One thing I hate is when something/someone places a large amount of data
into a filesystem, which automatically grows. You then find that data was
placed there accidentally, or incorrectly. You're left with an over
allocated filesystem, with no way of dynamically (that I know of anyway)
reclaimin
We use OPS/MVS to raise all kinds of alerting - batch job failures, STCs
falling over, error messages from syslog, etc etc etc, you name it.
OPS/MVS uses OPSCAWTO and sends SNMP traps over to a server running BMC
software to raise the incidents.
We have a generic REXX which numerous rules pass data
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 23:18:50 +1100, Shane Ginnane wrote:
>I find myself inexorably drifting away from REXX. Seems to be the dying
>"language".
Are you saying COBOL has died, then?
If only I got a penny for every line of COBOL written today in the world, I
could retire this very minute and step
Jan MOEYERSONS pisze:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 23:18:50 +1100, Shane Ginnane wrote:
I find myself inexorably drifting away from REXX. Seems to be the dying
"language".
Are you saying COBOL has died, then?
If only I got a penny for every line of COBOL written today in the world, I
could retire th
Anyone else having trouble with service.boulder.ibm.com?
I have an automated process of getting enhanced holddata that has failed the
last two days in a row with:
EZA2589E Connection to server interrupted or timed out. Receiving data
EZA2590E recv error from receive_data - EDC5120I INTERRUPTED F
Hi Patrick,
Many thanks for your comprehensive response which proved useful, as it gave
some indications of where to start.
The actual problem was two libraries missing from the TSO STEPLIB i.e.
thlqual.SCSQANLE
thlqual.SCSQAUTH
in our case thlqual is CSQ700
Kind Regards - Terry
Director
KM
In <1294308564.4d2594d48c...@postoffice.tpg.com.au>, on 01/06/2011
at 09:09 PM, Shane Ginnane said:
>Personally I prefer regex
Regexen are fine for simple tasks, but beyond that you need a more
heavyweight tool, e.g., YACC. For XML, why reinvent the wheel? Write
or download a wrapper around a
Patrick,
Thanks for the information. I "knew" that SNMP is not guaranteed delivery, but
it was not at the forefront of my thoughts on this. We currently have CA-7 use
CCI to talk to a server running "nizm" (that's what it sounds like when my boss
talks about it). This server then generates a CA
Thanks. I copied that into my library. It'll save me some effort.
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com
Co
In , on 01/06/2011
at 11:02 PM, Binyamin Dissen said:
>As it has a W suffix, the issue would be with the binder.
Why? For both the Binder and the old Lnkage Editor, the GIGO rule
applies. Do you have any reason to believe that IEW2556W message was
invalid? If the message is correct then the e
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 08:11:58 -0500 "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)"
wrote:
:>In , on 01/06/2011
:> at 11:02 PM, Binyamin Dissen said:
:>>As it has a W suffix, the issue would be with the binder.
:>Why? For both the Binder and the old Lnkage Editor, the GIGO rule
:>applies. Do you have any reason to
Hello List,
I'm tring use here, the REXX program CSQOREXX , under TSO.
So, We insert in my procedure of LOGON the library's need for run this, but
something is wrong, and I can't see.
Our procedure of LOGON is now this :
//IKJSUP EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,DYNAMNBR=500,PARM=ISPSUP
//STEPLIB DD DI
>>I'm trying use here, the REXX program CSQOREXX , under TSO.
>>So, We insert in my procedure of LOGON the library's need for run this,
but something is wrong, and I can't see.
Did you log off & back on after changing the LOGON proc?
ddk
This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with i
Yes,
Sergio
> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 07:45:01 -0600
> From: darth.kel...@assurant.com
> Subject: Re: Question About run REXX Under TSO
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
>
> >>I'm trying use here, the REXX program CSQOREXX , under TSO.
> >>So, We insert in my procedure of LOGON the library's need for r
Hello,
Another thing, I can't see the MQ Libraries in our ISRDDN command, only in the
STEPLIB, but SYSEXEC, not.
Thanks,
Sergio
> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 07:45:01 -0600
> From: darth.kel...@assurant.com
> Subject: Re: Question About run REXX Under TSO
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
>
> >>I'm tr
Do you have a logon clist/rexx that is modifying allocations?
