:
Mark Zelden pisze:
[...]
I don't have a stake either way, but if I were rooting for Neon and they
won this battle, IBM would still be free to change the licensing rules or
not charge less for
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:59:19 -0800, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:
While I agree with what you are saying and being a very early WAS customer
there were also sometimes severe implications to performance *trying* to get
WAS to play nice with the traditional workloads. Something
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 9:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBM countersues Neon over zPrime accelerator
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:04:43 -0600, Mark
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:23:15 -0600, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:04:43 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
** Everyone that uses them enough to get a price advantage. It doesn't
help to purchase a specialty engine at 1/4 the price of a general engine
and only run it
-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4831 (20100203
FOSS software? That goes with PUT tape, PIN number, and ATM machine.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of zMan
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 9:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBM countersues Neon over zPrime accelerator
FOSS software? That goes with PUT tape, PIN number,
A carpenter goes the hardware store to buy some hammers. They are offer him
some all-round general purpose blue hammers for $40 each. He can use them to
build anything we wants. Also with the purchase of each blue hammer, he can
get a special purpose red hammer for $10 each. However, he is only
Really? Is engine switching overhead with SP's and GP's CP's more of a concern
versus running WAS with GP CP's and other traditional workloads from a
performance perspective?
Hmm. I've been there, no SP's, and it can be very ugly. I'm not sure I follow
you...So are you saying zAAP's really
On 3 Feb 2010 06:51:55 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
I saw a roadshow this past summer and immediately came away with the
implications to licensing. A small group of us also talked about what you do
below, IBM changing the licensing or breaking the software.
To me anyway, it's a
Query IBMMAIN
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Thanks Tom
Where do you go to define the regions to the STC subsystem? Is this in
WLM?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
We have a z990 box with 3 Shared CPs. We use to break the weights up over
all of our LPARs using the actual weights and the # of CP online varied. For
example LPAR1=881(3 CPs) LPAR2=63(2 CPs), LPAR3=221(3CPs), LPAR4=50
(2CPs), LPAR5=37(1 CP), but we wanted to try something and recently
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Patrick Falcone
Really? Is engine switching overhead with SP's and GP's CP's more of a
concern versus running WAS with
GP CP's and other traditional workloads from a performance perspective?
Hmm. I've been
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:31:02 -0500, Don Williams wrote:
A carpenter goes the hardware store to buy some hammers. They are offer him
some all-round general purpose blue hammers for $40 each. He can use them to
build anything we wants. Also with the purchase of each blue hammer, he can
get a special
What are the benefits on controlling via a response time goal vs. a velocity
goal? Our system has been pretty constrained lately and I'm looking for ways
to improve it, but I'm not that familiar with WLM. By the way, I am looking at
the WLM manual was well. I need to get the MVS Planning
Don,
Hang on. The Blue Hammers are only $40 if you hammer 1000 nails a day. If
you start hammering 2000 nails a day the guy from the hardware store knocks
on your door and asks for another $40. He doesn't care how many nails you
hammer a day with the red hammer.
I recall this analogy being
I'm bringing up an 3584 ATL with some 3592 drive on two control units. I
noticed that when I allocate a tape the drives are allocated serially from
low to high, ie control unit zero, device zero then on then ... and then
control unit one device zero,
I couldn't find anything in the
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:34:21 -0800, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:
Really? Is engine switching overhead with SP's and GP's CP's more of a
concern versus running WAS with GP CP's and other traditional workloads from
a performance perspective?
Hmm. I've been there, no SP's,
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:30:08 -0800, Ron Hawkins
ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Don,
Hang on. The Blue Hammers are only $40 if you hammer 1000 nails a day. If
you start hammering 2000 nails a day the guy from the hardware store knocks
on your door and asks for another $40. He doesn't care
Yes, it is not a good idea to assign all of your CPs (physical
processors) to all of your LPARs. What you are doing is having all the
LPARs competing for the CPs on an equal basis. The weights take effect
only when the total CEC is 100% busy or at least very close to it.
Also, the recommendation
Does the hardware store have a right to control the use of any hammers it
sold?
Does the carpenter have a right to ignore the hardware store's conditions of
the sale?
Does the craftsman have a right to modify the hammers?
Or should carpenter switch to screws and a drill?
When copyright law,
I am in the process of completely redesigning our WLM policy, so I'm
going through pretty much the same as you. Although, I do have some
experience in designing one shortly after WLM appeared on the scene.
