john gilmore wrote:
For n = 50(10)100 I inverted an identity matrix, a unit upper triangular
matrix, and a unit lower triangular matrix using first HFP and then BFP.
The results, stated as index numbers with BFP=100, are summarized below.
50 60 70 80 90 100n
101 101 100 103
No problem Wayne, I figured that's what happened. Can't count the times my
typing got ahead of what little brain cells I have left were thinking.
Dr. Stephen Fedtke:
Here's some sample code and you don't have to use R1 like I did.
L R1,PSATOLD-PSA ADDR OF ASCB
George,
You are correct, I got the two control blocks mixed up. I did indeed mean
ASXBSENV is used to locate the ACEE. Sorry for any confusion.
===
Wayne Driscoll
OMEGAMON DB2 L3 Support/Development
wdrisco(AT)us.ibm.com
=
> Only the TCBSENV for the current TCB is used if non-zero. If the current
> TCBSENV is zero, then ACEESENV is used.
>
Never heard of a ACEESENV. I think you mean ASXBSENV.
George Fogg
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archiv
Chris have you had a look at the PAV analysis tool on the z/OS Unix "Tools
and Toys" page ?.
The graphs (from SAS) are a bit lurid, but you might be able to use the
extracted data.
Shane ...
Chris wrote on 17/03/2010 01:37:23 AM:
>I would be looking at tracking HyperPAV at the device level
Only the TCBSENV for the current TCB is used if non-zero. If the current
TCBSENV is zero, then ACEESENV is used.
===
Wayne Driscoll
OMEGAMON DB2 L3 Support/Development
wdrisco(AT)us.ibm.com
===
From:
"Dr.
hi all,
when there is a need to determine the TCBSENV (TCB ACEE) in charge for a
given RACHECK call, determining it for the current TCB is quite easy:
L R14,PSATOLD-FLC(0,0)LOAD CURRENT TASK CONTRO
ICM R15,B'',TCBSENV-TCB(R14)
BNZ tcbacee_given
my question:
EFLISTS don't come close to EasyEdit lists IMHO. You will no doubt meet
user resistance unless you have the clout of a Corporate fiat.
Haven't looked at XEF from Mark - or simplist for that matter.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subsc
For n = 50(10)100 I inverted an identity matrix, a unit upper triangular
matrix, and a unit lower triangular matrix using first HFP and then BFP.
The results, stated as index numbers with BFP=100, are summarized below.
50 60 70 80 90 100n
101 101 100 103 10199I
101 10
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010f.html#13 What was the historical price of a
P/390?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010f.html#14 What was the historical price of a
P/390?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010f.html#16 What was the historical price of a
P/390?
there is this old IBM story about the c
>This forum is not the place for lessons in English orthography, and
>discouraging non-native speakers of English from posting in no part of what we
>are about here. >Moreover, style is not important; but substantive keyword
>correctness is.
Hear! Hear!
I usually try to help those challeng
I think we all understand the intent of 'floting'. Moreover, Miklos Szigetvari
writes English very much better than I should write Hungarian if I were
required to do so.
Why then address this difference?
The answer is that threads that have quaint titles vanish into the archives
essen
Just go into RMFMON III, select Option 1 OVERVIEW, then Option 4 DELAY and
you get a display showing who the job is waiting for and why.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Pawel Leszczynski <
pawel.leszczyn...@pkobp.pl> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Recently, when I was looking at RMF monitor I
In a message dated 3/16/2010 1:00:11 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
jch...@ussco.com writes:
This one works for me:
>>
Me too. Organization kinda shabby in the org as A-DB/2 UDB
and DB/2 v7-NCP 7.7. While the V7 and v8 shelves are in the former
DB/2 v9 is in the latter? Clearly not vetted b
Thanks, Patrick, Bret, John; I've got 8.8 docs,
so I'll go on a search for 9.2 docs.
Mullen, Patrick wrote:
The latest version of File-AID/MVS is 9.2, according to their (login
required) Frontline website.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.u
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
>
> Until recently I was using
>
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/handheld/Connected/
library
> to
> get to IBM manuals in Bookmanager form whereby I could see the
> different products
No, but I sent Big Blue a nasty-gram via the contact us link, explaining
the performance issues. I encourage all online users to do the same.
Then 3 clicks, 3 seconds and I was at the manual I wanted. Now 4 clicks,
30-45 seconds and I'm still not there.
Blankety-blank PFCSK's
Subject: IBM Libra
Until recently I was using
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/handheld/Connected/library
to
get to IBM manuals in Bookmanager form whereby I could see the
different products in their own shelves which made it easy to search for
instance all the DB2 V8 books. That link has now ch
Curious to learn if anyone else has experienced this problem and what you did
to resolve it.
Migrating from z/OS 1.9 to 1.10. z/OS 1.10 exploits more 64-bit storage (GRS,
SMSPDSE, TRACE, etc). The system trace (TRACE) buffers not only increased from
256K to 1M per logical CP, but also moved
I just got done installing File-AID 9.1.0 a week ago, but I do believe 9.2.0 is
the most current release available.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Donnelly, John P
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 12:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.
