Matan,
Might be worth trying DATASET(INCLUDE(**) EXCLUDE(SYS1.**))
Richard Marchant
Johannesburg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Matan Cohen
Sent: 02 March 2011 09:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: DFDSS copy
but all the files in the DISK are named as I specify in the INCLUDE so i
don't see how this will solve it.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Richard Marchant
richard.march...@shoden.co.za wrote:
Matan,
Might be worth trying DATASET(INCLUDE(**) EXCLUDE(SYS1.**))
Richard Marchant
Why don't try DUMP/RESTORE process...?
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
for some reason I needed to empty a DASD disk from its content (All files
are DB2 VSAMS) .
i noticed there is a multivolume DSNs so i added the 'SPHERE'
'SELECTMULTI' .
i had a bad expirence in the past when trying to do a similar action with
DUMP\RESTORE.
so I prefered to avoid this option.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Cobe Xu cob...@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't try DUMP/RESTORE process...?
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Matan Cohen
Barry,
Here is Dennis's original post.
Ray
On 2/28/2011 11:56 AM, Dennis Schaffer wrote:
Hi,
We're running TRX from OES Inc., and we're looking for alternatives.
TRX provides allocation and i/o services for the TSO/ISPF environment. TRX
allows us to
avoid maintaining logon procs with
Hi,
for some reason I needed to empty a DASD disk from its content (All files
are DB2
VSAMS) .
i noticed there is a multivolume DSNs so i added the 'SPHERE'
'SELECTMULTI' .
so after backing up the disk i run this JCL :
//ADB2CPY JOB ,,CLASS=A,REGION=0M,MSGCLASS=X,
//
Thank you all for your responses. That is the conclusion I came to, but
wanted to make sure I was correct. Hopefully in the future it would be nice
to remove ML1 completely and set some kind of VTOC backup up manually,
but for now I will HSM handle that.
As others have pointed out, the DB2 governor will let you kill threads
that have exceeded some arbitrary amount of CPU time. There's
obviously pluses and minuses to that.
Using WLM you can age those long-running queries so they drop to a
low enough importance that they don't substantially
So if you're not actually dumping volumes with HSM would not recover
them with HSM, what good are the VTOC Copies?
ddk
This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may
contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended
solely for the use of the addressee(s). If
Hi Lizette
You could go to ISMF Option 1 (dataset) and see what it generates to do
this
for you.
*Did it now. but I can check it only tommorow .*
*I review the message several times and there is nothing spacial in it
beside the regular messages there is the:*
*ADR431I (001)-XVSAM(01),*
*
snip
In order to try to be more precise about the S, I waded into water
that
caused me to get rather out of my depth. That'll teach me to try to
provide
comprehensive answers when I know only half or so of the story!
/snip
In SMP/E parlance, HLQ.Sxxx is generally a SMP/E target.
My previous response:
snip
AFAIK, the last ML1 cannot be deleted unless you turn off volume dump.
The VTOC copies are used for Volume Recovery and Incremental Backup
application.
/snip
You can still back up datasets without volume dump.
HTH,
The ZCIOWAIT Resource Name is not given in Tmon, so I am not sure what is kind
of resource the task waiting.
The task is shipping record to another CICS region. So I guess first maybe the
cics setting have some problem, second the program in another region response
slowly. Is it possible
From the sound of it you are doing function shipping of File Control
requests. If this is common then there could be an issue with the number
of Sessions between the two CICS regions. This can be more of a concern
if the files are being updated. Could you include the Connection and
Session
Do these left DataSets being used by DB2 or any other program? Just
reminder
2011/3/2 Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.com
Hi Lizette
You could go to ISMF Option 1 (dataset) and see what it generates to do
this
for you.
*Did it now. but I can check it only tommorow .*
*I review
We are dumping volumes, which is why I can't remove the VTOC copies from
ML1. Thanks again for all the replies.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
Perhaps the same volumes were selected in the copy operation ? Are you using
SMS how do the ACS routines look like
2011/3/2 Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.com
Hi,
for some reason I needed to empty a DASD disk from its content (All files
are DB2 VSAMS) .
i noticed there is a multivolume
What programm is involved is the dcb changed for sysut2 by the programm ?
2011/3/1 John P. Baker hfdte...@comporium.net
Lucy,
If you use the same DD statement with IEFBR14, what blocksize is
calculated?
John P. Baker
Chief Software Architect
HFD Technologies
-Original Message-
Hi,
While I don’t have access to Tmon, I am amazed that it doesn’t display the
Dispatcher Task Summary Table the same as Omegamon does. This display is
fundamental to any CICS monitor as this gives a list of all the tasks that are
currently dispatched. This table displays all the Tasks
Did IBM back off the ETR sunset date?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
My God! I hope so, SR is awful
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Don Williams
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 10:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: ETR sunsets on 26 Mar 2011?