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Sergio Lima wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Another thing, I can't see the MQ Libraries in our ISRDDN command, only in
> the STEPLIB, but SYSEXEC, not.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sergio
>
> > Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 07:45:01 -0
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:47:39 +0300, Sergio Lima wrote:
>I can't see the MQ Libraries in our ISRDDN command, only in the STEPLIB,
>but SYSEXEC, not.
Then, assuming that this is in fact the logon proc that you used, something
has freed SYSEXEC. Is there a logon clist or exec?
--
Tom Marchant
-
Hello Scott.
My ISRDDN screen show this :
Z2RES1 SHR,KEEP >STEPLIB DIT.SDITMOD1
Z2RES1 SHR,KEEP > WMQ600.SCSQANLE
Z2RES1 SHR,KEEP > WMQ600.SCSQAUTH
Z2RES1 SHR,KEEP >SYSEXEC EUVF.SEUVFEXC
Z2RES1 SHR,KEEP >
Hello Tom,
Here, is what We see, in the SDSF screen of IKJSUP PROC :
COMMAND INPUT ===>S
1 //IBMUSR3 JOB 'ACCT#',REGION=4096K
2 //IKJSUP EXEC IKJSUP
XX*--
- Original Message -
From: "Sergio Lima"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 8:42 AM
Subject: Question About run REXX Under TSO
Hello List,
I'm tring use here, the REXX program CSQOREXX , under TSO.
So, We insert in my procedure of LOGON the library's ne
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:21:20 +0300, Sergio Lima wrote:
>Here, is what We see, in the SDSF screen of IKJSUP PROC :
>
> 4 XXIKJSUP EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,DYNAMNBR=500,PARM=ISPSUP
The ISRDDN output that you showed includes SYSEXEC with several data
sets. They were allocated by something, proba
Nice rexx ispf macro. As someone who has written rexx since it first 'hit the
scene' on VM , I feel as a language it has a lot of flexibility.
I have used it on TSO/NETVIEW/MVS/VM and Object Rexx on Windows and Linux. I
also write in Cobol and Assembler, language is a matter of what you want to d
Group,
We maintain the SYSTEM CONFIG on z/VM using an exec that renames the
members. I need to run this exec on the oldest file first. If I could sort
FLIST/LISTF in descending date order I would be able to process the files in
order from top to bottom. I looked at FLIST and found:" If th
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 09:07:34 -0600, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
wrote:
> We maintain the SYSTEM CONFIG on z/VM using an exec that renames the
members. I need to run this exec on the oldest file first. If I could sort
FLIST/LISTF in descending date order I would be able to process the files in
o
It's been a long time since I used CMS, but what happens if you issue the
same sort command a second time?
There is a VM-specific mailing list I think, but someone here should know
the answer.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
>
> Great points.
>
> Unfortunately this is vendor code. So I will ask the vendor to change the RC
> on the Lked.
Arguably "better" to suggest the vendor fix the defective object module.
-jc-
-
Run the following PIPE from your Ready prompt
pipe command LISTFILE fn ft fm (DA | sort 63.2 d 57.5 d 66.8 d | >
sorted list a
Of course you could call the exec from the PIPE if you want, but this
gives you a list of files in descending order by date/time
Larry
-Original Message-
From
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B.
>
> Anyone else having trouble with service.boulder.ibm.com?
>
> I have an automated process of getting enhanced holddata that has
failed the last two days in a row
> with:
>
> EZA2589E Connectio
Another way (and maybe better for you) is to issue the following:
LISTFILE fn ft fm (DA EXThis creates a CMS EXEC file
XEDIT CMS EXEC A
Issue the XEDIT command: sort * d 70 71 64 68 73 80
Issue the XEDIT command: FILE
>From the Ready prompt issue:
CMS EXEC execname This w
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 06:46:40 -0500, Richards, Robert B.
wrote:
>Anyone else having trouble with service.boulder.ibm.com?