We're at 9.0.1, but I don't think that is the latest version.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com
...we use FILE-AID 8.9.5...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Steve Comstock
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 10:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: File-aid: latest version?
I have a client who is interested in including s
I have a client who is interested in including some
File-aid training in our JCL and Utilities course;
Compuware doesn't seem to be as forthcoming as IBM
in terms of available technical documentation on the
web, or for that matter, even stuff like release levels and
so on for non-customers.
So ca
I should have also noted that WLM does not work quickly. So, we could have an
inappropriate goal and WLM has not yet given up or is retrying.
Upon rereading the OP, I see that I missed that the event occurs upon heavy job
submission. I've seen this before a while back: a job/task starts a mass
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
> PC's may have the speed edge for an individual I/O, but how does a fast PC
> I/O stack up against 1
Agreed. I think the issue of what TSO and/or ISPF should do with lower case
operands is somewhat complex, i.e., reasonable people can disagree about
whether what TSO and ISPF do today is optimal. But in this case the problem
is just C/C++ and/or LE doing something unbelievably gratuitous.
Charles
I was just reading a presentation made by Rich Olcott at the August 2008
SHARE that might relate to what Hal is referring to. In it Rich is
discussing the unattainable goal. He says that after a time WLM will
realize that the goal can't be reached and will stop trying for a while.
So basically th
John,
I would be looking at tracking HyperPAV at the device level. That way
we could see how well they move around in the LCU while different jobs are
running. However, the numbers reported at the LCU level are useful.
Thanks,
Chris Burgess
EMC²
where information live
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010f.html#8 What was the historical price of a
P/390?
recent old email
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010e.html#email810617
in this
On 15 Mar 2010 12:19:23 -0700, shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel
Metz , Seymour J.) wrote:
>>IBM And Microsoft Clash Over Unbundling Policy
>>http://www.informationweek.com/news/global-cio/interviews/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223800165
>
>Does this mean that microsoft has stopped signing res
Although IBM has some recommendations on it, the SMP/E environment is
flexible and allows each one to have it defined as you see more convenient.
We can have at least three possible scenarios for it:
* Single-CSI structure
* Multiple-CSI structure
* consolidate previous with a Master CSI
Anyway
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:16:08 -0500, Rabbe, Luke wrote:
>I'm not determined to break the rules. I've already broken them and I want to
>fix it.
>
Can you start over? Do you still have the original installation media?
It's hardly more drastic and certainly more straightforward than
cloning the (
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:56:05 -0500, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
>I have been asked if it is possible to take a PDF and load it on the
>Mainframe for printing.
As others have mentioned, the Infoprint server component of z/OS includes
most of the pieces you need to do this - the rest are in the AFP
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
> PC's may have the speed edge for an individual I/O, but how does a fast PC
> I/O stack up against
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
> PC's may have the speed edge for an individual I/O, but how does a fast PC
> I/O stack up against 100's of concurrent mainframe I/O's? It's the number
> of channels operating in parallel that gives the mainframe a speed edge.
re:
ht
The PDS command (CBT file 182) supports REFLIST dataset changing and PDS
also has a "Change Menu" panel that allows up to 15 datasets/volsers/disps
for dataset changing (this could be extended by making it a scrollable
panel). The change menu variables are saved in the ISPF profile.
Regards,
John
It's not free (though it is cheap), but I would suggest looking at
Mackinney's Simplist product. It has the ability to store lists of users'
favorite data sets (and other types of objects such as DB2 tables, Unix
directories and TSO commands).
I've been using it for about 5 years now, and I am a
I hear that overly aggressive WLM goal settings can do this. Look for high
importance workloads not meeting their goals because the goals are not
achievable. I believe that WLM will hold back recourses in an effort to 'push'
these workloads towards their goals.
-Original Message---
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:07:15 -0400, Duane Weaver wrote:
>We are trying to move away from CA-PDSMAN. One feature that our few
>remaining users like, is the Easyedit feature of a list files that the user
>commonly edits.
>
>
>
>Has anyone else moved away from PDSMAN and how did you handle that fe
Try Mark Zelden's "XEF" freeware at http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
Rob Scott
Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.617.614.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Lis
Strange - during these delays CEC is not heavily loaded (75%),
we have 30% available frames, and these delays are reported in section
STORAGE delays (as 100% delays , reason: OUTR 100%)
I am not sure (I doubt) it's CPU problem
Regards,
Pawel
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:04:50 -0500, McKown, John
wro
Duane,
Have you looked at the ISPF "REFLIST" feature? It sounds like just what you
are looking for.
Regards,
Herman Stocker
It is impossible to make anything foolproof, because fools are so ingenious.
-- Robert Heinlein
-Original Message-
We are trying to move away from CA-PDSMAN.
