Search the archive at http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?IBMTCP-L. They
had a lengthy discussion on the topic. Look for contributions by Chris Mason.
HTH.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
sen
Thanks for the correction Patrick. I missed the other topic/chain discussion
and zoned out on the OMVS shutdown and restart. I was too caught up on the
Standalone TN3270 Telnet Server vis-a-vis TCPIP (stack) relationship.
Went searching for your post/response to Barbara. I get it.
On Tue, 11 Aug
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 00:44:20 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote:
>What did NOT come down were the three corresponding telnet address spaces
>(TCPTNx they're called here). Two of them made OMVS spit out a BPX
>message that shutdown was aborted because TCPTNx was blocking it, but the
>things did not react to
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:49:01 -0600, Jan MOEYERSONS
wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 23:17:30 -0600, John McKown
>wrote:
>
>>foolish as to get hooked on computers. National politics is the only way
>>to go (where else can you vote yourself a raise regardless of your
>>effectiveness?). Yes, I'm cynical
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:16:14 -0600, Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
wrote:
>On their old system, the user currently runs JCL on the mainframe that
>creates tape output (via a COBOL program) that contains formatted variable
>data. The output tapes are mounted as input on their old XEROX printer and
>
aid that, I would welcome any job leads you may have and please
send it offline. I'm definitely going for this one.
To those that are happily employed in this field of endeavor, I'd say enjoy the
challenges of z/OS and consider it a great privilege to work on such a great
platform.
Be
You will have to configure the 3745-170 as an EP-only CCU. But you also need
the BTAM code to drive the BSC-1/BSC-3 I/O devices. It may take a lot of
work on your or IBM's part, but it's do-able.
I do not understand why IBM did not come up with a supported HW/SW
product since Bisynch communicat
Your best bet is to ask your question at IBM TCP/IP List [mailto:IBMTCP-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Google for "Nursery School for the Enterprise-Extender-Impaired --" written by
Gwen Dente in a zSeries EXPO presentation.
Just curious: why OSA Token-Ring, not OSA Gig-E or OSA Express GbE?
You mentioned
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:50:04 -0500, Ed Rabara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>Gil, your situation is a close match to mine. Unfortunately, my Servers is
>in Production status. We push a lot of files back and forth. Before this
>change, i.e., going to a more current AIX and faste
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:00:13 -0500, Steve O'Connell
wrote:
>Hi Ed.
>
>You're not giving much away about your configuration, but this issue
>caught my eye as I am trying to gen up on NFS at the moment as part of the
>1.4-1.7 migration - and we have AIX clients connecting to the NFS server
>on z/o
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:49:39 -0700, Paul Gilmartin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In a recent note, Ed Rabara said:
>
>> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:52:06 -0600
>>
>I've deferred reporting this because all the data sets I use in
>this fashion are expendable.
Has anyone run across a situation where the MVS NFS Server retains its
exclusive enqueue against an MVS data set (not a HFS file) created by one of
its clients even after the client no longer use the file?
NFS clients run on AIX.
Because MVS NFS Server holds an exclusive enqueue, MVS batch jobs a
You're not alone. We run BTAM and EP-only 37x5's to connect to our trading
partners using BSC RJE (or emulators). No matter how often we ask them to
switch to IP based solutions, they always have a reason to stick with the
status quo.
Speaking of alternative products, I once ran Sterling Commerce'
SyncSort for z/OS R1.2 can be installed using SMP/E or not. Your choice.
SyncSort even provides an ISPF front-end to the installation process (which
I do not use, went straight to the manual SMP/E install). The SMP/E
process, as provided, will allow you to build a new SMP CSI for your
global, t
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:26:06 +0200, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We also are having problems with 1 OSA. We did put the channel
>Off/Online but that did not solve the problem. My IP colleagues are
>still looking for the cause. How did you discover the card was flaky and
>did
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 08:03:48 +0100, Mark Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>After the normal scheduled re-IPL of the LPAR we could not connect using
the VIPA, but could use the physical addresses that relate to the OSA ports.
