re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011p.html#106 SPF in 1978
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011p.html#107 SPF in 1978
I had originally done extended sharing on cp67 along with paged-mapped
CMS filesystem ... which I then converted to vm370 ... some old email
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006v.html#emai
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 19:19:34 -0500, zMan wrote:
>Yeah, I see the case for 8-character consistency since TSO seems to be
>the weirdo here, but I'm hard-pressed (much as I'd like to see it) to
>find a case for changing the other areas. It ain't broke...
>
Hmmm. How many upper-case alphanumeric cha
Yeah, I see the case for 8-character consistency since TSO seems to be
the weirdo here, but I'm hard-pressed (much as I'd like to see it) to
find a case for changing the other areas. It ain't broke...
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
> While I agree that the control block (and
On 24 Dec 2011 14:44:22 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>In <4ef583a2.1080...@phoenixsoftware.com>, on 12/23/2011
> at 11:47 PM, Edward Jaffe said:
>
>>I am curious: is TSO the only hold-out?
>
>For 7 character userids, probably. However, there are two related
>issues that are global
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:25:29 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>
> 1. The current limit of userids to 8 characters is equally
>obsolescent.
>
> 2. The limitation of DSN components no longer makes sense, now
> that IBM has put a stake through the heart of CVOL's.
>
I understand from di
In <4ef583a2.1080...@phoenixsoftware.com>, on 12/23/2011
at 11:47 PM, Edward Jaffe said:
>I am curious: is TSO the only hold-out?
For 7 character userids, probably. However, there are two related
issues that are global:
1. The current limit of userids to 8 characters is equally
obsolesc
Benyamin:
It was later explained to me that SPF was written at a woman's
undergarment (Bra?) place in Chicago by I think an IBM person (or
group). My mind is complete blank as to its name. Whoever came up
with structured program facility was short sighted IMO. The immediate
use might have
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:00:22 -0600 Ed Gould wrote:
:>I think you are about right on the time line. I do remember the two
:>separate products. We had look at ISPF (we had gone FSE instead).
:>Our IBMers at the time went AWOL and I could never get a good
:>explanation between the two products.
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 09:45:12 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
>Edward Jaffe wrote
>
>
>Recently, the need for eight-character TSO userids made it into the
>list of the highest ranked MVS SHARE requirements. Many installations,
>driven by their business units, are attempting to standardize on a
>single,
Not true at all. CA-Vtape can optionally use "open system" storage, but it is
not required. If you want to go directly from MF DASD/CACHE to tape - that is
an option.
Actually, there was a presentation (panel-type) at the SHARE in Orlando where
we had a short 7-minute presentation from each of
A Christmas gift from ISO:
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/ISO-updates-C-standard-1400814.html
Article has a link to a PDF with the draft standard.
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=57853
for the real standard. Which costs money to buy.
---
Edward Jaffe wrote
Recently, the need for eight-character TSO userids made it into the
list of the highest ranked MVS SHARE requirements. Many installations,
driven by their business units, are attempting to standardize on a
single, eight-character, cross-platform userid. These attempts are
being
W dniu 2011-12-24 10:50, Tommy Tsui pisze:
It seems the only choice for enterprise tapeless solution is only vsm or
7720, anyone will consider bustech or ca-tape software solution what is
pros and cons
Well, I never said that. BusTech MDL is also a choice, as well as
Luminex product or Interkom
It seems the only choice for enterprise tapeless solution is only vsm or
7720, anyone will consider bustech or ca-tape software solution what is
pros and cons
On 2011-12-24 上午8:52, "R.S." wrote:
> W dniu 2011-12-23 20:44, Cosby, Bob - OCFO pisze:
>
>> At the time of this tape implementation we w
I will be out of the office starting 12/24/2011 and will not return until
01/03/2012.
HAPPY HOLIDAYS!! I will respond to your Note when I return. If you need
immediate assistance, please contact the Technical Services hotline x12880
-
15 matches
Mail list logo