I'm not determined to break the rules. I've already broken them and I want to
fix it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 9:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SMP/E datase
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:59:58 -0500, Rabbe, Luke wrote:
>The two zones are different levels of the same product. My technique is to
>apply PTFs to the test zone and after they've tested out, apply the same PTFs
>to the production zone. Most of the time the two zones have the same
>maintenance
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:59:58 -0500, Rabbe, Luke
wrote:
>The two zones are different levels of the same product. My technique is to
apply PTFs to the test zone and after they've tested out, apply the same
PTFs to the production zone. Most of the time the two zones have the same
maintenance appli
We are trying to move away from CA-PDSMAN. One feature that our few
remaining users like, is the Easyedit feature of a list files that the user
commonly edits.
Has anyone else moved away from PDSMAN and how did you handle that feature?
Is there REXX exec out there that will save a list of
I'm no expert, but I am fairly sure that "swapped out and ready to run" is more
due to lack of CPU resource, or some sort of WLM problem than a problem due to
swapping.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills
Hello everybody,
Recently, when I was looking at RMF monitor III reports during End of Day
processing I have noticed (from time to time) following delays:
Job: WMJPXSR0 Primary delay: Swapped out and ready to run.
Probable cause:
The two zones are different levels of the same product. My technique is to
apply PTFs to the test zone and after they've tested out, apply the same PTFs
to the production zone. Most of the time the two zones have the same
maintenance applied.
Luke
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainfra
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:31:32 -0500, Rabbe, Luke
wrote:
>Luckily this isn't z/OS. It's a couple 3rd party products. I do apply to
both target zones.
>
>The only library with members is SCDS. Does that mean that I'm only
potentially in trouble if I need to do a RESTORE?
>
It depends. You still
Luckily this isn't z/OS. It's a couple 3rd party products. I do apply to both
target zones.
The only library with members is SCDS. Does that mean that I'm only
potentially in trouble if I need to do a RESTORE?
Luke
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m
Hello forumers,
Has anyone experienced with Tivoli ABAR for z/OS and CA-DISK and
willing to share with me his insights?
Thanks,
Arye Shemer.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
>At the very least there should be a C/C++ PARM= or #pragma option (NOT
one
>of the LE "slash" options) to disable this behavior.
Yes, something along that line is the right answer. TSO/E has no control
over the behavior of the call-target application.
TSO/E passed the data the way that the use
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] För
> Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
> Skickat: den 14 mars 2010 07:20
> Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Ämne: Re: SDSF DOC for USER -- NOT SYSPROG/SEC ADMIN
>
> In <45d79eacefba9b428e3d400e924d36b903336
In <58fc7f986fcb804286e23b59decf420fc2a...@nwt-s-mbx1.rocketsoftware.com>,
on 03/14/2010
at 05:36 PM, Bob Shannon said:
>>IBM's position seems to be that you can hit PFK1, so why do you need a manual
>It's the OS/2 mentality.
ITYM windows mentality; OS/2 has *both* manuals and help files.
In <4b9e4304.2080...@valley.net>, on 03/15/2010
at 10:24 AM, Gerhard Postpischil said:
>I have mixed feelings about that. When maintaining software, that's
>great, but as a stockholder I can't wonder how much money IBM loses due
>to that policy.
My guess is none. Specifically, my guess is t
In
,
on 03/15/2010
at 11:29 AM, "Rabbe, Luke" said:
>The SMP/E User's Guide states:
>...each SCDS is directly related to a specific target zone, and each
>target zone must have its own SCDS.
>It also says this about the MTS, STS, and LTS.
>Why is that?
Because an element name might exist i
In , on 03/14/2010
at 11:11 AM, Anne & Lynn Wheeler said:
>with fiber channel transfer speeds ... at the time when there was
>struggles to get mainframe disks at escon speeds.
PC's may have the speed edge for an individual I/O, but how does a fast PC
I/O stack up against 100's of concurrent m
In , on 03/15/2010
at 11:08 AM, Paul Gilmartin said:
>How many vendors might a customer need to call to get
>running on a Disaster Recovery site? Are the DR CPUs
>pre-keyed?
And do the pre-issued keys work? When the pre-issued keys don't work *and*
the vendor misses the guarantied response t
Yes, it does.
(no, it does't, yes it does...)
And so we can continue the game safely and without bothering readers
that are not interested in this branch-off of the CPU Id topic.
Kees.
"Shane Ginnane" wrote in message
news:<1268732667.4b9f52fb3e...@postoffice.tpg.com.au>...
> On this list ???.
>
On this list ???.
Surely not.
Shane ...
On Tue, Mar 16th, 2010 at 8:26 PM, "R.S." wrote:
...
> BTW: This thread deviates from the topic.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@b
"R.S." wrote in message
news:<4b9f4eaa.5060...@bremultibank.com.pl>...
>
> BTW: This thread deviates from the topic.
>
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
Excellent remark and well in time.
We should pay more attention to this.
Kees.
***
Paul Gilmartin pisze:
[...]
Gossip, unsubstantiated: Several years ago when some music
publishers experimented with copy-protected CDs, they observed
lower sales for the protected CDs than for the unprotected.
The truth, confirmed:
1. SONY issued protected CDs with dedicated application allowin
-SNIP---
> In the early 1990s, a company with datacenters in multiple
> locations had a
> popular piece of software I was working on. They had paid
> for it in one
> locatio
64 matches
Mail list logo