>
>Reloading the TCP/IP stack didn't fix the problem and eventually we h
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:33:37 -0500, McKown, John
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Veilleux, Jon L
>> Subject: Re: 64-bits is a really big number! - was z/OS level
>> for SETFRR for AMODE(64)
>>
>>
>> What's the point if you don't have that much memory and can't
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 23:31:06 +0100, Roy Hewitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>> This is not one of my strengths.
>;-)
>
>> I have read all the redbooks on it.
>
>try this one..
>
>http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246297.html?Open
>Networking with z/OS and Cisco Routers: An
On Mon, 22 May 2006 12:20:09 -0500, McKown, John
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Subject: nfs server
>>
>> HI!
>> We have Z/OS UNIX NFS SERVER(10.200.5.59),
>> On Z/VM SLES9 , we mounted :
>> mount -o vers=2,proto=udp 10.200.5.59:zoca /mnt
>>
>> succesfully.
>>
>> On Z/VM SLES9 we type command
>>
>>
>On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:34:17 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>
>>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/27/2006
>> at 02:57 PM, "Patrick O'Keefe" said:
>>
>>Actually, I think it never held up. As far as I know a node has
>>always been hardware and a PU has always bee a program
>
>In such boxen th
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:39:34 -0600, Ed Rabara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:54:27 -0600, Tim Hare wrote:
>
>>Is this the correct place to ask about VTAM issues? We're trying to move a
>>Microsoft Host Integration Server from 802.2 connectio
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:54:27 -0600, Tim Hare wrote:
>Is this the correct place to ask about VTAM issues? We're trying to move a
>Microsoft Host Integration Server from 802.2 connection to IP-DLC (AKA
>Enterprise Extender). The documentation we've found, however, doesn't
>really use the same names
I got this via private e-mail. I'm posting it here for completeness.
Ed R.
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 12:52 PM
>Subject: Re: Secure FTP
>There's a few things you need to configure ...
>
>* ICSF -- if you're going to use hardware encryption
> SA22-7520 ICSF System
John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
>We originally tried SFTP (SSH FTP) but ended up using FTPS (FTP TSL/SSL)
>instead.
>
>SSH FTP can only access files in a HFS/ZFS, no "real mvs files", FTP
>TSL/SSL can access all files no matter where they live. As 99.9% of
>all the files we process are "mvs files
McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I crossposted this to IBM-MAIN and IBMTCP-L because I'm not too sure
>where the NFS expertise might reside. Apologies to those, like me, who
>will get two copies.
John,
I replied to your posting in IBMTCP-L. You can contact me offline if I can
help.
One
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 06:51:26 -0700, Timothy Sipples wrote:
>Any chance you could use z/OS SMB as an alternative?
Because of time constraints we cannot use SMB. We have close to zero
experience in-house with SMB on z/OS. The opposite is true with MVS NFS,
we've been using it for years and we "think
>John McKown wrote:
> ... because NOBODY reallys wants the
>responsibility for this. It is one of those things that crosses
>functional barriers. The mainframers don't really want to deal with a
>server issue. And the server/Windows people don't want to be bothered
>with what they consider a mainfr
[This item is cross-posted from IBMTCP-L]
An internal customer at my shop wants to connect to my MVS NFS server (z/OS
1.6) from a Red Hat Linux on an Intel server.
I asked IBM a question regarding the availability of a Linux port of the
mvslogin/mvslogout/showattr code and was told that the suppor
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:33:03 -0600, Pommier, Rex R.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have 1 other step to chase down here and then I will be talking to IBM
>about it. I wanted to try this group first because you are really fast
>on helping out and I wanted to check to make sure I wasn't overlooking
>
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:49:08 -0600, Staller, Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Don't know, Haven't used it. However, circa OS/390 2.10 IBM provided
>a procedure to "extract" BTAM from the SMP CDS so that it could be re-
installed.
>
>AFAIK this "reworked" BTAM release has functioned through (at le
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 02:50:24 -0700, mary george <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>All,
>
> While giving solution sto some problems ,IBM
> suggests us to refer to problem reporting databases
> to find a fix.
> Can anyone pls guide on how to refer to these
> problem reporting database?
>
>Cheers,
>
31 matches
Mail list logo