Did IBM back off the ETR sunset date?
The ServiceLink page now says:
The date for the sunset of ETR will be determined after an evaluation
of the results of the initial phase of this transition.
It also requests feedback on the SR function and gives a link to a form
for that purpose.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Yes. That is true.
--Original Message--
From: Don Williams
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
ReplyTo: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: ETR sunsets on 26 Mar 2011?
Sent: Mar 2, 2011 7:55 AM
Did IBM back off the ETR sunset date?
Hi,
Can a 2074 Model 2 (with 2 ESCON ADAPTER) be shared to 2 CPC (a z900 and z800) ?
We plan to use it to control consoles to a separate z900 and z800.
Thx.
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
I'm running the RSH client on z/OS 1.11 and getting the following -
EZA5051E The call to rcmd_af procedure failed:
EDC5112I Resource temporarily unavailable. rsn = 744C7246
EZA4994I Foreign host aborted the connection.
I found the following apar for z/OS 1.5 -
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pearce, Colin E
Hi,
While I don't have access to Tmon, I am amazed that it doesn't display
the Dispatcher Task Summary
Table the same as Omegamon does. This display is fundamental to any
CICS monitor as this
Did you give access to the required port(port 222) for RSH to the user
or TCPIP itself;
TCPIP
JRPortAccessAuth: User does not have authority to access this port.
Action: Specify a valid port.
Mark Jacobs
On 03/02/11 11:58, Jim McAlpine wrote:
I'm running the RSH client on z/OS 1.11 and
Short Answer is yes. You will have to have a separate configuration for
each Adapter
Thanks,
Craig Pace
z/OS Systems Programmer
Fruit of the Loom, Inc.®
Office: (270) 781-6400 ext. 4397
Cell: (270) 991-7452
Fax:(270) 438-4430
E-mail: cp...@fruit.com
One Fruit of the Loom Drive
PO
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Mark Jacobs mark.jac...@custserv.comwrote:
Did you give access to the required port(port 222) for RSH to the user or
TCPIP itself;
TCPIP
JRPortAccessAuth: User does not have authority to access this port.
Action: Specify a valid port.
Mark Jacobs
I looked at /etc/services on my FreeBSD workstation. I'm making the
assumption (maybe incorrectly) that network ports are pretty standard
across all Un*x like environments.
grep rsh /etc/services
rsh-spx 222/tcp#Berkeley rshd with SPX auth
rsh-spx 222/udp#Berkeley rshd
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mark Jacobs mark.jac...@custserv.comwrote:
I looked at /etc/services on my FreeBSD workstation. I'm making the
assumption (maybe incorrectly) that network ports are pretty standard across
all Un*x like environments.
grep rsh /etc/services
rsh-spx
Hi:
Resource Name = 16 bytes
Resource Type = 8 bytes
Regards,
Gene
In a message dated 3/2/2011 10:27:10 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
colin.pea...@baml.com writes:
Hi,
While I don’t have access to Tmon, I am amazed that it doesn’t display
the Dispatcher Task Summary Table the same as
In a message dated 3/2/2011 12:44:49 A.M. Central Standard Time,
bernd.oppol...@t-online.de writes:
I'm working in the SQL training business from time to time, and I saw
horrible SQLs which wasted machine time for hours, issued from remote
Yeah Craig Mullin's DB/2 book says 70% of tuning
My first suspicion is almost always a firewall issue, very rarely would I
suspect z/os. Some firewalls will step in and actively block by pretending to
be the remote host. (Literally a man-in-the-middle exploit.)
HTH and good luck.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
Hello, does anybody out there have an idea where I can get a description
of the SMP/E record layout within a CSI dataset. Especially I'm looking
for a unique identifier which describes the TZONE entry records within a
targetzone. Up to now I thought, that all these records have hex 010300
on
W dniu 2011-03-02 17:51, Moussadak Mostafa pisze:
Hi,
Can a 2074 Model 2 (with 2 ESCON ADAPTER) be shared to 2 CPC (a z900 and z800) ?
We plan to use it to control consoles to a separate z900 and z800.
Yes.
You can even share it between three or four CPCs - using ESCON Director.
--
Radoslaw
To me, SR looked more like a student team project/demo than a mature full
function global business application. I'm glad that they seem to be
reevaluating it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Veilleux, Jon L
Sent: Wednesday,
Yes exactly, I thought Tmon would display this Resource Type and Resource Name.
Thanks
Colin Pearce
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Chase, John
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 1:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
38 matches
Mail list logo