What I'm trying to get a handle on is new functionality and subsystems
that have been
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:59:00 -0600, Kelman, Tom
thomas.kel...@commercebank.com wrote:
Yes, it is not a good idea to assign all of your CPs (physical
processors) to all of your LPARs. What you are doing is having all the
LPARs competing for the CPs on an equal basis. The weights take effect
only
I'm not a lawyer, so I never learned how to properly apply the 14th
amendment.
Regardless, it is not clear cut to me, who is right. I'm sure that
eventually it will be declared who is legally right, however, I doubt that
everyone will agree with the correctness of that decision.
-Original
Neon has posted a response to IBM's countersuit on their web site here -
http://www.neon.com/neon/countersuit.shtm. These are several documents
that have been filed in the US District Court, Western District of
Texas, for all you that are interested in that.
This could get real interesting.
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:31:02 -0500 Don Williams donb...@gmail.com wrote:
:A carpenter goes the hardware store to buy some hammers. They are offer him
:some all-round general purpose blue hammers for $40 each. He can use them to
:build anything we wants. Also with the purchase of each blue hammer,
I found this interesting:
24. IBM licenses its customers to use IBM Machine Code to process all
types of computing jobs (workloads) on CPs. In contrast, customers
are authorized to process only certain specified types of workloads on
specialty processors. z/OS directs to specialty engines
I have an old STK tape system ( ten 9840's in 3490 emulation mode inside a
9740. Each drive ESCON point to point) , that will hopefully go away but
I have an issue with HSM dump running longer than expected. The problem
appears disconnect time. During the HSM dumps, we're using four
Can you tell me which manual is best to read for setting up HIPERDISPATCH?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Is the 2.5 time the number of CPs a documented recommendation? In your
experience, can this be higher, such as 3 times the number of CPs?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:25:02 -0600, gsg gsg_...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is the 2.5 time the number of CPs a documented recommendation? In your
experience, can this be higher, such as 3 times the number of CPs?
As I wrote in this thread from October 2007, it's all in the archives.
Re: Logical to
R.S. wrote:
Mark Zelden pisze:
[...]
I don't have a stake either way, but if I were rooting for Neon and they
won this battle, IBM would still be free to change the licensing
rules or
not charge less for special engines, or they could just change the code
and break zPrime for Neon. So the
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:04:50 -0600, gsg gsg_...@yahoo.com wrote:
Can you tell me which manual is best to read for setting up HIPERDISPATCH?
MVS Initialization and Tuning Reference (see IEAOPTxx).
The best place to find more general information is probably SHARE
presentations. Even if you
We are a monoplex z/OS system and will be moving to a new data center late this
year. When we move, we will get a new CPU (z9 now) and replace our Shark
(2105-800) with something else. Ideally, the desire is to keep our existing
system running while testing the new system and do a quick cutover
Has anyone had this shell script looping ?
/usr/lpp/zWebSphereOEM/V7R0/bin/WASOEM.sh
-n BBN0004W:ZPMT_WORK_ROOT directory
(/tmp/zWebSphereOEM/V7R0/zpmt/work) does not exist. Would you like to
create it? (Y/N)
BBN0229I: * Your response was ÝEnter¨
-n
Did you actually enter a Y or N. Looks like you just pressed enter...
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.8497
When we built our new data center we used PPRC (async) to mirror the disk. By
breaking the mirror we were able to test without impacting the production site,
and simply resync the mirrors when each test was finished.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
You're not running this in ISHELL (or batch) are you? If so, you will need to
login using OMVS or telnet.
Jon L. Veilleux
veilleu...@aetna.com
(860) 636-9179
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Glen Gasior
Sent:
Get a pair of DS8100's and PPRC or XRC them together. The data is replicated in
near real time. You can cut over in minutes.
Then move the second DS8100 to your hot DR site.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
That's fine, I don't agree. Thanks for checking for the documentation.
I would have killed for a zAAP when we tried to go WAS V5 years ago. I would
not have taken a GP either since the startup of the cell group dimmed the
lights and having a GP, that was knee-capped, would have been a
IIRC, some of those STK drives were faster than ESCON could go. Have you looked
at the path?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
John Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 12:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
That doesn't sound like a lot of data to me, considering you have 3592s, I
would think the backup/restore outage window would be manageable, but politics
play a part there.
Johnston, Robert E johnstonrobe...@uams.edu 2/3/2010 3:14 PM
We are a monoplex z/OS system and will be moving to a new
Here are a few ideas if you have the dasd at the new location configured and
connected to you current processor;
IBM, Innovation and others have software that can move your data between dasd
units while you are up and running. We used this years ago to move from an RVA
to a Shark
Use some
Have a job I've been submitting many times, runs as
expected. Minutes ago I submitted the same job and
it fails with JCL ERROR and under SDSF I see:
STMT NO. MESSAGE
1 IEFC607I JOB HAS NO STEPS
Now, submitting various other jobs that have worked
in the past, they all fail this way.