>
>I have an automated process of getting enhanced holddata that has failed
the last two days in a row with:
>
>EZA2589E Connection to server interrupted or timed out. Receivi
Patrick,
I *was* trying to get the full.txt file, but I am seeing the same problem with
the full.bin file.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Patrick Lyon
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.e
John,
I am not even at the RECEIVE portion yet.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Chase, John
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBM Boulder site having problems?
SMP/E RECE
I had the ftp timeout issue earlier this week. After a couple hours it worked
fine.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Patrick Lyon
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBM Boulder
Iain,
We put the patch on about 3 weeks ago and haven't had the problem since.
Thanks again for pointing this APAR out to us.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Iain Robertson
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 4:00 AM
To
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:02:29 -0500, Richards, Robert B.
wrote:
>Patrick,
>
>I *was* trying to get the full.txt file, but I am seeing the same problem with
the full.bin file.
>
>Bob
>
>
Interesting. I just tried and downloaded full.bin just fine and then realized
I
forgot to put it in binary
The RECEIVE ORDER command sends the request ( CONTENT(HOLDDATA) ) to a
(different) server in Boulder, downloads the HOLDDATA and then RECEIVEs
it, all in one "swell foop". This also presumes that you allow z/OS to
reach the external server.
-jc-
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainfr
In FILEL an /SD command will sort by descending date.
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
> It's been a long time since I used CMS, but what happens if you issue the
> same sort command a second time?
>
> There is a VM-specific mailing list I think, but someone here should know
I am getting more than my share of misses then!
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Patrick Lyon
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 11:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBM Boulder site having problems?
On Fri, 7 J
Larry,
Thank you for looking into this. Yes, I want the most recent Date/Time
field LAST which is the opposite of /SD in FLIST. The CMS sort is ascending
order only. CMS sort is where I was hoping for a choice of sort orders, but
it's not there. Thank you for pointing out the XEDIT sort.
There seem to be several tools that convert PDFs to MOBI, have you tried all
and found them to be unsatisfactory?
I have a Kindle (3), and to my thinking it is never going to be satisfactory
for reading technical manuals because of the speed of the E-ink display.
IMO reading these requires fast s
In case you were not aware or if you needed a reminder, there
is a SHARE early bird registration rate.
Save $200 on your conference experience by registering on or
before January 14.
SHARE Anaheim
Feb 27- March 4, 2011
Hilton Anaheim
Anaheim, California
http://www.share.org/
Regards,
Pam C
P.
Hi All
I am having a similar problem. I am unable to edit a dataset and instead am
getting the 'browse substituted message'
The ISPF edit was attempted for a dataset with following characteristics
- RECFM=VB, LRECL=5000.
- DSORG=PS
- BLOCKSIZE=27998
- It's total size is 31MB and has 1003372 r
When you login in the tso screen has a size parm. You can try to increase the
size, but you may be limited to the size you can put in , but it is worth a try
Mace
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
1. Your site may have set a maximum region size that overrides the
setting on your tso login screen.
2. The temporary file that edit uses until you save your edits may be
too small. Do a 3.4 on datasets starting with your userid while not
editing a file, then again while successfully editing some
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Krishnan
> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 1:10 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: can I dynamically increase tso size
>
> Hi All
>
> I am having a similar problem. I am unabl
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 08:33:58 -0700, Larry Dinwiddie wrote:
>Run the following PIPE from your Ready prompt
>
>pipe command LISTFILE fn ft fm (DA | sort 63.2 d 57.5 d 66.8 d | >
>sorted list a
>
I tried that, and I got Y2K problems.
How quickly we forget.
-- gil
---
IIRC, this can also be controlled via the ISPCONFG process. In our shop we
throw our users into BROWSE if the file is too large.
The suggestions of logging on with a large region size (if allowed through your
security product) or allocating a large file for temp are good.
Lizette
>2. The temporary file that edit uses until you save your edits may be too
>small.
I may be wrong, but I always thought that ISPF EDIT used memory only, except
when submitting jobs.
Of course, it's also been over 20 years since I directly supported ISPF.
Does anybody know?
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamac
>IIRC, this can also be controlled via the ISPCONFG process.
>In our shop we throw our users into BROWSE if the file is too large.