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:30:21 -0800, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:
That's fine, I don't agree. Thanks for checking for the documentation.
You don't agree with what? That having 10 GPs has less overhead than
5 GPs and 5 zAAPs and can service the same workload just as well or
Maybe a comment got continued right over the following EXEC statement?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Steve Comstock
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 2:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Strange JCL error
snip
some of those STK drives were faster than ESCON could go. Have you looked
at the path?
/snip
the LCU display doesn't show any contention and each drive has its own
ESCON so I would image that the throttle would be the CHP and/or I/O
processor in the z9. The total number of I/O vary by
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:58:00 -0700, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
wrote:
Have a job I've been submitting many times, runs as
expected. Minutes ago I submitted the same job and
it fails with JCL ERROR and under SDSF I see:
STMT NO. MESSAGE
1 IEFC607I JOB HAS NO STEPS
Now,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 2:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Strange JCL error
Have a job I've been submitting many times, runs as
expected. Minutes ago I
Hal Merritt wrote:
Maybe a comment got continued right over the following EXEC statement?
No, it's the exact same JCL. (Still, I went back and
double-checked; when you've been around awhile you
learn to look again.)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:58:00 -0700, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
wrote:
Have a job I've been submitting many times, runs as
expected. Minutes ago I submitted the same job and
it fails with JCL ERROR and under SDSF I see:
STMT NO. MESSAGE
1 IEFC607I JOB HAS
Have you tried renaming your ISPF profile data set (temporarily) and
using a completely fresh one for a session?
Best regards,
David Tidy Tel:(31)115-67-1745
IS Technical Management/SAP-Mf Fax:(31)115-67-1762
Dow Benelux B.V.
We have a DMX3-2500. Can anyone tell me what is a good I/O rate/sec. is
and when it is considered bad? For example, 4500 Good, 4501 - 7500 is a
warning, and 7501 is bad. We've been trying to get this type of information
from EMC, but they seem unwilling to tell us.
TIA
*
Has anyone had WASOEM.sh loop trying to allocate a directory in /tmp/ ?
*
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
- Original Message -
From: Johnston, Robert E johnstonrobe...@uams.edu
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:15 PM
Subject: Options for moving data
We are a monoplex z/OS system and will be moving to a new data center late
this year. When we move, we
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:22:58 -0700, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
wrote:
If you look at what is allocated for ISPCTL0 using ISRDDN, do
you see anything strange there? Can you delete that data set so
it will get re-allocated.
There is nothing visible; there is no ISPCTLx DDname
Tidy, David (D) wrote:
Have you tried renaming your ISPF profile data set (temporarily) and
using a completely fresh one for a session?
Best regards,
David Tidy Tel:(31)115-67-1745
IS Technical Management/SAP-Mf Fax:(31)115-67-1762
Dow
Come on Mark, you made a blanket statement about zAAP's and performance and I
disagreed. Now you're coming back with specifics which I'm not going to/can't
argue. I'm just stating I've been in situations where I personally believe that
a zAAP would have been benificial over a GP CP from a
What are our options for quickly moving about 400 3390-3 and a few 3390-9,
or replicating our current volumes to a new unit located a few miles away?
If you're within Ficon distance, and I don't recall what the limit is, and if
you buy IBM DASD, you can negotiate for the use of TDMF to do the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Strange JCL error
Tidy, David (D) wrote:
Have you tried renaming your ISPF profile data set
Hi all,
I have a strange one that I can't figure out. As part of my testing of
z/OS 1.10, I'm running some test jobs that e-mail output to internal
users (namely, me). On my current 1.7 system, the e-mails flow almost
instantaneously. On the 1.10 test system, the actual e-mail step takes
DNS resolution? Perhaps the RESOLVER has multiple DNS servers listed and the
first one is timing out? Just a WAG.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:22:58 -0700, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
wrote:
If you look at what is allocated for ISPCTL0 using ISRDDN, do
you see anything strange there? Can you delete that data set so
it will get re-allocated.
There is nothing visible; there is
You know what the TCB problem is don't you? You need an updated IEFACTRT
exit. I don't remember the details but its something like what was a
halfword is now a fullword.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Pommier, Rex
Anyone know where to find a manual on PR/SM for z/OS? I've been looking all
over and can't seem to find one.