That, again, supports my recollection that EDIT does not use disk for managing
files.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
-
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:09:52 -0600, Krishnan wrote:
>I am unable to edit a dataset and instead am
>getting the 'browse substituted message'
>
>The ISPF edit was attempted for a dataset with following characteristics
>
>- RECFM=VB, LRECL=5000.
Edit/View does not support that LRECL. Not sure what
I almost had it. From the Customization manual
Under the ISPF Configuration Section
MAXIMUM_STORAGE_ALLOWED_FOR_EDIT
The maximum number of kilobytes of storage that the editor can use when
initially reading in data. If the initial read of the data requires more
storage than this value, browse
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:54:41 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
>Edit/View does not support that LRECL. Not sure what the maximum is,
>but IIRC it used to be 256 bytes.
Sorry, I should check before I post. The above is incorrect.
--
Tom Marchant
No longer true.
EDIT ,TSH009.BIG.TXT
,Columns,1,00124,
Command ===>,tso listds big.txt
,Scroll ===>,CSR ,
**,
Krishnan wrote:
Hi All
I am having a similar problem. I am unable to edit a dataset and instead am
getting the 'browse substituted message'
The ISPF edit was attempted for a dataset with following characteristics
- RECFM=VB, LRECL=5000.
- DSORG=PS
- BLOCKSIZE=27998
- It's total size is 31
On 7 January 2011 14:36, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 08:33:58 -0700, Larry Dinwiddie wrote:
>
>>Run the following PIPE from your Ready prompt
>>
>>pipe command LISTFILE fn ft fm (DA | sort 63.2 d 57.5 d 66.8 d | >
>>sorted list a
>>
> I tried that, and I got Y2K problems.
Meaning t
On 8/01/2011 01:37 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:21:20 +0300, Sergio Lima wrote:
Here, is what We see, in the SDSF screen of IKJSUP PROC :
4 XXIKJSUP EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,DYNAMNBR=500,PARM=ISPSUP
The ISRDDN output that you showed includes SYSEXEC with several data
sets. T
>>2. The temporary file that edit uses until you save your edits may be
too small.
>I may be wrong, but I always thought that ISPF EDIT used memory only,
except when submitting jobs.
>Of course, it's also been over 20 years since I directly supported ISPF.
>Does anybody know?
Per the ISPF Edit
While the active copy of data being edited IS kept in memory, if edit
recovery is "ON", when the first change is made the original data and
any subsequent changes are also kept in an external edit recovery BACKUP
dataset until a SAVE is done and the associated edit pending state data
is kept in
On 01/07/2011 02:48 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
On 7 January 2011 14:36, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 08:33:58 -0700, Larry Dinwiddie wrote:
Run the following PIPE from your Ready prompt
pipe command LISTFILE fn ft fm (DA | sort 63.2 d 57.5 d 66.8 d |>
sorted list a
I tried that, a
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:12:46 -0600, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
>On 01/07/2011 02:48 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
>> On 7 January 2011 14:36, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>>> On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 08:33:58 -0700, Larry Dinwiddie wrote:
>>>
Run the following PIPE from your Ready prompt
pipe command LISTFIL
I am irritated by some geology textbooks that specify dates
in years BP (Before the Present)
I can't see what's irritating here.
To me, 'BP' (before present) stands as : somewhere of the vicinity of
now, and *NOT* right now !
Geological timescales are sometimes in K Years.. Mostly in M yea
some things aren't meant to be done foreground. why not run a batch job to
sort the file into 2 files, one containing records requiring edit, and the
other the ones that don't require editing. make the changes and merge back
together batch mode. if all records need editing, write a batch prog
How does the geologist impress his blond girlfriend?
He tells her that a certain lake is a million and 1 years old.
She says how do you know that so precisely?
He says "last year when I went there, the tour guide said it was a million
years old".
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Ivan Warren
At 15:13 -0500 on 01/07/2011, Bob Rutledge wrote about Re: can I
dynamically increase tso size:
Krishnan wrote:
Hi All
I am having a similar problem. I am unable to edit a dataset and
instead am getting the 'browse substituted message'
The ISPF edit was attempted for a dataset with follow
64 matches
Mail list logo