TIA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:02 PM, gsg gsg_...@yahoo.com wrote:
Anyone know where to find a manual on PR/SM for z/OS? I've been looking
all
over and can't seem to find one.
I don't believe the question makes any sense -- it's like asking for a
manual on z10 for z/OS. PR/SM is above z/OS: the
Let me rephrase my question. Where can I find information PR/SM?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Is there any space in your TSO pool?
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
SNIPPAGE
Well that gives me:
ISPF system data set allocation error - press Enter to continue.
Temporary control card data set cannot be allocated.
Error trying to open ''.
***
On a hunch I then logged off and logged back on.
Same problem.
SNIPPAGE
The Mighty Fine Manual says:
-
We are nearing the end-stage of a long running project to get rid of all
of our legacy and manual tape drives. We still have a very few contacts
that insist that they can not transmit us the data (color me dubious but
there is apparently much more going on in the relationship than just the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of gsg
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 4:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: PR/SM
Anyone know where to find a manual on PR/SM for z/OS? I've
been looking all
over and can't
Try entering BUILTIN SUB and see what happens.
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simplist.html
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:58:00 -0700
From: st...@trainersfriend.com
Subject: Strange JCL error
To:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:57:34 -0700, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
wrote:
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:22:58 -0700, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
wrote:
If you look at what is allocated for ISPCTL0 using ISRDDN, do
you see anything strange there? Can you delete
Greetings again,
I have two LPARs that I'm trying to group softcap to 76 MSU's.
I set the defined capacity in each to 76 and made them both members
of the DEFAULT group and set that group capacity to 76.
I expect this to allow resources to shift between both LPARs as
needed. What I'm
Dave Salt wrote:
Try entering BUILTIN SUB and see what happens.
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simplist.html
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:58:00 -0700
From: st...@trainersfriend.com
Subject: Strange JCL error
To:
Bob Shannon wrote:
Is there any space in your TSO pool?
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
Interesting question. How would I check that?
--
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com
z/OS Application development made easier
* Our
V7 is a 31-bit app therefore everything is under the bar there. Increase the
pool only if you have enough real memory to go with it otherwise results may
not be to your liking. Even if there is enough real memory to go with it do
check that you are not taking away virtual storage from another
Have you looked at the JES2 LOG from your previous TSO session?
I have seen this sort of error caused by a RACF issue. (The user had
changed his TSO prefix to an invalid value).
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 17:34, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.comwrote:
Dave Salt wrote:
Try entering BUILTIN
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:46:24 -0800, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:
Come on Mark, you made a blanket statement about zAAP's and performance and
I disagreed. Now you're coming back with specifics which I'm not going
to/can't argue. I'm just stating I've been in situations where
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:02:42 -0600, gsg gsg_...@yahoo.com wrote:
Anyone know where to find a manual on PR/SM for z/OS? I've been looking all
over and can't seem to find one.
Resource link.
https://www-304.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc03100.nsf?OpenDatabase
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:57:34 -0700, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
wrote:
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:22:58 -0700, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
wrote:
If you look at what is allocated for ISPCTL0 using ISRDDN, do
you see anything strange
From a performance only point of view, yes, an all GP configuration might be
better, if none of the GP's were capped.
The point of the z/IIP and z/AAP was to get you horsepower without increasing
your software licensing fees. It is much cheaper to have 5 GPs and 5 z/IIPs or
z/AAPs rather than
My colleague, Hunter Cobb, is having the same issue, and
he tried using a fresh ISPF profile, but no luck.
Here's an update: logging in under a different ID, the
problem goes away; logging off and re-logging on under
the original ID, the problem is back. That narrows
things down a little.
We'll
Check the link below, there is information on switching in question/answer #2.
http://www.itindepth.com/JoseCastano-zAAP.htm
A zAAP in my last situation would have beat the freakin pants off a GP CP,
that's a fact. I'm sitting here with many disparate machines and again find
myself with
Hallo To All,
I performed a full volume backup on a 3390-3 and then performed a full volume
restore on a 3390-9 using the same volser of HESPD01. The restore ran
successfully, but I am puzzled by the message ADR866I.
ADR866I (ttt)-(yy), UNABLE TO RENAME VTOC INDEX ON VOLUME
Since you change the volume size(mod type), you may have to be concerned
that the entire 3390-9 space may not be available to you. You may have to
change to run a job to change the size.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005bde01...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom, on
02/02/2010
at 07:20 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
True. More portable to what other environment?
*bsd. Linux. OS/2. Other Unix. Windows.
In
I work with the State of Oregon and heard of these new job openings.
Please investigate if interested.
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
